GTreasury unveils ‘Ripple Treasury’ – Is TradFi about to get disrupted?

ambcrypto2026-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Ripple and GTreasury have launched "Ripple Treasury," a product integrating XRPL blockchain rails with GTreasury's enterprise treasury software. This partnership aims to streamline financial operations for GTreasury's network of 13,000 banks, targeting faster, cheaper cross-border payments and offering full cash visibility for flows up to $12.5 trillion. Ripple's native stablecoin, RLUSD, which has seen significant growth and dominates XRPL's stablecoin market, provides the on-chain liquidity. This move positions XRPL as a bridge into traditional finance (TradFi), using blockchain to enhance efficiency, liquidity management, and risk oversight in banking operations.

What started as tech to support “decentralization” has now found its footing in the financial world. With how things are shaping up, the future looks bright for decentralized finance (DeFi) and the way we handle money.

Payments are naturally the ground most L1 blockchains are now targeting as a bridge from TradFi to DeFi. Ripple’s [XRP] $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury last year, for instance, was a major step in line with this strategy.

Building on that move, Ripple and GTreasury have now teamed up to launch Ripple Treasury, aiming for faster cross-border payments by plugging XRPL rails into GTreasury’s enterprise-grade treasury software.

As noted on Ripple’s official website, the goal of the treasury is to streamline financial operations for GTreasury’s network of 13,000 banks, offering 100% cash visibility and supporting flows of up to $12.5 trillion.

At the macro level, this move is another major boost for XRPL’s real-world adoption. Its native stablecoin, RLUSD, powers these payments by providing on-chain liquidity, faster settlement, and a seamless experience.

In short, this partnership shows how blockchain can do what traditional banks do, but faster, cheaper, and more efficiently. Naturally, it raises a key question: Is this Ripple’s first “real” step toward outpacing TradFi?

Ripple brings blockchain speed to banks

Ripple’s RLUSD is showing its growing impact in the market.

According to DeFiLlama, its circulating supply on XRPL has jumped 15.36% over the past 30 days, bringing the total to 388 million. That’s 60 million added in on-chain liquidity, ready as dry powder for real-world use.

And it’s not stopping there. The total stablecoin market on XRPL hit a $400 million ATH, with $100 million added so far in 2026. RLUSD makes up 83% of that, cementing its role as the backbone of the network’s liquidity.

In this context, Ripple’s push into TradFi isn’t random.

Instead, its growing stablecoin presence is positioning XRPL as a bridge. Think of it this way: RLUSD acts like a digital highway, letting banks move money instantly while still connecting to the systems they already use.

However, with Ripple Treasury now in place, the system adds a full suite of enterprise-grade treasury tools like liquidity management, risk oversight, and payments, bringing blockchain speed straight into traditional finance.

Against this backdrop, the Ripple–GTreasury partnership isn’t just another move to support banks. Instead, it’s a strategic push into the heart of TradFi, using stablecoins to make banking operations more efficient.


Final Thoughts

  • Ripple and GTreasury have launched a Ripple Treasury to integrate XRPL rails with GTreasury’s enterprise-grade tools.
  • Ripple is positioning XRPL as a bridge for traditional finance, using stablecoins to make banking faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main goal of the newly launched 'Ripple Treasury' by GTreasury and Ripple?

AThe main goal of Ripple Treasury is to streamline financial operations for GTreasury's network of 13,000 banks by offering 100% cash visibility, supporting massive payment flows, and enabling faster cross-border payments by integrating XRPL's blockchain rails with GTreasury's enterprise-grade treasury software.

QHow does Ripple's stablecoin, RLUSD, contribute to the XRPL ecosystem according to the article?

ARLUSD provides on-chain liquidity, enables faster settlement, and offers a seamless payment experience. It acts as the backbone of the network's liquidity, making up 83% of the total stablecoin market on XRPL, which recently hit a $400 million all-time high.

QWhat was the strategic significance of Ripple's $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury last year?

AThe acquisition was a major strategic step to bridge TradFi and DeFi, specifically targeting the payments sector. It laid the foundation for integrating Ripple's blockchain technology with GTreasury's established treasury management tools for traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific advantages does the article claim blockchain technology has over traditional banking (TradFi)?

AThe article states that blockchain can perform the same functions as traditional banks but with greater speed, lower cost, and higher efficiency. It highlights faster cross-border payments, improved liquidity management, and enhanced risk oversight as key advantages.

QHow much has the circulating supply of RLUSD on XRPL increased in the past 30 days, and what does this signify?

AThe circulating supply of RLUSD on XRPL has jumped 15.36% in the past 30 days, adding 60 million in on-chain liquidity. This growth signifies increasing market adoption and readiness of 'dry powder' for real-world financial use cases.

İlgili Okumalar

Data Modeling: How to Improve the Quality of Interaction on Polymarket?

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is anticipated to have one of the largest airdrops in the sector. This analysis provides a data-driven strategy to optimize user interactions for potential rewards. A critical finding is that public dashboards often double-count trading volume by including both sides of a trade. The true, single-sided figure is likely half of what is displayed, which will be the metric Polymarket uses internally. User distribution data reveals extreme concentration: only 0.51% of addresses profited over $1,000, and a mere 1.74% traded over $50,000. Crucially, 79% of traders have never earned even $1 in liquidity provider (LP) rewards, making LP activity a currently undervalued and highly capital-efficient interaction. Historical airdrop precedents suggest rewards will be based on active behavior—not profitability—to avoid favoring insiders. A multi-dimensional model is predicted, likely featuring: * 40% weight on trade volume (using a square root compression formula to limit whale dominance). * 35% weight on LP rewards. * 15% weight on market diversity (number of distinct markets traded in). * 10% weight on longevity (months active). The analysis advises users to accumulate genuine, on-chain provable volume across diverse markets, hold positions for 1-24 hours, and, most importantly, begin providing liquidity to accumulate LP rewards, which are a strong anti-Sybil signal. A hard cap per address is also expected to prevent excessive concentration of the airdrop.

Odaily星球日报16 dk önce

Data Modeling: How to Improve the Quality of Interaction on Polymarket?

Odaily星球日报16 dk önce

Deep Reflections Behind the OP Plunge

In a significant move, Coinbase's Base announced its departure from the Optimism OP Stack to develop its own proprietary unified architecture, causing a sharp 20% drop in $OP’s price. This event highlights the ongoing debate between two competing economic models for blockchain infrastructure: Optimism’s fully open-source, MIT-licensed approach versus Arbitrum’s “community source” model, which mandates a 10% protocol income contribution from chains built on its Orbit stack that settle outside the Arbitrum ecosystem. Optimism’s strategy emphasizes openness and network effects, attracting major projects like Base, Worldcoin, and Uniswap with its modular, permission-free stack. However, this model risks ecosystem fragmentation, as high-value chains may eventually choose independence. In contrast, Arbitrum enforces economic alignment through its revenue-sharing requirement, aiming for long-term sustainability, though it may slow initial adoption. This tension mirrors historical open-source dilemmas, such as those seen with Linux, MySQL, and WordPress, where balancing free access with sustainable funding remains challenging. In crypto, the presence of native tokens amplifies these dynamics, making economic alignment and infrastructure financing even more critical. Neither model is perfect—each involves trade-offs between growth and sustainability. The key takeaway is the need for a broader ecosystem discussion on how to fund and maintain essential public infrastructure without relying on free-riders. Base’s exit should serve as a catalyst for this conversation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Deep Reflections Behind the OP Plunge

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片