"Crypto Retirement Plan" Heavily Criticized by Democrats: Trump Is "Harvesting" American Workers' Pensions

marsbit2026-06-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-03 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Democratic senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA), are urging the Labor Department to repeal a proposed rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts, such as 401(k)s, to investments in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and other alternative assets. The rule, stemming from an August executive order by President Trump, would provide a legal safe harbor for plan fiduciaries offering these volatile assets if they follow a prescribed process. The lawmakers argue in a 14-page letter that the rule dangerously weakens long-standing "prudent man" standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), potentially exposing the $14.2 trillion in 401(k) savings to high-risk, minimally regulated investments. They cite warnings from FINRA about crypto's high volatility and from the FBI about massive cryptocurrency scam losses. The letter also alleges a conflict of interest, noting that President Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which has reportedly raised billions from digital token sales. They contend the rule change could enrich the Trump family at the expense of workers' retirement security. In defense, the Trump administration frames the rule as expanding worker choice. Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling stated it ends the department "picking winners and losers," requiring fiduciaries to follow a prudent process. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent supported it as a step ...

Original Author: Micah Zimmerman

Original Compilation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) have called on the Trump administration's Department of Labor to repeal a rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The lawmakers argue this move would endanger workers' financial futures while allowing President Trump and his family to profit.

On Monday, the three Democrats sent a 14-page letter to Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling. Sanders, Warren, and House Education and the Workforce Committee Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA) strongly condemned the rule proposed by the Department of Labor in March.

The rule would provide fiduciary protections for 401(k) plan sponsors, allowing them to offer volatile assets—including cryptocurrencies, private equity, and private credit—as long as the fiduciaries can demonstrate they have weighed relevant factors before offering them.

The letter states: "The proposed rule is harmful to American workers and runs counter to the law, congressional intent, existing regulations, and case law."

What the Rule Would Do

This proposal stems from an executive order President Trump signed last August, directing the Department of Labor to reconsider the treatment of alternative assets in retirement plans. Under current law, fiduciaries managing 401(k) plans must adhere to a strict "prudence" standard—a requirement rooted in the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and reinforced by Supreme Court precedent.

Democratic lawmakers argue the new rule would flip this standard. Fiduciaries would no longer need to prove they conducted due diligence; instead, they would be presumed to have acted prudently as long as they followed the process outlined in the rule.

The lawmakers state this shift conflicts with decades of legal precedent and would expose roughly $14.2 trillion in U.S. 401(k) accounts to assets with extreme price volatility and limited regulation.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has warned that crypto investments "exhibit higher volatility compared to traditional investment assets" and "pose a significantly higher risk of losing the entire investment." FBI reports indicate cryptocurrency scam losses exceeded $110 billion in 2025, one of the highest loss categories in cybercrime.

Trump Conflict of Interest Argument

The Democratic lawmakers' criticism extends beyond retirement policy, directly pointing to conflict of interest issues. Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which, according to The Wall Street Journal, has raised approximately $50 billion for the Trump family since launching its digital currency last September.

The Trump family's crypto portfolio includes WLFI and USD1 tokens from World Liberty Financial, as well as the official Trump Meme Coin—which briefly surged above $75 around Trump's January 2025 inauguration before crashing to around $2.

The letter states: "The aforementioned change in the prudence standard expands opportunities for President Trump and his family to profit at the expense of taxpayers, workers, and retirees."

Consumer advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform expressed similar concerns. Its senior policy analyst, Oscar Valdés Viera, said: "Opening 401(k)s to these products could turn workers' retirement savings into a tool resembling a Ponzi scheme, providing a lifeline for an industry desperate for new funds."

The letter also cites elderly poverty data: Over 22.8% of American seniors live in poverty, compared to 5.1% in Denmark, 5.8% in France, and 12.6% in Germany—highlighting the risk retirees cannot afford to take significant losses.

The Administration's Defense

The Trump administration has described the rule as an effort to expand worker choice.

Acting Labor Secretary Sonderling said in a statement: "The days of the Department of Labor picking winners and losers are over. Our rule makes clear that managers must evaluate any potential product offering by following a prudent process."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also expressed support, calling the rule "another step toward ushering in President Trump's 'Golden Age'."

İlgili Okumalar

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit31 dk önce

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit31 dk önce

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit37 dk önce

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit37 dk önce

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit37 dk önce

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit37 dk önce

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报46 dk önce

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报46 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片