a16z Partner: Perpetual Contracts Are Rewriting Global Trading Rules

marsbit2026-04-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Perpetual contracts ("perps"), a crypto-native innovation, are transforming global trading behavior and market structure. These non-expiring futures contracts have seen explosive on-chain growth in 2025, with decentralized exchange (DEX) volume surging 346% year-over-year to $6.7 trillion. Perps now extend beyond crypto to traditional assets like stocks, commodities, and even private company valuations. Key drivers include structural advantages over options for directional leverage: 24/7 trading, no expirations or rollovers, simpler risk exposure, and capital efficiency. Real-World Asset (RWA) perps have gained significant traction, at times comprising 44% of volume on leading DEXs like Hyperliquid. The ecosystem is expanding rapidly with new exchanges, front-ends, market creators, and liquidity providers. While challenges remain around liquidity, oracle reliability, and regulation, perps are evolving from a niche crypto instrument into a dominant global trading primitive. The open question is whether value will accumulate at the exchange layer or within applications built atop perpetual trading infrastructure.

Author: jay

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

Perpetual contracts ("perps") are futures contracts that never settle. As a crypto-native innovation, they experienced an explosion on-chain in 2025. Today, they have become one of the largest markets in the crypto space, covering traditional assets with trading volumes reaching trillions of dollars.

Last year, the trading volume of perpetual contracts settled by top centralized exchanges reached $86.2 trillion (a 47% year-on-year increase), while the growth of on-chain perpetual contracts was even more astonishing: leading decentralized exchanges (DEX) reached a trading volume of $6.7 trillion (a 346% year-on-year increase). Currently, DEX trading volume accounts for about 7.8% of centralized exchange (CEX) volume, whereas just over a year ago, this proportion was only around 2.5%. [Note: While a few US-regulated centralized platforms offer US investors products similar to perpetual contracts, all centralized and decentralized exchanges restrict US investors from trading true perpetual contracts.]

But more importantly, perpetual contracts are gradually shedding their image as a marginal crypto-native primitive and beginning to demonstrate the transformative power to reshape trading behavior and market structure fundamentally.

So, what is driving the popularity of perpetual contracts? Why now? The following will explore why global traders are increasingly favoring perpetual contracts, the scale of the market opportunity, and the opportunities seen by builders.

A Brief History and Evolution of Perpetual Contracts

The idea itself is actually older than the crypto industry. Theoretically, perpetual contracts existed as early as 1993, when Nobel laureate Robert Shiller proposed perpetual futures contracts, initially conceived as a tool to hedge against real estate value risks. But it wasn't until 2016, with the rise of BitMEX and XBTUSD (the longest-running Bitcoin perpetual swap contract), that perpetual contracts became popular in the crypto space.

A decade later, modern exchanges now offer perpetual contracts covering stocks, indices, commodities, interest rates, startup valuations, and even the price of Nvidia's H100 GPUs.

For years, perpetual contracts have been a multi-billion dollar revenue engine for centralized exchanges. As retail demand for leverage has grown, perpetual contracts have become the primary venue for short-term price discovery, liquidity, and trading activity—in many large Asian CEXs, their volume is multiple times that of spot trading.

What changed in the past year and a half is that decentralized perpetual exchanges began to meaningfully eat into the perpetual market share of CEXs. With the structural advantage of self-custody, perpetual DEXs are rapidly closing the gap with CEXs in terms of liquidity, performance, and features for active traders.

With the breakthrough success of perpetual DEXs like Hyperliquid, leading crypto wallets and applications began to support perpetual contracts and launched high-quality trading experiences, reaching millions of users. In the second half of 2025, the front-end for perpetual DEXs exploded—ranging from casual mobile apps to complex multi-venue trading terminals.

Hyperliquid, in particular, pushed the boundaries of what a DEX can offer through HIP-3 (Builder-Deployed Perpetuals). This mechanism allows anyone to permissionlessly launch a perpetual market on the exchange. With HIP-3, builders can list almost any asset and earn a 50% fee share while managing their own oracles and risk parameters.

At the same time, new entrants and competitors like Avantis, Lighter, Ostium, and Variational have emerged or accelerated product development. Increasing competition has forced perpetual DEXs to differentiate in exchange design, market structure, asset support, and permissionlessness, and has led some platforms to find strong product-market fit in new categories like real-world asset (RWA) perpetuals.

For years, perpetual traders only speculated on crypto assets—BTC, ETH, SOL, and various long-tail altcoins. But late last year, when perpetual volume cooled significantly from recent peaks amid a broader crypto market sell-off, RWA perpetuals began to gain traction. A few perpetual DEXs listed commodities, stocks, and stock indices, expanding the universe of tradable assets to include Nvidia, Samsung, even private companies like SpaceX, and commodities like silver and palladium.

