Alameda Research链上持仓和操作分析：杠杆债务已基本还清，仍有超过1亿美元的主流币

Panews2022-11-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-11-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Alameda Research的以太坊钱包显示，抵押借贷债务已基本还清，仍有超过1亿美元主流币，FTT等资产未动用，持有质押的SUSHI，山寨币已充值至币安。

头部交易所FTX遭到挤兑，Crypto面临“雷曼时刻”，作为FTX的兄弟公司，Alameda Research的链上持仓和操作如何呢？

The Block的研究副总裁Larry Cermak在11月7日公布了他整理的Alameda Research的钱包，共31个地址。当时钱包余额为2.69亿美元，比上个月减少了47%。PANews整理了最近Alameda Research的主要链上操作。

地址1：余额2811万美元，债务基本偿还

地址：0xbefe4f86f189c1c817446b71eb6ac90e3cb68e60

该地址两天前余额为8730万美元，是11月7日余额最多的地址。

目前该地址余额2811万美元，持有的主要头寸为在Abracadabra上抵押FTT借入MIM，为加杠杆的操作。不过到目前为止，FTT抵押品的数量为507万，价值为2559万美元，债务仅141.6 MIM，债务基本已经全部偿还，解除风险。

从链上数据看，该地址最近的操作主要是从Bitfinex提取MIM，以及从Binance提取USDT再通过Cow Protocol兑换为MIM，用于偿还MIM债务。

地址2：余额3657万美元，质押600万美元Sushi

地址：0xc5ed2333f8a2c351fca35e5ebadb2a82f5d254c3

该地址两天前余额为5901万美元，目前余额3657万美元。

在DeFi协议中，该地址质押在SushiSwap中的xSUSHI价值607万美元，在Sushi中还有少量SRM+ETH、REN+ETH、UBXT+ETH、MAPS+ETH、OXY+ETH的流动性。在BENQI中有404万美元的sAVAX抵押品，没有债务。在Abracadabra上有67.5万FTT抵押品，价值351万美元，MIM债务已基本还清。另外在Uniswap、Synapse、Balancer等协议上也有少量流动性。

钱包中的余额为1568万美元，持有的资产主要为SRM、DAI、renBTC、WBTC、UNI。

该地址最近的链上操作也主要是偿还抵押FTT借MIM的债务，另外还将一些BIT、SUSHI、USDC代币转移到其它地址。

地址3：余额753万美元，仅3万多美元债务

地址：0xca436e14855323927d6e6264470ded36455fc8bd

该地址两天前余额3429万美元，目前余额753万美元。

该地址现在的持仓包括钱包中的20万FTT和Abracadabra中的120万FTT抵押品，这部分价值就超过700万美元，Abracadabra中只有32775美元的债务。

同样，该地址也从Binance提取了USDT，兑换成MIM，偿还债务。

值得注意，该地址3天前才从Convex/Curve提取了1500万美元的稳定币，发送到其它地方。但昨晚随着FTT的剧烈下跌，不得不偿还债务。

地址4：余额1773万美元，仅少量CRV债务

地址：0x712d0f306956a6a4b4f9319ad9b9de48c5345996

该地址两天前余额3063万美元，目前余额1773万美元。

目前该地址钱包中持有1177万美元的代币，主要为价值1008万美元的549 WBTC和价值146万美元的29.8万FTT。

DeFi项目中，在Aave中抵押有208 WBTC，借入了价值约10%的CRV；在Ankr中有1798 aETHc的余额，价值253万美元。

该地址最近从Compound中赎回了800 WBTC，并将其中的250.9 WBTC充值到Binance，剩余部分保留在钱包中。

地址5：余额7513万美元，全仓USDC

地址：0xe31a9498a22493ab922bc0eb240313a46525ee0a

该地址两天前余额为1952万美元，目前余额7513万美元，持仓全是USDC。

从链上交易记录看，该地址主要用于钱包间USDC的中转。

地址6：余额1704万美元，高频向币安充值

地址：0x3507e4978e0eb83315d20df86ca0b976c0e40ccb

该地址为Alameda Research在Binance的充值地址。

该地址两天前余额为1074万美元，目前余额1704万美元。由于该地址由Binance掌握私钥，地址上的余额也并不代表仍由Alameda Research掌控，同样Alameda Research在Binance的余额也可能高于地址上的余额。但是，充值情况能够反映一些问题。

