Consensys：网络活动数据逆势增长，以太坊正在蓄势待发

深潮TechFlow2022-09-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-09-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

以太坊的用户数量和流动性是其他 L1 网络无法比拟的。

以太坊是世界上最大的可编程区块链。它是互联网（Web3）的未来，以及金融（DeFi）未来的基础。

⠀

目前，整个 DeFi 生态系统的一半以上都存在于以太坊上，尽管受到了市场波动和宏观经济的不确定性的影响，以太坊的参与度仍然很高。

⠀

本文将带您一起了解以太坊生态系统是如何进行长期建设，并确保做好准备迎接网络增长的。

⠀

与任何高效的技术一样，以太坊的路线图充满了对其基础设施的升级，使其能够更好地面向未来。

⠀

第一个我们称之为「合并」的升级，将在 2022 年 9 月中旬发生。

⠀

对于新生的加密货币行业来说，这将是一个历史性的时刻，合并将为以太坊增加安全性、可持续性和可扩展性做好支撑。

⠀

目前，以太坊网络有两个并行运行的区块链层——运行工作证明（PoW）的层，称为执行层（以太坊的历史状态和区块生产），以及运行权益证明（PoS）的层，称为共识层。

⠀

合并是指将这两层合并的事件，有效地结束 PoW，并将以太坊主网完全过渡到 PoS。

⠀

为什么以太坊在 DeFi 中占主导地位？

⠀

今天的 DeFi 生态系统价值 626 亿美元，而以太坊占整个 DeFi 生态系统的大部分，总价值锁定（TVL）为 367 亿美元。

⠀

以太坊在 DeFi 中占主导地位的部分原因是：

⠀

大多数流行的 DeFi 应用都是在以太坊上建立的，如 MakerDAO、Aave、Uniswap 和 Curve 。

⠀

以太坊还受益于强大的开发者和用户社区，特别是以太坊 CoreDevs，他们致力于通过创建文档和定期推出网络更新来改善网络。

⠀

这些资源有助于维持一个强大的、去中心化的网络，并推动其进一步的采用。

⠀

该网络的采用率和利用率都出现了暴涨的数字，这是网络成熟度的强烈信号。

⠀

要了解以太坊的用户采用率如何增加，让我们看一下一些统计数据。

⠀

网络活动

⠀

自 2020 年 1 月以来，以太坊网络上的唯一地址总数已经增加了一倍多，超过了 2 亿，这表明了以太坊网络在 Web3 用户中的受欢迎程度。

⠀

自 2020 年 1 月以来，活跃的以太坊地址数量也呈上升趋势，尽管最近市场低迷，目前仍在 504K 以上。

⠀

尽管市场剧烈波动，用户仍参与网络表明以太坊的用例超越了价格活动。

⠀

相比之下，自 5 月市场崩溃以来，Fantom 上的增长下降了 70%。

⠀

作为以太坊网络成熟的一个标志，Gas 费用自今年 1 月以来稳步下降。

⠀

即使网络活动增加，它们也变得更加可预测。

⠀

较低的 Gas 费用使以太坊交易具有成本效益，并且不受网络活动的影响。

⠀

因此，用户不需要担心在网络拥堵的时候支付 100 美元来完成交易。

⠀

自 2020 年 1 月以来，以太坊的每日交易量呈上升趋势，并已趋于稳定。

⠀

在过去的 12 个月里，平均每天在以太坊上完成超过 100 万笔交易。

⠀

因此，尽管 Web3 和全球宏观市场波动，用户仍继续使用着网络。

⠀

这也是一个信号，表明具有现实世界用例的有意义的应用程序正在以太坊上构建。

⠀

为了了解在以太坊上发生的交易数量的规模，我举了例子：2021 年，以太坊处理的交易量超过了世界上最大的支付处理器 Visa。

⠀

以太坊处理了价值 11.6 万亿美元的交易，而 Visa 处理了 10.4 万亿美元。

⠀

确定区块链网络需求的一个强有力的指标是协议收入——即用户愿意为在区块链上进行的交易而支付的金额。

⠀

区块链通过出售区块空间来赚取收入，矿工（或共识层的验证者）购买区块空间来完成交易。

⠀

另一方面，区块链的主要支出是围绕着它在巩固网络完整性和维护安全方面所花费的资源。

⠀

目前，几乎每一个区块链花在保障网络安全上的钱都比他们从出售区块空间获得的钱要多。

⠀

因此，收入比简单地依赖交易总数提供了更好的网络需求感知。

⠀

虽然使用 Tron 或 Solana 可能比以太坊便宜，但由于网络的安全性和可靠性更好等因素，用户可能愿意支付溢价来使用以太坊。

⠀

自今年 3 月中旬以来，ETH 产生了 18 亿美元的协议收入，是 Avalanche、Solana、Polkadot 和 Polygon 等 20 个顶级区块链中最高的。

