Axie Infinity up 14% – AXS faces decisive $2 test next

ambcrypto2026-01-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Axie Infinity (AXS) leads gaming tokens with a 14% daily gain, continuing the bullish momentum from the previous week. However, the broader gaming sector shows mixed performance, with only SAND and MANA also posting gains among the top 10 tokens. AXS faces a critical resistance test at the $2 level after breaking out from a consolidation phase below $1. Technical indicators like the MACD show weakening bearish pressure, while the On Balance Volume suggests strong buying interest. On-chain data reveals mixed sentiment, with some addresses depositing (potentially profit-taking) and others withdrawing (indicating bullish belief). A sharp decline in holders could challenge further upside, but a break above $2 remains possible if bullish momentum continues.

Gaming tokens were still maintaining the bullish momentum that started as the previous week came to a close. However, most of them have not sustained this trend in the past 24 hours.

Axie Infinity is leading all the top-capped tokens with double-digit gains of 14%. This rally was within the 113% range of last week.

Only three of them have managed positive returns among the top 10 in terms of capitalization. The Sandbox [SAND] and Decentraland [MANA] recorded 6% and 5%, respectively, while the others were in red.

The rally follows capital rotation into gaming tokens. They have been the strongest sector among all altcoins over the past week. Will AXS bulls sustain the trend?

AXS bears testing bulls’ strength

The chart showed that AXS was in an uptrend after breaking out of the sideways consolidation below $1. The breakout was followed by a surge that was paused around the higher high of $2.

The pause came as bears kicked in. As such, the MACD was red, though the strength was diminishing after bulls countered the pullback.

This signal showed sellers were being taken out gradually after recovery was initiated at $1.6.

Meanwhile, the On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million explained what drove the recovery. However, bulls needed to beat bears at the $2 zone, which was the decision area for the next move.

Transactions show mixed signals

The network activity on Etherscan showed that there were over 2,600 transactions on the day. This indicated why AXS had outperformed its peers during the day.

However, this on-chain activity was mixed in sentiment despite the gauge being 84% bullish and 16% bearish. There were addresses that were withdrawing from exchanges, and at the same time, there were those depositing.

For instance, a wallet deposited over $40K AXS to Bybit. Another wallet withdrew $16.9K worth of AXS from Binance.

Furthermore, there was inter-exchange token movement. For instance, Coinbase moved $5K to Binance, while OKX moved $1.3K to the Gate.io exchange.

The withdrawing addresses showed belief in a continued uptrend, while those depositing were potentially taking profit. The balance in the two activities showed there was no consensus in direction bias.

Axie Infinity holders dip sharply

The number of Axie Infinity holders dropped sharply, with over 1.5K lost in a week, at 166.72K at press time. This meant that they were taking profit from the aforementioned rally.

Such an outcome could derail Axie Infinity’s potential to break past $2. However, if bulls beat bears and gaming tokens continue thriving, AXS may breach $2.

Final Thoughts

AXS rallies 14%, leading all the gaming tokens in terms of daily gains.
AXS price faces a key test at $2, with holders declining sharply.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the current price movement of Axie Infinity (AXS) and what key level is it testing?

AAxie Infinity (AXS) is up 14% and is currently testing the key resistance level of $2.

QWhich other gaming tokens, besides AXS, recorded positive returns among the top 10 by market cap?

ABesides AXS, The Sandbox (SAND) recorded a 6% gain and Decentraland (MANA) recorded a 5% gain.

QWhat on-chain metric, with a value of over $90 million, is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery?

AThe On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery.

QWhat does the sharp decline in the number of Axie Infinity holders suggest about investor behavior?

AThe sharp decline of over 1,500 holders suggests that investors are taking profits from the recent price rally.

QAccording to the network activity on Etherscan, what was the mixed sentiment among AXS traders?

AThe mixed sentiment was shown by some addresses depositing AXS to exchanges to take profits, while others were withdrawing AXS from exchanges, indicating a belief in a continued uptrend.

İlgili Okumalar

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit28 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit28 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit36 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit36 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News40 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News40 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit47 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit47 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit56 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit56 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot