Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ru2026-07-31 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-31 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

In just four weeks since launch, Robinhood Chain has attracted around 230,000 daily active users, enough to solidly overtake Base in this metric. Its total DEX trading volume also surpassed $9 billion, including a 24-hour peak of $877.6 million on July 12, which briefly made Robinhood Chain the second-largest chain in the world, trailing only Solana.

However, more than 80% of this volume came from meme coin trading, not the tokenized stocks that Robinhood had positioned as its key feature; the latter accounted for just 4% of network activity. In fact, by July 25th, that figure had grown roughly five-fold, but even then, tokenized stocks still made up only a small fraction of the network's daily DEX turnover (with stablecoins remaining the largest category).

Base Missed the Mark

The timing of these figures seemed to put Base at a disadvantage, and in two lengthy X posts, co-founder Jesse Pollak acknowledged that the network's bet on social blockchain products (i.e., Farcaster, Zora, mini-apps, and creator coins) "completely missed the mark," leaving it behind in key areas that "are now becoming more important," including perpetual contracts and prediction markets.

He also admitted that tokenized stocks in the EVM environment were something "Robinhood Chain got right," and that Base "lagged behind on that," though a solution was imminent. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made a similar admission earlier this month, noting Base's "creator coin" strategy hadn't worked, adding:

Base is focused on trading, payments, and agents (in that order). I think all three are inextricably linked. The majority of resources are going to trading right now, for what it's worth. It may not be obvious to the outside world yet, but that's what's happening.

The Case Presented

Base's response leaned on distribution built over nearly three years, rather than a direct rebuttal of Robinhood's DAU or DEX trading volume metrics. Céline Beinhamm-Herd, Head of Global Development at Base, told Bitcoin.com News that the network's x402 payment protocol has already processed 187.8 million agent-mediated payments worth $42.4 million with over 5,000 merchants.

She also noted that Visa included Base in its stablecoin settlement pilot alongside Polygon, Arc, and six other chains, and mentioned the project's May update dubbed "Azul," which merged trusted execution environments with zero-knowledge multi-proofs, reducing final settlement times for withdrawals to roughly one day.

Traditional payment processors charge fixed fees of up to 30 cents per transaction, making online micropayments unfeasible, Beinhamm-Herd pointed out; x402 reduces protocol fees to zero and gas costs to about one-hundredth of a cent, positioning the Visa pilot as recognition that legacy rails are simply more expensive, not a marketing concession.

Base's scope extends beyond agent payments to traditional stablecoin liquidity, with roughly $3.9 billion in stablecoins held on the network (about 90% of which is $USDC), putting it on par with Arbitrum at the top of the L2 stablecoin rankings. Furthermore, Shopify processes $USDC payments on Base, and JPMorgan also settles its tokenized deposit product there – capabilities, as Beinhamm-Herd noted, unavailable to a chain only four weeks old.

Finally, she pointed out that the aforementioned figures represent a completely different level of activity than Robinhood Chain's retail metrics, specifically system-to-system payments and corporate settlements, not DAU or DEX volumes, adding:

Developers go where the users are. Users go where the applications work and provide utility. This flywheel is the moat. The only metric I pay attention to is whether applications have users returning without being rewarded for it. If they don't, no TVL or DAU metric matters.

What Comes Next

Coinbase has announced the launch of tokenized stocks on its centralized exchange, so the gap Pollak seemed to hint at pertains specifically to the on-chain version, native to the Landing Base, built on a 1:1 stock-backed model, which doesn't yet have a confirmed launch date.

Robinhood's tokens, by contrast, are structured as tokenized debt securities (i.e., holders don't get voting rights or shareholder privileges and can't claim the underlying shares directly, only a cash redemption). The launch of Base's on-chain product would erase the most obvious remaining advantage for Robinhood.

This, coupled with Base's push into institutional and agent payments, underpins Coinbase's strategy: Robinhood's early lead, still over 80% fueled by meme coins, is easier to surpass than the distribution network Base has been building for nearly three years. Whether this bet pays off will be seen in whether Base's tokenized stock volume continues to grow exponentially after the initial launch metrics start to fade.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what key metric did Robinhood Chain surpass Base in shortly after launch, and by approximately how much?

ARobinhood Chain surpassed Base in daily active users (DAU), attracting about 230,000 DAU within four weeks of its launch.

QWhat did Base's co-founder Jesse Pollak acknowledge as having 'fully failed' in the network's strategy?

AJesse Pollak acknowledged that the network's bet on social products on the blockchain (i.e., Farcaster, Zora, mini-apps, and creator coins) 'fully failed.'

QWhat is the primary advantage that Base claims will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge, as argued by Base's global development lead Xen Beinham-Herd?

ABase claims its advantage lies in the distribution network it has built over nearly three years, particularly citing its use for institutional and on-chain payments (like Visa's pilot and agent payments via x402), corporate settlements, and its deep stablecoin liquidity.

QWhat is the fundamental structural difference mentioned between Robinhood Chain's tokenized stocks and the potential on-chain version planned for Base?

ARobinhood's tokens are structured as tokenized debt securities, where holders have no voting rights or shareholder claims. In contrast, Base's planned on-chain version would be a stock-backed model with a 1:1 backing of real shares.

QAccording to Xen Beinham-Herd, what is the 'only metric' he pays attention to when evaluating an application's success?

AHe stated the only metric he pays attention to is whether applications have users who return without being rewarded for it. He argues that if they don't, no TVL or DAU metrics matter.

İlgili Okumalar

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片