A $20 Billion Valuation: Kalshi and Polymarket in an Arms Race?

marsbit2026-03-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A potential "arms race" is brewing in the prediction market sector, with industry leaders Polymarket and Kalshi each reportedly in funding talks at valuations around $20 billion. This represents a near doubling of their respective $12 billion and $11 billion valuations from late 2025. As of February 2026, the global prediction market has reached a cumulative notional trading volume of $127.5 billion. Polymarket leads with $56.07 billion, followed closely by Kalshi at $44.71 billion, together commanding 79% market share. Their growth trajectories differ: Kalshi has experienced explosive user growth, with monthly active users surging from 600,000 to over 5.1 million in 2025, while Polymarket's user growth has been steadier, peaking around 700,000 monthly active users. Kalshi's trading volume skyrocketed over 1100% in 2025, largely driven by sports contracts which account for 81% of its volume. It has secured key partnerships with platforms like Robinhood, which contributed over 50% of its volume in late 2025, and media outlets like CNBC and CNN. Polymarket maintains a stronghold in political and crypto event markets. It has formed significant partnerships with X (formerly Twitter), ICE (for a strategic investment up to $2 billion), and the UFC for exclusive prediction market data. Both platforms are also official partners of the NHL, and their data is integrated into Google's search and finance products. Their divergent strategies—Kalshi's focus on USD-compliant trading and...

Recently, according to The Wall Street Journal, the two leading prediction market platforms, Polymarket and Kalshi, have been in talks with potential investors for funding rounds, each with an estimated valuation of around $20 billion. In November 2025, it was reported that Polymarket was negotiating funding at a $12 billion valuation. That December, Kalshi completed a $1 billion funding round, bringing its valuation to $11 billion.

In just a few months, the valuations have nearly doubled again.

According to public market data and industry reports, as of the end of February 2026, the cumulative nominal trading volume of the global prediction market reached $127.5 billion, with Polymarket leading at $56.07 billion and Kalshi at $44.71 billion, together accounting for 79% of the market share.

While leading in cumulative trading volume, Kalshi showed more outstanding growth in 2025, not only reversing its market share from a minority position at the beginning of the year to over 60% but also driving its monthly active users (MAU) from 600,000 to over 5.1 million, demonstrating a faster pace of scale expansion. In contrast, Polymarket, leveraging its crypto-native advantages, maintained its global event coverage and cumulative trading lead, but its user growth was relatively steady, with peak MAU hovering around 700,000. The two core metrics—trading volume and MAU—clearly outline Kalshi's explosive catch-up and Polymarket's sustained深耕 (deep cultivation), forming a duopoly in the prediction market.

Specifically regarding trading volume performance, Kalshi's growth trajectory shows a leap from a low base to a high volume.

In 2024, Kalshi's annual nominal trading volume was approximately $1.9 billion, limited by early regulatory frameworks and market awareness, primarily driven by a few events. Entering 2025, this number surged to about $23.8 billion, a year-on-year increase of over 1100%. This explosion was directly reflected in monthly and weekly records: September single-month trading reached $2.86 billion, October further climbed to $4.39 billion, and December skyrocketed to $6.58 billion. The strong momentum continued into the beginning of 2026, with January's monthly trading exceeding $10.4 billion.

Sports event contracts contributed about 81% of this trading volume.

As of March 9, Kalshi's cumulative total trading volume exceeded $48.6 billion. Currently, its open interest hovers around $500 million.

Polymarket's trading volume reflects its earlier accumulation advantage and later steady maintenance. Dune Analytics data shows that in 2024, Polymarket's monthly nominal trading volume experienced explosive growth, reaching a historical high of $4.266 billion in October 2024, bringing its cumulative trading volume to $7.6 billion.

Subsequently, although its monthly trading volume slowly declined, it remained at a high level. The turning point occurred in September 2025, when Polymarket began its pulse-like surge in trading volume.

October single-month trading broke $4.1 billion, November broke $4.3 billion.

By 2026, in January alone, its trading volume broke $7.658 billion, and February broke $7.9 billion. As of March 9, its cumulative trading volume exceeded $59.9 billion.

According to Dune data statistics, its total number of users has skyrocketed from 40,000 in 2024 to 2.31 million today.

It is worth noting that Polymarket still holds an advantage in liquidity depth for political and crypto events, with some weekly transaction counts accounting for up to 57%, but its overall market share dropped from 95% to 35-40% in mid-2025 before gradually stabilizing.

The divergence in trading volume data between the two platforms essentially stems from differences in business focus and user access models. Kalshi, as a CFTC-regulated entity, focuses on compliant trading in USD, covering over 42 US states. Kalshi gains the upper hand in sports dominance, while Polymarket maintains a lead in political and crypto domains, jointly pushing the entire market's weekly nominal trading volume to stably remain in the tens of billions of dollars.

