Another Big Scandal in the Crypto World? AI Doomsday Theory... What Are KOLs Talking About?

比推2026-02-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Based on the provided content, here is an English summary: The article discusses trending topics among crypto KOLs on social media platform X. The main points include: 1. **Crypto "Strict Father" Action:** Speculation about an imminent major regulatory crackdown on insider trading, with a list of targets allegedly locked in and set to be revealed on the 26th. Multiple embedded images suggest this is a major point of discussion. 2. **Bit Mining Company Sells Bitcoin:** The mining company Bitdeer, with a market cap of $1.9 billion, has drawn controversy for selling off its entire Bitcoin holdings. 3. **AI and Financial Crisis Debate:** A significant online debate questions whether AI will trigger a financial crisis by 2028. The discussion includes concerns about AI's current unreliability for critical tasks, its high cost compared to human labor, and its potential to cause massive unemployment and economic disruption. Opinions vary on the likelihood of an extreme crisis versus a scenario of long-term economic stagnation and inequality. Links are provided to read the full discussions. 4. **Private Equity Mogul Comments on Justin Sun:** Well-known Chinese private equity investor Dan Bin made comments about Tron founder Justin Sun. Replies to this note Sun's controversial reputation but acknowledge the foresight of his past investment ideas, and praise Dan Bin for adapting to new market trends like AI. The article is a roundup of community discussions and explicitly states ...

Dear readers, Wishing you great success as you start work~

What have the KOLs in the crypto circle been talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions. It does not represent the stance of this platform and should not be considered investment advice.

Crypto "Strict Father" is about to take action: Insider trading list locked in, to be revealed on the 26th!

Mining company Bitdeer with a market cap of $1.9 billion liquidates Bitcoin, sparking controversy

Hot topic overseas: Will AI trigger a financial crisis in 2028?

Click to read the full article:

https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613842;

<极>https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613859


Popular replies:

The first point about SaaS dying by mid-2026 is unreliable. Currently, AI accuracy is only 95% to 99%, and this is an inherent characteristic of GenAI. Which company is willing to bear this inaccuracy in mission-critical business? Would you dare use software generated by Vibe Code for tax filing? Would you dare use software generated by Vibe Code for building construction?;

For now, humans are cheaper than tokens. Try running a few tasks with lobsters; even simple ones like checking flight tickets are more expensive than humans;

First inflation, then deflation, but there is still a long period in between, depending on when AI productivity is realized and the race of capital expenditure;

AI will definitely bring huge unemployment and distribution crises, and may even trigger a severe recession. However, the most extreme scenario of an "unprecedented financial crisis + a sharp drop in US stocks" has a low probability of occurring in 2028 (20–30%?). What is more likely is "Japan-style long-term stagnation + class solidification + coexistence of inflation and asset bubbles;";

Since AI can raise a large amount of money just by telling a story, why don't these people switch to the AI industry?;

Private equity big shot Dan Bin comments on Brother Sun

Popular replies:

You can doubt Brother Sun's character, but you can't doubt the foresight of his investment philosophy. I remember listening to Brother Sun's podcast on喜马拉雅 in 2018, and many of the things he talked about have now come true;

Dan Bin is quite famous. His shift to investing in AI shows that he is also keeping up with new market trends;

Learning from the younger generation, I admire Dan Bin's breadth of vision and open-mindedness;


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG discussion group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613895

İlgili Sorular

QWhat major cryptocurrency mining company sold off all its Bitcoin holdings, causing controversy?

ABitdeer, a mining company with a market capitalization of $1.9 billion, sold off all its Bitcoin holdings, sparking debate.

QAccording to the article, what potential global crisis is AI predicted to trigger by 2028?

AAI is predicted to potentially trigger an unprecedented financial crisis and a stock market crash by 2028, according to discussions among KOLs.

QWhat is the date mentioned for the revelation of a list related to insider trading in the crypto circle?

AThe list related to insider trading is scheduled to be unveiled on the 26th.

QWhich well-known private equity investor commented on 'Brother Sun' (Sun Yuchen) in the article?

ADan Bin, a prominent private equity investor, commented on 'Brother Sun' (Sun Yuchen).

QWhat is a key criticism mentioned in the popular replies regarding the current use of Generative AI (GenAI) in business?

AA key criticism is that GenAI's current accuracy is only 95-99%, and this inherent unreliability makes companies unwilling to use it for mission-critical tasks, as people are currently cheaper than AI tokens for many operations.

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片