从链上数据看，该地址的交易非常活跃，仅在过去24小时就有36笔充值记录。近期的充值数据包括稳定币和MASK、SRM、SAND、KNC等山寨币的充值。

地址7：余额3429万美元，存放BIT

地址：0x84d34f4f83a87596cd3fb6887cff8f17bf5a7b83

该地址两天前余额仅16万美元，现在余额3429万美元。

近段时间，该地址几乎没有进行操作。但在过去22～18小时期间，Alameda Research从FTX和Coinbase提现BIT到该地址。

此前，迫于BitDAO社区指责双方互换的代币可能已遭抛售，Alameda Research不得不将这些代币重新充值到链上。目前，该地址上主要就为1亿枚BIT代币。

小结

在分析了Alameda Research的链上持仓后，我们发现此前Alameda Research确实在Acracadabra上有抵押FTT的借贷行为，但到目前为止，两天前余额超过1000万美元的地址上的债务都已基本还清，Alameda Research也没有动用这些FTT。

在主要的前五个地址中，抛开FTT、SRM等全家桶外，稳定币、BTC、ETH的余额约为1亿美元，再加上其它地址，主流币余额超过1亿美元，仍有部分流动性。山寨币已经充值到币安，此外还有约600万美元的SUSHI处于质押中。

本次整理的持仓仅参考了以太坊地址，Solana等链上的并未包括在内。

İlgili Okumalar

Those Who Wanted to Buy Have Already Bought: SpaceX Retail Frenzy Subsides, Real Selling Pressure Arrives in August

SpaceX (SPCX) debuted on June 12 at $150, soared to a record $225 by June 16 in a retail-fueled frenzy, then collapsed, losing over $600 billion in market cap in a single day this week and crashing back near its IPO price. Analysts note the initial surge was driven by record retail inflows exceeding those for major tech stocks, but momentum evaporated swiftly after the peak. The sell-off occurred with only 5% of shares freely tradable. The real pressure is yet to come: lock-up expirations starting in August could release up to 44% of insider shares by early September, potentially increasing the float ninefold. With retail buying exhausted and massive supply looming, analysts warn the path higher is now severely challenged, posing a broader risk to a market sustained by speculative momentum.

marsbit2 dk önce

Those Who Wanted to Buy Have Already Bought: SpaceX Retail Frenzy Subsides, Real Selling Pressure Arrives in August

marsbit2 dk önce

20-Year-Old Founder Hires 18-Year-Old Employee, Funded by 19-Year-Old

The AI industry is experiencing a radical youth movement. Companies are aggressively recruiting extremely young talent—interns as young as 17 with daily salaries up to $800, and recent undergraduates earning annual packages of $200k-$1M. This shift prioritizes being "AI Native"—a mindset more common in the post-2000 generation—over traditional experience. Major tech firms like ByteDance, Tencent, and Alibaba restructure to empower young researchers directly, finding that past management expertise can hinder innovation in this fast-paced field. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: young researchers gain authority, hire peers, attract young investors, and start companies, collectively building a new power network that sidelines older professionals. The intense competition for a limited pool of top young minds has led to astronomical salaries, defensive hiring, and sophisticated early talent scouting from high school. However, this concentration of opportunity exacerbates inequality, leaving many experienced workers facing obsolescence as AI disrupts traditional tech roles. While rewarding "extraordinary" talent unprecedentedly, the industry is simultaneously delivering a harsh penalty for those perceived as ordinary or tied to outdated methods.

marsbit6 dk önce

20-Year-Old Founder Hires 18-Year-Old Employee, Funded by 19-Year-Old

marsbit6 dk önce

Micron Q2 Earnings Preview: Citi Raises Price Target

TL;DR: Ahead of Micron's Q2 FY26 earnings report on June 24, Citi raised its price target from $840 to $1,200, citing stronger-than-expected 2026 memory prices and high gross margins. The stock price had already neared $1,211, shifting focus to whether the aggressive earnings assumptions will hold. The $1,200 target is based on significantly higher FY27 EPS estimates ($114.73), driven by projections of DRAM ASPs rising 200% and NAND ASPs rising 186% in 2026. The bullish outlook hinges on the ongoing transition of spot price increases (DRAM up 52% YTD) to contract prices, with server demand being a key driver. Supply remains tight, with a projected 5% DRAM shortage in 2026, exacerbated by HBM production consuming capacity. Long-Term Agreements (LTAs) could provide stability but their specific terms are crucial. Risks include HBM yield/ramp challenges, potential industry overcapacity, and AI/data center capex fluctuations. With the stock near the target, future moves depend on the continuation of strong pricing, tight supply, and high margins.

