BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

bitcoinist2026-01-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Crypto custody firm BitGo is targeting a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming U.S. IPO, planning to raise $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares priced between $15 and $17. Despite a volatile market environment and recent selloffs, BitGo aims to leverage positive momentum in early 2026. The company, which secured a national trust charter from the OCC, has enlisted Goldman Sachs and Citigroup as lead managers for the offering. It plans to list on the NYSE under the ticker "BTGO," joining other major crypto firms entering public markets.

Crypto custody firm BitGo announced on Monday that it aims for a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming initial public offering (IPO) in the United States, amid major interest by these firms to trade in public markets.

As reported by Reuters, the crypto company plans to raise as much as $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares, with prices expected to range from $15 to $17 per share.

Investing Climate Remains Shaky

Established in 2013, BitGo has emerged as one of the largest crypto custody firms in the United States, specializing in the secure storage and protection of digital assets. This role has become increasingly important amid rising institutional interest in cryptocurrencies.

Following a strong showing for other major crypto firms in 2025, including successful market debuts from stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL) and cryptocurrency exchange Bullish (BLSH), BitGo is entering a competitive landscape. Crypto exchange Kraken is also looking to go public.

However, recent market volatility, particularly the sharp selloff in October of last year, whipping out nearly $20 billion in long positions, has created challenges for companies looking to attract investors. Additionally, ongoing pressure on technology and artificial intelligence (AI) valuations has heightened scrutiny across risk assets.

According to Lukas Muehlbauer, an IPOX research analyst, this shift has led to a “flight to quality,” favoring established and regulated companies like BitGo over more speculative ventures.

BitGo Targets IPO Success

Despite the challenges, BitGo aims to leverage positive market momentum in early 2026, when outperformance by small and mid-cap indices could provide a favorable environment for mid-sized offerings.

The firm has enlisted Goldman Sachs as the lead book-running manager for the IPO, with Citigroup also serving as a book-running manager. Other financial institutions in the offering include Deutsche Bank Securities, Mizuho, Wells Fargo Securities, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Canaccord Genuity, and Cantor.

Clear Street, Compass Point, Craig-Hallum, Rosenblatt, Wedbush Securities, and SoFi will act as co-managers. BitGo plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BTGO.”

Notably, the company is one of five crypto firms, alongside Ripple, Circle, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos Trust Company, to receive national trust charter applications approved by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in December of last year.

This national trust bank charter would empower BitGo to manage and hold assets for its customers, enabling faster payment settlements—a move that could bolster the firm’s competitive edge in the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency and digital finance.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap recovery and subsequent consolidation above the $3 trillion mark. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the target valuation and how much does BitGo aim to raise in its upcoming IPO?

ABitGo aims for a valuation of up to $1.96 billion and plans to raise as much as $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares at a price range of $15 to $17 per share.

QWhat is BitGo's primary business and why has its role become increasingly important?

ABitGo is a crypto custody firm that specializes in the secure storage and protection of digital assets. Its role has become increasingly important due to rising institutional interest in cryptocurrencies.

QWhich major financial institutions are leading BitGo's IPO process?

AGoldman Sachs is the lead book-running manager for the IPO, with Citigroup also serving as a book-running manager. Other institutions involved include Deutsche Bank Securities, Mizuho, Wells Fargo Securities, and several others.

QWhat significant regulatory approval did BitGo receive recently and what does it allow the company to do?

AIn December of last year, BitGo was one of five crypto firms to have its national trust charter application approved by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). This charter empowers BitGo to manage and hold assets for its customers and enables faster payment settlements.

QOn which stock exchange and under what ticker symbol does BitGo plan to list its shares?

ABitGo plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol 'BTGO'.

İlgili Okumalar

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ru6 dk önce

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ru6 dk önce

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit13 dk önce

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit13 dk önce

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit22 dk önce

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit22 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片