JPMorgan seeking hire to push banking products onto metaverse, crypto companies

THE BLOCK2022-09-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-09-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

JPMorgan is seeking a west coast business development specialist to push institutional payments products onto new crypto, web3 and metaverse clients.

Wall Street megabank JPMorgan is looking to expand its reach in the crypto market, seeking a new business development specialist in its payments group to target new clients across Web3, the metaverse, and crypto.

The bank — which has provided banking services for crypto exchange Coinbase — noted in a job advert on LinkedIn for a payments business development manager that the firm is keen to grow its business in merchant banking and treasury services "in the Web3, Crypto, Fintech, & Metaverse industry sub vertical."

The new hire would sit in the bank's technology, media, and telecom payments team on the West Coast.

As reported in 2020, JPMorgan took on Coinbase and Gemini as its first crypto exchange clients. More recently, the firm announced in February 2022 that it had opened up a branch in DCG-backed metaverse Decentraland.

Per the job description, the new hire would be responsible for lining up new corporate clients for a wide range of payment products, including transactional FX, liquidity and treasury services, and escrow.

"There is no industry playbook for these segments. This individual must be comfortable paving a path, creating frameworks, and working with extremely fast moving companies amongst ambiguity," the bank said. "These segments require increased technical knowledge around software that do not fit into the traditional training of front-office financial professionals."

Elsewhere, Wall Street heavyweight Citigroup was looking to hire a global head of digital asset risk management, signifying its own strategic push toward crypto services, as The Block reported in January. In August, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management was seeking a product development manager for the firm’s Investment Solutions Product Development team, which is responsible for supporting more than $900 billion in assets under management.

To be sure, such job ads don't necessarily mean banks are moving into new crypto opportunities at breakneck speed, as previously noted by Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley.

“Hiring a mid-level person to work on something like this doesn’t guarantee a product comes to market,” said Horsley.

İlgili Okumalar

IOSG: DeFi at Its Most Critical Moment, The Real Vulnerability Lies Not in the Code

In April 2026, a series of major DeFi exploits—targeting Drift Protocol ($285M), KelpDAO ($292M via bridge), and Wasabi Protocol ($4.5M)—revealed a fundamental security crisis. None involved smart contract code vulnerabilities. Instead, losses stemmed from compromised operational foundations: social engineering of multi-signature signers, a single-point-of-failure bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. This month, where over $625M was stolen across ~30 incidents, marked the collapse of DeFi's core security premise: that rigorous code audits alone ensure safety. The real vulnerabilities lay in trusted operational components—admin keys, governance councils, and bridge configurations—areas audits typically ignore. The KelpDAO incident triggered an asymmetric domino effect: its $2.92B unsupported token mint caused ~$8.5B in outflows from Aave and a $13.2B total DeFi TVL drop in 48 hours, showcasing how one protocol's operational failure can cascade through composable systems. The article argues that most so-called "DeFi" is actually "OpenFi": permissionless and transparent on-chain, but critically reliant on trusted third parties for key operations. This inherent trade-off between decentralization and operational feasibility is often obscured by marketing. The industry's path forward requires honest disclosure of trust assumptions (like L2Beat's framework), treating operational security as a first-class discipline alongside code audits, and designing systems whose risks can be clearly assessed and insured. The April events were not a code security failure but a breakdown in the mental model surrounding it.

marsbit5 dk önce

IOSG: DeFi at Its Most Critical Moment, The Real Vulnerability Lies Not in the Code

marsbit5 dk önce

The 'Stock Call King' Serenity: 3840% Annual Return, Beating Institutions to the Punch

