市场多维度向好,链游赛道融资加速

Foresight Research2022-03-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-03-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

本周BTC持续上涨。技术层面是整体偏多,BTC处于周线级别调整尾声,当前上涨距离牛熊分界线已是近在眼前。

市场观点

现货观点

本周BTC持续上涨。技术层面是整体偏多,BTC处于周线级别调整尾声,当前上涨距离牛熊分界线已是近在眼前。ETH周线级别突破,这次ETH明显强于BTC,主要是转POS减产影响。宏观上,美联储资产负债表继续扩张,至8.9625万亿美元,是08年底的11倍,过去两周扩张了510亿美元。以此速度,两周之内将到9万亿美元。这周美国免除部分中国商品关税,帮助美国去通胀,有利于加息放缓,对美股与加密市场形成利好。同时俄罗斯考虑用BTC支付石油和天然气。

链上观点

交易所的巨鲸指标(WhaleRatio)观察到,巨鲸与散户之间的行为出现重大分歧。从去年年底开始,由于美联储加息与缩表预期,双方都进行了减仓。但是2月底以来,巨鲸不再恐慌,认识到市场或已充分消化缩表影响,逐渐将资金带回市场。另一方面,散户仍然处在熊市思维当中,保持在很低的交易频次。

稳定币数据显示,USDT市值占比已到达周期顶部区间,大变盘就在朝夕。历史上每当稳定币重新下场(例如20年10月,21年7月),BTC都会迎来新一轮宏观上升趋势。

本周链上数据跟踪到,标记为SBF的聪明钱地址加仓约3.5亿美元。USDT在波场增发7.4亿美元,表明有新资金入场。

期货观点

本周期货市场情绪偏空。各交易所的BTC多空比下降,永续资金费率为负,未平仓合约量上升,表明刚刚这轮上涨之后,大部分人开始开单做空。

市场热点

ETH

ETH在2.0开发上有了重大突破,随着测试网kiln成功升级为完整的POS共识机制,预计6月有望正式合并。ETH当前每天产出约1.2万个ETH,一旦转为POS后,产出会减少90%,相当于BTC的三次减半,即每天产出约1300个。近期ETH每天销毁约2000个,即未来每天负增长700个。而ETH网络活跃的时候,每天销毁约2万个。

STG

Stargate是基于LayerZero首个跨链流动性应用,在推出一周后锁仓额迅速突破20亿美元。LayerZero团队聘请了SushiSwap联合创始人0xMaki加入;其投资者阵容豪华,包括binance,multicoincapital,polychain等知名机构。SBF旗下的Alameda购买了Stargate这次发行的所有STG(10%份额),计划3年内不会出售。

市场数据

公链总锁仓量情况

本周TVL出现4.78B的上涨,上涨幅度为2.26%,远低于BTC和ETH上涨幅度,可能表明整体市场TVL增量较差和小币种表现仍较差。

各公链TVL占比情况

本周收益于ETH大幅上涨,ETH链占比大幅提升,从上周的54.84%上升至56.15%,占比上升1.31%,TerraTVL出现近两个月以来第一次占比下降,下降0.52%,其余各链变化均较小。

各链协议锁仓量情况

ETH锁仓量情况

BSC锁仓量情况

Solana锁仓量情况

Avalanche锁仓量情况

Polygon锁仓量情况

Fantom锁仓量情况

Terra锁仓量情况

本周协议情况总结

本周Curve协议在ETH链上出现较大增长,其余协议中BeethovenX出现较大增长,TVL即将突破前高,BeethovenX是基于Balancer构建的,主要特色是为流动性提供商赋予较大自由度,可任意选择注入资金的比例,如20%的ETH和80%的USDT来配对,降低无常损失。其代币BEETS,本周出现15%幅度增长,但距离前高仍有较大空间。

ETHGasfee历史情况

当前链上转账费用约为$2.56,Uniswap交易费用约为$8.72,Opensea的交易费用约为$9.56,基本与上周同期持平,整体点位继续保持最低点。

NFT市场数据变化

NFT指数市值

NFT市场交易概览

NFT"聪明的钱"购买排序

近期NFT市值继续出现小幅增长,且活跃性出现明显增强,短期可能迎来一波NFT热潮,从市场交易量和聪明的钱购买系列来看均指向了同一款NFT,Worldofwomengalaxy;此系列为Worldofwomen的第二期产品,WorldofWomen是倡导女性权益的重要NFT标志,由中东艺术家YamKarkai手绘的女性头像组合的NFT头像,共1万个,该NFT的拥有者可以拥有对应NFT的商业版权。不仅如此,若玩家拥有带有特殊配饰的女性头像NFT,还可获得分享版权费和WoW基金利润的50%,以及有权建议让WoW基金购买价格不超过0.3ETH的NFT作品。值得一提的是,WorldofWomen将销售额的7.5%捐赠给现实世界的公益项目来支持女性。目前Worldofwomengalaxy刚刚发售不久,Opensea地板价为1.6ETH,对比上期Worldofwomen的11个ETH地板价仍有较大升值空间。

项目最新融资情况

免责声明:ForesightVentures所有文章均不作为投资建议。投资有风险,请评估个人风险承受能力,审慎做出投资决策。

ForesightVentures支持创新和颠覆性的Web3项目。我们相信未来的创新将由加密技术定义.作为早期投资者,我们希望参与项目的成长,并从我们的生态系统中提供广泛的支持。

İlgili Okumalar

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbitŞimdi

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbitŞimdi

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit10 dk önce

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit10 dk önce

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit10 dk önce

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit10 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片