Why P2P and Exchangers Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them

cryptonews.ru2026-07-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Titled "Why P2P and Exchanges Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them," this article discusses the evolution of stablecoins, particularly USDT, from a trading tool to a global payment method. However, converting crypto back to fiat for daily expenses remains a challenge. The process of using P2P platforms or crypto exchanges has become increasingly risky and complex due to stricter banking anti-fraud measures, new legislation in Russia, and rampant fraud schemes like "triangles," where sellers can inadvertently receive stolen funds. The article highlights that while P2P was convenient, banks now scrutinize frequent peer-to-peer transfers, often freezing accounts. Exchanges also pose risks like unfavorable rates and unclear compliance. The market is therefore shifting towards integrated services that eliminate the manual conversion step. It cites OneSix as an example—a crypto wallet accessible via Telegram and web that embeds currency conversion directly into payment and withdrawal scenarios. Users can pay bills or send money as if using a bank app, with the crypto-to-fiat exchange happening seamlessly in the background. It also offers invoicing for freelancers and conducts AML checks, returning suspicious transactions instantly instead of freezing them. In conclusion, as crypto integrates into everyday finance, the demand for manual, risky exchange methods is declining. The future lies in unified platforms that combine storage, compliance, conversion, and payment...

Over the past few years, $USDT has transformed from a cryptocurrency trading tool into a universal means for international settlements. Freelancers and IT specialists receive payments in stablecoins, relocants use them for transfers between countries, and for many entrepreneurs, $USDT is the most convenient and fastest way to settle payments with foreign counterparties for deliveries of components from abroad.

Transfers in $USDT and other cryptocurrencies are fast, the coins are credited to wallets. However, users then face the problem of how to convert the cryptocurrency into fiat, as most routine payments in a person's life are conducted in fiat money. For example, rubles are needed to pay utility bills, send money to relatives, buy plane tickets, or order home delivery of groceries. Most often, the user has to go through the same chain: find an exchanger or a cryptocurrency buyer on a P2P platform, sell $USDT, wait for the rubles to arrive, and only then make the necessary payment.

However, over recent years, the process of exchanging cryptocurrency for rubles has become noticeably more complicated. Increased bank anti-fraud measures, crackdowns on money mules, a rise in fraudulent schemes, and the development of compliance procedures have made the cryptocurrency exchange process riskier than before. The situation will worsen in the coming year, as the State Duma has passed in the second and third readings a bill tightening the rules for handling digital currencies in Russia.

What's Wrong with P2P

For many users, P2P was the easiest way to exchange cryptocurrency for rubles at the market rate. The model seemed quite convenient: one user transfers rubles, the other sends cryptocurrency. The exchange acts as a guarantor of the transaction and holds the assets until the exchange is completed.

The problem lies in the fact that the bank does not see the cryptocurrency part of the deal. It only sees a transfer from an unknown individual. If there are many such operations, they can trigger internal monitoring systems.

The reason is the increase in cryptocurrency-related fraud and, as a consequence, changes in legislation, primarily in Federal Law No. 161-FZ "On the National Payment System," as well as requirements for combating money laundering (Law 115-FZ).
According to the Central Bank of Russia, the volume of operations without the voluntary consent of clients in 2025 exceeded 27 billion rubles, and a significant portion of the stolen funds passed through the accounts of individuals used as money mules.

Now banks analyze:

  • the number of incoming transfers;
  • the number of senders;
  • the speed of subsequent withdrawal of funds;
  • matches with known fraudulent patterns;
  • links to details from the Central Bank of Russia's database.

If a transaction seems atypical or raises questions, the bank may request additional explanations and documents.

The Main Risk: "Triangles"

One of the most common problems in the P2P market remains the fraudulent scheme known as the "triangle" or "triangulation." It works as follows: a fraudster simultaneously negotiates with a victim and a cryptocurrency seller. The seller is confident they are selling $USDT to an ordinary buyer. At the same time, the fraudster convinces a third person to transfer money to the seller's card under any pretext: a transfer to a "safe account," helping a relative, buying goods, or another common ruse.

After the seller receives the transfer, they send the cryptocurrency to the fraudster's wallet, considering the deal complete.

Problems arise later, often months after the transaction. When the victim realizes they have been part of a fraud scheme, they contact the bank and law enforcement. The only known details are the card to which the money was sent—that is, the cryptocurrency seller's card.

As a result, the person who themselves became part of the fraudulent scheme and never communicated with the victim may find that they become a subject of a criminal case, their accounts are frozen, and their data is included in the Central Bank of Russia's database of suspicious transactions.

Exchangers allow users to avoid direct contact with unfamiliar counterparties but do not eliminate the risk of being drawn into dubious schemes.

