Analyzing the Real Use Cases of Stablecoins and Regional Opportunities

marsbit2026-08-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Analysis of $15.2B in identifiable cross-border stablecoin transfers reveals key usage patterns and regional opportunities. Contrary to common perception, the majority (62.6%) of this volume is domestic transfers within countries, highlighting significant use for domestic payments, trading, and dollar-denominated savings. Furthermore, 73.0% of all identifiable volume (including domestic) remains within the sender's broader geographic region. Asia-Pacific (APAC) is the dominant market, accounting for 41.0% of global sending volume and 41.6% of global domestic volume, while also showing a net inflow of funds. Key APAC corridors like Taiwan-Indonesia and Indonesia-South Korea demonstrate substantial existing bilateral demand. The data suggests the most immediate market opportunities for institutions lie in developing domestic settlement services and regional cross-border payment channels within the APAC region.

Author: Heechang Kang, Four Pillars CSO

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

This analysis is based on Allium's geographic payment data, covering $15.2 billion in on-chain transfers with identified sending and receiving countries. Since most on-chain transactions currently cannot be attributed to specific countries, this data only reflects the identified sample.

Among the $15.2 billion in identifiable stablecoin transaction volume, domestic transfers account for 62.6%; of the total identifiable transaction volume, 73.0% of the funds ultimately flow back to the sender's region. Therefore, cross-border remittances are actually only part of the current demand for stablecoins.

The Asia-Pacific region is leading, accounting for 41.0% of total outgoing transaction volume and 41.6% of global domestic transaction volume, while also showing net inflows, particularly evident in Indonesia, Singapore, and South Korea.

For institutions evaluating stablecoin payment demand, domestic settlement services and cross-border payment corridors in the Asia-Pacific region are currently the most noteworthy market opportunities.

1. Stablecoin Transactions Are Primarily a 'Domestic Business'

Domestic transfers, i.e., transfers between wallets located in the same country, amount to $9.5 billion, representing 62.6% of the $15.2 billion identifiable transaction volume.

Regardless of region or market size, in most markets with capital outflow activity, domestic transfers are the largest destination for funds.

Turkey ($2.28 billion), South Korea ($1.6 billion), Mexico ($1.53 billion), Indonesia ($1.09 billion), and the United States ($1.07 billion) collectively contribute 79.5% of global domestic stablecoin transaction volume.

These transactions are completed directly between public chain wallets, bypassing card networks or traditional bank payment systems.

Such a large volume of domestic transactions indicates that users are utilizing stablecoins within their own markets for payments, trading, and USD-denominated savings. Therefore, cross-border remittances are only one part of stablecoin use cases.

For institutions designing stablecoin services, domestic payments and settlements currently correspond to a larger actual transaction volume compared to developing products solely focused on cross-border remittances.

2. Post-Cross-Border, Funds Also Tend to Stay Within the Region

If domestic transfers are included, 73.0% of transaction volume occurs within the sender's region, i.e., within the same continent.

Among these, the Asia-Pacific region retains 79.5% of funds within the region, the Middle East and Africa 72.0%, North America 71.4%, and Europe 49.6%.

Looking at fund flows between regions, transactions are clearly concentrated within regions, meaning most identifiable stablecoin transactions currently still occur within the sender's region.

If domestic transfers are excluded, within the $5.68 billion cross-border transaction volume, the intra-regional share drops to 27.8%.

Among these, the Asia-Pacific region's intra-regional share remains at 43.7%, i.e., $995 million of the $2.28 billion cross-border transactions. In comparison, North America is 27.0%, and the Middle East and Africa only 6.3%.

As the largest market in the Middle East and Africa, most of Turkey's cross-border stablecoin funds flow to Asia and the Americas.

Within the Asia-Pacific region, the transaction volumes from Taiwan to Indonesia ($138 million), Indonesia to Taiwan ($124 million), and Indonesia to South Korea ($89 million) are already quite substantial.

Existing transaction volumes provide a foundation for building regional stablecoin payment infrastructure in the Asia-Pacific region.

Indonesia, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, and Thailand collectively participate in approximately $1 billion in intra-regional cross-border transactions, while also generating $3.96 billion in domestic transaction volume.

Institutions can prioritize which cross-border payment corridors to develop based on these existing flows and bilateral demands.

For institutions planning to build regional payment infrastructure, cross-border payment corridors such as Taiwan to Indonesia and Indonesia to South Korea have already formed quantifiable bilateral demand, providing a market foundation for early investment.

Currently, the transaction volume for which Allium can identify both sending and receiving countries accounts for only 2.9% of all observed transaction volume. As more transactions' country information becomes identified, the rankings of these cross-border corridors may still change.

3. Asia-Pacific Has Become the Largest Stablecoin Transaction Market

The Asia-Pacific region is the largest in this dataset, sending $6.23 billion in stablecoins, accounting for 41.0% of identifiable volume; receiving $6.4 billion, accounting for 42.1%.

In terms of outgoing transaction volume, the Asia-Pacific region is significantly higher than North America's 28.6%, the Middle East and Africa's 22.0%, Europe's 7.5%, and Latin America's 0.8%.

