The Inside Story of Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Top Users: $20K Signing Bonus + $30K Monthly Salary

Odaily星球日报2026-08-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launchpad, is reportedly offering exclusive contracts to lure high-value users and traders away from its competitor FOMO. The alleged agreement includes a $20,000 signing bonus, a $30,000 monthly stipend, and requires users to migrate funds, use a dedicated wallet, and permanently close their FOMO accounts. This aggressive move highlights a significant shift in the competitive landscape of the meme market. FOMO, a multi-chain mobile-focused trading platform launched in 2025, has rapidly grown to challenge incumbents. Data shows its 30-day revenue recently surpassed Uniswap and Phantom, and it has overtaken GMGN to become the market leader in trading bot share. FOMO's success is largely attributed to its "social-first" design, featuring profit leaderboards and feeds that track top traders' moves. This effectively creates and promotes "meme trading influencers," turning successful traders into attention hubs that drive platform engagement and user growth. Recognizing this model's power, Pump.fun recently updated its app to replicate similar social features. The competition for influential traders signals the meme market's evolution into a "influencer-driven" phase. Platform growth now hinges less on technical features and more on securing key personalities who can attract followers and trading volume. While a standard competitive tactic, this trend risks centralizing attention around a few individuals and potentially stifling the organic, commun...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

The current Meme market is severely fragmented. Whether it's the blockchain ecosystem or the trading tools used, there is almost no intersection between overseas users and the Chinese-speaking community. This fragmentation not only diverts global Meme funds into various ecosystems but also makes "industry gossip" confusing to understand.

On August 8th, a piece of gossip about "Pump.fun spending huge sums to poach users from a competitor" went viral in overseas Meme communities.

Originally leaked by an overseas user CLR, it stated that Pump.fun is using an incentive program to lure users away from the FOMO platform to Pump.fun. According to the disclosed agreement document, Pump.fun plans to offer eligible users a one-time $20,000 signing bonus and a fixed monthly payment of $30,000. The agreement requires signed users to migrate their funds and trading positions from the FOMO platform to Pump.fun; use a new, previously unused by other platforms, wallet as their exclusive wallet; bind their X account to the Pump.fun wallet; publicly declare on their X profile that this wallet is their only public wallet; and permanently delete and close their FOMO platform account.

Additionally, users must meet real trading requirements, including completing at least $25,000 in monthly trading volume on Pump.fun (or 25% of their previous average monthly trading volume on the FOMO platform). It's clear that Pump.fun is determined to go all out to snatch users from the FOMO platform.

Translated Full Content of the Agreement (Source: 0xAA)

From a business perspective, this is a normal act of corporate competition and is perfectly legal. In entertainment platforms or user-centric business models, companies often pay KOLs or users with significant fan influence to leave competitor platforms and maintain exclusive representation on their own platform. This competition model is quite common domestically as well, such as the exorbitant exclusive contracts for internet celebrities and streamers by early short-video live-streaming platforms like Douyin, Kuaishou, Bilibili, and Huya.

But the first thing that confused onlookers about this entire incident was: Who is FOMO?

Pump.fun is the largest token launch platform overseas, consistently ranking among the top five on-chain protocols in terms of fee revenue. What reason would lead it to poach users from the FOMO platform? What kind of magic does the FOMO platform possess to become a commercial rival that makes Pump.fun nervous? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze the undercurrents and massive changes in the current overseas Meme market through this "gossip."

FOMO Has Become a Major Meme Trading Platform for Users

FOMO is a multi-chain Meme trading platform, with business and services similar to GMGN. The platform launched in May 2025 and has been in formal operation for just over a year. However, according to RootData, FOMO has completed 3 rounds of financing, raising a total of $94 million, with a valuation exceeding $550 million.

FOMO primarily serves overseas Meme communities and focuses on promoting mobile trading. Most users in the Chinese-speaking community may not have even heard of FOMO. What's even more shocking is that this platform you may never have heard of or used has already surpassed Uniswap and Phantom in revenue over the past 30 days, and its Trading Bot market share has surpassed GMGN to become number one in the market.

According to DeFiLlama data, FOMO's revenue over the past 30 days is $8.17 million. While still less than GMGN and Axiom, it has already surpassed Phantom, Uniswap, and mainstream Launchpads on Robinhood (Flap and Pons).

Meanwhile, according to Dune data, as of the time of writing, the FOMO platform's total fees have reached $30.39 million. As shown in the chart below, looking at daily fees, the FOMO platform began experiencing rapid growth starting in July, with average daily fees exceeding $200,000, having previously maintained an average of around $10,000. As of the time of writing, the FOMO platform set a new daily fee record on August 6th, reaching $556,000.

Entering August, the FOMO platform continued its high growth. As of August 8th, the FOMO platform's market share in Trading Bots has risen to 43%, surpassing GMGN to become the market leader, a position GMGN had consistently held.

How influential is FOMO now? A recent example will make it clear. On August 4th, the Solana Meme coin CATE experienced a flash crash of 65% within a minute, its market cap dropping from over $80 million to around $20 million. The community summarized two reasons: first, CATE's X account was suspended; second, FOMO went down, preventing users from trading during the outage. Of course, this incident is still controversial; interested readers can delve deeper. (Related reading:$CATE Flash Crashes 65% in One Minute, FOMO Platform's "Coincidental" Outage Raises Rug Pull Suspicions Again)

Regardless of the truth, this incident is enough to demonstrate the current influence of the FOMO platform in the Meme ecosystem. So, from a product perspective, what sets FOMO apart from numerous competitors?

The answer lies in FOMO's product design. The core services FOMO provides are similar to most Meme trading platforms, but its slogan is "the only social-first trading app." This is embodied in the product through the introduction of a profit Leaderboard and a Feed providing real-time alerts on top traders' activities.

LEADERBOARD and FEED on the FOMO platform

The Meme market inherently worships financial success – those who make enough money are considered "smart money" and gain a large following of fans and copy traders. The FOMO platform leverages this group characteristic by artificially "creating stars", using pages like the Leaderboard to deliberately push high-profit users to the forefront, helping them gain influence. On August 9th, FOMO team member @villagebythexyz posted on X, stating that compared to previous cycles, anyone with any influence in the cryptocurrency space now must be a good trader, emphasizing that "it's trading that builds your following, not your following that builds your trades."

This model has been a huge success. For example, the reason the Solana Meme coin CATE surged was not due to its compelling narrative, but rather the traffic and open support from the so-called "Little Ansem," Poorgoat. Poorgoat is a member of the FOMO Hall of Fame (a list of users recognized by FOMO for achieving substantial profits on the platform). Therefore, with the support of fans, even though CATE lacked a compelling narrative, it was still able to create a "myth."

Pump.fun recognized the immense potential of this model for platform growth. So, on August 7th, the Pump.fun APP announced a social feature upgrade. The core of the upgrade was replicating FOMO's social features. Now, entering the Pump.fun homepage, users no longer see an overwhelming stream of new Meme coin information, but rather a feed of Meme traders/KOLs and push notifications monitoring their operations.

Pump.fun Homepage

Pump.fun founder, alon, has recently been posting frequently to welcome various overseas Meme traders/KOLs to join the Pump.fun app. To attract more renowned overseas Meme traders to the Pump.fun platform, Pump.fun has even resorted to poaching from FOMO and requiring Meme traders to sign "exclusivity agreements."

Pump.fun's adoption of such competitive business practices essentially reflects that the overseas Meme market has entered an "influencer-driven model." Whoever signs the most KOLs with strong trading influence captures the market.

The Overseas Meme Market Enters the Influencer-Driven Model

From the rise of FOMO to Pump.fun's poaching behavior, we can see an important shift occurring in the overseas Meme market: the core of market competition is no longer about launch tools, trading speed, or on-chain liquidity, but rather the battle for "attention resource carriers."

As the cultural consensus and celebrity-driven narratives that the early Meme coin market relied on begin to lose effectiveness, the Meme market shifts its focus from the Meme coins themselves to the people trading them. FOMO's rapid growth logic is precisely based on this shift in market dynamics. In this model, traders replace Memes as the new content subject. Platforms package decentralized on-chain trading behavior into a content stream akin to entertainment consumption through leaderboards, trading activity feeds, and copy-trading mechanisms. People become the new vessels of consensus.

For the vast number of retail investors lacking professional analytical skills, following a trader who has previously made millions of dollars in profit is obviously simpler than researching a newly born Meme project with no historical record.

However, this trend also signifies that the Meme market is entering a more intensely competitive stage. When trading volume and market attention are concentrated on a handful of top traders, competition between platforms naturally shifts from争夺ing users to争夺ing the "super nodes" that bring users – the Meme influencers.

This is extremely similar to the early battle for streamers in China's short-video live-streaming industry. Back then, platforms like Douyin, Kuaishou, Huya, and Douyu competed for top streamers with high signing fees, essentially competing for attention entry points. The difference is that the competition for top streamers in the short-video live-streaming industry occurred in a rapidly expanding emerging market, where user scale and commercial value were still in the growth phase, ultimately pushing the live-streaming industry toward maturity.

However, the emergence of a similar competitive model in the Meme market today reflects a completely different signal.

When platforms start competing for the same batch of "trading influencers," the winner might gain short-term growth, but it also means that the entire Meme track is losing the vitality originally formed by community culture and spontaneous propagation. For Memes, this is the greatest risk.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what are the specific terms of the incentive plan that Pump.fun allegedly offered to users from the FOMO platform?

AThe alleged incentive plan offers a one-time $20,000 signing bonus and a fixed monthly payment of $30,000. The conditions require users to: migrate their funds and trading positions from FOMO to Pump.fun; use a new, previously unused wallet as their dedicated Pump.fun wallet; link their X account to this wallet; publicly declare this wallet as their only public wallet on their X homepage; and permanently delete and close their FOMO platform account. They must also meet a monthly trading volume requirement of at least $25,000 on Pump.fun (or 25% of their average monthly volume on FOMO).

