Can XRP Catch Up To SWIFT? This Latest ISO Is Changing The Game

bitcoinist2026-05-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A crypto analyst argues that SWIFT's upcoming global shift to the ISO 20022 messaging standard by November 2026 will force a major overhaul of the legacy banking system, potentially benefiting XRP. The analyst, Cheeky Crypto, explains that SWIFT will phase out unstructured messaging, compelling banks to adopt structured, blockchain-backed solutions. He suggests institutions, lacking time and resources to build their own compliant systems, are increasingly turning to existing, regulator-approved bridges like XRP to ensure liquidity. He notes rising institutional interest in XRP-based products and highlights the XRP Ledger's advantages—settling transactions in seconds for minimal cost compared to the days and high fees of traditional cross-border transfers. Ripple's Executive Chairman is cited, stating the 2026 mandate will "wash away" non-compliant, legacy foundations.

A crypto analyst has said that the global banking system is about to be forcibly changed, as a new SWIFT mandate sets a critical deadline that could change XRP and Ripple forever. ISO 20022 is SWIFT’s new global messaging standard for cross-border payments, and the change is set to take full effect in November 2026. The analyst said that SWIFT will shut down the older unstructured messaging, forcing every major bank onto a new system. He also suggests this could have major implications for XRP, as it aims to serve as a global bridge asset for cross-border transfers.

SWIFT’s ISO 20022 To Overhaul Unstructured Messaging

In a YouTube video released on May 10, a market analyst known as Cheeky Crypto said that SWIFT is about to bring “the death of legacy banking data.” He noted that the new ISO 20022 mandate will remove unstructured addresses within the SWIFT network by November 2026. According to him, if banks fail to comply with these new standards, their transactions will not be cleared or processed.

Cheeky Crypto explained that over the past few decades, traditional banks have consistently relied on messy manual data-entry systems, which often lead to failed or delayed transactions. However, SWIFT is ending this era and introducing new solutions backed by structured data that run on blockchain technology.

Notably, Cheeky Crypto said he spent the last few days researching XRP’s role within this upcoming global money shift. He noted that as legacy systems prepare for a major change, institutions are being backed into a corner because they do not have the time or money to build compliant systems of their own. Because of this, he said banks are now looking for existing bridges like XRP that are already cleared by regulators. He noted that trillions of dollars from these institutions are set to move into blockchain-ready solutions like XRP, to ensure global liquidity continues to flow effectively.

According to the analyst, institutional inflows into XRP-based products are already rising significantly ahead of the November deadline. He said the move is primarily driven by corporate entities desperate to remain operational before SWIFT shuts the door on its old unstructured messaging standards.

He also cited a statement by Ripple’s Executive Chairman, Chris Larsen, who said that legacy banking systems are built on weak foundations. Larsen noted that the upcoming “2026 mandate is the tide coming to wash away anything that isn’t structured, verified, and compliant.”

XRP Ledger Presented As Better Alternative For Banks

In his video, Cheeky Crypto also stated that banks are now showing strong interest in the XRP Ledger as legacy systems break down and they build stronger ones. The analyst noted that XRP is built to handle the exact type of structured data SWIFT is trying to build instantly.

To back this up, Cheeky Crypto has compared the average transaction time and cost of legacy cross-border transfers with those of the XRP Ledger settlement. He says that legacy systems tend to take 3-5 days and cost a fortune in hidden fees. Meanwhile, the Ledger settles a transaction in roughly 3-5 seconds for a fraction of a penny.

XRP trading at $1.46 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the ISO 20022 mandate and what is its key deadline according to the article?

AISO 20022 is SWIFT's new global messaging standard for cross-border payments, and the key deadline for it to fully take effect is November 2026.

QWhat major change does SWIFT's ISO 20022 mandate bring to the global banking system, according to the analyst Cheeky Crypto?

AThe ISO 20022 mandate will remove unstructured messaging and addresses within the SWIFT network, forcing every major bank onto the new structured data system and effectively ending the era of messy manual data-entry.

QWhy are banks increasingly looking towards solutions like XRP according to the article?

ABanks are looking towards existing, regulator-cleared bridges like XRP because they lack the time and money to build their own compliant systems from scratch for the upcoming SWIFT changes, and they need to ensure global liquidity continues to flow effectively.

QHow does the XRP Ledger's transaction performance compare to legacy cross-border transfer systems as stated in the article?

ALegacy cross-border transfers typically take 3-5 days with high hidden fees, while the XRP Ledger settles a transaction in roughly 3-5 seconds for a fraction of a penny.

QWhat did Ripple's Executive Chairman, Chris Larsen, say about the upcoming 2026 mandate?

AChris Larsen stated that the upcoming 2026 mandate 'is the tide coming to wash away anything that isn’t structured, verified, and compliant,' implying that legacy banking systems built on weak foundations will be forced to change.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Diamond Hands Set New Supply Record Of 14.8 Million BTC

The supply of Bitcoin held by long-term holders (those holding for over 155 days) has reached a new all-time high of 14.8 million BTC, signaling strong investor conviction. After a period of profit-taking and selling during price declines through late 2025 and early 2026, this metric has reversed its trend since February. The rising supply indicates a growing tendency to HODL, as coins enter this category only after being held for over five months. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price has stalled in its recovery, trading sideways around $80,700.