In terms of ecosystem partnerships, the two major prediction markets are also frequently active, deeply integrating with mainstream institutions, media, and sports IPs. Both are not only opening offline pop-up shops but also expanding疯狂 (frantically) online.

Kalshi focuses on leveraging its compliance advantages, forming a strategic partnership with Tradeweb and receiving a minority equity investment, embedding real-time probability data into its institutional trading platform; Robinhood became its largest traffic source, contributing over 50% of trading volume in the second half of 2025; simultaneously, it secured exclusive media partnerships with CNBC and CNN, with data directly integrated into programs and reports.

Polymarket, on the other hand, emphasizes Wall Street data output and entertainment penetration. In June last year, Polymarket partnered with X, becoming its official prediction partner. It secured a strategic investment of up to $2 billion from ICE, which incorporates the data into financial product streams. In November, Polymarket reached a multi-year exclusive agreement with TKO Group, becoming the official prediction market partner for UFC and Zuffa Boxing, with data integrated into broadcasts and live events.

In January 2026, Polymarket entered an exclusive partnership with Dow Jones-owned media, providing prediction market data to media outlets including Barron's and The Wall Street Journal.

Interestingly, both are official NHL prediction market partners. Additionally, Google has integrated data from both into its search and finance platforms.

Overall, judging from the trading volume and MAU data over the past two years, both are jointly driving the evolution of prediction markets from niche tools into mainstream information and risk management platforms. This trend is not only reshaping the valuation logic of the crypto industry but also providing real-time signal references for traditional finance. If subsequent funding rounds materialize, coupled with热门 (hot) geopolitical events (US-Iran conflict), World Cup tournaments, and the eve of the US election, various data points for both platforms in 2026 are expected to break historical records.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the current valuations of Polymarket and Kalshi, and how have they changed recently?

ABoth Polymarket and Kalshi are currently in talks with potential investors at valuations around $20 billion. In November 2025, Polymarket was negotiating funding at a $12 billion valuation, and in December 2025, Kalshi completed a $1 billion financing round at an $11 billion valuation. Their valuations have nearly doubled in just a few months.

QWhich platform leads in cumulative nominal trading volume, and what is the combined market share of these two companies?

AAs of the end of February 2026, Polymarket leads with a cumulative nominal trading volume of $56.07 billion, followed by Kalshi with $44.71 billion. Together, they account for 79% of the global prediction market share.

QWhat drove Kalshi's explosive growth in trading volume in 2025?

AKalshi's trading volume surged by over 1100% in 2025, driven primarily by sports event contracts, which contributed approximately 81% of its trading volume. Key monthly records included $6.58 billion in December 2025 and over $10.4 billion in January 2026.

QHow do Polymarket and Kalshi differ in their business focus and user access models?

AKalshi, as a CFTC-regulated entity, focuses on compliant USD trading and is available in over 42 U.S. states, with a strong emphasis on sports contracts. Polymarket leverages its crypto-native advantages, maintaining leadership in political and crypto events, and uses cryptocurrency for settlements.

QWhat major partnerships have Polymarket and Kalshi established to expand their influence?

AKalshi partnered with Tradeweb for institutional data integration, Robinhood for significant traffic, and CNBC and CNN for media coverage. Polymarket collaborated with X (Twitter) as its official prediction partner, ICE for a strategic investment, TKO Group for UFC and boxing data, and Dow Jones media outlets including The Wall Street Journal.

İlgili Okumalar

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit31 dk önce

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit31 dk önce

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

In June 2026, Reuters investigations revealed that since Donald Trump's return to the White House, his family has accumulated roughly $2.3 billion in profits from four core crypto ventures: World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the $TRUMP meme coin, American Bitcoin, and ALT5 Sigma (later renamed AI Financial). Coincidentally, overall investor losses in these projects were estimated to be a similar amount. The businesses, spanning DeFi, stablecoins, meme coins, Bitcoin mining, and digital payments, largely relied not on technological innovation but on converting the political influence and notoriety of the Trump brand into financial assets sold to the market. This marks a dramatic shift from Trump's earlier skepticism of cryptocurrencies. The ventures operated on a similar logic: leveraging the Trump name to generate market hype and trust, attracting investment through token sales or public listings, and enabling the family to capture profits upfront through equity, token allocations, and fees, while later entrants often bore the brunt of the risk as markets cooled. WLFI, the most profitable venture, generated an estimated $1.6 billion for the family, primarily through sales of its locked, illiquid governance token and its USD1 stablecoin. The $TRUMP meme coin, a direct monetization of the presidential IP, brought in over $600 million for Trump-linked entities before its price crashed nearly 97% from its peak. American Bitcoin gained a "Trump stock" premium for its mining operations, and ALT5 Sigma/AI Financial combined Trump, AI, and crypto themes for a temporary valuation surge. The episode underscores how political influence can be packaged into financial assets, creating substantial wealth for promoters while highlighting the risks for investors who base decisions on hype and brand allegiance over fundamental business models and cash flows.

marsbit1 saat önce

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片