marsbit11 dk önce

Micron Q2 Earnings Preview: Citi Raises Price Target

marsbit11 dk önce

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

**Missing the 20x Opportunity: A Simple 'Dumb' Approach to AI Investing** The AI boom, driving NVIDIA's revenue from $60B to $216B in two years, creates immense investment pressure. However, like the internet bubble of 2000, the largest AI opportunities likely lie ahead, perhaps after a correction. Instead of rushing in now or waiting paralyzed for a crash, the author proposes a third way: building a "knowledge warehouse" by systematically mapping the AI industry to be ready when opportunities arise. The core of the strategy is understanding AI's four-layer value chain: 1. **Compute Infrastructure (The "Engine"):** This foundational layer, where all money eventually flows, includes: a) **Chip Design:** NVIDIA's dominance via its CUDA ecosystem, b) **Chip Manufacturing/Packaging/Memory:** TSMC's near-monopoly in advanced manufacturing and SK Hynix's lead in High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), c) **Optical Interconnects:** Essential for large-scale AI clusters (e.g., Lumentum, Coherent), d) **Cooling & Power:** Critical for high-density AI data centers (e.g., Vertiv), e) **Servers/Data Centers & Cloud Platforms:** The physical and virtual wholesale providers. 2. **Models & Tools (The "OS"):** The competitive layer of foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI), now generating real revenue. A key shift is the center of gravity moving from **Training** models to **Inference** (running models), which demands different chip characteristics and could challenge NVIDIA's monopoly. 3. **Middleware & Platform ("The Glue"):** Connects models and applications (e.g., Scale AI, Hugging Face). This layer could explode if applications take off. 4. **Vertical Applications ("The Cash Register"):** Where AI meets end-users (e.g., enterprise AI, coding tools, medical AI, robotics). A critical cross-cutting constraint is **Energy**, as AI's massive power consumption drives investment in nuclear and other energy infrastructure. The author identifies four key questions for further research: 1) How will the shift from Training to Inference reshape the competitive landscape? 2) With tech giants spending over $600B on capex, where is the ROI from AI applications? 3) What are the under-the-radar opportunities in the "second" and "third" circles of the value chain (e.g., cooling, specialty foundries)? 4) How will geopolitics (e.g., U.S.-China chip restrictions) bifurcate the supply chain? The conclusion is that missed opportunities stem from insufficient research, not slow timing. By methodically studying each layer—its business models, competition, and valuations—investors can build the "killer intuition" needed to act decisively when the market presents its chance.

marsbit17 dk önce

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

marsbit17 dk önce

Having Raised $37 Million with a16z's Backing, Why Did Goldfinch Ultimately Fail?

The decentralized credit protocol Goldfinch, which raised $37.7 million in funding led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is officially entering a shutdown process. After six years of operation and issuing approximately $100 million in loans, it faces widespread borrower defaults and frozen depositor funds. Depositors report an estimated actual loss rate of around 70%, with the protocol's governance token GFI having plummeted 99.8% from its all-time high. The current proposal involves winding down operations, halting new development, and establishing a trust to manage loan recovery over an estimated two-plus years. Founded by ex-Coinbase employees, Goldfinch aimed to channel crypto capital into loans for emerging markets via local lenders. However, it suffered significant defaults from major borrowers like Tugende Kenya, Stratos, and Lend East, leading to over $18 million in losses. The failure highlights the core challenge for DeFi-based Real-World Asset (RWA) lending: while blockchain technology improves capital fluidity, it cannot replace the critical offline components of credit underwriting, collateral management, and legal enforcement, especially in high-risk jurisdictions.

Foresight News21 dk önce

Having Raised $37 Million with a16z's Backing, Why Did Goldfinch Ultimately Fail?

Foresight News21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures