Jane Street Sued: Suspected of Using Telegram Insider Information to Exit and Short Before Terra Collapse, Profiting $134 Million

marsbit2026-05-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Wall Street trading giant Jane Street Group is facing a lawsuit alleging it used insider information from a private Telegram channel with a former Terraform Labs intern to avoid losses and profit from the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022. According to newly unsealed court documents, Jane Street allegedly sold nearly $192 million worth of the UST stable币 before its depeg, and then established short positions, netting approximately $134 million in profits. The suit, filed by Terraform's bankruptcy estate, claims the firm gained a critical "information advantage" through these private communications, allowing it to execute large sales, including an $85 million UST transaction on Curve Finance minutes after Terraform quietly withdrew liquidity. Jane Street has denied the allegations as "baseless" and moved to dismiss the case. A 2023 court ruling that classified UST and Luna as securities bolsters the legal basis of this suit.

Author:CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Chao TechFlow

Deep Chao Introduction: Wall Street's top trading firm, Jane Street, is accused of using a private Telegram chat to obtain insider information before the Terra collapse, precisely exiting their position and shorting to profit $134 million. This lawsuit not only exposes the information advantage of traditional finance giants in the crypto market but also gains stronger legal footing due to a 2023 court ruling that recognized UST and Luna as securities. It holds significant reference value for investors understanding institutional behavior and market manipulation.

Jane Street Group, one of Wall Street's largest trading firms, is accused of selling $192 million worth of the TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin just before the Terra collapse in May 2022, allegedly through a private Telegram channel with Terraform Labs insiders, according to newly unsealed court filings in Manhattan federal court.

The lawsuit, brought by the administrator liquidating Terraform's bankruptcy estate, was amended last week to reduce redactions and reveal new details about how Jane Street allegedly obtained non-public information as the Terra ecosystem crumbled.

Jane Street denied the initial allegations when they were filed in February, calling them "desperate" and "baseless," and asked the court to dismiss the case.

According to the suit, Jane Street's alleged informational edge came from a private Telegram backchannel between former Terraform intern Bryce Pratt (then working at Jane Street) and his former Terraform colleagues.

The bankruptcy administrator claims this access helped Jane Street unload its UST position near its face value before the algorithmic stablecoin's implosion and then establish short positions, profiting approximately $134 million during the collapse of Terra's $40 billion ecosystem.

In one internal exchange cited in the suit, Pratt allegedly joked that colleagues should be "slightly happier" about having an "information advantage."

With that advantage, Jane Street allegedly sold its entire UST position on May 7, 2022, unloading roughly 193 million tokens. Its single largest trade was an $85 million UST sale on the decentralized exchange Curve Finance, which occurred just nine minutes after Terraform quietly withdrew $150 million in UST liquidity from the same pool.

This trade is significant because public post-mortems of Terra's collapse have long focused on a large swap on Curve that helped push the token off its $1 peg. The lawsuit now alleges that wallet belonged to Jane Street.

When a crypto analytics firm later told a Jane Street contact that the firm had "made a killing," internal communications cited in the case show traders worrying about how their wallet was identified and then discussing how to "deactivate" them.

"This lawsuit is a transparent attempt to extract money in the well-known context that losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were the result of a multi-billion dollar fraud perpetrated by Terraform Labs management," a Jane Street spokesperson said. "As demonstrated by the motion to dismiss filed with the court last month, we will vigorously defend ourselves against these baseless, opportunistic claims."

The suit also names Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri and trader Michael Huang. It alleges violations of federal securities laws and the Commodity Exchange Act and seeks to recover the profits to repay creditors.

A 2023 federal court ruling in a separate U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission case that found UST and Luna qualified as securities gives the new lawsuit stronger legal grounding.

The lawsuit states that on May 18, 2022, five days after UST bottomed, Jane Street offered a job to a Terraform research lead. He joined the firm two weeks later.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the core accusation against Jane Street Group in the lawsuit related to Terra's collapse?

AJane Street Group is accused of obtaining non-public insider information about Terraform Labs through a private Telegram channel with a former Terraform intern, allegedly using that information to sell off $192 million worth of UST stablecoin and establish short positions before Terra's collapse, profiting approximately $134 million.

QWho is Bryce Pratt mentioned in the article, and what role does the lawsuit allege he played?

ABryce Pratt is a former Terraform Labs intern who was working at Jane Street. The lawsuit alleges he provided Jane Street access to a private 'backdoor' Telegram channel with his former Terraform colleagues, giving the firm an information advantage.

QWhat specific transaction on Curve Finance is highlighted in the lawsuit as significant to the UST depegging?

AThe lawsuit highlights Jane Street's sale of $85 million worth of UST on the Curve Finance decentralized exchange, which occurred just nine minutes after Terraform Labs quietly removed $150 million in UST liquidity from the same pool. This transaction is alleged to have been a key event in pushing UST away from its $1 peg.

QHow did a 2023 court ruling in an SEC case impact the legal basis for this new lawsuit against Jane Street?

AA 2023 federal court ruling in a separate SEC case determined that UST and Luna were securities. This legal finding strengthened the foundation of the new lawsuit, which includes allegations of violations of federal securities laws.

QWhat action did Jane Street allegedly take regarding their trading wallets after an analytics firm noted their profits?

AAccording to internal communications cited in the lawsuit, after a crypto analytics firm informed a Jane Street contact that the firm had 'made a killing,' Jane Street traders expressed concern about how their wallet was identified and discussed how to 'deactivate' it.

İlgili Okumalar

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit37 dk önce

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit37 dk önce

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbit39 dk önce

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbit39 dk önce

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

"Global AI Model Unicorn" Zhipu's stock surged nearly 30% in a single day, reaching a new market cap high. The catalyst was the launch of its GLM-5.1-highspeed API, boasting a generation speed of **400 tokens per second**, setting a new global benchmark. This speed, roughly 3-5 times faster than industry leaders like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude, is achieved **without compromising the full-scale model's capabilities**. In the era of AI Agents requiring dozens of self-calls, such latency reduction is critical, transforming speed from a system metric into a determinant of intelligence limits. The breakthrough stems from a three-layer technical overhaul: 1. **TileRT Inference Engine**: Compiles the entire model into a continuous, always-on computation pipeline using "Warp Specialization," minimizing GPU idle time by having different processor groups handle data loading, computation, and communication in parallel. 2. **Heterogeneous Parallelism for MLA**: To efficiently run the GLM-5.1 model using the MLA attention mechanism, TileRT employs a heterogeneous strategy. One GPU handles sparse indexing/routing, while the others perform dense computation, optimizing for MLA's unique workflow. 3. **ZCube Network Architecture**: Replaces the standard Spine-Leaf (ROFT) network topology with a flat, dual-group interconnect. This design creates a single optimal path between any two GPUs, eliminating network congestion at scale and reducing latency. The business impact is significant: a 15% increase in cluster throughput (free extra capacity), a 40.6% reduction in tail latency (improved stability), and a one-third cut in networking hardware costs. Long-term, this innovation challenges the dominance of NVIDIA's integrated hardware-software stack (GPU+NVLink+InfiniBand), potentially benefiting manufacturers of high-density Leaf switches and optical modules while lowering the software barrier for domestic AI chips like Huawei's Ascend. The innovation proves that more can be achieved with the same compute, reshaping the infrastructure beyond just GPUs.

marsbit2 saat önce

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片