This article profiles the mysterious stock trader and analyst known as Serenity, who has gained significant influence on social media platform X as a "stock call king." Serenity claims extraordinary annual returns of 3840% for the current year and 2256% over the past two years, primarily by focusing on overlooked companies within the AI and semiconductor supply chains. Operating anonymously, Serenity describes himself as a former Reddit WallStreetBets trader, an AI/semiconductor supply chain analyst, and a former AI research scientist. His core investment strategy, termed the "Chokepoint" theory, involves identifying small, critical bottleneck companies in the AI infrastructure ecosystem—such as those in photonics, substrates, and materials—that are essential yet undervalued. He argues these "invisible champions" become crucial as demand for AI hardware surges, creating significant investment opportunities before large institutions take notice. A frequently cited example is stock AXTI, which he has recommended for over two years and claims has yielded over 10,000% returns. The article notes that while Serenity's free, public posts on X have garnered a large following, his identity and exact portfolio size remain unverified, leading to some skepticism. Critics question if his reported returns are fabricated or if he might be manipulating prices of low-market-cap stocks. Serenity counters that he shares research freely to democratize information, allowing retail investors to benefit before institutional buy-ins, and that percentage returns are more meaningful than disclosing specific dollar amounts. Ultimately, the article presents Serenity as a polarizing figure—either a visionary analyst with a superior research framework or a potentially sophisticated market player. It concludes that the truth of his claims and legacy will only be determined by time.

Odaily星球日报13 dk önce

The 'Stock Call King' Serenity: 3840% Annual Return, Beating Institutions to the Punch

Odaily星球日报13 dk önce

Will Ethereum's Native Privacy Proposal EIP-8182 Absorb Liquidity from Other Privacy Coins?

The article discusses Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 8182, titled "Private ETH and ERC-20 Transfers," a draft proposal to integrate native privacy directly into the Ethereum protocol layer (L1). Currently, Ethereum transactions are fully transparent, and existing privacy solutions like Tornado Cash are third-party dApps with limitations: small anonymity sets (mixing pools), lack of interoperability, and regulatory vulnerability. EIP-8182 aims to create a large, unified "shared shielded pool" and zero-knowledge proof (ZK) precompiles within the core protocol. Key features include a massive, shared anonymity pool for all users and dApps, significantly enhancing privacy strength; native support for private transfers of ETH and any ERC-20 token; a decentralized system contract architecture without admin controls or fees; and the use of ZK proofs to validate transactions without revealing specific details. If implemented, this upgrade could position Ethereum as the world's largest privacy-focused blockchain. By offering a built-in, highly private environment with a vast user base and liquidity, it might attract institutional and individual users, potentially drawing liquidity away from dedicated privacy coins like Zcash and Monero, or even users seeking privacy on Bitcoin. The integration could transform Ethereum from a transparent public ledger into a dominant privacy-centric platform, with potential future enhancements like fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) for compliance capabilities.

marsbit17 dk önce

Will Ethereum's Native Privacy Proposal EIP-8182 Absorb Liquidity from Other Privacy Coins?

marsbit17 dk önce

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

"Investors are pouring billions into Chinese AI startups with no profits, betting on the future of the industry. A state-backed fund is reportedly in talks to lead DeepSeek's funding at a $45B valuation, just weeks after it was valued at $10B. Along with companies like Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and Kimi (backed by Meituan and Alibaba), their combined valuation exceeds $140B. This isn't a typical venture capital play. Investors are paying for 'future definition rights'—a chance to set the standards for the next tech era. Morgan Stanley notes a 6-12 month window for this scarcity premium before more AI companies go public. Despite massive losses, these companies show strong growth. Zhipu AI's API revenue grew 60x, Kimi's annual recurring revenue doubled to $200M in a month, and MiniMax turned its gross margin positive, with over 70% of revenue from overseas. Their valuations vastly exceed profitable firms like iFlytek. Crucially, technical progress underpins this growth. DeepSeek's latest model boasts costs just 1% of a leading competitor's, while Zhipu AI has raised API prices due to high demand. However, gaps with top global models remain. Tech giants like Tencent and Alibaba, investing heavily while describing their own AI efforts as 'leaky boats,' are also investing in these startups as a hedge. Key risks loom: the closing scarcity window, computing power bottlenecks limiting growth, and the sustainability of DeepSeek's cost-advantage model. With state capital now a major player, the success of these companies has become a strategic national concern. The next year will test if their soaring valuations can be justified by future profits."

marsbit1 saat önce

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片