FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

cryptonews.ru2026-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, is facing accusations of insolvency and withdrawal issues, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse. Despite announcing a gradual wind-down until January 2027 and assuring users they could withdraw assets, reports emerged of significant problems shortly after. On-chain analysts noted unusually low withdrawal volumes, with some users reporting failed or stuck transactions. BitMart's CEO, Sheldon Xia, eventually broke the company's silence on August 8, 2026, claiming the team was consolidating assets for an orderly shutdown and denied misappropriating funds, mentioning potential court and auditor involvement. However, new complaints arose. A user named BeardStaff claimed $10.1 million was stuck, while Matthew Wang, co-founder of market maker OpenGradient, accused BitMart of insolvency, noting his firm's funds were also trapped. Wang highlighted a suspicious offer from BitMart for high-yield, locked staking just a week before the closure announcement. Numerous other users reported being unable to withdraw sums ranging from thousands to millions of dollars. Several crypto projects, including Gen6, Paxi Network, and Scandic Coin, are pursuing legal action. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows BitMart's wallet holdings have plummeted from over $100 million in early July 2026 to around $36.4 million, while CoinMarketCap data indicates reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in BitMart's native BMX token.

The cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, has faced criticism, for example from OpenGradient market maker co-founder Matthew Wang. It is being accused of insolvency and delays in withdrawing funds.

What is happening with BitMart?

At the end of July 2026, the company announced its closure. It is assumed that the platform will gradually wind down all operations by the end of January 2027. At the same time, BitMart particularly highlighted the fact that assets can be withdrawn even after the start of the transition period.

Despite this, the very next day on-chain experts Lookonchain reported certain problems with the platform. About $805,000 was withdrawn from it in 24 hours from 58 wallets, which, as analysts emphasized, is little for such a platform.

They also drew attention to the fact that for eight hours, not a single withdrawal from BitMart was recorded. Furthermore, some users directly pointed out the inability to receive funds, as transactions were processed for a long time and with errors.

Since the closure announcement, the exchange has not commented on the situation. Only on August 8, 2026, BitMart CEO Sheldon Xia published a message trying to reassure users.

According to him, the team is still consolidating assets, ensuring an orderly wind-down of operations.

"We have not misappropriated any assets nor have we taken any steps for premature withdrawal of funds or evasion of our obligations. We are considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report," he stated.

New Complaints

On August 9, a user under the pseudonym BeardStaff stated on his X (formerly Twitter) page that a sum of $10.1 million was stuck on the exchange for him. He also pointed to suspicious behavior by team members. For example, his manager Tony deleted his Telegram account, and members of the management are not responding to requests to comment on the situation.

The trader asked BitMart's top management to clarify the situation and provide confirmation that the funds are safe. He also began collecting an evidence base from other victims.

His post was commented on by Matthew Wang. According to him, the funds of the OpenGradient market maker are also stuck on the exchange. He called the platform insolvent.

Furthermore, Wang attached screenshots of BitMart's proposal to lock up crypto assets for a period of six months with yields of up to 15% per annum, put forward a week before the exchange's closure. The CEO of OpenGradient considers this suspicious and unethical.

Numerous other victims commented on the post. The amounts stuck on the exchange range from relatively small, for example $3,000, to substantial.

A user under the pseudonym King David tried to withdraw $24,000 from the platform but received only $5.

"Many of us have begun to wonder if another scenario, similar to FTX, is unfolding here. [...] Now you [Sheldon Xia] have mentioned involving courts and third parties. Whatever legal or commercial complexities arise within BitMart's company, they should not become a burden for customers. We placed our funds with BitMart and are simply asking for them to be returned to us in a timely manner," he emphasized.

The team of the crypto project Gen6 stated that they contacted the Hungarian police due to problems withdrawing $80,000. The organization noted that they intend to use all possible legal levers to secure the return of funds.

Similar statements were also made by Paxi Network and Scandic Coin. They all point out that their withdrawal requests are not being processed.

According to Arkham Intelligence, wallets associated with BitMart hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million. As of early July 2026, the balance exceeded $100 million.

According to CoinMarketCap, the exchange's reserves amount to $4.6 million. And most of it is in the native token BMX.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the primary accusation against the BitMart crypto exchange?

AThe primary accusation against BitMart is insolvency and delays in processing withdrawals of funds, with users and analysts suggesting it could be following a scenario similar to FTX.

QWhat specific evidence did analysts from Lookonchain provide to suggest BitMart was having problems?

AOn-chain analysts from Lookonchain reported that over 24 hours, only about $805,000 was withdrawn from BitMart across 58 wallets, which they noted was very low for such a platform. They also highlighted an 8-hour period with no recorded withdrawals at all.

