【研报精选】2023年是ZK 之年吗?以下可能是财富密码

DeFi之道2023-01-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-01-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

ZK Rollups 优点包括对以太坊网络可扩展性的贡献,与传统 Rollups 相比更高的安全和隐私性,以及创建复杂智能合约和 dApps 的能力。

随着区块链空间对可扩展性和安全性的需求不断增加,ZK-rollups 已成为以太坊扩展计划的关键解决方案。 在这篇文章中,我们将仔细研究哪些 ZK 项目将在 2023 年产生重大影响。

ZK-rollups 🔥

与传统的以太坊 L1 相比,ZK-rollups 有很多好处,因为它们更快、更便宜。 它们也是复杂智能合约和 dApp 的引人注目的解决方案。

一些在该领域引起轰动的著名 ZK 项目包括:

Scroll:这个项目在他们的平台上启用了智能合约,目前正在测试他们的 Pre-Alpha 测试网。

PolygonZK(前身为 Polygon Hermez):该项目已部署其公共测试网,旨在为以太坊 L1 提供更高效、更具成本效益的替代方案。

zkSync:该项目旨在于 2023 年第一季度推出与 EVM 兼容的 L3,由 Matter Labs 提供支持,该公司已从投资者那里获得了 5000 万美元的资金。

StarkNet:这个项目在他们的平台上部署了 Uniswap V3,这是朝着在以太坊上实现可扩展性迈出的重要一步。

不同的 zkEVM 解决方案🔒

在比较 zkEVM 解决方案时,需要注意的是 ZK 技术已经存在了一段时间,但直到最近才被视为区块链构建的未来。

旁注:您可能听说过「Optimistic rollup」。ZK rollup 和 zk rollup 之间的主要区别在于,ZK rollup 使用无需信任的加密设置来确保安全性,而 Optimistic rollup 依赖于诚实的验证器 / 排序器。

Polygon ZK(以前的 Hermez)🚀

2021 年,Hermez 被 Polygon 收购,并更名为 Polygon Hermez(现名为 Polygon ZK)。 因此,Polygon 代币 $MATIC 和 $HEZ 整合在一起,可以在 Hermez 网站上自由兑换。 由于 Hermez 现在是不断发展的 Polygon 生态系统的一部分,Hermez 网络上激动人心的发展可能会在未来揭晓。

Scroll ZKP 📜

2023 年 1 月 9 日,Scroll 团队对计划中的 Pre-Alpha 重置以推出一些新的和令人兴奋的性能优化,这将有助于推动 Pre-Alpha 测试网的更高吞吐量。 测试网在第一周收到大量流量,记录了 270k+ 个独立地址。

zkSync💰

zkSync 是一种第 2 层扩展解决方案,它提供比主要的以太坊区块链(第 1 层)更便宜、更快的交易。 它使用 ZK-Rollup 技术来处理以太坊区块链之外的交易,同时保持其安全性和最终性。 zkSync 的好处包括低 gas 费用、高速度和高级别的安全性。

值得注意的一件有趣的事情是,Polygon、Scroll 和 zkSync 构建 zkEVM(零知识以太坊虚拟机)的方法各不相同,每种方法都在设计中有所取舍。

Polygon 的突破性 zkEVM 开发🖥

Polygon 的 zkEVM 解决方案旨在通过提供可扩展性和更低的交易成本来显着改善使用和构建以太坊的体验,这是朝着更广泛采用 Web3 技术迈出的令人兴奋的一步。

该系统还可以轻松地将存在于与以太坊虚拟机兼容的链上的 dApp 迁移到 zkEVM,其中 EVM 等效性和以太坊网络效应为开发人员提供了明显的优势。

Polygon 的 zkEVM 开发使用的是编程语言,例如 Solidity,以及开发人员已经熟悉的工具集,例如 Metamask、Hardhat、Truffle 和 Remix。 这意味着开发人员可以通过简单地切换节点来迁移 dApp。

这也使得 Polygon zkEVM 成为无缝创建 NFT、新游戏技术和企业应用程序的理想选择。 现有的 Polygon dApp 可以非常轻松地迁移到 zkEVM,只需最少的支持。

总结🌟

零知识证明的快速投资和发展是该技术进入黄金时期的重要信号。

ZK rollups 的优点包括它们对以太坊网络的可扩展性的贡献,与传统 rollups 相比更高的安全性和隐私性,以及创建复杂的智能合约和 dApps 的能力,这在以太坊 L1 上是不可能的。

缺点包括许多 ZK-Rollup 项目纷纷涌现,很难将好的项目与可能做出虚假承诺的项目区分开来。 虽然 rollup 技术提供了新的好处,但它也给以去中心化和抗审查的方式控制数据可访问性带来了一些新的困难。 在广泛采用的道路上,去中心化和安全必须放在首位。

总之,ZK 解决方案及其在 2023 年彻底改变区块链空间的潜力前景一片光明。随着各种项目和团队致力于 zkEVM 的开发,我们可以期待在未来看到这项技术的持续进步和进步 年。 成为区块链社区的一员是一个激动人心的时刻,因为我们见证了这项技术的发展及其对各个行业的潜在影响。

İlgili Okumalar

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 saat önce

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 saat önce

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片