Lawmakers Warn That Banks' Refusal to Serve Crypto Clients Could Paralyze Growth of the UK Market

cryptonews.ru2026-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Around 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers in the UK are currently being delayed or entirely rejected by British banks, and a majority of exchanges have seen an increase in blocked transactions over the past year. Lawmakers, including leaders of the UK's parliamentary Crypto and Digital Assets Group, are now questioning this trend, warning that major banks refusing to serve crypto clients could paralyze the growth of the UK market. They have called on banks to explain their stance towards digital asset firms following numerous reports of such companies struggling to open accounts. Industry executives argue that financial institutions are hindering properly registered and compliant businesses. Earlier this year, the government urged banks to treat all crypto sector enterprises fairly. A cross-party parliamentary group also launched an investigation into how banks block accounts and restrict transactions for digital asset companies. The group's co-chairs, Lord Vaizey and MP Dr. Gurinder Singh Josan, recently stated that banks are stalling the UK's crypto boom by denying services. They warn these restrictions risk undermining the effectiveness of the upcoming UK crypto regulatory framework, set for 2027. Banks justify their actions as necessary to protect customers from crypto fraud and volatility, a stance reinforced by recent stronger risk warnings from the Financial Conduct Authority. Concerns are rising that these banking restrictions could undermine the UK's ambition...

Currently, about 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are delayed or completely rejected by UK banks. Furthermore, four out of five exchanges have seen an increase in blocked transactions over the past 12 months.

Some lawmakers are now questioning this trend. They warn that the refusal of major banks to accept crypto clients could potentially paralyze the growth of the UK market.

Currently, leaders of the UK parliamentary group on cryptocurrencies and digital assets have called on UK banks to explain their position towards companies operating with digital assets, following numerous reports of difficulties faced by crypto companies when opening bank accounts.

For some time, crypto company executives have also been protesting that financial institutions are hindering the operations of legitimate digital asset businesses, even if these firms are properly registered and comply with current regulations.

In June, the organization Stand With Crypto UK even mobilized its 286,000 members to challenge UK retail banks over widespread restrictions on cryptocurrency transactions.

Earlier, the UK government called for fair treatment of cryptocurrency providers.

In early July, the UK Parliament's cross-party group on digital assets launched an investigation to examine how major credit institutions block accounts and restrict transactions for companies operating with digital assets. At that time, the group insisted: "Access to banking services is fundamental to any legitimate business, and where unnecessary barriers exist, they can hinder growth, investment, and innovation."

Nevertheless, the group maintains this position. Most recently, co-chairs of the parliamentary group on cryptocurrencies and digital assets, Lord Waizi and MP Gurinder Singh Ghosn, stated that banks are slowing down the cryptocurrency boom in the UK by hindering crypto companies' access to their services.

They also warned that the restrictions imposed by banks risk undermining the effectiveness of the UK's upcoming regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Currently, the UK's digital asset industry is preparing for the adoption of new regulatory rules starting October 2027.

Some bank executives justify their actions by arguing that these measures are necessary to protect customers from the rise in cryptocurrency fraud schemes and the risk of significant losses due to price volatility.

Primarily, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has intensified its warnings about cryptocurrency-related risks in recent months, exacerbating banks' concerns about potential large fines for unintentionally facilitating illegal financial activity.

Earlier this year, a representative of the UK Treasury, the country's economic and financial department, stated that the government expects banks to treat all businesses in the crypto sector fairly, including licensed firms, and will not restrict service provision to licensed companies only.

Banking Restrictions Could Undermine the UK's Crypto Ambitions

The imposed restrictions also raise questions about whether the UK can attract companies operating with digital assets while they struggle to access basic banking services.

The problem may intensify as the government introduces a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets. Legislators and industry representatives argue that maintaining banking restrictions could hinder the scaling of legitimate crypto businesses and weaken the UK's position as a global hub for digital assets.

Some Are Concerned About Political Changes in the UK

Meanwhile, Andy Burnham of the Labour Party recently took office as Prime Minister. However, some fear that his administration may not prioritize the fintech industry or the digital asset industry.

Burnham has already stated his intention to halt the digital identity project and instead focus on providing economic assistance to citizens, which has elicited mixed reactions. However, Jonathan Herbst from Norton Rose Fulbright assured the nation that the Chancellor would implement stable financial reforms.

"For international companies, part of the UK's appeal is the stability of the regulatory environment; therefore, capital markets, fintech, digital assets, and sustainable finance will continue to be important tests of this commitment," he said.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat percentage of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are currently delayed or rejected by UK banks, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, around 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are currently delayed or completely rejected by UK banks.

QWhat actions have British legislators taken regarding banks' treatment of crypto clients?