But risks remain here too:

  • users need to choose a reliable service;
  • rates can differ significantly from exchange rates;
  • delays are possible during transaction verification;
  • some exchangers operate without clear jurisdiction and compliance procedures.

The user does not know who is sending money to their card, has no guarantee that the exchanger is not using money mule cards for settlements. The main issue is that the user is still forced to manually solve the exchange problem every time.

This is precisely why the market has started moving towards services that combine cryptocurrency storage, conversion, and payment operations in one interface. This principle is the foundation of services trying to eliminate the very need to "go exchange cryptocurrency." One such example is OneSix.

How OneSix Solves This Problem

OneSix is a cryptocurrency wallet operating via a Telegram MiniApp and a web interface. Users have access to $USDT on the TRC-20, ERC-20, and BEP-20 networks, as well as BTC, ETH, BNB, TRX, and LTC.

The main feature of OneSix is that cryptocurrency exchange is built into the user scenario and ceases to be a separate operation. For the user, everything looks like paying for a product or service with cryptocurrency, although that is not the case: the process of exchanging cryptocurrency for fiat is simply "embedded" inside and invisible to the user.

For the user, the process looks much like paying through a regular banking app.

The withdrawal process works similarly. If it's necessary to send money to relatives or withdraw part of the income in fiat, the user can exchange $USDT within the wallet, for example, for rubles, and send the funds to a bank card without searching for exchangers and facing the risks associated with P2P platforms.

In addition, through OneSix, users can create invoices and payment links to receive cross-border transfers in digital assets. This can be convenient for freelancers, developers, and small companies working with foreign clients.

In OneSix, incoming transactions undergo verification. However, unlike other services, if assets do not comply with the service's AML policy requirements or carry a high risk, they are not credited to the balance and are immediately returned to the sender instead of being frozen.

P2P and exchangers were an important stage in the development of the crypto market, but today they no longer solve the user's main task: to safely and conveniently use digital assets in everyday life. The more cryptocurrency becomes part of real financial scenarios, the fewer people are willing to independently search for counterparties, verify the origin of funds, and understand the risks of each transaction. Therefore, the market is gradually moving from manual exchange to services where storage, verification, conversion, and payments are combined in one place.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, why are P2P platforms and exchanges becoming more problematic for converting cryptocurrency to fiat?

AThe process has become more risky and complex due to increased bank anti-fraud measures, the fight against money mules ('drops'), a rise in fraudulent schemes, stricter compliance procedures, and the adoption of new laws in Russia tightening rules on digital currencies.

QWhat is the major fraudulent risk associated with P2P exchanges described in the text?

AThe major risk is the 'triangle' fraud scheme, where a scammer simultaneously negotiates with a victim and a crypto seller. The victim is tricked into sending fiat to the seller's card, the seller then sends crypto to the scammer, and later the victim reports the fraud, making the seller a suspect.

QHow does the service OneSix, mentioned in the article, aim to solve the problem of cryptocurrency exchange?

AOneSix integrates the exchange of cryptocurrency into the user's payment flow, making it invisible. It combines crypto storage, conversion, and payment operations in one interface, allowing users to pay for goods or send money as if using a regular bank app, without manually finding an exchange counterparty.

QWhat are the key factors that banks in Russia now analyze regarding user transactions, as per the article?

ABanks analyze the number of incoming transfers, the number of senders, the speed of subsequent fund withdrawals, whether operations match known fraudulent patterns, and any connections to details in the Bank of Russia's database of suspicious operations.

QWhat is a key advantage of OneSix's transaction verification process compared to some other services?

AIf incoming assets do not meet the service's AML policy requirements or are high-risk, OneSix does not freeze them on the user's balance. Instead, the assets are immediately returned to the sender, reducing risk and potential inconvenience for the receiver.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Panicking? Mythos Cracks Post-Quantum Cryptography Algorithm in 60 Hours

Claude Mythos Preview, a new AI system from Anthropic, has made significant breakthroughs in fundamental cryptanalysis, targeting the mathematics underlying algorithms rather than just implementation bugs. Its first target was HAWK, a candidate in the NIST post-quantum signature standardization process. Mythos identified a previously unexploited symmetry (a nontrivial automorphism) in the lattice structure of HAWK, effectively halving its effective key strength. It achieved this feat in just 60 hours, a task that had eluded two years of human expert review. Crucially, the human operator was not a lattice cryptography expert, primarily managing the project while AI agents debated and discovered the attack path. Its second, more dramatic achievement was against a simplified 7-round version of AES-128, the world's most widely used symmetric encryption algorithm. Initially reluctant, stating the task was "impossible," Mythos was prompted to "try novel ideas." It then autonomously rewrote its own agent framework and proceeded to discover a novel attack method it named "Möbius Bridge." This technique bypasses a critical 256-guess step in previous "meet-in-the-middle" attacks, resulting in a speedup of 200-800 times. Both findings are currently "harmless"—HAWK is not deployed, and full AES-128 remains secure. However, the process reveals a profound shift. Mythos completed the AES discovery in about a week, while human researchers spent nearly a month verifying its correctness. This highlights a new bottleneck: the rate of AI-driven discovery may soon outpace human capacity for verification. The research concludes with a pressing, unanswered question: what happens when such an AI finds a critical flaw in a widely deployed, real-world cryptosystem?

