Justin Sun: HT Is Seriously Undervalued Compared to BNB

Huobi2022-10-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-10-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB.

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB. Here are several reasons:

● These two tokens have the same circulation

● Huobi Global has more tools to empower HT

● Popular coins such as APT have a higher trading volume on Huobi Global

Is it real?

Firstly, look at the circulation. The total supply of BNB is 200 million, while the total supply of HT is 500 million, 300 million more than its compatitor. However, nearly 300 million HTs have already been burnt through the “HT Token Burn Program Community Vote”. From the perspective of circulating supply, the current circulating supply of HT is around 130 million, and the circulating supply of BNB is 160 million. The circulating supply of HT is less than that of BNB. Focusing on non-circulating HT, with 200 million in circulation compared to 160 million, the price of BNB is around 270 US dollars per token, while the price of HT is only 7 US dollars per token, the gap is indeed too wide.

From the burning curve below, by burning 150 million HT in March 2020, the burning speed of HT was significantly accelerated, while BNB was relatively slow.

Second, when HT was initially released, part of it was used to buy point cards as gifts, and HT could be used to purchase VIP members, and also could be used to vote for listing. Since the end of 2020, the empowerment actions will be significantly reduced. In addition, the Chinese users would force to leave in 2021, and the empowerment actions of HT were basically suspended. However, the empowerment of BNB actions was continuous, which lead to a rebound in the price of BNB at the end of 2021, and widens its price gap with HT. The empowerment move of HT is indeed a little weaker, but there is no fundamental difference between them by circulation and brand influence, if HT could follow the BNB in the empowerment perspective, the price gap may see a quick narrowing in the short run.

Lastly, take the trading volume of the popular currency APT as an example to analyze the gap between the giants. According to the data of Coingecko, the trading volume of the APT/USDT trading pair in Binance for the last 1 day is around 120 million US dollars, while in Huobi it is about 40 million US dollars. the gap was just about 3 times. This gap is much narrower than the price gap between HT and BNB.

The following are quoted from Justin in the live broadcast. You can tell for yourself whether it makes sense or not:

“I personally believe that HT is definitely undervalued because the circulation of HT and BNB is exactly the same, about 160 million. Now a BNB coin is a few hundred dollars, while HT is only 7-8 dollars, I think HT is still undervalued. Although Binance has a strong network effect, Huobi Global is still an excellent exchange.

For example, in the past two days, Huobi Global is still the main battlefield for the trading of APT which is a new and top-level project. To a certain extent, the price of HT does not match the users, trading depth, and capital of Huobi global. In another word, HT is still underestimated.

I’m not trying to spread FOMO emotion to you guys. Suppose I’m not a Huobi Global consultant, my judgment of the undervalue of HT will still be firm. So HT now is definitely will be a profitable investment. The reason HT was undervalued is that Huobi Global did not empower HT. Now that I am a Huobi Global consultant, I must ensure that Huobi Global will focus on empowering HT. In meetings for the last few days, I have emphasized more than 50 times to make sure that our organization's top priority is to empower HT and turn the direction of operation back to HT prosperity. "

İlgili Okumalar

13 Business Lines Surpass $100 Million in Annualized Revenue, Robinhood Moves Toward a 'Super Financial App'

Robinhood Q2 2026 Earnings: Record Revenue and a Push Towards a "Super Financial App" Robinhood (HOOD) reported strong Q2 2026 results, with net revenue reaching $1.308 billion, up 32% year-over-year, and net income hitting $561 million, a 45% increase. The company now has 13 distinct business lines each generating over $100 million in annualized revenue. Key drivers included a 44% surge in transaction-based revenue to $776 million, led by a more than 10x growth in "event contracts" (prediction markets) and strong performance in stocks and options. User metrics also grew, with funded accounts rising to 28.4 million and total assets under custody reaching $369 billion. The Robinhood Gold subscription service hit a record 4.8 million users. The report highlights a strategic shift for Robinhood. Moving beyond its core as a zero-commission trading platform for retail investors, it is actively building a broader financial ecosystem. This includes expanding into wealth management (Robinhood Strategies), payments (Robinhood Credit Card), and next-generation infrastructure like AI-powered "Agentic Trading" and its own Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain, Robinhood Chain. The company's goal is to evolve from a trading app into a comprehensive "super financial app," offering a one-stop shop for investing, cash management, and future on-chain finance.

Odaily星球日报27 dk önce

13 Business Lines Surpass $100 Million in Annualized Revenue, Robinhood Moves Toward a 'Super Financial App'

Odaily星球日报27 dk önce

13 Business Lines Surpass $100 Million in Annualized Revenue, Robinhood Advances Toward a 'Super Financial App'

On July 30th, Robinhood (HOOD) reported its Q2 2026 financial results, showcasing significant growth with record revenue and profits. The company achieved a net revenue of $1.308 billion, a 32% year-over-year (YoY) increase, and a net income of $561 million, up 45% YoY. This strong performance was driven by robust trading activity and expansion into new financial services. A key highlight was the surge in transaction-based revenue, which rose 44% YoY to $776 million. Notably, income from event contracts (prediction markets) skyrocketed over 10x to $156 million, emerging as a major new growth driver alongside strong gains in stock and options trading. However, crypto trading revenue declined by 38%. Beyond trading, Robinhood is successfully diversifying its revenue streams. User assets grew 32% to $369 billion, and the subscription service Robinhood Gold reached a record 4.8 million users. The company revealed that 13 of its business lines now generate over $100 million in annualized revenue, including its new credit card, prediction markets, and Gold subscriptions. Looking forward, Robinhood is strategically investing in AI and blockchain to build a comprehensive financial ecosystem. It has launched AI-powered "Agentic Trading" and the "Robinhood Chain," a layer-2 blockchain network. The company's vision is evolving from a retail trading platform into a "super financial app" that integrates trading, wealth management, payments, and next-generation digital asset services, though regulatory hurdles remain for some new ventures.

marsbit28 dk önce

13 Business Lines Surpass $100 Million in Annualized Revenue, Robinhood Advances Toward a 'Super Financial App'

marsbit28 dk önce

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

The article examines the significance of recent data showing China's total R&D expenditure, measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), catching up to or slightly surpassing that of the United States in 2024. It argues that while this milestone reflects China's immense capacity to mobilize research resources, the competition in semiconductors now extends far beyond sheer financial input. The analysis highlights key differences: China's R&D is heavily skewed towards experimental development (over 80%), focusing on product engineering and industrialization, whereas the U.S. allocates a proportionally larger share (about 15%) to basic research. Furthermore, leading U.S. semiconductor firms reinvest a significant portion of their substantial global sales revenue into R&D, creating a sustainable commercial innovation cycle that is difficult to replicate. The article emphasizes that semiconductor progress depends on converting R&D into commercially viable products that pass rigorous customer validation and achieve repeat orders, not just on spending levels. It concludes that as China enters the top tier of R&D spenders, the critical challenges shift to improving resource allocation efficiency, fostering long-term basic research, and building effective mechanisms to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and reliable, market-ready industrial capabilities.

marsbit1 saat önce

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片