Crypto Clarity At Standstill In Congress, Says Fed Governor On Market Structure Bill

bitcoinist2026-02-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated that progress on the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, has stalled in Congress due to disagreements over key issues. The main points of contention include stablecoin yield provisions and the Fed's proposed "skinny" master accounts. Crypto advocates argue that yield-bearing stablecoins promote adoption and competition, while banking groups oppose them, warning of potential deposit outflows from traditional banks. Additionally, the White House has scheduled a meeting to address tensions between crypto firms and banks. The Fed aims to propose regulations for skinny master accounts by the fourth quarter of this year.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that progress on the long‐anticipated crypto market structure legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, appears to have stalled in Congress.

His remarks come as lawmakers remain divided over key issues, most notably stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve’s proposal for so‐called “skinny” master accounts, a topic earlier highlighted by Crypto In America.

Stablecoin Yield Fight Fuels CLARITY Act Stalemate

Waller’s comments quickly drew reaction from market observers. Crypto analyst MartyParty noted on X that the governor’s assessment reflects the ongoing deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act.

According to MartyParty, the delay is not accidental. He argued that resistance from the banking sector has intensified, particularly around the treatment of stablecoin yields and rewards.

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms such as exchanges and digital wallets should be allowed to offer interest‐like returns or incentives on stablecoins held by users.

Crypto industry advocates contend that yield‐bearing stablecoins encourage adoption, improve efficiency, and increase competition in the payments market. Banking groups, however, strongly oppose this view.

They argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, warning that higher returns—often in the range of 3% to 5% or more, compared with near‐zero yields on many bank accounts—could trigger massive deposit outflows.

In MartyParty’s assessment, banks are concerned that passage of the CLARITY Act could move trillions of dollars onto crypto‐based payment rails, breaking what he described as the banking sector’s “closed‐loop system” and putting pressure on long‐established profit models.

Crypto And Banks Head Back To White House

Amid rising tensions, MartyParty also reported that the White House has scheduled a second meeting for Tuesday, February 10, aimed at easing friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over stablecoin yield payments.

The meeting is expected to include senior policy officials rather than company chief executives, along with representatives from banking and crypto trade associations.

Another major point of contention is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account model. Under this framework, eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

The debate around skinny accounts became especially clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve. Crypto firms and industry groups generally expressed support, while banking organizations responded with caution or outright opposition.

Banking groups raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many entities likely to qualify for payment accounts lack a long‐term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards.

Governor Waller indicated that he hopes the Federal Reserve will be able to publish proposed regulations for skinny master accounts in the fourth quarter of this year.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.35 trillion as of Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main reason for the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in Congress, according to the article?

AThe main reason is the ongoing deadlock over key issues, particularly the dispute around stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve's proposal for 'skinny' master accounts.

QWhy do banking groups oppose the idea of stablecoin yields?

ABanking groups argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, as higher returns (often 3% to 5% or more) compared to near-zero yields on many bank accounts could trigger massive deposit outflows and threaten their established profit models.

QWhat is the purpose of the White House meeting scheduled for February 10th?

AThe White House meeting aims to ease friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over the contentious issue of stablecoin yield payments.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account model?

AThe 'skinny' master account model is a framework where eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

QWhat was a key concern raised by the American Bankers Association (ABA) regarding the 'skinny' master accounts?

AThe ABA warned that many entities likely to qualify for these payment accounts lack a long-term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards, raising concerns about oversight and risk.

İlgili Okumalar

Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department's Latest FAQ: How to Determine Tax Residency for the "Dual-City Lifestyle"?

Hong Kong's Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has updated its Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to clarify how the "tie-breaker rules" under the Mainland China-Hong Kong Comprehensive Double Taxation Arrangement (CDTA) determine the tax residency of individuals with dual residency claims. With increasing cross-border work and living between Hong Kong and Mainland China, many individuals may meet the residency criteria of both jurisdictions simultaneously. The CDTA’s tie-breaker rules are essential to resolve such conflicts and prevent double taxation. The FAQ emphasizes that residency is not determined by a single factor, such as holding a Mainland household registration (hukou) or the number of days spent in Hong Kong (over 180 days). Instead, a comprehensive analysis is applied based on the following hierarchical criteria: 1. Location of the individual's permanent home; 2. The jurisdiction with which their personal and economic relations are closer (centre of vital interests); 3. Their habitual abode; 4. Mutual agreement by the tax authorities of both sides if unresolved. Key factors considered include the residence of family members (spouse, children), location of employment and salary payment, social security contributions, and business investments. The update provides practical examples (e.g., individuals under talent schemes, "dual-city" lifestyles) to illustrate how these rules are applied in real-world scenarios, offering clearer guidance for frequent cross-border commuters. This clarification signifies a move towards more precise and sophisticated cross-border tax administration, reflecting enhanced regulatory capabilities and greater transparency in tax information exchange.

marsbit24 dk önce

Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department's Latest FAQ: How to Determine Tax Residency for the "Dual-City Lifestyle"?

marsbit24 dk önce

Trading Volume Hits New Highs Repeatedly, Why Is Kalshi's Pre-IPO Stock Price Experiencing a Tale of Extremes?

Amidst a declining broader market, the prediction market sector has shown remarkable resilience, with trading activity hitting record highs. Kalshi, the largest regulated prediction market platform in the U.S., reached over $9.5 billion in trading volume in January, ranking first in the sector and setting a new monthly record. This has sparked renewed discussions about the fair pre-IPO share price of Kalshi, which is poised to become the "first prediction market stock." Currently, significant price discrepancies exist on crypto-based pre-IPO trading platforms: PreStocks lists Kalshi shares between $364 and $369, while Jarsy shows a price of around $504. In traditional markets, Nasdaq Private Market prices shares at approximately $320, and Hiive at $358. Kalshi completed a Series E funding round last year at a $11 billion valuation. Based on this, the reasonable pre-IPO share price range is estimated to be between $320 and $358. However, considering Kalshi's dominant market share and January volume nearing the entire prediction market's size from October last year, its implied valuation could be at least $15 billion. This would adjust the reasonable share price range to approximately $320–$423. Thus, Jarsy's current pricing appears high, while PreStocks may present arbitrage opportunities. With 2026 being a major year for global sporting events, Kalshi's annual revenue potential is significant, likely exceeding earlier estimates for competitor Polymarket, which could further drive up its pre-IPO valuation in the future.

比推24 dk önce

Trading Volume Hits New Highs Repeatedly, Why Is Kalshi's Pre-IPO Stock Price Experiencing a Tale of Extremes?

比推24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片