The Next Dominos Is Grayscale? The Truth May Be the Opposite

Mirror2022-11-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-11-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Under the continuous amplification of the FUD sentiment of DCG and Genesis, Grayscale's premium rate reached a record low. Although it is difficult for the SEC to allow Grayscale to convert assets into ETFs in the short run, using a long-term perspective, the GBTC is offering a BTC discount at 8,500 USD, which is attractive enough.

After the collapse of FTX, the premium of DCG ’s Bitcoin Trust Fund (GBTC) continued to decrease and reached a record low at -46%.

What is Grayscale?

Grayscale owns the world's largest Bitcoin trust, GBTC, which accounts for 3.5% of all available BTC. The birth of Grayscale provided compliant investors a Bitcoin exposure for the first time, marking the asset's entry into the mainstream.

Unlike traditional US equity funds applying company structure, the intrinsic value of GBTC comes from the BTC it directly holder and is publicly traded on OTCQX (the US over-the-counter market).

Grayscale’s token holdings and historical performance

Holding 673,000 BTC, accounting for 3.5% of all available BTC, GBTC is currently a $10.6 billion trust fund, compared to $13.5 billion 2 weeks ago.

Holding 3 million ETH, Grayscale currently holds 3.6 billion ETH, compared with 4.8 billion U.S. dollars two weeks ago.

2018 market collapse: GBTC plummeted 90.5% in 13 months before bottoming out.

2022: market collapse: GBTC has fallen by more than 85% and still falling.

Last Friday, in order to appease the market sentiment , Coinbase certificated the asset of Grayscale's asset with reserves of various assets announcement.

The reason for the negative premium of GBTC

Worried about internal risk control issues

Both Grayscale and Genesis are subsidiaries of DCG, and Genesis is in charge of the issuance of Grayscale 's new shares before. It seems reasonable to worry about internal transfer by them.

Concerns about Grayscale's robustness intensified after Genesis announced on Nov. 16 that it started to suspend redemptions and loans.

In addition, GBTC is facing a problem that it has been replaced by better Bitcoin tools.

Defects of trust products

Once upon a time, GBTC was one of the few investable vehicles for qualified traders. With the expansion of the encryption industry, their management scale and premium were at a high level.

Later, Canada began to launch the first Bitcoin ETF. The new vehicle cut the fee to its half, and it also provided greater liquidity without paying a premium. GBTC‘s crown began to dim.

Actually, GBTC does not have an arbitrage mechanism to make its price approach to fair, and GBTC shares cannot be redeemed for real bitcoins and can only be sold through the OTC. If the managers want to cut the premium by repurchasing, they also needs to obtain the approval letter from US SEC, which is difficult under Gary Gensler's watch.

Gary Gensler , chairman of the US SEC , coerce GBTC’s redeem

Although Grayscale, out of the original intention of protecting investors, hopes to convert GBTC into Bitcoin to reduce the negative premium. The SEC is determined not to allow it, citing concerns about potential fraud and manipulation, refusing to follow regulators elsewhere who approved bitcoin ETFs.

Currently, Grayscale is suing the SEC to get the right to convert GBTC. But the widening negative GBTC premium suggests few market participants think the SEC will let up.

Messari founder Ryan Selkis expressed his dislike of Gary Gensler more than once:

After all, the SEC continues to allow investors to trade GBTC, but does not approve a path that can solve the GBTC discount problem, which is ridiculous. This may just be a maneuver of Gary Gensler.

Negative premiums may not last

As the market has been weak recently, the reputation of Coinbase has been questioned, and the SEC has not changed its tone, the negative premium of GBTC will not last in the near future.

Long-term investors such as ARK are constantly buying discounted GBTC . This may be one of the few acts in the market that use real money to cast a vote of confidence in the Crypto industry.

Grayscale is becoming a canary for predicting bad luck

The reason why Grayscale 's negative premium can reach such a low level is inseparable from its connection with Genesis and DCG which are the parent company and brother company of Grayscale separately. Their ties have raised concerns about insider trading。

Coinbase has dispelled some suspicions. And ARK cast a vote of confidence for Coinbase with practical actions. It seems that the canary in a coal mine is still alive.

DCG and Genesis behind Grayscale be the next dominoes?

Genesis is a New York licensed institution that can carry out token lending. It is allowed to provide institutional investors and high-net-worth investors with brokerage transactions of tokens such as BTC , ETH , ETC , BCH , XRP , Litecoin and Zcash.

The market generally believed that Genesis had been hit hard in the bankruptcy of 3AC. After 3AC went bankrupt, the news that Genesis claimed $1.2 billion from 3AC is a prove. Recently, Genesis confirmed lent 2.36 billion USD to 3AC.

After the FTX thunderstorm in November, Genesis’s loan department could not withdraw 175 million from FTX. Finally, it announced on Nov.16 that it would stop redemption and new loan issuance services. The market began to pay attention to their solvency, well, a new round of storm.

A few days ago, there were rumors that DCG, the parent company of Genesis, borrowed more than 110 million US dollars from Genesis, and the market anxiety began to intensify, which lead Genesis to turn to giants such as Binance and Apollo for help. But Binance walked way after due diligence.

Genesis and DCG have deeply bounded. If Genesis falls, the corresponding related parties may not be able to survive alone, which could also affect the traditional financial world.

Next: Will Genesis play the same as FTX

What we're seeing so far is Genesis trying to avoid bankruptcy.Looking forward, we could picture that:

Optimistically, Genesis and DCG negotiated with their debtor to extend their debt. After all , Grayscale still contributes 2% of management expenses to DCG every year, and stakeholders can wait for the storm settle down. In this scenario, Crypto winter may be over soon.