bitcoinist17 dk önce

Bitcoin Diamond Hands Set New Supply Record Of 14.8 Million BTC

bitcoinist17 dk önce

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

In a concentrated move over the past week, several Wall Street giants have advanced their tokenized money market fund initiatives, signaling a strategic shift driven by impending U.S. stablecoin regulations. JPMorgan Chase launched its second such fund, JLTXX, on Ethereum, explicitly targeting future stablecoin issuer reserve needs. Concurrently, Franklin Templeton partnered with Kraken to integrate its BENJI tokenized funds onto the exchange platform for use as collateral and cash management tools. BlackRock further solidified its position by filing for two new tokenized funds with the SEC, aiming to convert its massive traditional stablecoin custody business into a tokenized model. These parallel developments represent a multi-pronged institutional "compliance hunt" to capture future crypto liquidity. BlackRock and JPMorgan are focusing on the backend, preparing to serve as the core reserve and settlement infrastructure for compliant stablecoins as outlined by the GENIUS Act. This act defines strict "qualified reserve asset" requirements for stablecoin backing while prohibiting interest payments to holders. Franklin Templeton and Kraken, however, are exploiting a potential regulatory gap. By offering a tokenized fund (BENJI) that is not a stablecoin, they aim to provide yield-bearing, collateralizable digital cash instruments, circumventing GENIUS Act's ban on stablecoin yield. The impending CLARITY Act, which will delineate digital asset market structure, is seen as a complementary piece to GENIUS. Its treatment of passive income could solidify the niche for instruments like BENJI. With conservative market size estimates for tokenized money market funds reaching hundreds of billions by 2030, Wall Street institutions are positioning themselves early, using on-chain settlement as a key competitive differentiator to offer superior liquidity and composability for the next generation of dollar reserves.

marsbit21 dk önce

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

marsbit21 dk önce

SK Hynix Becomes the 'Capitalist Traitor', Samsung Employees Launch Major Strike

A major labor dispute is escalating at Samsung Electronics, with its union threatening an 18-day strike from May 21st after mediation failed. The core conflict is over profit-sharing, not the wage increase amount. The union, emboldened by a precedent set at rival SK Hynix, demands a permanent, formula-based annual bonus tied to 13% of the semiconductor division's operating profit. Management offered a large one-time payout instead, refusing to institutionalize an annual split, fearing it would set a costly precedent across Samsung's diverse business groups and the wider Korean conglomerate system. SK Hynix's deal, guaranteeing employees 10% of annual operating profit for a decade, has already delivered substantial bonuses due to its dominance in the lucrative HBM memory market for AI chips. This has triggered rare employee movement from Samsung to SK Hynix. The strike, potentially involving tens of thousands, risks impacting global DRAM and NAND production. Analysts see this as the start of a broader recalibration within the AI supply chain, where workers in critical, scarce roles are beginning to renegotiate their share of the massive profits generated, moving beyond traditional models like stock options towards more direct, transparent cash profit-sharing agreements.

marsbit32 dk önce

SK Hynix Becomes the 'Capitalist Traitor', Samsung Employees Launch Major Strike

marsbit32 dk önce

Research Debunks AI Layoff Myth: 80% of Companies Cut Jobs, None Made Money From It

Research Debunks AI Layoff Myth: 80% of Firms That Cut Jobs Saw No Financial Gain A Gartner survey of 350 large enterprises (revenue >$10B) found 80% that deployed AI/automation conducted layoffs, but found no positive correlation between the scale of layoffs and financial return. Companies that cut more jobs did not outperform those that cut fewer. The highest returns were achieved by "human-amplified" businesses using AI to augment employee productivity rather than replace them. Meanwhile, nearly 50,000 U.S. jobs were cut due to AI in the first four months of 2026, with tech sector layoffs hitting a three-year high. The report suggests that current AI-driven layoffs may often be small-scale experiments or "AI washing"—using AI as a pretext for cuts driven by other economic pressures. Short-term challenges are significant, with over 40% of AI agent projects predicted to be cancelled by 2027 due to cost and value issues. However, Gartner forecasts AI will become a net job creator by 2028-2029, creating new roles that AI cannot fulfill. Despite high project failure rates, AI software spending is projected to grow rapidly, from $86.4B in 2025 to $376.3B in 2027.

marsbit34 dk önce

Research Debunks AI Layoff Myth: 80% of Companies Cut Jobs, None Made Money From It

marsbit34 dk önce

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

In a California court, Sam Altman testified for the first time in the ongoing legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI. Altman made a striking claim: Musk once suggested that control of OpenAI could one day be passed down to his children. This statement reframes the long-standing conflict not as a simple governance dispute but as a foundational power struggle. Altman sought to counter the narrative that OpenAI betrayed its original non-profit, idealistic mission. He argued that from the beginning, it was Musk who sought increasing control over the organization, including a larger equity stake and ultimate decision-making authority. Altman opposed this, citing OpenAI's core principle that AGI should not be controlled by any single individual. He also addressed the key point of contention about OpenAI's shift to a for-profit structure, claiming Musk was aware of and initially supportive of exploring such a model to secure the massive funding needed for advanced AI research. Altman framed the change as a practical necessity, not a betrayal. Further testimony revealed internal concerns after Musk left OpenAI's board, with worries he might take retaliatory action. Altman critiqued Musk's management style as unsuitable for a research lab, damaging morale and culture. Throughout his testimony, Altman's focus appeared to shift from technological idealism to the realities of organizational governance and resource requirements. Regarding his brief ouster in 2023, Altman stated he seriously considered joining Microsoft but ultimately returned because OpenAI was too important to abandon.

marsbit1 saat önce

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures