80% of Oil Revenue Settled in USDT, Stablecoin Becomes Venezuela's 'Second Dollar'

比推2026-01-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Summary: Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA now uses Tether's USDT stablecoin to settle approximately 80% of its oil export revenue, a strategic shift to circumvent U.S. sanctions. This move has cemented USDT's role as a "second dollar" in the country's economy. While it serves as a critical financial lifeline for citizens grappling with hyperinflation and the collapse of the bolivar, it also functions as a tool for the government to bypass traditional banking systems. The dual-use nature of stablecoins is highlighted: they provide essential stability for everyday transactions and remittances for the populace, yet simultaneously enable sanctioned entities to evade financial oversight. Despite the recent arrest of former President Nicolás Maduro, the pervasive use of USDT is expected to continue due to Venezuela's ongoing economic instability.

Author: Vicky Ge Huang, the Wall Street Journal

Compiled by: Peggy, BlockBeats

Original title: 80% of Oil Revenue Settled in Stablecoin, Venezuela Turns USDT into a Second Dollar


Editor's Note: From the "stablecoin of outlaws" to attempting to enter the U.S. compliant market, the role of USDT in Venezuela reveals the most real and contradictory aspect of stablecoins: they serve both as a settlement tool for oil exports to bypass sanctions and the traditional banking system, and as a financial lifeline for ordinary people to sustain their lives amid the collapse of the bolivar and capital controls.

When nearly 80% of a country's oil revenue is taken over by stablecoins, and even the elderly pay property fees with USDT, this is not only an extreme example of crypto penetrating the real economy but also a reminder that the core controversy of stablecoins has never been just about "how well they work," but rather their inherent "dual use": becoming a lifeline where institutions fail, and an escape route in regulatory vacuums.

Below is the original text:

Nicolás Maduro has, in a way, contributed to USDT becoming the world's most dominant stablecoin. And now, as the former Venezuelan leader is held in a Brooklyn prison, the central role of this cryptocurrency in Venezuela's economy is once again in the spotlight.

For Venezuela's state-owned oil company, USDT has become a crucial tool to evade sanctions and is used as a payment currency for settling oil transactions. At the same time, Tether provides a financial "lifeline" for ordinary Venezuelans amid the ongoing devaluation of the national currency, the bolivar. Like most major stablecoins, USDT maintains a 1:1 peg to the U.S. dollar.

According to crypto industry analysts, Maduro's arrest and removal as Venezuela's president may not necessarily weaken USDT's presence in the country—after all, hyperinflation remains a long-term challenge. Meanwhile, the financial ties between Tether and Venezuela also place the cryptocurrency company in a critical position: it could become a key ally for U.S. authorities as they attempt to trace the whereabouts of funds allegedly embezzled by the Maduro regime.

Adam Zarazinski, CEO of crypto intelligence firm Inca Digital, stated: "The use of cryptocurrency in Venezuela will continue and is likely to expand in the short term. For ordinary users, it is a self-help mechanism to cope with economic failure and institutional collapse. But the same governance failures also create space for evading sanctions—if there is no credible improvement in governance, this outcome will not change."

Maduro pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking charges in his arraignment in U.S. federal court last week.

This new phase comes as cryptocurrency company Tether and its token—once stigmatized as the "stablecoin of choice for outlaws"—are seeking acceptance in the U.S. market. Last year, legislation was passed to pave the way for broader use of stablecoins, and Tether announced plans to launch a stablecoin open to U.S. investors. If realized, this would put it on a level playing field with competitors like Circle Internet Group and Paxos. Otherwise, Tether risks being marginalized in the U.S. market.

Just last week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated that the U.S. would indefinitely sell blocked Venezuelan oil. He said the proceeds from the sales would be deposited into accounts controlled by the U.S. government and eventually transferred to the Latin American country to "benefit the Venezuelan people." A senior Trump administration official also told The Wall Street Journal that the government is selectively rolling back some sanctions to allow crude oil and petroleum products to be transported and sold to global markets.

Faced with escalating U.S. sanctions in 2020, Venezuela's state-owned oil company Petroleos de Venezuela (PdVSA) began requiring payments in USDT to bypass the traditional banking system. Oil export revenues are settled either by directly transferring USDT to a wallet address or by converting cash proceeds into USDT through intermediaries.

This shift has been "transformative" for the country's oil economy. Venezuelan local economist Asdrúbal Oliveros recently stated in a podcast that, according to one estimate, nearly 80% of Venezuela's oil revenue is received in the form of stablecoins like USDT.

Subsequently, Tether cooperated with U.S. authorities to freeze dozens of wallets identified as being involved in Venezuelan oil trade. A Tether spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

Soon after the sanctions took effect, Tether, with the ticker USDT, also became a viable alternative currency for many Venezuelans. They use this stablecoin for cross-border remittances, savings preservation, and daily payments.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said at a recent crypto industry conference: "Over the past 10 years, the Venezuelan bolivar has depreciated by 99.8% against the U.S. dollar, the Turkish lira by 80%, and the Argentine peso by about 94.5%. This simple chart alone is enough to explain why USDT has succeeded."

Mauricio Di Bartolomeo, a crypto entrepreneur born and raised in Venezuela, said that two months ago, his 71-year-old aunt called him because she needed to buy some USDT to pay her apartment's homeowners association fee.

"You pay the gardener, you pay for a haircut—everything is paid this way. Basically, you can use USDT for anything," said Di Bartolomeo, co-founder of crypto lending platform Ledn. "The penetration of stablecoins in Venezuela is so deep that even without regulated, compliant channels to buy and sell stablecoins, people still choose stablecoins over the local banking system."

Researchers say it was almost inevitable that USDT would play a major role in Venezuela—due to a lack of trust in the country's banking system and strict capital controls that limit access to physical dollars. A prime example: the Venezuelan government attempted to launch an oil-backed cryptocurrency called Petro in 2018, but it failed due to lack of public trust and international recognition.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs, said: "The issue is not with USDT itself, but with the inherent 'dual-use' reality of stablecoins." TRM Labs has partnered with Tether to track the use of stablecoins on the Tron blockchain in illegal activities. "They can be a lifeline for ordinary people and also serve as a tool to evade sanctions under pressure."


Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7602350

İlgili Sorular

QWhat percentage of Venezuela's oil revenue is settled using USDT, according to the article?

ANearly 80% of Venezuela's oil revenue is settled using USDT and other stablecoins.

QWhy has USDT become a crucial tool for Venezuela's state oil company, PDVSA?

AUSDT has become a crucial tool for PDVSA to circumvent international sanctions and bypass the traditional banking system for settling oil transactions.

QWhat dual role does USDT play in the Venezuelan economy, as described in the article?

AUSDT serves a dual role: it acts as a financial lifeline for ordinary citizens coping with hyperinflation and capital controls, while also being used as a tool to evade sanctions for oil exports.

QWhat was the outcome of the Venezuelan government's attempt to launch its own oil-backed cryptocurrency, the Petro?

AThe government's attempt to launch the Petro failed due to a lack of public trust and international recognition.

QHow is Tether, the company behind USDT, attempting to gain legitimacy in the US market?

ATether is attempting to gain legitimacy in the US market by announcing plans to launch a stablecoin that will be open to US investors, following new legislation that paves the way for wider stablecoin use.

İlgili Okumalar

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手1 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手1 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit3 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit3 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手5 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手5 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit6 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片