After Two Years and 36 Applicants Narrowed to 2! Hong Kong's First Batch of Stablecoin Licenses Issued, HSBC and Standard Chartered Successfully Break Through

Odaily星球日报2026-04-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hong Kong has issued its first batch of stablecoin licenses to two institutions after a two-year regulatory process. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) granted approval to HSBC and AnchorFin Tech Limited, a joint venture involving Standard Chartered Bank, HKT, and Animoca Brands. The licensed entities are expected to launch regulated stablecoins by mid-to-late this year. The move marks a major milestone in Hong Kong’s digital asset development, following the introduction of a sandbox arrangement in March 2024 and the formal enactment of the Stablecoin Ordinance in August 2025. Initially, over 70 companies showed interest in applying, but only 36 eventually submitted applications. The HKMA emphasized a cautious and quality-focused approach to licensing. This development is seen as a key step in strengthening Hong Kong’s position as an international digital asset hub. It is expected to promote the use of compliant stablecoins in areas such as cross-border payments, tokenized securities, and decentralized finance (DeFi), while ensuring user protection and risk management. The issuance of the first licenses is viewed not as an endpoint, but as the beginning of a broader expansion of Hong Kong’s stablecoin ecosystem.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses has finally been issued.

At 5 PM on April 10th, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses were granted to two institutions: HSBC Bank and Anchor FinTech Company Limited (a joint venture established by Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Hong Kong Telecom (HKT), and ANX Group). It also stated that, according to the current business plans of the two institutions, regulated stablecoins in Hong Kong will be launched successively from the middle to the second half of this year.

Mr. Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the HKMA, said: "The issuance of the stablecoin issuer licenses is an important milestone in the development of digital assets in Hong Kong. The regulatory regime provides an orderly operating environment, allowing stablecoin issuers to apply innovative technology while properly safeguarding user rights and managing related risks, enabling the healthy, responsible, and sustainable development of Hong Kong's stablecoin ecosystem. I look forward to the issuers launching their businesses as planned, actively exploring development opportunities while managing risks well, promoting the application of compliant stablecoins, addressing pain points in financial and economic activities, creating value for the public and enterprises, and driving the healthy development of Hong Kong's digital assets."

Previous news indicated that the HKMA had completed the final review of the first batch of applications in mid-March 2026. The HKMA received a total of 36 applications.

After Two Years, Hong Kong's Compliant Stablecoins Finally Land

The issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses marks a new phase in the implementation of Hong Kong's stablecoin regulatory system. However, the market waited a full two years for this compliant stablecoin license to materialize, making it an achievement reached after a precise博弈 (game/balancing act) between financial innovation and regulatory safety in Hong Kong.

Rewind two years to March 2024, when the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) officially launched the "Stablecoin Issuer Sandbox Arrangement." This was a crucial starting point for Hong Kong's stablecoin regulation moving towards practical implementation. The market saw the Hong Kong regulator's open attitude towards crypto finance, which attracted applications from multiple institutions, including traditional financial giants and native Web3 enterprises, to participate in the sandbox experiment.

In July of the same year, after four months of review, the HKMA announced the sandbox participants. Five institutions, including JD CoinChain Technology (Hong Kong) Limited, RD InnoTech Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, ANX Group Limited, and Hong Kong Telecom (HKT) Limited, obtained participation qualifications. Market expectations were ignited because this indicated that Hong Kong's stablecoin regulation had entered the stage of specific institutional testing and regulatory磨合 (breaking-in/磨合), and Hong Kong was not far from bringing stablecoins into the formal regulatory framework.

Hong Kong's stablecoin sandbox experiment lasted for one year. On August 1, 2025, Hong Kong's "Stablecoin Ordinance" came into effect, and the stablecoin issuer regulatory system was officially implemented. This was a key node in the development of Hong Kong's virtual assets, marking the entry of Hong Kong's stablecoins into the era of licensed regulation.

The second half of 2025 also coincided with the peak of narratives intersecting crypto and traditional finance, such as RWA, stock tokenization, and listed company crypto treasuries. After the Hong Kong "Stablecoin Ordinance" took effect, the market expected Hong Kong's crypto finance to enter a great navigation era. Therefore, when the HKMA opened the first round of stablecoin issuer license applications, it was reported that over 70 companies intended to apply for Hong Kong stablecoin licenses, including financial institutions, Web2 internet companies, and blockchain enterprises.

