Robinhood CEO: Five Years After the GameStop Incident, We Are Committing to Unlocking Real-Time Settlement for Retail Traders Through Tokenization

marsbit2026-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Five years after the GameStop trading halt, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev reflects on the event and outlines the company's push for real-time settlement through tokenization. The 2021 trading restrictions were caused by legacy clearinghouse risk rules tied to the slow T+2 settlement cycle, which required massive capital reserves during periods of high volatility. While advocating for and achieving T+1 settlement in the initial response, Tenev argues it remains insufficient in today's 24/7 markets. The solution is tokenization—converting stocks into blockchain-based tokens. This enables real-time settlement, drastically reducing systemic risk, lowering costs, and allowing for features like 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, and DeFi integration. Robinhood has already launched over 2,000 tokenized US stocks in Europe, with plans to enable round-the-clock trading and self-custody. Tenev emphasizes that US adoption requires a clear regulatory framework, noting recent SEC openness to innovation and the importance of the CLARITY Act in establishing modern rules for stock tokenization. The goal is to prevent future trading restrictions and fully unlock real-time settlement for retail investors.

Author: Vlad Tenev, Co-founder and CEO of Robinhood

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

What exactly happened? And how can we ensure such an event never happens again?

Five years ago today, Robinhood and other brokerages were forced to halt purchases of several "meme stocks," most notably GameStop. It was one of the most bizarre and dramatic stock market crashes in recent memory.

The root cause of this trading halt lay in a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risks stemming from the then two-day settlement cycle for U.S. stock trades. These rules required brokerages to deposit massive amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of these highly volatile "meme stocks." What happens when slow, antiquated financial infrastructure collides with unprecedented trading volume and volatility in a handful of stocks? Massive deposit requirements, trading restrictions, and millions of angry customers.

Retail investors trying to buy GameStop stock were understandably furious. In their eyes, Robinhood went from hero to villain. I was just one month into my role as CEO of Robinhood, facing my first major crisis. After many team members worked around the clock for 72 hours to address the immediate fire and raise over $3 billion to shore up our capital reserves, we finally had a moment to step back and assess the situation. I vowed to do everything in my power not only to improve Robinhood's resilience in a similar scenario but also to advocate for systemic improvements to ensure such an event never happens again.

We strongly advocated for real-time settlement of U.S. stock trades, ultimately helping to shorten the settlement cycle from 2 days (T+2) to T+1—arguably the most significant achievement during Gensler's tenure as Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), despite the otherwise regrettable aspects of that period.

But in an era of 24-hour news cycles and real-time market reactions, a T+1 settlement cycle is still too long, especially when it effectively becomes T+3 on Fridays and T+4 over long weekends. Our pursuit of real-time settlement continues, but within the traditional stock market, achieving it has been elusive due to the need to manage numerous legacy stakeholders. Clearly, a new approach was needed.

Enter tokenization. Tokenization is the process of converting an asset, like a stock, into a token that exists on a blockchain. Among its many advantages—such as lower costs, native fractionalization, and 24/7 trading—putting stocks on-chain as tokens allows them to benefit from the real-time settlement properties of blockchain technology. The elimination of long settlement cycles means significantly reduced systemic risk and less strain on clearinghouses and brokers, allowing customers to trade freely, anytime, anywhere.

We've already seen this approach work. In Europe, Robinhood has launched tokens representing over 2,000 U.S.-listed stocks. These tokens allow European traders to invest in U.S. equities and receive dividend payments. In the coming months, we plan to enable 24/7 trading and decentralized finance (DeFi) services, where investors can self-custody their stock tokens and engage in activities like lending and staking.

As the advantages become increasingly clear, I believe it's imperative for the U.S. to embrace this technology. We are already seeing some progress: major U.S. exchanges and clearinghouses recently announced plans for stock tokenization.

But without a clear regulatory framework, these efforts will be in vain. Fortunately, we now have a prime opportunity. The current leadership at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is actively embracing innovation and encouraging experimentation with tokenization. Furthermore, Congress is actively considering the CLARITY Act, significant crypto legislation that would require the SEC to continue advancing this technology and establish modern rules for stock tokenization. This act would ensure that subsequent SEC leadership cannot abandon or reverse the progress made by the current commission.

By working with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and advocating for sound U.S. stock tokenization guidelines through CLARITY, we can collectively ensure that trading restrictions like those in 2021 never happen again. Let's seize the moment and finally unlock real-time settlement for retail traders.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the root cause that forced Robinhood and other brokers to halt purchases of meme stocks like GameStop five years ago?