This year, the growth of RWA perpetuals has accelerated further. In recent weeks, RWAs have accounted for up to 44% of Hyperliquid's total volume, and RWA pairs have consistently become some of the highest fee-generating pairs on the exchange. On Ostium, RWAs have constituted the vast majority of the exchange's volume for months.

Decentralized exchanges have excelled at facilitating price discovery for RWAs like crude oil, especially on weekends when traditional exchanges are closed.

With the takeoff of RWA perpetuals, we see more companies developing products and businesses related to perpetual contracts. In the past 6 months alone, new exchanges, trading interfaces, market deployers, and liquidity providers have emerged.

Players flooding into this space include brand-new startups, startups pivoting to perpetuals, and some of the world's largest fintech companies integrating perpetual trading into their existing products.

All these diverse players are converging on the same opportunity: perpetual contracts have the potential to become one of the dominant trading instruments in global finance.

The Market Opportunity for Perpetual Contracts

Stepping back to look at traditional finance (TradFi), options are one of the largest and most actively traded markets globally. They exist in currencies, stocks, indices, commodities, and ETFs, and are extremely powerful and expressive tools that enable people to trade based on many different predictions: timing, volatility, price ranges, etc.

But if you zoom in on retail trading behavior, you find a huge amount of activity concentrated in a specific category of options: short-term, leveraged, directional exposure. A prominent example is 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options—traders pay a small cost to bet on high-magnitude intraday moves.

This type of trading is one of the fastest-growing option categories. In 2025, average daily volume for 0DTE SPX (S&P 500 Index) options reached 2.3 million contracts, up 51% year-on-year, accounting for 59% of total SPX option volume. Responding to this demand, the market introduced several new daily-expiring index products, including CBTX and MBTX Bitcoin ETF index options, and options on the equal-weight Cboe Magnificent 10 Index.

So, while options have many sophisticated uses—structured hedging, volatility trading, discrete trading, convexity (referring to the asymmetric特性 of收益与风险 : your maximum loss is fixed, but potential gains are theoretically unlimited), etc.—an enormous and growing flow of retail capital is essentially just looking for short-term, leveraged directional exposure. This is precisely the need that perpetual contracts fulfill perfectly.

The trade-offs are real: options excel at defined risk and convex payoffs, and remain the default tool for expressing volatility. Traders can lose at most the premium they pay. With perpetual contracts, the entire margined position can be liquidated. But for the directional leverage that most retail traders actually want, perpetual contracts have several structural advantages:

  • Always on. The latest generation of perpetual markets trade 24/7, with no trading hours or market close gaps. For a global, crypto-native user base, continuous access is an expected norm.
  • No strike prices, no expiration, no rollover. With a single continuous position, traders don't have to choose parameters, manage expiries, or rebuild positions daily or weekly. They can hold for seconds, months, or theoretically forever.
  • Simpler risk exposure. For perps, the primary considerations are price, collateral, and liquidation thresholds. For options, even if you're right on direction, you can lose due to time decay, implied volatility changes, and path dependence. Perps strip out this complexity. The trade is a pure expression of directional conviction.
  • Capital efficiency for continuous exposure. Short-term options require paying the full premium upfront and rolling over repeatedly. Perps require margin—often a fraction of the notional value—which is typically more capital efficient for intraday to multi-day directional positions.

Options aren't going away. They have long been part of financial history and will likely remain dominant for a significant subset of trading use cases, especially those involving defined risk and more complex payoff structures. But for the huge and growing flow of capital looking for Delta-1 directional leverage, perpetual contracts have already captured trillions in volume and billions in revenue.

This raises the question: as perpetual contracts evolve from niche tool to mainstream trading primitive, where will the value accrue in the tech stack?

In traditional markets, the most valuable companies are often built on top of exchange infrastructure, not at the exchange layer itself. For example, the retail broker Robinhood has a higher market cap than its underlying exchange, Nasdaq.

Whether this pattern holds in crypto—or whether platforms like Hyperliquid, Lighter, or Ostium can accumulate sufficiently powerful network effects at the exchange layer—is one of the most interesting open questions in the space.

