疫情之下,元宇宙婚礼考虑一下?

火星财经2022-03-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-03-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

以虚拟形象出现在婚礼仪式上更像是一种游戏体验

突如其来的疫情打乱了人们正常的生活节奏。提前准备好的工作计划、外出游玩甚至是结婚计划都在反复的疫情中被推迟或取消。对于有结婚计划的新人来说,婚纱照不能如约拍摄、婚宴不能如期举行实属遗憾。现在有了一个新鲜的选择,元宇宙婚礼考虑一下?
元宇宙婚礼成为新的选择
疫情之后,工作生活重心转移到线上,元宇宙概念平台的建设也加快了我发展脚步,一些公司如 Com2uS 已经将办公场地迁移到了元宇宙中,公司员工都在元宇宙中完成办公和交互。不少明星也将线下集会搬到线上,例如贾斯汀·比伯就在虚拟演艺平台 WAVE 上举办了个人第一场虚拟演唱会,现实中的场景被无缝衔接的过渡到元宇宙中。
最近,一对印度夫妇就邀请了 2000 人来参加他们的元宇宙婚礼派对。宾客们可以通过手机、平板电脑或笔记本电脑参加婚礼。
新郎是区块链和加密货币的爱好者,他和 TardiVerse 合作并打造了一个灵感源自霍格沃茨的城堡般的数字空间,因为夫妻二人都是哈利波特的粉丝。
这场元宇宙婚礼涉及派对设计、开发和举办,一共耗资15万印度卢比(约合人民币1.3万元)。婚礼时长在一小时左右,他们以自己在元宇宙中的虚拟形象为代表来出席婚礼。宾客们可以通过在电脑前操作来参观城堡,并定制自己的头像和服饰。

这场婚礼最有趣的亮点是新郎定制了一个与已过世岳父相似的 3D 角色,让他也能来见证这对新人的婚礼。
新郎说:“我的岳父去年四月去世了。所以我定制了一个与岳父相似的 3D 角色,他会祝福我和我的未婚妻。这是只有在元宇宙中才能实现的。”

元宇宙婚礼的合法性
目前,Decentraland的设施和生态发展都比较完善,这也让它成为了承载元宇宙婚礼的最佳选择。
一对美国夫妇就于上个月在 Decentraland 上举行了婚礼,他们的见证人以及美国亚利桑那最高法院法官 Clint Bolick 和 2000 名虚拟观众出席了婚礼。
新娘和新郎聘还请了 Rose Law Group 将婚姻合法化。 Rose Law Group 是一家提供全方位服务的房地产和商业律师事务所。该事务所通过纳入“虚拟婚前协议”开发了一个“元婚姻框架”,确定了这对夫妇的虚拟身份和数字资产记录在区块链上。
同时,“元婚姻许可证” 将区块链上这对夫妇的虚拟身份和结婚地点识别、记录和标记为 NFT。
该法律小组认为“目前元宇宙没有婚姻的法律框架,所以它是否具有法律约束力更多的是合约问题。”
来自巴西的一对新人同样也在 Decentraland 中举办了婚礼,婚礼通过智能合约邀请了亲友及其他机构来宾,每位宾客均可收到 NFT 作为婚礼纪念品。
他们这场婚礼所在 Decentraland 的地块价值 200 万美元,不过婚礼中的场景及物品的布置都是合作方赠送的。这对新人在接受采访时表示:“我们的婚礼是合作举行的,很多名人和机构都参与了这场活动,所以我们几乎没有花钱。”

不过,尽管 Rose Law Group 尽可能的将元宇宙婚姻合法化,但对于大部分法律专家来说,这种形式仍不具备法律效益,毕竟以虚拟形象出现在婚礼仪式上更像是一种游戏体验。