QWhat key platform features does the article credit for FOMO's rapid rise in the meme trading space?

AThe article credits FOMO's 'social-first' product design, specifically its Profit Leaderboard (Leaderboard) and its news feed (Feed) which provides alerts on the trading activities of top traders. These features leverage the 'money-worshipping' nature of the meme market, allowing the platform to 'create influencers' by highlighting high-profit users, giving them influence, and attracting followers who copy their trades.

QBased on DeFiLama and Dune data mentioned, how significant is FOMO's performance compared to established competitors?

AThe data shows FOMO's performance is highly significant. In the past 30 days, FOMO's revenue of $8.17 million has surpassed that of Uniswap, Phantom, and mainstream launchpads on Robinhood (like Flap and Pons). Its total fees have reached $30.39 million, with daily fees averaging over $200,000 since July and hitting a record high of $556,000 on August 6th. By August 8th, its market share in the Trading Bot sector had reached 43%, surpassing GMGN to become the market leader.

QWhat fundamental shift in the competitive landscape of the overseas meme market does the Pump.fun vs. FOMO rivalry signal, according to the article's analysis?

AThe rivalry signals a shift where the core of competition is no longer just about issuance tools, trading speed, or on-chain liquidity, but a battle for 'attention resources'—specifically, for influential meme traders/KOLs. The market has entered an 'influencer-driven model' or 'influencer livestream sales model' where platforms vie to sign the most influential traders who can attract users and generate trading volume through their followers and copy-trading.

QWhat potential long-term risk does the article associate with meme markets adopting this 'influencer-driven' competitive model?

AThe article suggests the long-term risk is that the meme market could lose the original vitality and spontaneous community-driven cultural consensus that initially fueled its growth. When competition focuses on a few 'super node' influencers, it may lead to market centralization and a loss of the organic, grassroots energy that is fundamental to the meme ecosystem's appeal and sustainability.

İlgili Okumalar

AMD acquires Taalas: hardware AI manages without scarce HBM memory

AMD has agreed to acquire Toronto-based startup Taalas, which tackles a key bottleneck in AI inference: the constant need to transfer model weights from memory to the processor for each generated token. Taalas's chips eliminate this operation by permanently embedding the model weights into the transistors themselves. This data transfer is what currently limits inference speed and has made high-bandwidth memory (HBM) a scarce commodity. Taalas's first test chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process, reportedly generated tokens for Meta's Llama 3.1 8B model at speeds 48 times faster than comparable Nvidia GPUs. Its architecture features a mask ROM section for fixed weights and SRAM for adaptable components. However, this design comes with a significant trade-off: each chip is permanently dedicated to a single model. Switching models requires a partial redesign and fabrication, a process taking about two months. While the acquisition is seen as part of AMD's rivalry with Nvidia in inference, its broader implication lies in challenging the assumption of a permanent HBM memory shortage. The AI memory market is currently booming, with HBM supply sold out through 2026. Yet, Taalas's technology demonstrates that the memory bottleneck is an engineering challenge, not an absolute physical constraint. This aligns with industry-wide efforts from companies like Nvidia (through model compression) and memory makers like Samsung and SK hynix (developing new packaging and storage technologies) to reduce dependency on scarce HBM. AMD's move suggests that the current high prices for memory, driven by AI demand, may not be sustainable. It highlights a growing engineering push against the premise of perpetual memory scarcity, reminding investors that memory has historically been a cyclical business.

cryptonews.ru58 dk önce

AMD acquires Taalas: hardware AI manages without scarce HBM memory

cryptonews.ru58 dk önce

Vance says US-Iran conflict remains in 'midgame', US military 'seeks exit', Iran sets 'six conditions for reopening the strait'

U.S. Vice President Vance described the U.S.-Iran conflict as being in the "mid-game," stating the U.S. is utilizing diplomatic, economic, and military tools, with a focus on increasing oil and gas shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine is reportedly seeking an "exit" privately, expressing concerns that airstrikes alone are insufficient to achieve objectives and that further escalation carries significant risks. He highlighted critical ammunition shortages for key missile defense systems. In response, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary, Zolgadr, presented six conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz: a U.S. pledge never to threaten Iran, an end to aggression against Iran and its allies, withdrawal of forces from the region, war reparations, lifting of all sanctions, and the unconditional unfreezing of Iranian assets. These demands, seen as a high bar set by hardliners, contrast with more pragmatic requests made in backchannel talks, which focus on lifting the blockade, restoring oil sanctions waivers, and accessing frozen funds. While Iran and Oman are close to a technical agreement on a temporary shipping lane, Iran clarified this does not equate to a full reopening of the strait, which remains contingent on U.S. meeting its conditions. Attacks on commercial vessels in the area continue, with recent incidents attributed to Iran. Despite pauses in military action and expressions of openness to talks from both sides, negotiations are currently stalled over Iran's economic demands and U.S. insistence on freedom of navigation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vance says US-Iran conflict remains in 'midgame', US military 'seeks exit', Iran sets 'six conditions for reopening the strait'

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片