QWhat did CEO Sheldon Xia announce in his August 8 statement regarding BitMart's situation?

AIn his statement on August 8, CEO Sheldon Xia claimed the team was still consolidating assets to ensure an orderly wind-down of operations. He denied misappropriating any assets and stated the company was considering involving courts and independent third-party auditors to prepare a transparent report.

QWhat suspicious action did Matthew Wang, co-founder of OpenGradient, highlight regarding BitMart's activities before its closure?

AMatthew Wang highlighted a suspicious and unethical proposal from BitMart, made just a week before announcing its closure, that offered users up to 15% annual yield for locking their crypto assets on the platform for six months.

QWhat discrepancy is reported between the assets held on BitMart's wallets and its official reserves according to the article?

AThe article reports a discrepancy between on-chain data and official reserve figures. According to Arkham Intelligence, BitMart's wallets hold crypto assets worth $36.4 million, down from over $100 million in early July. However, CoinMarketCap data shows the exchange's official reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in its native BMX token.

İlgili Okumalar

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

The article analyzes the apparent failure of HyperEVM, the application engine of the Hyperliquid blockchain, contrasting it with the success of its core trading engine, HyperCore. Hyperliquid operates on a dual-engine architecture. HyperCore is a closed, high-performance order-book exchange for perpetuals and spot trading, which dominates on-chain volume and generates massive fees. HyperEVM, launched in February 2025, is an EVM-compatible layer meant for DeFi applications like lending and DEXs, which can access HyperCore's liquidity. Despite Hyperliquid's overall strength in a bear market, a stark divergence exists: * **HyperCore (Trading):** Captures over half of on-chain perpetual volume, generating ~$56M in fees over 30 days. * **HyperEVM (Applications):** All DeFi protocols combined generate less than $60M in fees. TVL is shrinking, daily active addresses are low (~8k), and the ecosystem lacks diversity. The DEX sector is particularly anemic, with most volume concentrated in a single protocol. The article identifies four key reasons for HyperEVM's struggles: 1. **Core Monopoly on Execution:** HyperCore exclusively handles order matching. This makes native DEXs on HyperEVM redundant and limits viable applications to those leveraging its order book (e.g., staking, lending). 2. **Architectural Concentration:** Shared liquidity across interfaces naturally leads to a "winner-takes-most" outcome, explaining the high concentration in both the trading (e.g., trade.xyz) and application layers. 3. **"No Insider" Philosophy:** Hyperliquid's commitment to fair launch means it provides no grants, business development, or marketing support to ecosystem projects, stunting growth. 4. **Complex Developer Experience:** The asynchronous design between HyperEVM and HyperCore (via the CoreWriter contract) creates non-standard development hurdles, as EVM transactions don't roll back if the core action fails. The conclusion is that HyperEVM's weakness is a deliberate trade-off, not an accident. Hyperliquid prioritized building an unbeatable trading engine, sacrificing the development of a broad, independent application ecosystem. HyperEVM functions more as a tokenization layer for HyperCore's liquidity rather than a general-purpose chain. The debate isn't whether it's "dead"—it serves a niche—but whether Hyperliquid ever intended to build a thriving, diverse DeFi ecosystem beyond its core trading product.

marsbit36 dk önce

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

marsbit36 dk önce

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

SuperPure Applied Materials (Stock Code: 301717) debuted on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext board. The company issued 25.4615 million shares at an offering price of 65.99 yuan per share, raising approximately 1.68 billion yuan. The stock opened at 450 yuan, soaring 582% from the IPO price, and closed at 503 yuan, up 662%, giving the company a market capitalization of 51.2 billion yuan. The company specializes in special coating processes and related technologies and materials, providing precision components and services for the semiconductor manufacturing and precision optics sectors. Its products cover core equipment parts for wafer fabrication, packaging, and silicon wafer manufacturing, with notable technical advantages in etching, lithography, measurement/inspection, annealing, and thin-film deposition equipment. Financially, SuperPure reported revenues of 169 million, 260 million, and 496 million yuan for 2023, 2024, and 2025 respectively, with corresponding net profits of 64.8 million, 82.26 million, and 185 million yuan. For Q1 2026, revenue reached 147 million yuan, a 62% year-over-year increase. The company forecasts H1 2026 revenue between 270 to 290 million yuan and net profit between 103 to 110 million yuan. The company's controlling shareholder and actual controller is Chai Jie, who directly and indirectly controls 48.23% of the voting rights. Together with his brother Chai Lin, a concerted action person, they control a total of 68.84% of the voting rights. Major pre-IPO shareholders included GSD Venture Capital, BYD, and AMEC.

marsbit1 saat önce

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片