İlgili Okumalar

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor Alchemy

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor "Alchemy" On July 27, 2026, a memory chip maker from Hefei made history by surpassing the market capitalization of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China on its Shanghai Stock Exchange debut. This marks the culmination of Hefei's two-decade industrial transformation, often summarized in three strategic leaps: "Screen, Chip, Vehicle." The journey began in 2008 with a bold investment in BOE, establishing China's first 6th-generation LCD panel line. The second leap was the "Project 506" in 2016, which gave birth to ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). With initial backing of 14.4 billion RMB from Hefei's state-owned investment platform, CXMT aimed to break into the global DRAM market, then over 95% controlled by three overseas giants. CXMT achieved a breakthrough in 2019 by producing China's first 8GB DDR4 DRAM chip, employing "generational leapfrog" R&D to catch up. After years of significant losses, the company turned profitable in 2025. A dramatic surge followed in 2026, driven by AI-driven demand and full capacity utilization, propelling CXMT to become the world's fourth-largest DRAM manufacturer. CXMT's success is not isolated. It anchors a dense, localized semiconductor ecosystem in Hefei. Within its vicinity are numerous supporting companies for equipment, materials, and packaging & testing. This cluster has fueled the regional economy, with Hefei's integrated circuit industry output growing over sevenfold between 2016 and 2025. The ripple effects extend beyond high-tech, revitalizing local communities with new businesses and services catering to the influx of workers. For individuals, Hefei offers competitive tech salaries at a significantly lower cost of living compared to major coastal cities, along with improved amenities and shorter commutes. Hefei's story demonstrates two decades of focused, long-term industrial policy, transforming the city from a provincial capital into a trillion-RMB GDP "Double Ten-Thousand" city (10 million people, 1 trillion RMB GDP). It shows how persistence in strategic sectors—turning sand into chips—can redefine a city's economic destiny.

marsbit1 dk önce

From Sand to Chips: Hefei's Semiconductor Alchemy

marsbit1 dk önce

Some Go Bankrupt, Others Go Shopping: The Counter-Cyclical Acquisition Logic of MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken

During a period of market stress where multiple crypto firms filed for bankruptcy or shut down, three major companies—MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken—pursued strategic acquisitions to strengthen their positions. Their divergent strategies reflect differing dependencies on key unresolved industry questions: which trading platforms, public blockchains, and stablecoins will ultimately dominate. MoonPay, operating at the fiat-crypto gateway, acquired Glide to expand its capabilities in token swaps, cross-chain operations, and financial reconciliation. Its business model is not tied to any single blockchain or stablecoin, allowing it to profit from user activity across various platforms. Circle, facing competitive pressure from the new Open Dollar Standard (OUSD) which could erode its core revenue from USDC reserve interest, acquired nearly a thousand patents from IBM. This move aims to build a competitive moat around USDC by enhancing its enterprise infrastructure, banking integrations, and compliance tools, shifting competition beyond mere interest yields. Kraken acquired Magic Labs' wallet-as-a-service business to deepen its integrated trading platform. The goal is to create a seamless "universal account" where users can trade crypto, stocks, and tokenized assets without leaving Kraken's ecosystem, while also bolstering its own layer-2 blockchain, Ink. These acquisitions highlight a trend where leading firms are consolidating core infrastructure not just for immediate profits, but to secure their futures amid ongoing industry consolidation and uncertainty. The competitive battleground is shifting from basic infrastructure access to superior product integration and ecosystem scale.

marsbit7 dk önce

Some Go Bankrupt, Others Go Shopping: The Counter-Cyclical Acquisition Logic of MoonPay, Circle, and Kraken

marsbit7 dk önce

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

The article "The Permanent Underclass: No One Has an Answer for That 17-Year-Old" explores the concept of a "permanent underclass" emerging in a future where AI can perform most cognitive and physical labor. This theory, gaining traction in tech circles, suggests that as AI reduces the need for human workers, wages lose importance, and wealth increasingly flows to those who own AI models, compute, and data. The core issue is not temporary poverty but the potential breakdown of the traditional ladder of upward mobility—through labor, bargaining, and asset accumulation—making "underclass" a permanent status. The piece highlights a poignant question posed by researcher Jasmine Sun to AI lab personnel: What advice would you give a typical 17-year-old facing this future? Most had no answer, acknowledging the frightening transition ahead. However, while struggling to advise others, many in the AI field are securing their own positions, shifting from research or policy into labs to gain equity and stand on the "capital" side. This creates a vicious cycle: the more people believe labor's bargaining power is vanishing, the fewer work to rebuild it, accelerating its decline. Common personal survival strategies—learning AI skills, acquiring AI company equity, or pivoting to hands-on, in-person work—are analyzed. The author argues these are largely stopgaps, accessible mainly to the privileged, and may collectively undermine labor's overall position. The fundamental question shifts from "how not to fall behind" to "why must one's survival depend on being needed by capital?" The article concludes that the real solution is not individual adaptation but building a new societal "negotiating table"—new laws, forms of collective bargaining, or redistribution mechanisms (like taxes or public funds) to ensure the wealth AI creates is shared, especially with those displaced. It contrasts tentative institutional responses in China with a potential regulatory vacuum in the US, warning that without such frameworks being established before public frustration boils over, social unrest could follow. The 17-year-old’s dilemma underscores a systemic failure: the architects of this future are buying personal insurance but offering no collective answers.

marsbit16 dk önce

The Permanent Underclass: No One Can Answer That 17-Year-Old Child

marsbit16 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片