Bitcoin: Why betting against a BTC price rally might not be the way ahead

Ambcrypto2023-01-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-01-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

BTC logged its largest profit-take ratio day for the first time since 28 March 2022. Its price has grown by 5% since the beginning of the year

An assessment of the aggregate amount of coins across all Bitcoin [BTC] transactions on the network that moved in profit or loss revealed that the king coin had clinched its largest profit-take ratio day for the first time since 28 March 2022, data from Santiment revealed.

”“

What do the metrics of BTC reveal?

”“

According to the on-chain analytics platform, the recent spike in the profit-take ratio was attributable to the 5% growth in the leading coin’s price since 2023 began. As of this writing, BTC traded at $17,446.89. On 1 January, one BTC exchanged hands at $16,548, data from CoinMarketCap revealed.

”“

In addition, per data from CoinGlass, there was a surge in BTC’s Open Interest since the beginning of the year. This suggested that there have been numerous contracts open in a bid to profit from BTC’s price growth.

”“

An increase in open interest indicated that more traders were entering the market and opening new positions at press time. This could be an indication of growing investor confidence in the market.

”“

It is also evidence of increased liquidity and volatility in the market. This was because more traders and more open positions typically lead to more buying and selling activity.

”“

With $9.79 billion at press time, BTC’s Open Interest has grown by 7% since the year started.

Source: CoinGlass

”“

Many are rooting for the king coin

”“

An analysis of BTC’s on-chain activity showed that the number of sell-offs for the coin decreased since the start of the year. Thus, signaling a potentially positive trend for the digital asset’s value.

”“

According to Santiment, after a momentary rally in BTC’s supply on exchanges between 1 – 4 January, it has since declined by 1%. The uptick in BTC’s supply on exchanges in the first few days of the new trading year was because of the negative sentiment that many investors harbored at the close of 2022. This caused them to sell off their holdings.

”“

It is trite that when the supply of a crypto asset on exchanges decreases, it typically indicates that more coins are being held by traders and investors rather than being sold in the open market.

Source: Santiment

”“

BTC’s funding rates have been positive since the year began, data from CryptoQuant showed. A positive funding rate indicates that traders who have taken long positions, believing the price of the crypto asset will rise, are in the majority.

”“

This is because, in this case, short-position traders are required to pay these long-position traders, marking their dominance in the market.

Source: CryptoQuant

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手23 dk önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手23 dk önce

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit1 saat önce

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片