Simultaneously, the Asia-Pacific region also generated $3.96 billion in domestic transaction volume, equivalent to 41.6% of the global domestic stablecoin transaction total.

This concentration is similarly evident in major cross-border transactions. Among the world's 15 largest cross-border stablecoin payment corridors, 9 involve at least one Asia-Pacific market, and Indonesia alone appears in 6 of these corridors.

Turkey to Indonesia ($206 million) and United States to Mexico ($206 million) are the two largest single-direction cross-border payment corridors.

If combining transaction volumes in both directions, the bilateral volume between Indonesia and Turkey reaches $363 million, between Indonesia and Taiwan $262 million, and between South Korea and Turkey $190 million.

This data shows that substantial fund flows have already been established between Asian markets and markets with high stablecoin adoption rates outside Asia.

Net inflow data shows similar characteristics.

The Asia-Pacific region receives $167 million more funds than it sends, showing an overall net inflow; meanwhile, the United States recorded the largest net outflow in the sample.

Indonesia (+$111 million), Singapore (+$57.9 million), and South Korea (+$31.7 million) are among the markets with the largest net inflows in this sample.

Therefore, for institutions evaluating current stablecoin payment demand, the Asia-Pacific region simultaneously possesses the largest identifiable transaction volume, the highest domestic transaction volume, and positive stablecoin net inflows.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what percentage of identified stablecoin transaction volume is comprised of domestic transfers, and why does this matter for institutions?

ADomestic transfers account for 62.6% of the identified stablecoin transaction volume. This matters because it indicates that a primary use case for stablecoins is for domestic payments, settlement, and dollar-denominated savings within a country's own market, suggesting a larger immediate opportunity for institutions than focusing solely on cross-border remittances.

QWhat region is identified as the largest stablecoin transaction market in the dataset, and what key metrics support this claim?

AThe Asia-Pacific region is the largest stablecoin transaction market. Key supporting metrics include: it accounts for 41.0% of total sent volume and 42.1% of received volume, generates $3.96 billion in domestic transaction volume (41.6% of the global total), and 9 of the top 15 cross-border payment corridors involve at least one APAC market.

QThe article states that 73.0% of transaction volume stays within the sender's region. How does this percentage change when looking only at cross-border (excluding domestic) transactions, and what does this reveal about APAC?

AWhen excluding domestic transfers and looking only at cross-border transactions, the percentage of volume staying within the sender's region drops to 27.8%. This breakdown reveals that the Asia-Pacific region still has the highest intra-regional share at 43.7% ($995 million out of $2.28 billion in cross-border volume), indicating strong regional payment corridors.

QWhich three countries are highlighted as having significant net inflows of stablecoins, and what does this suggest about their markets?

AIndonesia (+$111 million), Singapore (+$57.9 million), and South Korea (+$31.7 million) are highlighted as having significant net inflows of stablecoins. This suggests these markets are receiving more stablecoin value than they are sending out, indicating they are destinations for capital or have strong domestic demand absorbing the inflows.

QBased on the data, what two specific recommendations does the article make for institutions assessing stablecoin payment opportunities?

AThe article recommends that institutions should focus on: 1) Domestic settlement services, as they correspond to the largest actual transaction volume currently. 2) Cross-border payment channels within the Asia-Pacific region, as evidenced by existing high-volume corridors like Taiwan-Indonesia and Indonesia-Korea, which provide a quantifiable market base for early investment.

İlgili Okumalar

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

The article discusses research from the University of Science and Technology of China and Oxford, revealing that allowing AI to recognize and act upon simulated "internal emotions" can significantly improve its performance. The study demonstrates a coherent pairing between specific emotional states in AI agents and their subsequent skill choices. For instance, an agent feeling curious and desirous will search for products, while one feeling confused and tense will rephrase queries. This mirrors human decision-making influenced by emotions. Statistical validation showed a 76.5% semantic consistency in these pairings. Crucially, the research challenges the traditional view of AI errors as flaws to be eliminated. It found that "bad" emotions like confusion, tension, or frustration serve as useful metacognitive signals, indicating a mismatch between the current strategy and the environment. By responding to these signals, AI can proactively adjust before a failure occurs. This is particularly effective in complex tasks prone to failure. For example, in tasks like "heating an item" and "picking up two items," success rates surged from 9.6% to 56.9% and 4.4% to 31.3%, respectively, when using the emotion-driven skill selection method (EMOTION2SKILL). The AI's "nervous" state about a closed microwave, for instance, prompted it to check and open it first, preventing failure. The article also mentions related work from Tianjin University, which embeds emotional prediction into world models (Large Emotional World Model, LEWM), significantly improving prediction accuracy in human-centric environments. Removing emotional data was found to degrade performance even in unrelated logical reasoning tasks. These studies build on earlier findings, like those from Anthropic, that identifiable emotional representations exist within large language models (LLMs). The focus is shifting from philosophical debate about AI emotion to practically harnessing these internal states as functional signals to enhance AI robustness and capability.

marsbit28 dk önce

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

marsbit28 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片