Backpack Surges Over 150% in Half a Month

marsbit2026-06-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

BP, the token of the Backpack exchange, has surged over 150% since early June, driven by the platform's expansion into regulated US stock brokerage and asset tokenization services. On June 2nd, Backpack announced Backpack Securities, offering traditional stock trading and tokenization, causing BP's price to jump over 80%. Momentum continued on June 12th with the launch of SPCX, a tokenized product for SpaceX stock on Solana, facilitating seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. This aligns with the RWA (Real World Assets) narrative, creating a bridge between traditional finance and Solana DeFi. The token's unique economics also support its growth. All 2.5 billion initially circulating tokens were airdropped to the community, with zero allocation to the team or investors at launch. A key feature allows users who stake BP for at least one year to gain the right to convert tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Despite some initial community controversy over airdrop distribution, focus is shifting to BP's long-term utility and value alignment as real products launch.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On June 15, the Backpack exchange token BP surged over 30% again within 24 hours, currently quoted at $0.475 with a market cap of $118.48 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $473.94 million. Since early June this year, BP has skyrocketed from around $0.16, breaking through a high of $0.48.

The direct catalyst for this market surge stems from the platform's latest breakthroughs in traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services.

Venturing into U.S. Stock Brokerage and Tokenization Business

In March 2026, BP completed its Token Generation Event (TGE) on Solana with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 250 million. After listing, the token price briefly touched a high point before rapidly declining, with a single-day drop exceeding 40% at its worst, as the market was once filled with profit-taking pressure. For several weeks thereafter, the price consolidated at lower levels until a turning point emerged in early June.

On June 2, Backpack announced the launch of the Backpack Securities platform, which will provide regulated U.S. stock brokerage services while also supporting the tokenization of traditional stocks for circulation on the blockchain, enabling seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. The brokerage service is planned to launch gradually in June, with initial tokenized products rolled out in the Solana ecosystem through a partnership with Sunrise. BP skyrocketed over 80% in a single day, rapidly climbing from the $0.14-$0.15 range to around $0.27, with its market cap approaching $70 million at one point.

On June 12, coinciding with SpaceX's listing on NASDAQ, its tokenized product SPCX launched on Solana. In the subsequent 24 hours, BP rose approximately 27% further, pushing its price above $0.347. This token is pegged 1:1 to real SpaceX shares, supports 24/7 on-chain trading, and can be redeemed through a Backpack brokerage account into a traditional securities account, achieving interoperability between on-chain and off-chain assets. On its first day of launch, the product generated around $35-38 million in on-chain trading volume across DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium. According to the latest official data, the total on-chain SPCX trading volume exceeds $86 million.

Backpack is building a bridge between traditional U.S. stocks and Solana DeFi. Users can not only trade crypto assets within the platform but also access real stocks through the same account and tokenize portions of their assets for use, trading, or composition on-chain. This pathway aligns highly with the current RWA (Real World Assets) narrative and provides the BP token with clearer use cases and demand support.

BP's recent surge stems more from substantial platform business expansion than short-term speculation. Currently, its official website shows that Backpack's total custodied assets (nominal value) have rebounded to $390 million.

No Tokens for the Team Unless the Company Goes Public

Supporting the above business development is the BP token and its unique economic structure launched as early as March. The total supply of 1 billion tokens is divided into three phases: 25% (250 million) at TGE was entirely airdropped to community users, with approximately 240 million allocated to participants in the points program and 10 million to Mad Lads NFT holders. At launch, the team, founders, and investors received 0 token allocation; 37.5% in the Pre-IPO phase is tied to growth triggers such as regulatory milestones and product launches, continuing to be distributed to users upon unlocking; 37.5% in the Post-IPO phase enters the company treasury, locked for at least one year after an IPO, with the team benefiting only through equity, not directly through tokens.

The most attention-grabbing mechanism is the equity conversion design: users who stake BP for at least 1 year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition, with the bonus increasing with holding time up to the 4th year based on the initial unlock.

Additionally, staking provides benefits such as tiered trading fee discounts, extra yield on USD collateral, free wire transfers, and priority access to the Backpack Card. Currently, about 66% (approximately 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

While the airdrop process was technically smooth, it also sparked community discussion. Supporters argue that the "no insider TGE allocation" model is quite radical, and the points system genuinely rewarded trading and ecosystem participation. Criticism focused on the relatively strict Sybil filtering mechanism, which led to some long-term users having their points removed, resulting in lower-than-expected allocations, as well as noticeable profit-taking during the post-listing price correction. CEO Armani Ferrante publicly denied allegations of team OTC sales.

These controversies temporarily affected market sentiment, but as tangible products like Backpack Securities were launched, the focus is gradually shifting from allocation details to the platform's long-term growth and the token's actual utility. Against the backdrop of the platform's expansion into U.S. stock brokerage and tokenization services, the long-term alignment value of BP's staking and equity mechanisms is being reevaluated.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the key factor driving the recent sharp increase in the price of Backpack's BP token?

AThe key driver is Backpack's expansion into traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services through its new Backpack Securities platform, starting with the tokenized SpaceX (SPCX) offering on Solana.

QWhat is the unique feature of BP's tokenomics regarding team and investor allocation?

AAt TGE, 0 tokens were allocated to the team, founders, or investors. 100% of the initial circulating supply (25% of total) was airdropped to the community. Team members can only benefit through company equity (via a token conversion option post-IPO), not through direct token holdings.

QWhat significant milestone for Backpack occurred on June 12 alongside SpaceX's NASDAQ IPO?

AOn June 12, the tokenized product for SpaceX, SPCX, was launched on Solana. It is a 1:1 tokenized representation of real SpaceX stock, facilitating 24/7 on-chain trading.

QWhat major benefit can BP stakers obtain, and what percentage of the circulating supply is currently staked?

AStakers who lock BP for at least one year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Currently, approximately 66% (about 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

QWhat criticism did the BP token airdrop face from parts of the community?

ACriticism focused on the Sybil filtering mechanism being overly strict, which led to some long-term users having their points invalidated and receiving fewer tokens than expected. There were also accusations of team OTC selling, which the CEO denied.

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit18 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit18 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit21 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit21 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit41 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit41 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片