CLARITY Act Leaves 5 Loopholes—From Pensions to Trump's $1.4 Billion in Cryptocurrency

cryptonews.ru2026-08-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A US Senate Banking Committee minority staff analysis, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, identifies five major loopholes in the proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act). The analysis argues the bill fails on key measures: protecting retirement savings from securities law gaps, preventing illicit finance, shielding taxpayers from bailouts, stopping presidential self-enrichment, and preserving consumer protections. The bill's dual regulatory system could let crypto assets evade SEC oversight, weakening fraud enforcement and state regulators' authority, while also restricting investors' legal recourse. Concerns include that DeFi platforms could escape anti-money laundering rules, and stablecoin interest payments might drain deposits from local banks. The staff report highlights that former President Trump earned over $1.4 billion from crypto in 2025, raising self-dealing concerns as enforcement would rely on his Attorney General while banning state suits. Industry leaders like Coinbase's CEO support the bill as providing US oversight. The bill faces a Senate cloture vote on September 15, needing 60 votes to proceed.

Minority staff of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, led by the committee's ranking member, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), reviewed the text of the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act," published on July 22. The result of this work was an analysis published on August 5, which identified five major loopholes in the CLARITY Act.

The CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) is digital asset market structure legislation that draws jurisdictional boundaries between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Staff identified five provisions they believe must be included in cryptocurrency legislation: protecting retirement savings from securities law gaps, cracking down on illicit finance, protecting taxpayers from financial bailouts, preventing presidential self-enrichment, and preserving consumer protections. According to the analysis, the bill fails to address any of these five provisions.

Majority staff on the Senate Banking Committee argue that the bill strengthens investor protections, establishes federal oversight, and aims to combat fraud and money laundering.

Pensions, Fraud, and Right to Sue

Staff assert that the two-tier system would allow assets offered on blockchain to evade SEC oversight. Cryptocurrency-issuing companies would be able to self-certify their exemption from requirements applicable to securities. Staff state this would deprive the SEC and state regulators of the disclosure and oversight tools needed to protect investors.

This staff memo names six organizations expressing concerns about pension issues, including Healthy Markets—an investor advocacy group whose members include pension funds and financial companies. Also mentioned are five labor union organizations: the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the National Education Association (NEA), and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).

Legal recourse would be sharply curtailed under the fifth standard, which governs actions after an investor has been defrauded. Staff argue that exempting assets from securities laws would weaken the SEC's ability to combat fraud. State and tribal authorities could also be stripped of their power to enforce their own securities laws, consumer protections, and gambling regulations. Staff further assert that the bill does not establish an enforceable private right of action and does not regulate the use of forced arbitration in cryptocurrency-related disputes.

Cartels, Sanctions, and Bank Deposits

According to the minority staff memo on the CLARITY Act, companies associated with Decentralized Finance (DeFi) platforms would be exempt from illicit financing responsibilities even if they earn millions from transactions on the platforms. The minority staff document cites a 2023 Treasury Department warning linking DeFi services to ransomware operators, thieves, and drug traffickers. Some cryptocurrency mixers would also remain outside the scope of U.S. sanctions thanks to the so-called "Tornado Cash loophole"—a legislative gap that, by court decision, only Congress can fix.

The yield on stablecoins raises the third objection. The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) warn that paying interest would lead to an outflow of deposits from local banks, tightening credit conditions for small businesses. At the same time, banks would be granted leeway to issue loans backed by cryptocurrency collateral, hold cryptocurrency directly, and trade derivatives using customer deposits and the federal financial safety net. The Systemic Risk Council—a non-partisan body composed of former regulators—has identified these activities as a potential risk for requiring financial bailouts.

Trump Family Profits and Uncertain Vote Outcome

According to the minority staff of the Senate Banking Committee, President Trump earned over $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency projects in 2025 alone, accounting for nearly two-thirds of his total income. Enforcement of the law would rest solely with his Attorney General, while state Attorneys General would face an outright ban on filing lawsuits. These obligations would also expire once Trump leaves office. Warren and U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) separately demanded the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigate Trump's "memecoin," citing investor losses of $3.8 billion.

Industry leaders state that this bill would bring cryptocurrency activities under U.S. oversight rather than push them offshore. The CEO of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN), Brian Armstrong, described the bill as a result of bipartisan work and urged the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act. The bill is now slated for a Senate vote on September 15 on a cloture motion to end debate and proceed to a vote. Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) filed this motion just before the Senate's August recess, and 60 votes are still required to advance the bill.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the main criticism against the CLARITY Act by the Senate Banking Committee minority staff?

AThe main criticism is that the CLARITY Act contains five major loopholes. It fails to address key issues such as protecting retirement savings from securities law gaps, curbing illicit financing, protecting taxpayers from bailouts, preventing presidential self-enrichment, and preserving consumer protections.