Regardless, builder activity is expanding rapidly. We see developer growth in the following areas:

  • Customized distribution layers: Vertical or audience-specific frontends that not only present markets but also package narratives, strategies, gamification, or social hooks.
  • Market creators and operators (e.g., HIP-3 deployers): Operating a popular market on Hyperliquid essentially gives a deployer a "mini-exchange" without building the most complex exchange infrastructure. Today's deployers may only be scratching the surface of the data or price feeds that could be "perp-ified" in the future.
  • Specialized liquidity provision: Market makers focused on long-tail markets, event-driven order books, and cross-venue inventory management.
  • Perp-specific data infrastructure: An ecosystem of community-driven dashboards, block explorers, heatmaps, and analytics tools has already emerged around positions, funding rates, liquidations, trader signals, leverage exposure, retention cohorts, etc. More mature, high-quality, real-time data will make the entire ecosystem more transparent and efficient for all participants.

Of course, there are still significant open questions and challenges, spanning distribution, liquidity depth for new trading venues, oracle reliability as asset scope expands, inevitable tail events ("10/10" events), and regulation (which currently restricts US investor access to these products). These are the expected growing pains as perpetual contracts "graduate" from the crypto-native bubble and step onto the main stage of global finance. As the perpetual ecosystem matures, the question is no longer whether perps can scale, but who will build the most valuable applications and infrastructure around them when they do.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are perpetual contracts and why are they considered a crypto-native innovation?

APerpetual contracts, or 'perps', are futures contracts that never expire and do not require settlement. They are considered a crypto-native innovation because they were popularized within the cryptocurrency space, starting with BitMEX's XBTUSD in 2016, and have since evolved to become a dominant trading instrument in crypto, with significant growth on both centralized and decentralized exchanges.

QHow has the growth of decentralized perpetual exchanges (DEX) compared to centralized exchanges (CEX) in recent years?

ADecentralized perpetual exchanges have grown at an astonishing rate. In the past year, leading DEXs saw a 346% increase in trading volume, reaching $6.7 trillion, while top CEXs settled $86.2 trillion in perpetual trading volume, a 47% increase. DEX volume now accounts for about 7.8% of CEX volume, up from just 2.5% a little over a year ago.

QWhat is HIP-3 on Hyperliquid and how does it impact the perpetual contract market?

AHIP-3, or Builder-Deployed Perpetuals, is a mechanism on Hyperliquid that allows anyone to permissionlessly launch a perpetual market on the exchange. It enables builders to list almost any asset, manage their own oracles and risk parameters, and earn 50% of the fees generated, significantly expanding the range of tradable assets and democratizing market creation.

QWhat are the key structural advantages of perpetual contracts over options for retail traders seeking directional leverage?

APerpetual contracts offer several advantages over options for directional leverage: they are always on (24/7 trading), have no strike prices or expiration dates (eliminating the need for rollovers), provide simpler risk exposure (focused on price, collateral, and liquidation thresholds without time decay or volatility complications), and offer capital efficiency for continuous exposure through margin requirements rather than full premium payments.

QWhat types of real-world assets (RWA) are being traded via perpetual contracts on DEXs, and how significant is their volume?

APerpetual contracts on DEXs now include a wide range of real-world assets such as commodities (e.g., silver, palladium, crude oil), stocks (e.g., Nvidia, Samsung), stock indices, and even private companies like SpaceX. RWA perpetuals have seen substantial growth, at times accounting for up to 44% of Hyperliquid's total volume and consistently being among the highest fee-generating pairs, with platforms like Ostium also seeing RWA dominate their trading activity.

İlgili Okumalar

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit5 dk önce

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit5 dk önce

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit14 dk önce

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit14 dk önce

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit15 dk önce

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit15 dk önce

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

On July 31, South Korean stocks staged a historic rebound. The benchmark KOSPI index surged 18.27%, with chipmaker SK Hynix hitting a 30% gain limit. This followed a brutal, near-40% decline in the KOSPI over the previous month, driven largely by a deleveraging spiral involving leveraged ETFs. Analysts attributed the sharp sell-off to structural liquidity issues rather than deteriorating corporate fundamentals. The rally was triggered by a confluence of positive catalysts. Firstly, strong earnings from U.S. cloud giants Microsoft and Amazon alleviated fears of an "AI bubble burst," boosting global tech sentiment. Secondly, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won made a rare personal purchase of SK Hynix shares, seen as a strong vote of confidence. Thirdly, the South Korean government announced a 20 trillion won ($139 billion) AI investment fund. In response to the market turmoil, South Korean regulators are tightening controls on leveraged ETFs, admitting oversight shortcomings. Measures include raising minimum cash保证金 requirements for散户 investors and suspending new product launches. While the rebound signals eased liquidity pressure, analysts note deep structural issues remain. The market's future stability is seen as dependent on global tech capital expenditure trends and memory chip price cycles, with some viewing the surge as a technical correction rather than a definitive trend reversal.

marsbit35 dk önce

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

marsbit35 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片