In the neutral to optimistic situation, DCG and Genesis are sold as a package, and the industry still shows some resilience. The crypto winter will last for a short period of time.

In a neutral to pessimistic situation, once Genesis goes bankrupt, DCG will inevitably fall, and related parties such as Gemini and traditional financial institutions may also suffered. The risk spillover and regulation choice will be put on the desk of regulators. Next, Tether’s balance sheet will be examined under the microscope by regulators. This winter of Crypto may be more painful. BTC will Drill down further.

In an extremely pessimistic situation, if Coinbase lied to the collateral of Grayscale, the entire Crypto industry will probably be subject to the most stringent regulation, Bitcoin will likely dip through $10,000 easily, and the industry may return to a prehistoric.

Summarize

Under the continuous amplification of the FUD sentiment of DCG and Genesis, Grayscale's premium rate reached a record low. Although it is difficult for the SEC to allow Grayscale to convert assets into ETFs in the short run, using a long-term perspective, the GBTC is offering a BTC discount at 8,500 USD, which is attractive enough.

Grayscale also provides DCG and Genesis with a stable cash flow, it is becoming a cushion for the market.

Stay SAFU!

İlgili Okumalar

From 'Western Learning Ants' to Korean Pension Funds: Why Does Korean Capital Continue to Flow to the US?

Summary: "From 'Western Ants' to National Pension: Why Korean Capital Continues to Flow to the U.S.?" South Korea’s capital is increasingly moving toward U.S. markets, driven by two key investor groups. Individual retail investors, known as "Western Ants," actively trade U.S. stocks overnight, seeking exposure to major tech firms and higher returns often unavailable in Korea’s concentrated domestic market. Simultaneously, the National Pension Service (NPS), managing over $1.16 trillion in assets, is expanding its global investment footprint. Facing demographic pressures and the sheer size of its fund, NPS has steadily increased overseas allocations, with over half its financial assets now invested abroad. A recent memorandum of understanding with six top U.S. venture capital firms (including Sequoia and a16z) marks a strategic extension into Silicon Valley’s private investment ecosystem, aiming to access growth-stage tech opportunities while leveraging external managers’ expertise. While both flows reflect limitations of Korea’s home market, their risk profiles differ sharply: retail investors often pursue speculative, concentrated bets, whereas NPS must ensure long-term, diversified returns for national retirement security. This outward shift also creates macroeconomic tensions, as demand for dollars from both groups pressures the Korean won, prompting coordinated measures between NPS and the central bank to mitigate currency volatility. Ultimately, Korea’s growing financial integration with global markets—especially the U.S.—signals a broader structural shift where citizens’ wealth and pension sustainability are increasingly tied to worldwide economic dynamics.

marsbit9 dk önce

From 'Western Learning Ants' to Korean Pension Funds: Why Does Korean Capital Continue to Flow to the US?

marsbit9 dk önce

This Strategy Earned Hefei One Trillion Yuan

This article analyzes the "Hefei Model" that enabled a municipal state-owned investment to generate paper profits exceeding one trillion yuan through the 2026 IPO of ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). It argues against framing this success as a "lucky gamble," instead presenting it as the result of a deliberate institutional system designed to enable long-term industrial investment. The system comprises three core components. First, a **quantified risk-tolerance mechanism**, including a 40% loss allowance for venture funds and a clear "duty-fulfilled exemption" list, decouples project failure from personal career risk for decision-makers, allowing them to focus on industrial potential rather than personal liability. Second, **strategic investment in critical supply chain gaps**: Hefei doesn't just invest in "good" projects, but targets "missing" links essential for its key industries (appliances, displays, cars). The investment in CXMT aimed to fill the critical DRAM memory chip gap, subsequently attracting over 450 upstream and downstream firms and creating a full semiconductor cluster. Third, **institutional authorization for counter-cyclical investment**: Protected by the risk-tolerance framework, Hefei supported CXMT with increased investment during the 2023 global memory industry downturn, enabling it to scale production and capitalize on the 2025 AI-driven demand surge. The article concludes that the true lesson is not the specific investment but building the institutional infrastructure—quantified risk tolerance, deep industry chain analysis, and counter-cyclical mandates—that makes such long-term, strategic bets possible. It notes the final challenge is perfecting the exit mechanism to complete the investment cycle and transform paper gains into sustainable fiscal returns and reinvestment capacity.

marsbit23 dk önce

This Strategy Earned Hefei One Trillion Yuan

marsbit23 dk önce

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

A Silicon Valley VC's on-the-ground observations of China's startup ecosystem reveal a harsher capital environment forging more aggressive and execution-driven companies. Unlike Silicon Valley's patient capital focused on long-term growth, China's venture landscape is characterized by intense pressure for exits. Startups often face "equity in name, debt in reality" terms with strict timelines and personal founder liability, pushing IPO as the nearly mandatory exit path due to a virtually non-existent M&A market. This high-stakes system, while potentially fostering short-termism, cultivates extreme cost discipline, rapid execution, and formidable commercialization skills—traits evident as these companies expand overseas. The funding ecosystem comprises three main pools: local RMB funds (often government-backed with economic development mandates), domestic USD funds (more founder-friendly, like Sequoia China), and dwindling direct foreign capital. Financial Advisors (FAs) play a crucial intermediary role, packaging deals and navigating China's opaque, relationship-based business networks where platforms like LinkedIn haven't taken root. Underpinning it all is significant state influence through industrial policy, directing capital and incentives toward strategic sectors like semiconductors and AI. The result is a distinct, parallel innovation model—less forgiving than Silicon Valley's, but capable of concentrating resources, accelerating iteration, and producing fiercely competitive companies in targeted industries.

marsbit28 dk önce

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

marsbit28 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片