a16z Crypto: 9 Charts to Understand the Evolution of Stablecoins

marsbit2026-04-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Stablecoins are evolving from trading instruments to core financial infrastructure, driven by regulatory clarity and increased adoption. Key trends include accelerated growth following the U.S. GENIUS Act and the EU’s MiCA framework, which spurred non-USD stablecoin activity. Consumer-to-business transactions are growing fastest, doubling in 2025, while stablecoin card usage has surged. Velocity has nearly doubled since 2024, indicating active use rather than passive holding. Geographically, Asia dominates volume, led by Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan. Notably, domestic transactions now account for nearly three-quarters of payments, highlighting stablecoins' role as local payment mediums on global infrastructure. Non-USD stablecoins, like Brazil’s BRLA, are also gaining traction. The data suggests stablecoins are becoming ubiquitous payment tools—global in design but increasingly local in practice.

Author: a16z crypto

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

Stablecoins have been finding their footing for years.

Initially, they were just a trading tool, a means to transfer dollars across exchanges. Then they evolved into a savings instrument, held rather than spent. Today, the data points in a new direction: stablecoins are increasingly becoming core financial infrastructure.

The following nine charts reveal the factors driving this trend.

Regulation Accelerates Market Growth

For most of their history, regulatory uncertainty limited institutional participation. Later, the GENIUS Act brought regulatory clarity. It didn't create this trend, but it amplified and accelerated it.

In the United States, the GENIUS Act established the first federal-level framework for stablecoin issuance. This shift is clearly visible in the data: adjusted trading volume had been rising for several quarters before the bill's passage, and growth accelerated further after its passage, reaching approximately $4.5 trillion in Q1 2026.

European regulation—the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework—tells a more complex story. When the法案 fully came into effect at the end of 2024, several major exchanges delisted USDT to comply, leading to a surge in activity for non-dollar stablecoins, which一度 exceeded $40 billion.

Since then, trading volume has stabilized at levels higher than the pre-MiCA baseline, around $15 billion to $25 billion per month. Regulation created a lasting market for non-dollar stablecoins that previously barely existed.

Stablecoin Commercial Activity is Growing

Perhaps the most noteworthy structural change lies in how people are actually using stablecoins.

In terms of raw transaction count, the C2C category far surpasses all others: reaching 789.5 million in 2025. But Consumer-to-Business (C2B) stablecoin transactions grew the fastest, reaching 284.6 million in 2025 compared to 124.9 million in 2024, more than doubling year-over-year (+128%).

Data from stablecoin card infrastructure highlights this trend.

Monthly collateral deposits for stablecoin card programs supported by Rain (including Etherfi Cash, Kast, Wallbit, etc.) grew from nearly zero in November 2024 to over $300 million per month by early 2026. While this is collateral supporting spending, not direct spending of stablecoins, the trajectory is striking: stablecoin commercial activity is on the rise.

Stablecoin Velocity is Increasing

Every dollar of stablecoin supply is turning over more frequently.

Since early 2024, the velocity of stablecoins (the ratio of adjusted monthly transfer volume to circulating supply) has almost doubled, rising from 2.6x to 6x. An increase in velocity means demand for stablecoin transactions is outpacing new issuance, and the existing supply is working harder.

This is a hallmark of a true payment network—the base currency is being actively used, not just held.

Stablecoin Volume Reflects More Payments

If trading, fund flows, and exchange mechanisms—which make up the bulk of stablecoin transactions—are excluded, the estimated total for payments between different entities last year was still between $350 billion and $550 billion.

By volume, the Business-to-Business (B2B) sector dominates stablecoin payments (unsurprising given its scale). But other sectors, such as direct Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) payments and interactions with merchants, are also expanding rapidly.

Stablecoin Payments are Currently Concentrated in Specific Regions

Geographically, stablecoin payment activity is not evenly distributed.

Nearly two-thirds of the transaction volume comes from Asia, primarily concentrated in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.

North America accounts for about a quarter. Europe's share is around 13%. Latin America and Africa together make up only a very small portion, less than $1 billion.

Not Just Cross-Border Payments, But Local Currencies on Global Rails

The development of non-dollar stablecoins is not limited to Europe; it is also evident in emerging markets, driven by various factors.

Brazil is a prime example. The monthly transfer volume of BRLA (a stablecoin backed by the Brazilian Real) has grown from nearly zero in early 2023 to about $400 million per month by early 2026. Access to the PIX instant payment network has driven its adoption.

Although stablecoins are often described as cross-border tools, the proportion of cross-border activity has actually been declining, not rising.

Domestic transactions (stablecoin transfers occurring within the same country/region) have grown from about half of the payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026. What does this mean? Stablecoins are not only establishing themselves as remittance or forex tools but also becoming a local payment medium running on global infrastructure.

Putting all these factors together, a clear picture emerges, though it's not the one most people expected: many thought stablecoins would be purely focused on cross-border transactions. Instead, they are becoming increasingly localized.

While the US dollar remains the core f币锚定 for the vast majority of stablecoins, stablecoins are by no means simply an export of the dollar. Non-dollar variants, such as euro-backed and Brazilian real-backed local currency stablecoins, are gaining popularity.

Although peer-to-peer (C2C) stablecoin transfers far exceed other types of payment flows in quantity, increasingly usage is flowing towards everyday consumption (C2B).

Each quarter's data provides more evidence that stablecoins are developing into general-purpose payment infrastructure. They are global by design but increasingly local in practice.

It's still early days. But the shape of this system is becoming clearer.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the impact of the GENIUS Act on stablecoin trading volume in the US?

AThe GENIUS Act established the first federal-level framework for stablecoin issuance in the US. Before its passage, adjusted trading volume had been increasing for several consecutive quarters. After its enactment, growth accelerated further, reaching approximately $4.5 trillion in Q1 2026.

QWhich region accounts for the largest share of stablecoin payment volume, and which specific areas are the main contributors?

AAsia accounts for nearly two-thirds of the stablecoin payment volume. The main contributors are Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.

QWhat is the most significant structural change in how people use stablecoins, as indicated by transaction growth?

AThe most significant structural change is the growth in Consumer-to-Business (C2B) stablecoin transactions. This category saw the fastest growth, more than doubling (+128%) from 124.9 million transactions in 2024 to 284.6 million in 2025.

QWhat does the increasing velocity of stablecoins indicate about their use?

AThe increasing velocity of stablecoins, which nearly doubled from 2.6x to 6x since early 2024, indicates that the demand for stablecoin transactions is outpacing new issuance. It means the existing supply is circulating more frequently, which is a hallmark of a genuine payment network where the base currency is being actively used, not just held.

QContrary to common belief, what trend is observed in the proportion of cross-border stablecoin activity?

AContrary to the common belief that stablecoins are primarily for cross-border transactions, the proportion of cross-border activity has actually been decreasing. Domestic transactions (stablecoin transfers within the same country/region) grew from about half of the payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026.

İlgili Okumalar

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit17 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit17 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit46 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit46 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 saat önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 saat önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片