AThe root cause was a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risk from the two-day settlement cycle (T+2) for US stock trading at the time. These rules required brokers to deposit huge amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of the highly volatile meme stocks.

QWhat specific improvement did Robinhood advocate for and help achieve in the US stock settlement system after the incident?

ARobinhood advocated for real-time settlement and helped achieve a reduction of the US stock settlement cycle from two days (T+2) to one day (T+1).

QAccording to the article, what is tokenization and what is its key advantage for stock trading mentioned in relation to settlement?

ATokenization is the process of converting assets, like stocks, into tokens that exist on a blockchain. Its key advantage for settlement is that it enables real-time settlement, which eliminates the long settlement cycle, drastically reduces systemic risk, and relieves pressure on clearinghouses and brokers.

QWhat has Robinhood already launched in Europe that demonstrates the feasibility of tokenizing US-listed stocks?

AIn Europe, Robinhood has launched over 2,000 tokens representing US-listed stocks, which enable European traders to invest in US stocks and receive dividend payments.

QWhat US legislative act does the article mention as being crucial for establishing a regulatory framework for stock tokenization?

AThe article mentions the CLARITY Act, a significant piece of crypto legislation being actively considered by Congress, which would require the SEC to advance this technology and create modern rules for stock tokenization.

İlgili Okumalar

Interpretation of Hong Kong's New Virtual Asset Licensing Regulations: Joint Announcement by Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and SFC Declares Entry into the 'Full Licensing' Era

Hong Kong's Financial Services and Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have jointly issued a consultation conclusion and launched a new public consultation, marking a significant step towards a comprehensive licensing regime for virtual asset (VA) activities. The new framework expands beyond the existing Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance (AMLO) requirements for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (VATPs) to establish mandatory licensing for VA trading, custody, advisory, and asset management services. Key measures include: - **VA Trading Services**: Defined similarly to "Type 1 regulated activity (dealing in securities)" under the SFO. Licensees must meet capital requirements (HK$5 million paid-up capital, HK$3 million liquid capital) and must use SFC-regulated custodians, separating trading and custody. - **VA Custody Services**: Standalone custodians require higher capital (HK$10 million paid-up capital) and must adhere to strict operational standards for cold/hot wallet storage, private key management, and independent audits. - **New Proposed Licenses**: A one-month consultation introduces licensing for "VA advisory services" (providing investment advice on VAs) and "VA asset management" (managing VA portfolios), with no minimum threshold exemptions, closing regulatory gaps. This shift to a "fully licensed" era aims to build institutional trust by imposing traditional financial standards, enhancing investor protection, and creating a regulated ecosystem. However, challenges include compliance costs for smaller players, potential capital outflow, and the need for regulatory capacity to handle applications and technical oversight. Market participants must immediately assess their services against the new classifications, begin licensing preparations, and integrate compliance into their long-term competitive strategy, including potential tax implications and reporting requirements. The landscape may evolve towards integrated full-service groups and specialized niche providers.

marsbit7 dk önce

Interpretation of Hong Kong's New Virtual Asset Licensing Regulations: Joint Announcement by Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and SFC Declares Entry into the 'Full Licensing' Era

marsbit7 dk önce

The Watershed of Gold Certificates: The Collapse of Jierui and the Fundamental Differences with Tether

A significant divergence in the model of gold-backed platforms is highlighted by the collapse of Jierui in China and the expansion of Tether’s gold-backed stablecoin, XAUT. In late January, Jierui, a Shenzhen-based gold trading platform, failed amid a liquidity crisis. Users faced severe withdrawal restrictions, with many unable to access funds despite holding substantial gold and cash balances. The platform offered unfavorable settlement terms, exposing a classic model of unregulated financial risk. Jierui’s core flaw was its use of high-leverage “pre-set price” trading, where users bet on gold price movements against the platform—effectively an unhedged options market. When gold prices rose sharply in 2025–2026, the platform faced unsustainable liabilities, triggering a collapse. In contrast, Tether Gold (XAUT) operates on a fully reserved, 1:1 model—each token represents one ounce of physical gold, held in reserve. With over 140 tons of gold, Tether has become one of the world’s top gold holders. Its transparent, asset-backed approach has allowed it to thrive amid gold price appreciation, with its gold reserves gaining over $5 billion in value. Tether is further expanding its gold acquisitions and leveraging market opportunities through professional trading. While Jierui’s failure underscores the risks of opaque, leveraged structures, Tether’s growth demonstrates how digitized, verifiable gold assets can serve as a resilient store of value—especially in an era of geopolitical and financial uncertainty.

比推19 dk önce

The Watershed of Gold Certificates: The Collapse of Jierui and the Fundamental Differences with Tether

比推19 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片