After the Collapse of the Believe Flywheel Myth, the 26-Year-Old Prodigy Founder Stands as Defendant in Federal Court

marsbit2026-04-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

In March 2026, 26-year-old Australian entrepreneur Ben Pasternak and his entities B24, Inc. and Believe Foundation were sued in a New York federal court. Investors accused Pasternak of deceptive practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and a forced token migration, causing hundreds of millions in losses. The case centers on Believe (formerly Clout.me), a Solana-based social token launch platform Pasternak founded. Users could create tokens via tweets, with the platform token LAUNCHCOIN reaching a peak market cap of $370 million in May 2025. Pasternak initially claimed he had "zero ownership" of his self-named token, PASTERNAK, which crashed over 95% within a week. In October 2025, Believe forced a migration from LAUNCHCOIN to a new token, BELIEVE, increasing total supply by 33.3%. New tokens were allocated to team members, investors, and the foundation, diluting existing holders. Pasternak falsely claimed no tokens were allocated to insiders for a year, while the foundation received 40 million tokens with no lock-up. The platform generated an estimated $54 million in fees from $6 billion in trading volume. Pasternak earned creator fees throughout. After the migration, significant selling occurred from top wallets. BELIEVE’s value plummeted from its peak to around $1.2 million. Pasternak, a former teen prodigy who dropped out of school at 15, had previously founded apps like Monkey and the food-tech startup NUGGS. His personal life also dre...

On March 23, 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York Federal Court, officially naming 26-year-old Australian entrepreneur Ben Pasternak and his entities B24, Inc. and Believe Foundation as defendants.

This class action lawsuit, initiated by investors Joshua Lee and Pierre Montmeas, accuses Pasternak of engaging in deceptive business practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and one forced migration, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses for consumers. By this time, nearly half a year had passed since his last original social media post.

The core of this lawsuit points to a Solana ecosystem application named Believe. Believe (formerly Clout.me) was a Solana social token launch platform launched in 2025, founded by Pasternak. Users could create tokens without code simply by posting a tweet on platform X with "@launchcoin + token name". It utilized a bonding curve mechanism, automatically upgrading to a Meteora liquidity pool once the market cap reached $100,000. The platform was positioned as an "idea crowdfunding platform," and its platform token LAUNCHCOIN reached a peak market cap of $370 million in May 2025.

According to the complaint, Pasternak launched a token named after himself, PASTERNAK, in January 2025, publicly stating on the same day that he had "zero ownership" of the token. This statement successfully built a trust narrative of "no insider allocation," and the token's market cap briefly touched $80 million on its first day. However, within a week, the price plummeted over 95%, and by March 2025, its market cap was only about $190,000.

On April 28, 2025, the platform was renamed from Clout to Believe; on May 2, the on-chain metadata for PASTERNAK was changed to LAUNCHCOIN, though the token contract itself was not redeployed. The complaint points out that in mid-May, the LAUNCHCOIN market cap once exceeded $240 million, reaching an all-time high of $0.3647. The price continued to decline afterwards, while Pasternak and the official Believe account publicly promised at least twelve times during this period to initiate a "flywheel" buyback mechanism, using platform fee revenue to purchase tokens on the open market to support the price.

On October 15, 2025, the Believe team announced the forced migration of LAUNCHCOIN to a new token, BELIEVE. Holders had to complete a 1:1 exchange by October 29; tokens not migrated by the deadline would be permanently destroyed.

Simultaneously, the total supply of the new token inflated from 1 billion to approximately 1.333 billion, an increase of 33.3%. The complaint details the allocation of the new tokens: about 17% allocated to current and future contributors, subject to a four-year vesting period and a one-year lockup; about 5% allocated to early investors, locked for one year; and about 3% allocated to the foundation, with no lockup restrictions, immediately available.

Original LAUNCHCOIN holders received no additional compensation and saw their ownership directly diluted.

The complaint further states that Pasternak publicly stated on the day of the migration announcement that "no individual or entity will get tokens for at least a year," a statement clearly contradicted by the fact that the foundation's approximately 40 million tokens were immediately unlocked. Additionally, the Believe team described the supply increase as "25%," while the actual mathematical calculation was approximately 33%, a discrepancy that sparked widespread skepticism and ridicule within the crypto community.

Regarding the platform's economic model, Believe charged approximately a 2% fee on each transaction, initially split equally between the token creator and the platform, but adjusted in June 2025 to 70% for the creator and 30% for the platform. The platform also designed a "scout" mechanism, where the first user to trigger a token launch would receive 0.1% of subsequent transaction fees. The complaint estimates that Believe processed approximately $6 billion in trading volume, with total platform fee revenue around $54 million.

As the creator of PASTERNAK, LAUNCHCOIN, and BELIEVE, Pasternak himself continuously received a share of the creator fees. The complaint also notes that in the week the migration was announced, on-chain data showed significant selling activity from top wallet addresses.

Pasternak's last original tweet was posted on October 16, 2025. In this lengthy post, he admitted for the first time that he had never purchased any Solana token before launching his first one, reiterated that the team received no token allocation in the initial offering, clarified the misstatement regarding the supply increase, promised that the foundation's holdings would not be sold, and committed to initiating the buyback flywheel after the migration was complete.

