a16z Crypto Founder on Stablecoins: The 'WhatsApp Moment' in Money Has Arrived

marsbit2026-02-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Chris Dixon, general partner at a16z Crypto, argues that stablecoins are bringing about a "WhatsApp moment" for money—dramatically reducing the cost and increasing the speed of global payments, much like messaging apps did for communication. Last year, stablecoin transaction volume reached over $12 trillion, nearing Visa’s $17 trillion, but at a fraction of the cost. Stablecoins, which are pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, are becoming mainstream for online and international payments. They offer near-instant settlement, high reliability, and programmability, effectively turning money into software. While adoption is still largely within crypto-native and global business contexts, integration with traditional finance is accelerating. U.S. policy developments, such as the proposed Clarity Act, could provide the regulatory framework needed for stablecoins to scale as part of global financial infrastructure. Major companies like Stripe, Fidelity, and SpaceX are already using or issuing stablecoins to cut costs, streamline cross-border payroll, and operate in regions with weak banking systems. A significant secondary effect is the strengthening of the U.S. dollar’s dominance. Stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether now hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, making them top holders. If growth continues, they could rank among the top 10 Treasury holders by next year. Ultimately, stablecoins are reshaping global finance by enabling borderless value tr...

Article Author: Chris Dixon

Article Translation: Block Unicorn

Chris Dixon is a General Partner at a16z, leading its crypto investment division

The internet globalized information, and cryptocurrency is having a similar effect on money. Although recent headlines may focus on Bitcoin's price, a deeper and more lasting transformation is underway in the digital payments space. This year, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the US dollar—are gradually becoming a mainstream choice for online and international payments.

Call it the "WhatsApp moment" for money. Just as messaging apps like WhatsApp reduced the cost of international texting from around 30 cents per message to zero, stablecoins are doing the same for financial transactions. The data confirms this: last year, after excluding bot and other non-rational trading, stablecoin transaction volume exceeded $12 trillion—approaching Visa's $17 trillion in volume for the same period, but at a much lower cost.

In the process, stablecoins are bringing the original open and interoperable vision of the internet to finance. Given that blockchain technology allows stablecoins to be programmed, money is effectively becoming software.

While most stablecoin transactions currently come from "crypto-native" and global commercial activities rather than everyday consumer spending, this is changing. As more improvements are introduced, such as integration with more traditional financial partners to make user transactions easier, mass adoption of stablecoins will follow.

People around the world using stablecoins for transactions will hardly notice they are using stablecoins. Most will think they are simply using US dollars. And that is indeed the case, as the distinction between stablecoins and dollars has become very abstract for end users. Since each token is backed by one dollar or equivalent assets, the name itself doesn't matter. What matters is that the product is more reliable than any previous payment technology, almost free, and settles much faster—almost instantly.

Stablecoins also demonstrate the infinite possibilities when policy and technology align. Last year's "Genius Act" established clear rules for US stablecoins. More importantly, Congress is currently reviewing the "Clarity Act," which aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins. The Clarity Act will help determine whether these networks can scale to become part of global financial infrastructure or will stagnate. When challengers are given a level playing field and space to innovate, markets work their magic. It was this magic that enabled the internet to triumph over incumbents; it was this magic that allowed the US to dominate the internet; and it is this magic that will enable stablecoins to surpass today's payment systems.

Businesses are already recognizing the advantages of stablecoins. Some of the world's largest tech companies, banks, and retailers are actively promoting the use of stablecoins, or, like Fidelity Investments, have already issued their own. Payment giant Stripe has acquired several cryptocurrency companies over the past year or so and now supports stablecoins at checkout, instantly reducing payment processing fees from about 3% to 1.5%, with plenty of room for further reduction. SpaceX uses stablecoins to move funds from countries like Argentina and Nigeria, where local banking systems are fragile or capital controls are strict. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees faster. Ultimately, the internet could transform into an open marketplace where machine-to-machine transactions thrive, and AI agents conduct trades and settlements on behalf of users in real time.

The adoption of stablecoins also has an often-underestimated second-order effect: these tokens solidify the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world, thereby creating strong new demand for US Treasury bonds. Leading stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether currently hold nearly $140 billion in short-term US government bonds directly, making them among the top 20 holders of US Treasuries today. If stablecoin adoption continues to grow at its current rate, their holdings could jump into the top 10 by next year. (Citi Research even predicts that by 2030, stablecoin holdings of US Treasuries could surpass those of foreign governments and commercial banks.)

This is not just about payments; it's about reshaping the global financial landscape. The internet gave us borderless communication; stablecoins give us borderless value transfer. With clear rules and a sound market structure, they can become the pipes and pillars of a new financial system.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat does Chris Dixon refer to as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money, and why?

AChris Dixon refers to the rise of stablecoins as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money because, similar to how WhatsApp reduced the cost of international messaging to nearly zero, stablecoins are drastically reducing the cost of financial transactions, making them cheaper, faster, and more accessible for online and international payments.

QHow does the transaction volume of stablecoins compare to Visa, and what is a key advantage of stablecoins mentioned?

ALast year, stablecoins processed over $12 trillion in transactions (excluding non-rational trades like bots), which is approaching Visa's $17 trillion volume. A key advantage is that stablecoin transactions are significantly cheaper and settle almost instantly.

QWhat two U.S. legislative acts are mentioned in relation to stablecoins, and what is their purpose?

AThe two acts are the 'Genius Act' and the 'Clarity Act'. The Genius Act established clear rules for stablecoins in the U.S., while the Clarity Act, currently under consideration, aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins to determine if they can scale as part of global financial infrastructure.

QHow do stablecoins benefit the U.S. Treasury and its global financial standing, according to the article?

AStablecoins consolidate the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world by creating strong new demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. Leading issuers like Circle and Tether hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. government bonds, making them top-20 holders. This demand is projected to grow, potentially making them a top-10 holder by next year.

QName two specific ways companies are already leveraging stablecoins for business operations.

A1. Companies like SpaceX use stablecoins to move funds from countries with fragile banking systems or strict capital controls (e.g., Argentina, Nigeria). 2. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees more quickly. Additionally, Stripe uses them to lower payment processing fees from ~3% to ~1.5% at checkout.

İlgili Okumalar

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报14 dk önce

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报14 dk önce

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit52 dk önce

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit52 dk önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2 saat önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片