Will SYRUP reclaim $0.24 as syrupUSDC volume doubles to $4.98B?

ambcrypto2026-02-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Maple Finance's native token SYRUP surged over 15% in 24 hours, driven primarily by the explosive growth of its stablecoin syrupUSDC. The transfer volume of syrupUSDC doubled to $4.98 billion in one month, while SYRUP's own trading volume declined by 33%. Active loans grew to $2.4 billion, with syrupUSDC accounting for 70% of that growth. The number of stablecoin holders increased by 4.8% to 6.9K, and daily active senders rose 17%. This activity boosted monthly fees and revenue by over 55%. Technically, SYRUP was testing a key resistance level at $0.24. A breakout could target $0.28-$0.30, while failure would invalidate the bullish outlook.

Maple Finance [SYRUP] was up by more than 15% in the past 24 hours, at press time. The altcoin came third among the top gainers in a day for the top 200 by market cap.

The expansion of Maple Finance’s DeFi activity into stablecoins, specifically syrupUSDC, drove the rally. The difference in the activity of the native token and its stablecoin showed that the latter was the real driver.

syrupUSDC growth fuels SYRUP activity

Looking at the asset transfer volume, syrupUSDC doubled in only one month, from $2.143 billion to $4.982 billion. This was massive growth, bearing in mind that the expansion happened in late January 2026, as noted earlier.

While the trading volume of the syrupUSDC token doubled, the trading volume of the native SYRUP token declined by 33%, according to Token Terminal. This showed that participants preferred SYRUP’s USDC stablecoin amid a general bearish crypto market.

Moreover, active loans on SYRUP grew by 8.4% to around $2.4 billion, with 70% coming from the stablecoin. However, it is those through syrupUSDC that drove the growth, as they jumped 30.5% to around $1.7 billion.

Additionally, the number of holders of the stablecoin grew by 4.8%, reaching 6.9K in just a month of launch. Those sending syrupUSDC daily also increased by 17% to around 4,420. This data showed that the stablecoin was gaining traction among crypto users.

The Total Value Locked (TVL) also grew by 21%, reaching $3.2 billion.

All this spike in activity at syrupUSDC had a ripple effect on the entire chain as fees and revenue grew. Both monthly fees and revenue rose by more than 55%, reaching $10 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Since the syrupUSDC is pegged to the U.S. dollar, it’s the native token that benefited from this liquidity.

SYRUP price approaches KEY level

The charts showed that SYRUP has been trading in a descending trend channel since the 12th of January. Interestingly, the altcoin was bouncing off the middle of the channel, indicating that bullish strength was building during this accumulation phase.

In fact, the price action was approaching the upper resistance of the channel with the Awesome Oscillator reinforcing bull strength as of writing. However, the oscillator was still below the neutral zone, indicating that bulls were yet to gain full control.

Additionally, Social Dominance was rising, reflecting market sentiments at the time. This metric was too dynamic, though, to make a firm judgment.

Combining the network activity with the technical setup, it appeared that SYRUP could break past the trendline resistance.

In case of a $0.24 breach, the next target area sat around the $0.28-$0.30 zone. But failure to surpass the resistance would invalidate the bullish anticipation.


Final Summary

  • SYRUP surges 15% in 24 hours, thanks to the thriving activity of syrupUSDC.
  • SYRUP’s upward potential was dependent on breaking past $0.24.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the percentage increase in SYRUP's price in the past 24 hours, and what ranking did it achieve among top gainers?

ASYRUP's price was up by more than 15% in the past 24 hours, and it came in third among the top gainers for the top 200 cryptocurrencies by market cap.

QWhat specific DeFi activity expansion was the primary driver behind SYRUP's recent rally?

AThe expansion of Maple Finance's DeFi activity into stablecoins, specifically syrupUSDC, was the primary driver behind the rally.

QBy how much did the asset transfer volume for syrupUSDC grow in one month, and what were the starting and ending values?

AThe asset transfer volume for syrupUSDC doubled in one month, growing from $2.143 billion to $4.982 billion.

QWhat key price level does SYRUP need to breach for its next bullish target, and what is that target zone?

ASYRUP needs to breach the $0.24 level. If successful, the next target area is around the $0.28 to $0.30 zone.

QHow did the monthly fees and revenue for the SYRUP ecosystem change, and what were their final values?

ABoth the monthly fees and revenue for the SYRUP ecosystem rose by more than 55%, reaching $10 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

İlgili Okumalar

What Brought GPT and Claude Together? Opposing the Pentagon?

The article discusses the unexpected alignment between rival AI companies OpenAI and Anthropic, driven by their shared ethical stance against the U.S. Department of Defense's demands. Anthropic, the maker of Claude, had signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon but insisted on two red lines: no mass surveillance of U.S. citizens and no autonomous weapons without human oversight. When the Pentagon demanded unrestricted use, Anthropic refused, citing ethical concerns. In a show of solidarity, over 400 employees from OpenAI and Google signed an open letter supporting Anthropic’s position. OpenAI’s CEO also internally affirmed similar principles. However, this unity was short-lived. After Anthropic held its ground and rejected the Pentagon’s ultimatum, it was labeled a "supply chain security risk," effectively barring it from all federal contracts. Meanwhile, OpenAI secured the Pentagon contract by accepting less stringent terms, agreeing not to engage in mass surveillance or autonomous weapons but without pushing for additional legal safeguards. The piece highlights the political and ideological dimensions of the conflict, noting that Anthropic’s stance was perceived as "woke" and ideologically driven, while OpenAI’s more pragmatic approach was rewarded. The outcome signals the high cost of resisting government pressure in the AI industry and raises questions about the real-world value of ethical principles when faced with political and economic consequences.

marsbit46 dk önce

What Brought GPT and Claude Together? Opposing the Pentagon?

marsbit46 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片