QWhat specific concern is raised regarding pension funds and retirement savings in the analysis of the CLARITY Act?

AThe concern is that the Act's two-tiered system could allow blockchain-offered assets to escape SEC oversight. This would deprive the SEC and state regulators of the disclosure and oversight tools needed to protect investors, putting retirement savings at risk. Investor advocate groups and several major labor unions have expressed this concern.

QWhat are the concerns related to DeFi platforms and sanctions mentioned by the minority staff?

AThe concerns are that companies linked to DeFi platforms would be exempt from illicit financing obligations even if they earn millions from platform transactions. The memo cites a 2023 Treasury warning linking DeFi services to ransomware operators, thieves, and drug traffickers. It also mentions that some crypto mixers could remain outside U.S. sanctions due to a 'Tornado Cash loophole' that only Congress can fix.

QHow much did the article claim President Trump earned from cryptocurrency projects in 2025, and why is this presented as a problem?

AThe article claims President Trump earned over $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency projects in 2025, which was nearly two-thirds of his total income. This is presented as a problem because the Act's enforcement would rely solely on his Attorney General, with state Attorneys General barred from bringing suits. This creates a potential conflict of interest regarding presidential self-enrichment.

QWhat is the next step for the CLARITY Act in the Senate, and what is required for it to proceed?

AThe next step is a cloture vote in the Senate scheduled for September 15, which would end debate and allow a vote on the bill itself. To proceed, the bill needs 60 votes to overcome the cloture motion filed by Majority Leader John Thune before the August recess.

İlgili Okumalar

Moore Threads, Having Just Raised 8 Billion, Is Already Planning a Hong Kong IPO

On August 9th, Moore Threads announced plans for a Hong Kong IPO alongside a strong first-half 2026 earnings report. Listed on the Shanghai STAR Market in December 2025 as the "first domestic GPU stock," the company raised 8 billion yuan. Its stock price initially surged but has since fallen 40% from its peak. This decline followed market concerns over its use of substantial idle raised funds for low-risk financial products instead of promised projects. The company's H1 2026 revenue reached 1.74 billion yuan, a 147.4% year-over-year increase, already surpassing its full-year 2025 revenue. This growth is attributed to strong demand for AI and full-feature GPUs, particularly its Kuae AI computing clusters. Despite the revenue surge, Moore Threads remains unprofitable on a non-GAAP basis, with a net loss of 115 million yuan after adjustments. R&D and sales expenses grew significantly. The proposed Hong Kong listing aims to support its global strategy, attract international talent, and improve corporate governance, following the path of other Chinese tech firms pursuing dual listings. However, its港股 IPO valuation may face challenges as international investors could benchmark it against peers like Biren Technology, potentially demanding a discount. In summary, while Moore Threads is expanding rapidly and strategically seeking a港股 listing for global growth, it continues to face profitability challenges amid high costs and market skepticism about its capital allocation and valuation.

marsbit22 dk önce

Moore Threads, Having Just Raised 8 Billion, Is Already Planning a Hong Kong IPO

marsbit22 dk önce

Hassabis Predicts: AI's 'Move 37' in Mathematics is Only a Matter of Time

Demis Hassabis, the co-founder of DeepMind, predicts that AI achieving a "Move 37" level breakthrough in mathematics—solving a major unsolved problem like a Millennium Prize problem—is only a matter of time. He draws a parallel to the pivotal "Move 37" in the 2016 AlphaGo vs. Lee Sedol match, where AI's unconventional play challenged human understanding. Conversely, Lee Sedol's "Move 78" victory highlighted human resilience and the potential for human-AI collaboration. The article details AI's rapid progress in mathematics. Starting from basic arithmetic errors in 2023, AI systems like AlphaProof and Gemini Deep Think reached gold-medal levels in the International Mathematical Olympiad by 2025. The shift from problem-solving to genuine research began in 2025, with AI (e.g., GPT-5, Claude Fable 5) contributing key ideas to solve or refute long-standing conjectures like the Erdős problem 848 and the Jacobian conjecture. In 2026, AI achieved breakthroughs such as OpenAI's solution to the plane unit-distance problem and DeepMind's Aletheia agent autonomously tackling multiple open problems. Hassabis envisions a "centaur" era of science, where human intuition guides AI in complex, less-verifiable fields like biology and drug discovery. While AI can enhance human creativity and efficiency, as seen in post-AlphaGo围棋, there is a risk of over-reliance diminishing human judgment. The core challenge is for humanity to find its own "Move 78"—leveraging AI while maintaining critical insight and direction.

marsbit24 dk önce

Hassabis Predicts: AI's 'Move 37' in Mathematics is Only a Matter of Time

marsbit24 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片