marsbit8 dk önce

Bitcoin Panicking? Mythos Cracks Post-Quantum Cryptography Algorithm in 60 Hours

marsbit8 dk önce

From Computing to Storage: The Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Industry Chain is Taking Shape

The article "From Computing to Storage: The 2D Semiconductor Industry Chain is Taking Shape" discusses the rise of two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors as a pivotal material in the post-Moore era. As silicon-based chips approach physical limits, 2D semiconductors like molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), offer atomic-layer thinness and superior electrical properties, making them a promising non-silicon alternative for advanced nodes beyond 1nm. Globally, industry leaders like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung, along with research institutes like IMEC, are actively investing in this field. Domestically in China, significant progress is being made across the entire supply chain, from material production and equipment R&D to chip integration and ecosystem development. **Key highlights include:** * **Material & Equipment Breakthroughs:** Chinese research teams and companies like Jimo Xin Technology have achieved mass production of 6-inch and 8-inch 2D semiconductor single-crystal wafers using domestically developed equipment like Oxy-MOCVD. This addresses the critical challenge of large-area, high-quality material growth. Breakthroughs have also been made in p-type 2D materials (e.g., MoSi2N4) and wafer-scale ferroelectric thin films, essential for building complementary circuits and low-power transistors. * **Engineering Ecosystem Formation:** A landmark 8-inch 2D semiconductor pilot line in Pudong has become fully operational, bridging the gap between lab research and industrial manufacturing. The release of a Process Design Kit (PDK) compatible with mainstream EDA tools further connects design and fabrication, supporting wafer-level manufacturing of complex circuits. * **Expanding Application Landscape:** Applications are expanding from logic computing to memory. Chinese researchers have developed pioneering 2D semiconductor-based microprocessors, including a 32-bit RISC-V CPU and a higher-density multi-bit parallel processor. In memory, 2D materials' ultra-low leakage current enables DRAM with exceptionally long data retention and advances toward single-electron non-volatile storage. 2D semiconductors also show unique potential in RF circuits, radiation-hardened communications, flexible electronics, and quantum computing. In conclusion, the 2D semiconductor industry in China is rapidly advancing from laboratory research into the engineering validation and small-batch production phase. A complete industrial chain covering materials, equipment, manufacturing, design, and application is初步 forming, positioning the sector as a new competitive dimension in the global semiconductor landscape.

marsbit13 dk önce

From Computing to Storage: The Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Industry Chain is Taking Shape

marsbit13 dk önce

Coinbase and Robinhood Vie for the Next Phase of Cryptocurrency Market Evolution Ahead of Earnings Reports

Coinbase and Robinhood are set to report their Q2 2026 financial results this week, with the outcomes serving as key indicators for the future direction of the crypto market. While both companies have grown from their 2021 IPOs—Coinbase as a dedicated crypto exchange and Robinhood as a commission-free brokerage that expanded into crypto—their paths are now converging in competition. Analysts project Robinhood to report a profit of about $0.40 per share on ~$1.25B revenue, while Coinbase is expected to post a loss of ~$0.36 per share on ~$1.3B revenue. Despite similar revenue figures, investors value Robinhood more highly, viewing it as a diversified fintech firm rather than a pure-play crypto company. This perception has been reinforced as Robinhood gained retail trading market share, with its quarterly trading volume growing from ~$261B in early 2024 to over $704B in Q1 2026, outpacing Coinbase's growth to ~$517B. Both companies are investing heavily in blockchain-based financial infrastructure, such as tokenized stocks and stablecoins, to build more sustainable revenue streams beyond transaction fees. Coinbase has successfully reduced its reliance on trading fees, with subscription/service revenue and stablecoin revenue seeing significant growth. However, over half of its subscription revenue is tied to USDC, exposing it to new competition from banks and payment processors launching rival stablecoins. Robinhood is pursuing a global expansion strategy, recently launching its own layer-2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and offering tokenized U.S. stocks in over 120 countries. Its revenue is more diversified, with crypto assets making up only about 12% of its total, which helps explain its premium valuation compared to Coinbase. The upcoming reports will reveal which company's strategy is gaining more traction in shaping the next phase of crypto market evolution.

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

Coinbase and Robinhood Vie for the Next Phase of Cryptocurrency Market Evolution Ahead of Earnings Reports

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片