TROVE token’s 97% wipeout: From $11.5 mln presale to rug-pull accusations

ambcrypto2026-01-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Trove Market's TROVE token experienced a catastrophic 97.5% crash shortly after its launch on January 20, falling from a fully diluted valuation of $20 million to just $500,000. The project had previously raised $11.5 million in a presale but faced immediate backlash after announcing a switch from Hyperliquid to Solana, breaching investor trust. Accusations of a rug pull intensified when it was revealed that funds were allegedly funneled to influencers, casinos, and betting platforms. A key liquidity provider liquidated $12.9 million worth of assets, further destabilizing the project. Most presale investors suffered massive losses, with sentiment remaining extremely bearish and fears of further price declines.

On the 20th of January, the crypto market was stunned when Trove Market launched its native token, TROVE.

Prior to the launch, Trove Market had faced community backlash after the team announced it would abandon the Hyperliquid LI blockchain.

This was a massive breach of its social contracts with investors after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, setting the ground for a rough launch.

Trove market accused of rug pull

The TROVE token launched on Trove’s Perp DEX, with a fully diluted valuation of $20 million. Shortly after launch, the token’s FVD plummeted 97.5% to $500k, then rose slightly to $722.8k at press time.

At the same time, its market cap dropped from $612k to $512k, a loss of nearly $100k, indicating capital outflows.

Soon after the TROVE token went live, it dumped 28% in minutes from $0.0006 to $0.00043 before attempting a recovery.

Since then, the altcoin price rose to $0.00078 before slightly retracing to $0.00072, marking an 18% rise on the daily timeframe.

Reasons why TROVE was doomed to fail

In preparation for the token launch, developers ran an ICO on Hyperliquid. The team managed to surpass its $2.5 million target and raised over $11.5 million.

After raising these funds, the team announced it will keep $9.3 million to build its Solana-based Perp DEX. The move was perceived as the first red flag, and the team faced fierce community backlash.

Even worse, the community accused Trove Market of paying KOLs for promotion, with funds flowing to entertainment addresses.

According to Hyperliquid Daily, waleswoosh alone pocketed $8K for pumping and promoting the token. ZachXBT dug up receipts showing ICO money funneled straight to casinos and Polymarket bets.

The last nail in the coffin was driven by the alleged liquidity provider. Days ago, a key liquidity partner lost confidence in the project and liquidated 500k HYPE worth approximately $12.9 million.

The decision to sell these Hype tokens effectively pulled the rug from under Trove’s operational requirements, forcing the team to seek support elsewhere.

With these factors combined, the TROVE token sat as a ticking time bomb, and the launch validated the community’s fears.

Will TROVE see more losses?

TROVE plummeted as negative sentiment had taken hold even before the token launch. As such, earlier buyers rushed to dump, fearing making more losses.

Despite that, most of the presale buyers recorded massive losses. For instance, an earlier buyer argued that his $20k investment should have resulted in $14k in USDC and $6k in TROVE.

However, the buyers received $600, blaming the token’s GIGA nuking. With market sentiment even more bearish, TROVE is at risk of further losses.

If current sentiment persists, the token will plummet to $0.0004. However, if the team can manage to restore community confidence, $0.001 is within reach.


Final Thoughts

  • Trove Market is accused of a rug pull, following a contentious launch of the TROVE token on Solana Perp DEX.
  • TROVE FVD dropped 97.5% from $20 million to $500k, warning of liquidity exit.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the TROVE token at launch and what did it drop to shortly after?

AThe TROVE token launched with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $20 million. Shortly after launch, its FDV plummeted 97.5% to $500,000.

QWhat was the first major 'red flag' that caused community backlash against Trove Market before the token launch?

AThe first major red flag was the team's announcement that they would abandon the Hyperliquid blockchain after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, which was seen as a massive breach of its social contracts with investors.

QAccording to the article, how did blockchain investigator ZachXBT claim the ICO funds were being misused?

AZachXBT provided receipts showing that ICO money was funneled directly to casinos and bets on Polymarket.

QWhat specific action by a key liquidity partner was described as 'the last nail in the coffin' for the TROVE project?

AA key liquidity partner lost confidence and liquidated 500k HYPE tokens worth approximately $12.9 million, which pulled the rug from under Trove's operational requirements.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned for the TROVE token, depending on market sentiment and team action?

AIf the current bearish sentiment persists, the token could plummet to $0.0004. If the team manages to restore community confidence, the price could rise to $0.001.

İlgili Okumalar

A Crypto Gamble That Split a Century-Old Swiss Private Bank?

An internal conflict over cryptocurrency strategy has led to a generational split within the Swiss private banking family behind Banque Syz. Marc Syz left the bank, led by his father Eric Syz, after the board rejected his proposal to integrate Future Holdings AG—a crypto treasury firm—into the bank’s alternative asset division, Syz Capital. Marc, who previously headed Syz Capital, is now pursuing a dual IPO for Future Holdings in Sweden and Switzerland, aiming to build one of Europe’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasuries. The dispute reflects broader tensions within Switzerland’s wealth management sector, where traditional private banks face intense competition and divergent views on innovation. Marc advocated for greater focus on digital assets and AI, warning that some banks rely too heavily on Switzerland’s reputation as a financial safe haven without adapting to new trends. Following the rejection of the merger, Marc and his business partner Richard Byworth resigned from Syz Capital and are launching a new asset management firm focused on alternative investments. Meanwhile, Banque Syz reaffirmed its commitment to alternative investments as a core business pillar and recently appointed Eric’s other son, Nicolas Syz, as CEO. The split underscores both the difficulties of family business governance and the high-stakes divergence in strategy between traditional finance and emerging digital asset models in Switzerland.

marsbit10 dk önce

A Crypto Gamble That Split a Century-Old Swiss Private Bank?

marsbit10 dk önce

Token Doesn't Need a Chinese Name, But the Business Behind It Does

Recent discussions in China have intensified around finding an appropriate Chinese translation for the technical term "Token," driven by its growing economic and industrial significance. Previously an obscure technical term within AI circles, Token has now entered mainstream discourse due to its role as a billing unit in cloud services, a revenue metric for AI companies, and a key indicator in national AI industry statistics. Proposed translations include "智元" (suggested by AI media, implying "intelligence unit"), "模元" (proposed by academics, leaning toward "model unit"), and "符元" (a more neutral, technical term meaning "symbol unit"). The debate is not merely linguistic but reflects broader commercial and narrative control over the AI industry. Different translations align with different stakeholders’ interests: "智元" benefits those emphasizing intelligent computation, while "模元" reinforces the role of model developers. The term already had an academic translation—“词元” (ciyuan)—since 2021, but it gained little attention until Tokens became a valuable economic unit. As Token consumption in China surges—reaching 180 trillion per day—the naming contest underscores deeper issues of market influence, branding, and “coinage” rights in the emerging AI-driven economy. Ultimately, those who produce Tokens may hold the power to define them, regardless of the chosen name.

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Doesn't Need a Chinese Name, But the Business Behind It Does

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片