Andreessen Horowitz-Backed Entropy Announces Shutdown

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Decentralized crypto custody startup Entropy, backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is shutting down and returning remaining capital to investors, according to founder and CEO Tux Pacific. After four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, Pacific announced the decision on January 25. The company had recently shifted to a crypto automation platform but failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations. Entropy raised $25 million in a 2022 seed round led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and others. Initially offering a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks, the startup ultimately could not achieve sustainable growth. Pacific expressed gratitude to investors and indicated a personal shift away from crypto towards pharmaceuticals.

A decentralised crypto custody startup supported by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Entropy is terminating and plans to return the rest of the capital to investors, as per the founder and CEO Tux Pacific.

Pacific publicised through writing on X on January 25 that, “I am winding up Entropy, and after four years, various pivots and two rounds of layoffs, I have decided to terminate Entropy and return capital to the investors.”

The termination is followed by a late-stage push last year to reposition the firm around a crypto automation platform, which Pacific referred to as “basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto”, having automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation leveraging trusted execution environments, and deep AI amalgamations.

That product direction was still not able to clear a venture-style growth bar. After the first feedback request disclosed that the business model was not venture scale, Pacific said that he was left with the choice to navigate a creative way forward or pivot once more.

The Heartful Gratitude

Entropy first captivated attention in 2022 when it generated $25 million in a seed round headed by a16z crypto, and the participants were Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant and Inflection. Before this, the company had so far accumulated $1.95 million in a pre-seed round.

At rollout, Entropy pitched itself as a decentralised alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, depending on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to allow users to control how funds move, comprising rule-based constraints.

Pacific also showed gratitude towards a16z crypto and Guy Wuollet for aiding in steering the wind-down and called their guidance “invaluable”. Pacific has also mentioned that they plan to step back before deciding what comes after Entropy.

He added that my time in crypto might be coming to a conclusion, as I feel myself drawn mainly into pharmaceuticals, and they want to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Las Vegas Businesses Use Bitcoin as a Mainstream Payment to Avoid High Credit Card Fees

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Entropy and why is it shutting down?

AEntropy is a decentralized crypto custody startup backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). It is shutting down because, after four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, its founder and CEO Tux Pacific decided to terminate the company as its latest product direction failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations.

QWho were the major investors in Entropy's seed funding round?

AEntropy's $25 million seed round in 2022 was led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant, and Inflection.

QWhat was Entropy's final product pivot before shutting down?

AEntropy's final pivot was to reposition itself as a crypto automation platform, described by its CEO as 'basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto', which featured automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation using trusted execution environments, and deep AI integrations.

QWhat did Entropy's founder, Tux Pacific, announce about his future plans?

ATux Pacific announced that he plans to step back before deciding his next move and expressed that his time in crypto might be concluding. He stated he is drawn to the pharmaceutical industry and wants to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

QHow did Entropy initially position itself in the market at its launch?

AAt its launch, Entropy positioned itself as a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, relying on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to give users control over fund movements with rule-based constraints.

İlgili Okumalar

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit4 dk önce

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit4 dk önce

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Metamorphosis of Crypto

Bitcoin's decline signifies a structural transformation within the crypto industry. Its two traditional core functions are being usurped: AI has absorbed speculative capital that once flowed into Bitcoin, while dollar stablecoins have replaced it as the foundational on-chain currency. This decoupling is not a sign of crypto's demise but of its maturation. Projects are now valued based on fundamentals like revenue and user growth, independent of Bitcoin's price movements. Examples include the on-chain exchange Hyperliquid, with transaction volumes surpassing Coinbase, and the prediction market Polymarket, valued at $200 billion. Privacy has emerged as a critical new sector, with assets like Zcash surging and protocols like NEAR enabling private, cross-chain transfers without requiring users to hold a new token. The landscape is shifting toward a multi-chain ecosystem anchored by stablecoins. A new layer of infrastructure for cross-chain coordination, privacy, and AI-agent interaction is emerging to connect this fragmented world, a role once implicitly held by Bitcoin. The era where all altcoins moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be gauged by project fundamentals and the underlying infrastructure enabling private, dollar-settled, and interconnected crypto-economy.

marsbit12 dk önce

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Metamorphosis of Crypto

marsbit12 dk önce

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbit14 dk önce

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbit14 dk önce

SEC’s 2026–2030 Plan Puts Crypto At The Center Of Its Regulatory Agenda

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has placed cryptocurrency at the center of its draft strategic plan for fiscal years 2026-2030, aiming to modernize regulation to keep pace with rapid market and technological changes. The SEC argues that the current regulatory framework has been outpaced by growth in digital assets and distributed ledger technologies, creating legal uncertainty. Its key objectives are to establish a clearer, more coherent regulatory foundation for crypto assets, clarify how securities laws apply to them, and resolve jurisdictional questions with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The agency believes this "harmonization" is necessary to encourage compliant innovation, support on-chain infrastructure, and ensure robust investor protection and market integrity.

bitcoinist23 dk önce

SEC’s 2026–2030 Plan Puts Crypto At The Center Of Its Regulatory Agenda

bitcoinist23 dk önce

Bitcoin Eyeing $60,000 Support As Iran Strikes Hammer Crypto Markets

Bitcoin faces crucial support at $60,000 following a market sell-off triggered by escalating Middle East tensions. The cryptocurrency fell 4.5% to an intraday low of $65,700, pressured by a record $1.44 billion in weekly outflows from US spot Bitcoin funds—the highest of 2026. Geopolitical events, including new US attacks on Iranian targets and reports of missile strikes in Bahrain, have fueled risk aversion, impacting oil prices and inflation fears. Technical analysis indicates Bitcoin has breached key support levels, with a close below $65,000 potentially opening a path toward the $60,000 mark. The conflict has also disrupted diplomatic ceasefire talks between the US and Iran.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Bitcoin Eyeing $60,000 Support As Iran Strikes Hammer Crypto Markets

bitcoinist1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures