a16z Crypto Founder on Stablecoins: The 'WhatsApp Moment' in Money Has Arrived

marsbit2026-02-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Chris Dixon, general partner at a16z Crypto, argues that stablecoins are bringing about a "WhatsApp moment" for money—dramatically reducing the cost and increasing the speed of global payments, much like messaging apps did for communication. Last year, stablecoin transaction volume reached over $12 trillion, nearing Visa’s $17 trillion, but at a fraction of the cost. Stablecoins, which are pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, are becoming mainstream for online and international payments. They offer near-instant settlement, high reliability, and programmability, effectively turning money into software. While adoption is still largely within crypto-native and global business contexts, integration with traditional finance is accelerating. U.S. policy developments, such as the proposed Clarity Act, could provide the regulatory framework needed for stablecoins to scale as part of global financial infrastructure. Major companies like Stripe, Fidelity, and SpaceX are already using or issuing stablecoins to cut costs, streamline cross-border payroll, and operate in regions with weak banking systems. A significant secondary effect is the strengthening of the U.S. dollar’s dominance. Stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether now hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, making them top holders. If growth continues, they could rank among the top 10 Treasury holders by next year. Ultimately, stablecoins are reshaping global finance by enabling borderless value tr...

Article Author: Chris Dixon

Article Translation: Block Unicorn

Chris Dixon is a General Partner at a16z, leading its crypto investment division

The internet globalized information, and cryptocurrency is having a similar effect on money. Although recent headlines may focus on Bitcoin's price, a deeper and more lasting transformation is underway in the digital payments space. This year, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the US dollar—are gradually becoming a mainstream choice for online and international payments.

Call it the "WhatsApp moment" for money. Just as messaging apps like WhatsApp reduced the cost of international texting from around 30 cents per message to zero, stablecoins are doing the same for financial transactions. The data confirms this: last year, after excluding bot and other non-rational trading, stablecoin transaction volume exceeded $12 trillion—approaching Visa's $17 trillion in volume for the same period, but at a much lower cost.

In the process, stablecoins are bringing the original open and interoperable vision of the internet to finance. Given that blockchain technology allows stablecoins to be programmed, money is effectively becoming software.

While most stablecoin transactions currently come from "crypto-native" and global commercial activities rather than everyday consumer spending, this is changing. As more improvements are introduced, such as integration with more traditional financial partners to make user transactions easier, mass adoption of stablecoins will follow.

People around the world using stablecoins for transactions will hardly notice they are using stablecoins. Most will think they are simply using US dollars. And that is indeed the case, as the distinction between stablecoins and dollars has become very abstract for end users. Since each token is backed by one dollar or equivalent assets, the name itself doesn't matter. What matters is that the product is more reliable than any previous payment technology, almost free, and settles much faster—almost instantly.

Stablecoins also demonstrate the infinite possibilities when policy and technology align. Last year's "Genius Act" established clear rules for US stablecoins. More importantly, Congress is currently reviewing the "Clarity Act," which aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins. The Clarity Act will help determine whether these networks can scale to become part of global financial infrastructure or will stagnate. When challengers are given a level playing field and space to innovate, markets work their magic. It was this magic that enabled the internet to triumph over incumbents; it was this magic that allowed the US to dominate the internet; and it is this magic that will enable stablecoins to surpass today's payment systems.

Businesses are already recognizing the advantages of stablecoins. Some of the world's largest tech companies, banks, and retailers are actively promoting the use of stablecoins, or, like Fidelity Investments, have already issued their own. Payment giant Stripe has acquired several cryptocurrency companies over the past year or so and now supports stablecoins at checkout, instantly reducing payment processing fees from about 3% to 1.5%, with plenty of room for further reduction. SpaceX uses stablecoins to move funds from countries like Argentina and Nigeria, where local banking systems are fragile or capital controls are strict. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees faster. Ultimately, the internet could transform into an open marketplace where machine-to-machine transactions thrive, and AI agents conduct trades and settlements on behalf of users in real time.

The adoption of stablecoins also has an often-underestimated second-order effect: these tokens solidify the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world, thereby creating strong new demand for US Treasury bonds. Leading stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether currently hold nearly $140 billion in short-term US government bonds directly, making them among the top 20 holders of US Treasuries today. If stablecoin adoption continues to grow at its current rate, their holdings could jump into the top 10 by next year. (Citi Research even predicts that by 2030, stablecoin holdings of US Treasuries could surpass those of foreign governments and commercial banks.)

This is not just about payments; it's about reshaping the global financial landscape. The internet gave us borderless communication; stablecoins give us borderless value transfer. With clear rules and a sound market structure, they can become the pipes and pillars of a new financial system.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat does Chris Dixon refer to as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money, and why?

AChris Dixon refers to the rise of stablecoins as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money because, similar to how WhatsApp reduced the cost of international messaging to nearly zero, stablecoins are drastically reducing the cost of financial transactions, making them cheaper, faster, and more accessible for online and international payments.

QHow does the transaction volume of stablecoins compare to Visa, and what is a key advantage of stablecoins mentioned?

ALast year, stablecoins processed over $12 trillion in transactions (excluding non-rational trades like bots), which is approaching Visa's $17 trillion volume. A key advantage is that stablecoin transactions are significantly cheaper and settle almost instantly.

QWhat two U.S. legislative acts are mentioned in relation to stablecoins, and what is their purpose?

AThe two acts are the 'Genius Act' and the 'Clarity Act'. The Genius Act established clear rules for stablecoins in the U.S., while the Clarity Act, currently under consideration, aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins to determine if they can scale as part of global financial infrastructure.

QHow do stablecoins benefit the U.S. Treasury and its global financial standing, according to the article?

AStablecoins consolidate the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world by creating strong new demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. Leading issuers like Circle and Tether hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. government bonds, making them top-20 holders. This demand is projected to grow, potentially making them a top-10 holder by next year.

QName two specific ways companies are already leveraging stablecoins for business operations.

A1. Companies like SpaceX use stablecoins to move funds from countries with fragile banking systems or strict capital controls (e.g., Argentina, Nigeria). 2. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees more quickly. Additionally, Stripe uses them to lower payment processing fees from ~3% to ~1.5% at checkout.

İlgili Okumalar

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

**Wintermute Market Weekly: BTC Rebounds to $60K Lows, But Caution Advised** This week saw a broad market rebound, primarily driven by two converging factors: a US CPI inflation reading that met expectations (4.2% YoY) and former President Trump's announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict. The latter triggered a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing geopolitical risk premiums and easing inflation fears. Consequently, risk assets like equities and cryptocurrencies rallied, with Bitcoin recovering from lows around $60,000 to close the week up 1.9%, while altcoins gained 3.1%. Despite the price bounce, the underlying liquidity picture for crypto remains weak. Key funding channels—stablecoin flows, ETF inflows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity—show no signs of structural improvement. ETF outflows recently hit a record streak, and DAT assets have declined significantly. The rally from $60K to $83K earlier is now viewed as a bear-market rally that has failed. The current environment is characterized by low directional conviction and choppy, range-bound trading, likely persisting into summer. The report advises caution against aggressively buying the dip. While the $60K area offers attractive long-term risk/reward, a sustained bull run requires a visible turnaround in capital inflows, which hasn't materialized. The upcoming FOMC meeting and Powell's commentary, alongside the formal Iran deal signing, are noted as near-term catalysts. The core takeaway is to watch fund flows rather than price action and avoid being whipsawed by volatility before clear signs of institutional or retail capital returning emerge.

marsbit14 dk önce

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

marsbit14 dk önce

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手16 dk önce

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

链捕手16 dk önce

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit21 dk önce

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit21 dk önce

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbit31 dk önce

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbit31 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片