On January 14, 2026, he retweeted a post from the official Believe account, which read: "The idea behind Believe v2 is simple: track everyone's real-time sentiment."

Updates from the official Believe account also stopped on that day, with its last tweet announcing: "New market listing: Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) is now open for trading." Thereafter, both Pasternak's personal and the project's official social media fell completely silent.

Believe v2, launched in January 2026, attempted to pivot to a "sentiment market," allowing users to bet on the real-time popularity of public figures through a perpetual bilateral market, but failed to regain market attention. As of the filing date, the BELIEVE token's market cap was approximately $1.2 million, having evaporated from its historical high.

This lawsuit invokes New York General Business Law Sections 349 and 350, California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, alongside common law claims such as negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs request the court to order the defendants to compensate for actual losses, return platform and creator fees, and, where necessary, impose constructive trusts and injunctive relief on traceable digital assets.

Documents show Pasternak resides in Manhattan, New York, and his controlled entity B24, Inc. is also registered in New York, with platform operations and development pointing to this jurisdiction. As of the time of writing, he has not publicly responded to the lawsuit nor disclosed the specific amount of profit he gained from the Believe project.

A Legendary Teenage Era

Prior to this legal storm, Pasternak's life resume was legendary. Born on September 6, 1999, in Sydney, Australia, into a Jewish family, he grew up in the Vaucluse suburb. He taught himself programming at age 13. In 2014, at 14 years old, he collaborated with an engineer from Chicago during a school science class and completed the iOS game "Impossible Rush" in a few hours, which garnered millions of downloads and briefly reached No. 16 on the US App Store overall chart. Media quickly picked up the story, dubbing him "the next Zuckerberg."

In January 2015, the 15-year-old Pasternak rejected internship offers from Facebook and Google, dropped out of high school, and flew alone to New York to seek venture capital. In April of the same year, he founded Flogg, a social shopping app for teenagers, raising about $2 million from firms like Binary Capital and Greylock Partners.

Flogg's performance fell short of expectations and it shut down by the end of 2016. He promptly redirected resources to a new project, Monkey, a video chat app for teenagers.

Monkey accumulated over 20 million users and was acquired by the Chinese company Holla in 2018, becoming his first successfully sold startup from his teenage years.

Starting in 2018, Pasternak shifted to the food tech sector, co-founding Simulate and launching the plant-based chicken nugget NUGGS. The project attracted support from notable investors like Alexis Ohanian, Jay-Z, and McCain Foods, raising over $50 million in 2021, with the company's valuation once exceeding $250 million. That same year, he was named to the Forbes "30 Under 30" list.

From mobile apps to food tech, and then to Web3, Pasternak's every pivot landed on trending sectors, accompanied by significant controversy and risk. And as he finds himself deep in legal troubles, his personal life has also taken a dramatic turn.

Since the second half of 2024, Pasternak was publicly dating TikTok influencer Evelyn Ha. Evelyn is from the influential Korean-American Ha family of three sisters, and Pasternak frequently shared their luxurious interactions on social platforms.

However, in early April 2026, netizens noticed that the Ha sisters had simultaneously unfollowed him on Instagram, and Evelyn was later revealed to be in a close relationship with a Twitch streamer. The outside world widely interpreted this series of actions as signals of the relationship's end, with some in the crypto community joking that "the Hermès budget can finally be reinvested into the flywheel."

From the teenager writing apps in a Sydney high school classroom to the entrepreneur standing as a defendant in a New York federal court, Ben Pasternak's 26th year has brought both legal and emotional storms. He was once the media's "next Zuckerberg," but now his name is more often associated with "fraud," "collapse," and "unfollow."

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the main allegations against Ben Pasternak and his entities in the federal lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit alleges that Ben Pasternak, B24, Inc., and Believe Foundation engaged in deceptive business practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and a forced migration, causing consumers to suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.

QWhat was the core mechanism and initial promise of the Believe (formerly Clout.me) platform?

ABelieve was a Solana-based social token launch platform where users could create tokens by posting a specific tweet. It used a bonding curve mechanism and promised an automatic 'flywheel' buyback mechanism, using platform fee revenue to purchase tokens on the open market to support their price.

QWhat controversial action did the Believe team take with the LAUNCHCOIN token in October 2025?

AThe Believe team announced a forced migration from the LAUNCHCOIN token to a new token called BELIEVE. The total supply was inflated by approximately 33.3%, diluting original holders, and the new tokens were allocated to team members, investors, and a foundation, contrary to Pasternak's earlier public statements.

QWhat was the significant contradiction between Pasternak's public statements and the token migration plan?

APasternak publicly stated that 'no individual or entity would receive tokens for at least a year' on the day the migration was announced. However, the foundation's allocation of approximately 40 million BELIEVE tokens was immediately unlocked and usable, directly contradicting his claim.

QWhat was Ben Pasternak's background and public persona before the Believe controversy?

ABefore the Believe controversy, Ben Pasternak was celebrated as a teenage prodigy who created popular apps, sold a company, and founded a successful food-tech startup, NUGGS. He was featured on the Forbes '30 Under 30' list and was often referred to as 'the next Zuckerberg' by the media.

İlgili Okumalar

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit8 saat önce

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit8 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit9 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit9 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit10 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit10 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片