Backpack Surges Over 150% in Half a Month

marsbit2026-06-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

BP, the token of the Backpack exchange, has surged over 150% since early June, driven by the platform's expansion into regulated US stock brokerage and asset tokenization services. On June 2nd, Backpack announced Backpack Securities, offering traditional stock trading and tokenization, causing BP's price to jump over 80%. Momentum continued on June 12th with the launch of SPCX, a tokenized product for SpaceX stock on Solana, facilitating seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. This aligns with the RWA (Real World Assets) narrative, creating a bridge between traditional finance and Solana DeFi. The token's unique economics also support its growth. All 2.5 billion initially circulating tokens were airdropped to the community, with zero allocation to the team or investors at launch. A key feature allows users who stake BP for at least one year to gain the right to convert tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Despite some initial community controversy over airdrop distribution, focus is shifting to BP's long-term utility and value alignment as real products launch.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On June 15, the Backpack exchange token BP surged over 30% again within 24 hours, currently quoted at $0.475 with a market cap of $118.48 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $473.94 million. Since early June this year, BP has skyrocketed from around $0.16, breaking through a high of $0.48.

The direct catalyst for this market surge stems from the platform's latest breakthroughs in traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services.

Venturing into U.S. Stock Brokerage and Tokenization Business

In March 2026, BP completed its Token Generation Event (TGE) on Solana with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 250 million. After listing, the token price briefly touched a high point before rapidly declining, with a single-day drop exceeding 40% at its worst, as the market was once filled with profit-taking pressure. For several weeks thereafter, the price consolidated at lower levels until a turning point emerged in early June.

On June 2, Backpack announced the launch of the Backpack Securities platform, which will provide regulated U.S. stock brokerage services while also supporting the tokenization of traditional stocks for circulation on the blockchain, enabling seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. The brokerage service is planned to launch gradually in June, with initial tokenized products rolled out in the Solana ecosystem through a partnership with Sunrise. BP skyrocketed over 80% in a single day, rapidly climbing from the $0.14-$0.15 range to around $0.27, with its market cap approaching $70 million at one point.

On June 12, coinciding with SpaceX's listing on NASDAQ, its tokenized product SPCX launched on Solana. In the subsequent 24 hours, BP rose approximately 27% further, pushing its price above $0.347. This token is pegged 1:1 to real SpaceX shares, supports 24/7 on-chain trading, and can be redeemed through a Backpack brokerage account into a traditional securities account, achieving interoperability between on-chain and off-chain assets. On its first day of launch, the product generated around $35-38 million in on-chain trading volume across DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium. According to the latest official data, the total on-chain SPCX trading volume exceeds $86 million.

Backpack is building a bridge between traditional U.S. stocks and Solana DeFi. Users can not only trade crypto assets within the platform but also access real stocks through the same account and tokenize portions of their assets for use, trading, or composition on-chain. This pathway aligns highly with the current RWA (Real World Assets) narrative and provides the BP token with clearer use cases and demand support.

BP's recent surge stems more from substantial platform business expansion than short-term speculation. Currently, its official website shows that Backpack's total custodied assets (nominal value) have rebounded to $390 million.

No Tokens for the Team Unless the Company Goes Public

Supporting the above business development is the BP token and its unique economic structure launched as early as March. The total supply of 1 billion tokens is divided into three phases: 25% (250 million) at TGE was entirely airdropped to community users, with approximately 240 million allocated to participants in the points program and 10 million to Mad Lads NFT holders. At launch, the team, founders, and investors received 0 token allocation; 37.5% in the Pre-IPO phase is tied to growth triggers such as regulatory milestones and product launches, continuing to be distributed to users upon unlocking; 37.5% in the Post-IPO phase enters the company treasury, locked for at least one year after an IPO, with the team benefiting only through equity, not directly through tokens.

The most attention-grabbing mechanism is the equity conversion design: users who stake BP for at least 1 year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition, with the bonus increasing with holding time up to the 4th year based on the initial unlock.

Additionally, staking provides benefits such as tiered trading fee discounts, extra yield on USD collateral, free wire transfers, and priority access to the Backpack Card. Currently, about 66% (approximately 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

While the airdrop process was technically smooth, it also sparked community discussion. Supporters argue that the "no insider TGE allocation" model is quite radical, and the points system genuinely rewarded trading and ecosystem participation. Criticism focused on the relatively strict Sybil filtering mechanism, which led to some long-term users having their points removed, resulting in lower-than-expected allocations, as well as noticeable profit-taking during the post-listing price correction. CEO Armani Ferrante publicly denied allegations of team OTC sales.

These controversies temporarily affected market sentiment, but as tangible products like Backpack Securities were launched, the focus is gradually shifting from allocation details to the platform's long-term growth and the token's actual utility. Against the backdrop of the platform's expansion into U.S. stock brokerage and tokenization services, the long-term alignment value of BP's staking and equity mechanisms is being reevaluated.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the key factor driving the recent sharp increase in the price of Backpack's BP token?

AThe key driver is Backpack's expansion into traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services through its new Backpack Securities platform, starting with the tokenized SpaceX (SPCX) offering on Solana.

QWhat is the unique feature of BP's tokenomics regarding team and investor allocation?

AAt TGE, 0 tokens were allocated to the team, founders, or investors. 100% of the initial circulating supply (25% of total) was airdropped to the community. Team members can only benefit through company equity (via a token conversion option post-IPO), not through direct token holdings.

QWhat significant milestone for Backpack occurred on June 12 alongside SpaceX's NASDAQ IPO?

AOn June 12, the tokenized product for SpaceX, SPCX, was launched on Solana. It is a 1:1 tokenized representation of real SpaceX stock, facilitating 24/7 on-chain trading.

QWhat major benefit can BP stakers obtain, and what percentage of the circulating supply is currently staked?

AStakers who lock BP for at least one year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Currently, approximately 66% (about 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

QWhat criticism did the BP token airdrop face from parts of the community?

ACriticism focused on the Sybil filtering mechanism being overly strict, which led to some long-term users having their points invalidated and receiving fewer tokens than expected. There were also accusations of team OTC selling, which the CEO denied.

İlgili Okumalar

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit40 dk önce

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit40 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit41 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit41 dk önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片