But just as the situation was heating up, Hong Kong's stablecoin and RWA businesses faced a regulatory cool-down. In September 2025, market rumors emerged that companies involved in stablecoin and RWA businesses in Hong Kong were "warned" to keep a low profile in their business and statements related to stablecoins and RWA. Simultaneously, the participation of Chinese-funded enterprises in Hong Kong's stablecoin business was strictly controlled. According to a Caixin report at the time, because Hong Kong's stablecoin business was still in its infancy, excessive participation by Chinese-funded entities might bring risks, so it was necessary to isolate the risks first.

This temporary incident directly led to a sharp decrease in the number of enterprises applying for Hong Kong stablecoin licenses. Not only did Chinese-funded banks and state-owned enterprises withdraw, but Web2 internet companies also suspended their stablecoin issuance plans. In October 2025, informed sources revealed that Ant Group, affiliated with Alibaba, and JD.com had suspended their related plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong. Ultimately, the HKMA received only 36 stablecoin license applications from institutions, and the market calmed down accordingly.

In early February this year, Mr. Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the HKMA, stated that they aimed to issue Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses by March this year. He emphasized: "The number of licenses issued in the first batch will certainly be small, with the goal being稳妥 (prudence/safety first)."

Back to the present, it has been over 8 months since the Hong Kong "Stablecoin Ordinance" came into effect. The issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses finally landed today. Over these two years, the market has been hyped, capital has been hot, concepts have been speculated on, and regulation has also been controlled. After going through countless hardships, the path for Hong Kong's compliant stablecoins has finally been fully traversed from "sandbox testing — legislative landing — application review — official licensing".

The Great Era of Hong Kong Stablecoins is Coming

Undoubtedly, the issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses is another important milestone on its way to becoming an "International Digital Asset Financial Center".

For Hong Kong, this licensing means that stablecoin regulation is no longer just at the institutional level. With the actual launch of stablecoin businesses by licensed institutions, such as cross-border payments, digital securities, and DeFi fields, Hong Kong's digital financial market will gain more vitality and grasp more discourse power in the future world digital financial system, seizing the strategic high ground of "digital currency sovereignty".

Looking more specifically at the market level, after the first batch of licenses are issued, the Hong Kong crypto market has the opportunity to regain some vitality. In the past, many people thought of forums, summits, and expectations when mentioning Hong Kong stablecoins—it was lively, but always half a step away from real business. Now, the first batch of licensed enterprises can finally legally conduct stablecoin businesses, practically exploring the potential of the Hong Kong market in areas such as cross-border payments, institutional settlements, and on-chain finance.

Of course, the issuance of the first batch of licenses does not mean the overall market situation is settled. Although first movers will have a leading advantage, it doesn't mean latecomers cannot catch up. Only when the second and third batches of licenses are issued in the future will the market truly enter the stage of competing on scenarios, execution capabilities, and products and services.

Therefore, the first batch of licenses is not the climax of the Hong Kong stablecoin story; on the contrary, it is just the beginning. The great era of Hong Kong stablecoins is about to begin.

İlgili Sorular

QWhich two institutions were granted the first stablecoin issuer licenses in Hong Kong?

AHSBC and AnchorX Financial Technology Limited (a joint venture between Standard Chartered Bank Hong Kong, HKT, and Ant Group).

QWhen did the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announce the issuance of the first stablecoin licenses?

AAt 5 p.m. on April 10th.

QHow many applications did the HKMA receive for the stablecoin issuer license?

AThe HKMA received 36 applications.

QWhat was the name of the regulatory sandbox arrangement launched by the HKMA in March 2024 for stablecoin issuers?

AThe 'stablecoin issuer sandbox arrangement'.

QWhen did Hong Kong's 'Stablecoin Ordinance' officially come into effect?

AThe 'Stablecoin Ordinance' officially came into effect on August 1, 2025.

İlgili Okumalar

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1 saat önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures