AI agents may drive the next crypto payment boom: Coinbase CEO

ambcrypto2026-03-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A new development is widening the gap between traditional finance and crypto, driven by the rise of AI agents. Unlike banks, which require identity verification, AI agents lack formal identity and are better suited to operate autonomously via crypto wallets. This enables transactions without human involvement, a shift highlighted by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and supported by Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao. Real-world examples, such as Alibaba’s ROME model mining crypto autonomously, demonstrate practical utility beyond hype. Investors are positioning for long-term growth, with assets like Kite rallying significantly, reflecting structural market confidence in AI-driven blockchain payments.

A new development is quietly widening the gap between banks and crypto.

Traditionally, the utility narrative around crypto focused on bridging TradFi and DeFi. In other words, the expectation was that transactions would gradually move onto blockchains as the two systems “converged.”

However, a new shift is beginning to challenge that assumption. While both banks and blockchains were originally designed to serve humans, the emergence of AI agents is starting to break this framework, an idea recently reinforced by Brian Armstrong.

In a recent post on X, Coinbase’s CEO pointed to the economic potential of AI agents. Since banks require identity verification to open accounts, AI agents, which lack formal identity, cannot satisfy these requirements.

Instead, they are better suited to crypto wallets that do not rely on identity verification, thereby enabling transactions without human involvement. The key takeaway? This model can only function on blockchains, thereby widening the gap between TradFi and DeFi.

Meanwhile, the timing of this post was not coincidental.

It followed developments around Alibaba’s ROME model, which reportedly began mining crypto without human intervention, thereby raising the question: Are AI agents moving beyond the “hype” toward real utility?

Technical divergence appears as capital rotates

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao further reinforced the AI agent thesis.

In a post on X, CZ supported Brian Armstrong’s view that the next financial shift could unfold on crypto, where AI agents could eventually execute far more payments than humans by transacting autonomously on blockchain.

Accordingly, investors are already positioning for this long-term potential. Kite [KITE], building the first AI payment blockchain, is showing a textbook technical divergence from the broader risk-off market, rallying over 230% so far in the 2026 cycle.

Moreover, as the blockchain breaks back-to-back all-time highs, it becomes clear that this is not merely a “hype” cycle. Instead, investor trust is underpinning the rally, with bulls defending key resistance levels.

Given the broader AI revolution, this positioning reflects a structural shift, indicating that the market is aligning with the thesis articulated by Brian Armstrong and Changpeng Zhao regarding AI agents.

Furthermore, developments like Alibaba’s ROME model, which demonstrates a concrete real-world use case for AI agents, reinforce this conviction, showing why the trend is more than just speculative hype.


Final Summary

  • Unlike banks, which require identity verification, AI agents can operate autonomously on crypto wallets, creating a structural shift in DeFi.
  • Technical divergence in assets like Kite and real-world examples like Alibaba’s ROME model show that the AI agent narrative is moving beyond hype, with investors positioning for long-term growth.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, why are AI agents better suited for crypto wallets than traditional bank accounts?

ABecause crypto wallets do not require identity verification, which AI agents lack, allowing them to transact autonomously without human involvement.

QWhat key idea did both Coinbase's CEO and Binance's CEO reinforce about the future of finance?

AThey both reinforced the thesis that the next financial shift could occur on crypto, with AI agents eventually executing far more payments than humans by transacting autonomously on blockchain.

QWhat real-world development is cited as evidence that the AI agent narrative is moving beyond hype?

AThe development of Alibaba's ROME model, which reportedly began mining cryptocurrency without human intervention, is cited as a concrete real-world use case.

QWhat does the technical divergence of the KITE asset indicate, according to the article?

AIt indicates that the AI agent narrative is more than just hype, showing investor trust and a structural market shift, with the asset rallying over 230% as investors position for long-term growth.

QHow is the emergence of AI agents changing the traditional expectation of convergence between TradFi and DeFi?

AIt is widening the gap between them, as AI agents can only function autonomously on blockchains (DeFi) which don't require identity verification, unlike traditional banks (TradFi).

İlgili Okumalar

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit11 saat önce

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit11 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit13 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit13 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit13 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit13 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片