[daily public chain] sol exchange accounts for 37%, and avax accounts for us $10.1 billion

Huobi Research2022-03-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-03-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Since 2017, large-scale ambushes have emerged and the fittest have been eliminated in the wheel of the times.

Since 2017, large-scale ambushes have emerged and the fittest have been eliminated in the wheel of the times. Until this year, the public chain has ushered in a collective outbreak, from Polkadot, a cross chain network of slot auction, to many emerging public chains such as Solana, avalanche and Cardano. Ethereum has created a public chain with great competition demand, giving birth to greater market opportunities.

More than 100 public chain projects are common and cross chain, which is a new trend

At present, there are more than 100 active public chains, which can be divided into single chain and cross chain according to the attributes of the chain, and the cross chain is represented by Boca and has become the mainstream trend of this era. Overall, the number of public chains has formed a certain scale, and the competition is quite fierce.

1、Solana

Solana started the upsurge of public chain. What's the difference between them?

Solana's fire has directly stirred the upsurge of the public chain camp, including avalanche, fantom, near and so on. The market pays more attention to the public chain, and both capital, project parties and developers are full of interest in this track. So, what are the differences between them?

In terms of technical architecture:

Solana: poh clock scheme

Different from most pieces + eth2 0 scheme, Solana created a unique and innovative poh clock mechanism in the public chain circle The scheme decouples the block out time and state. In terms of global consensus, it is not limited by the hard requirements of block size and block out time. Through the global clock, a globally available time chain is generated for all nodes. The state update can be carried out asynchronously. The verifier can send state updates to other nodes in real time. The poh clock gives the participants of Solana ecology more expandable space, Further improve and expand the overall throughput capacity.

Lock data

Sol's lock up scale has been pulled back from a high level, with a peak of US $15 billion in 2021. On March 24, the scale of lock up reached US $7.34 billion, and there is a large space for data callback of lock up volume.

In terms of the proportion of lock up on the sol chain, the proportion of loan lock up and decentralized exchange lock up is relatively large, while the scale of loan, pledge and mining lock up is small. According to the latest data on March 24, the decentralized exchange locked positions of US $2.76 billion, while loans, pledges and mining were US $1.17 billion, US $1.65 billion and US $1.4 billion.

Token price

The linkage effect between slol price and lock volume is good, and the sol price has dropped from a high of more than $240 to a minimum of $80. The current price on March 24 is $102. In the later stage, we can pay attention to the ecological development, as well as the trading opportunities of the upward lock up volume and price recovery.

2. Avalanche: three chain structure

Avalanche agreement entered the public view by means of incentives, and realized the sharp rise of currency price and lock up volume. Similarly, as a smart contract platform, avalanche is very novel in architecture design and adopts the three chain structure of X chain, C chain and P chain. X chain is a transaction chain, which mainly deals with point-to-point asset creation and transaction transactions between individuals; C-chain is a smart contract chain compatible with EVM, and the basic defi projects are built on C-chain; P chain is a platform chain, which is mainly responsible for token pledge, coordinating network verifiers, creating user-defined subnets and other affairs. The three chains perform their respective functions, but complement each other, further liberating avalanche's network performance.

Lock data

Avax lock up data increased by leaps and bounds in 2021. The data rebounded from a low of $2 billion to a maximum of more than $14 billion, with a growth space of more than six times. The current TVL value is US $10.15 billion.

In terms of the proportion of avax chain lock, the proportion of lending, lock and decentralized exchange lock is relatively large, while the scale of mining and cross chain lock is small. On March 24, the loan lockup reached its peak. The scale of loan lockup was US $4.6 billion, that of decentralized exchange lockup was US $4 billion, and that of mining and cross chain lockup was US $900 million and US $1.1 billion.

Token price

Avax experienced great growth in 2021, rising from $15 in August 2021 to a high of $135. From the second half of 2021 to the beginning of 2022, the price of avax remained around $85. Compared with the vicinity of TVL's decline, there is more room for price correction. Next, we can focus on low absorption opportunities.

İlgili Okumalar

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit7 dk önce

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit7 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit22 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit22 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit51 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit51 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片