U.S. Court Clears Path for Nevada to Take Action Against Kalshi Prediction Market

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A U.S. appeals court has allowed Nevada to proceed with legal action against prediction market platform Kalshi, denying the company’s request to block a potential temporary restraining order. This could force Kalshi to suspend operations in Nevada for about two weeks until a follow-up hearing. The dispute began in March 2025 when the Nevada Gaming Control Board issued a cease-and-desist order, arguing that Kalshi’s sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws. Kalshi contends that its products are federally regulated by the CFTC, which supports its position. The ruling is a setback for Kalshi and may lead to an imminent temporary ban in the state.

A U.S. appeals court has permitted the state of Nevada to pursue legal action against predictionmarket platform Kalshi. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Kalshi’s request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO). If approved, Kalshi may have to stop operating in the state for a short time, likely around two weeks, until the next hearing.

What this Case carries

The problem began in March 2025 when Kalshi received a cease-and-desist order from the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Because it believes that sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws, the regulator asked Kalshi to cease providing them. Kalshi countered that federalregulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

With the court decision, Nevada may now issue a temporary restraining order. Legal experts say that this order could come very soon, and Kalshi could be forced to stop operating in Nevada, and the ban could last at least two weeks.

Kalshi warned that it would face serious harm if the court did not intervene. The firm says that it could face multiple legal cases at the same time, and different courts might give conflicting decisions. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi’s view. The CFTC says it has authority over prediction markets, while states like Nevada believe they also have control, especially for sports-related products.

The court’s decision represents a setback for Kalshi and provides an opportunity for Nevada to take more robust action. The next few days will be important, as a temporary ban on Kalshi in Nevada could be enforced soon. More updates are expected soon as the state court moves forward with the case.

Highlighted Crypto News:

FBI Issues Warning Over Fake ‘FBI Tokens’ on Tron Network

TagsCryptocurrencyKalshi

İlgili Sorular

QWhat action did the U.S. appeals court allow Nevada to take against Kalshi?

AThe U.S. appeals court permitted Nevada to pursue legal action and denied Kalshi's request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO).

QWhy did the Nevada Gaming Control Board issue a cease-and-desist order to Kalshi in March 2025?

AThe Nevada Gaming Control Board issued the order because it believes Kalshi's sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws.

QWhat is Kalshi's argument regarding the regulation of its prediction market products?

AKalshi argues that federal regulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

QWhich federal regulatory body supports Kalshi's position in this case?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi's view, stating it has authority over prediction markets.

QWhat potential immediate consequence could Kalshi face in Nevada following the court's decision?

AKalshi could face a temporary ban on operating in Nevada for at least two weeks if a temporary restraining order is issued.

İlgili Okumalar

Cursor's "Shelling" Kimi Controversy Reverses: From Infringement Allegations to Authorized Cooperation, China's Open-Source Models Once Again Become the Global AI Foundation

On March 20, AI programming tool Cursor (parent company Anysphere, valued at $29.3 billion) released its self-developed model Composer 2, claiming performance improvements through continued pre-training and reinforcement learning, without disclosing the base model source. Shortly after, a captured API request revealed the model ID as "kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast," suggesting it was built on Kimi K2.5. Moonshot AI’s pre-training lead Du Yulun initially accused Cursor of violating Kimi’s modified MIT license, which requires commercial products exceeding certain revenue or user thresholds to credit Kimi model usage. The controversy gained traction with Elon Musk’s public comment. However, the situation reversed when Moonshot AI officially congratulated Cursor, clarifying that the usage was authorized through Fireworks AI’s commercial platform. Cursor’s co-founder Aman Sanger and VP Lee Robinson later explained that Kimi K2.5 was selected as the strongest base model after evaluation, and Composer 2 involved significant additional training by Cursor. They admitted failure to credit Kimi initially was a mistake. This incident highlights the growing influence of Chinese open-source models in the global AI ecosystem, as noted by Hugging Face’s CEO. It also serves as indirect validation for Moonshot AI, which is currently raising funds at a $18 billion valuation, suggesting its technology may be even more valuable than estimated.

marsbit24 dk önce

Cursor's "Shelling" Kimi Controversy Reverses: From Infringement Allegations to Authorized Cooperation, China's Open-Source Models Once Again Become the Global AI Foundation

marsbit24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片