ABritish legislators in the parliamentary Crypto and Digital Assets Group have called on UK banks to explain their stance towards digital asset firms. They have also launched an inquiry to investigate how major credit institutions block accounts and restrict transactions for companies operating with digital assets.

QHow do some bank executives justify the restrictions they place on crypto companies?

ASome bank executives justify their actions by claiming these measures are necessary to protect customers from the rise of cryptocurrency fraud schemes and the risk of significant losses due to price volatility.

QWhat potential consequence do the lawmakers warn about regarding the upcoming UK crypto regulatory framework?

ALawmakers warn that the restrictions imposed by banks risk undermining the effectiveness of the UK's upcoming cryptocurrency regulatory framework, which is set to be implemented from October 2027.

QWhat broader concern does the article raise about UK's ambitions in the crypto sector due to banking restrictions?

AThe article raises the concern that banking restrictions could undermine the UK's ambitions to attract digital asset companies, as they struggle to access basic banking services, potentially weakening the UK's position as a global hub for digital assets.

İlgili Okumalar

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

The article analyzes the apparent failure of HyperEVM, the application engine of the Hyperliquid blockchain, contrasting it with the success of its core trading engine, HyperCore. Hyperliquid operates on a dual-engine architecture. HyperCore is a closed, high-performance order-book exchange for perpetuals and spot trading, which dominates on-chain volume and generates massive fees. HyperEVM, launched in February 2025, is an EVM-compatible layer meant for DeFi applications like lending and DEXs, which can access HyperCore's liquidity. Despite Hyperliquid's overall strength in a bear market, a stark divergence exists: * **HyperCore (Trading):** Captures over half of on-chain perpetual volume, generating ~$56M in fees over 30 days. * **HyperEVM (Applications):** All DeFi protocols combined generate less than $60M in fees. TVL is shrinking, daily active addresses are low (~8k), and the ecosystem lacks diversity. The DEX sector is particularly anemic, with most volume concentrated in a single protocol. The article identifies four key reasons for HyperEVM's struggles: 1. **Core Monopoly on Execution:** HyperCore exclusively handles order matching. This makes native DEXs on HyperEVM redundant and limits viable applications to those leveraging its order book (e.g., staking, lending). 2. **Architectural Concentration:** Shared liquidity across interfaces naturally leads to a "winner-takes-most" outcome, explaining the high concentration in both the trading (e.g., trade.xyz) and application layers. 3. **"No Insider" Philosophy:** Hyperliquid's commitment to fair launch means it provides no grants, business development, or marketing support to ecosystem projects, stunting growth. 4. **Complex Developer Experience:** The asynchronous design between HyperEVM and HyperCore (via the CoreWriter contract) creates non-standard development hurdles, as EVM transactions don't roll back if the core action fails. The conclusion is that HyperEVM's weakness is a deliberate trade-off, not an accident. Hyperliquid prioritized building an unbeatable trading engine, sacrificing the development of a broad, independent application ecosystem. HyperEVM functions more as a tokenization layer for HyperCore's liquidity rather than a general-purpose chain. The debate isn't whether it's "dead"—it serves a niche—but whether Hyperliquid ever intended to build a thriving, diverse DeFi ecosystem beyond its core trading product.

marsbit1 saat önce

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

marsbit1 saat önce

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

SuperPure Applied Materials (Stock Code: 301717) debuted on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext board. The company issued 25.4615 million shares at an offering price of 65.99 yuan per share, raising approximately 1.68 billion yuan. The stock opened at 450 yuan, soaring 582% from the IPO price, and closed at 503 yuan, up 662%, giving the company a market capitalization of 51.2 billion yuan. The company specializes in special coating processes and related technologies and materials, providing precision components and services for the semiconductor manufacturing and precision optics sectors. Its products cover core equipment parts for wafer fabrication, packaging, and silicon wafer manufacturing, with notable technical advantages in etching, lithography, measurement/inspection, annealing, and thin-film deposition equipment. Financially, SuperPure reported revenues of 169 million, 260 million, and 496 million yuan for 2023, 2024, and 2025 respectively, with corresponding net profits of 64.8 million, 82.26 million, and 185 million yuan. For Q1 2026, revenue reached 147 million yuan, a 62% year-over-year increase. The company forecasts H1 2026 revenue between 270 to 290 million yuan and net profit between 103 to 110 million yuan. The company's controlling shareholder and actual controller is Chai Jie, who directly and indirectly controls 48.23% of the voting rights. Together with his brother Chai Lin, a concerted action person, they control a total of 68.84% of the voting rights. Major pre-IPO shareholders included GSD Venture Capital, BYD, and AMEC.

marsbit2 saat önce

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片