⠀

作为比较，以 Avalanche 为例：它在同一时期产生了第二高的协议收入，也只产生了 7260 万美元。

⠀

在同一时期，与其他第 1 层 (L1) 网络相比，以太坊占据了协议总收入的 90% 以上。

⠀

自 2020 年 12 月以来，对以太坊的质押获得了巨大的吸引力。

⠀

截至 2022 年 8 月 19 日，超过 1330 万个 ETH 被质押，占所有 ETH 供应量的近 11%。

⠀

总结

⠀

正如我们在上面看到的，来到以太坊的用户数量和流动性是其他 L1 网络无法比拟的。

⠀

由于这种高流动性和庞大的用户群，以太坊对那些在不同区块链之间选择建立的开发者来说变得很有吸引力。

⠀

这种受欢迎程度有助于为以太坊建立一条流动性的护城河。

⠀

大多数具有高 TVL 和 Web3 使用率的去中心化应用程序（dApps）都是以太坊上的原生产品。

⠀

因此，有大量的价值在网络中流动，机构参与者可以挖掘这些价值并从中获益。

İlgili Okumalar

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbit4 dk önce

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbit4 dk önce

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

In 2026, the DeFi sector faces a severe trust crisis following a series of high-profile security breaches, including a $292 million theft from KelpDAO’s rsETH, a $2.85 million exploit at Drift Protocol due to permission vulnerabilities, and a $14.9 million lending failure at Venus Protocol. These incidents triggered a withdrawal of approximately $10 billion from DeFi over a single weekend, highlighting systemic risks beyond smart contract flaws—such as governance, cross-chain complexity, and operational weaknesses. Despite these challenges, on-chain finance continues to grow, with capital shifting toward safer, regulated products. Stablecoins like USDT ($185B) and USDC ($78B) have reached a combined market cap of $263 billion, while tokenized U.S. Treasuries surged to $10.93 billion. Visa’s growing USDC settlement volume, now annualized at $3.5 billion, signals increasing institutional adoption of compliant blockchain-based financial infrastructure. The competition for the future of on-chain finance is intensifying. While native DeFi struggles with trust and capital outflows, regulated products—stablecoins, tokenized assets, and ETFs—are gaining dominance by offering programmable, 24/7 settlement without high DeFi risks. Over 80 crypto projects shut down in Q1 2026, reflecting dwindling patience for speculative ventures. The core challenge for open DeFi is to rebuild trust and demonstrate irreplaceable value—or risk ceding its role as the primary entry point to on-chain finance.

marsbit14 dk önce

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

marsbit14 dk önce

Arbitrum Freezes $71M ETH Linked to Kelp Hack, Sparks Decentralization Debate

Arbitrum, an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, froze 30,766 ETH (worth over $71.2 million) linked to the recent Kelp protocol exploit. The freeze was executed by a 12-member security council appointed by the Arbitrum community, moving the funds to an intermediary wallet accessible only through further governance action. The hack, which occurred on Saturday, resulted in at least $293 million in losses and was attributed to North Korea by LayerZero. The incident has reignited debates about decentralization, as some critics argue such freezes contradict blockchain’s core principles, while others support them for security. The council reportedly spent hours deliberating the decision, which was approved by 9 of its 12 members.

TheNewsCrypto19 dk önce

Arbitrum Freezes $71M ETH Linked to Kelp Hack, Sparks Decentralization Debate

TheNewsCrypto19 dk önce

Currency and Stock Barometer丨Global Listed Companies' Weekly Net Purchase of BTC Exceeds $2.5 Billion, Hitting a Recent High; Bitmine Increases Holdings by 101,627 ETH Last Week, the Largest Increase in Nearly Four Months (April 21)

Global public companies' net Bitcoin purchases surged to $2.542 billion last week, hitting a recent high, with Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) leading by adding 34,164 BTC. Bitmine significantly increased its ETH holdings by 101,627, the largest in four months. Amid easing Middle East tensions, U.S. and Asian equities rallied, with the S&P 500 reaching new highs. Analysts note a shift in focus to economic fundamentals, though oil price volatility persists. Meanwhile, Bitcoin mining firms sold over 32,000 BTC in Q1 2026, exceeding 2025’s total sales. Tether backed SDEV’s $134 million raise to bolster stablecoin ecosystem development, while BNB Plus faces potential Nasdaq delisting due to low share price.

marsbit19 dk önce

Currency and Stock Barometer丨Global Listed Companies' Weekly Net Purchase of BTC Exceeds $2.5 Billion, Hitting a Recent High; Bitmine Increases Holdings by 101,627 ETH Last Week, the Largest Increase in Nearly Four Months (April 21)

marsbit19 dk önce

Fermi Crisis: A Case Study of an AI Power Stock's Sudden Decline

The article "Fermi Crisis: A Case Study of an AI Power Stock's Collapse" details the rapid rise and fall of Fermi, a company that promised to build the world's largest AI data center campus in Texas. Despite having zero revenue, tenants, or a finished product, it raised $785 million in its October IPO, with its market cap peaking at $12.5 billion. However, its stock plummeted from $37 to $5.40 within months. The collapse began when its anchor tenant, believed to be Amazon, terminated its contract after promised funding failed to materialize. Construction halted as lease terms forbade building without a tenant. The simultaneous departure of the CEO and CFO, alongside insider stock sales totaling $68 million, accelerated the decline. A short-seller report highlighted the CEO's history of alleged fraud at a previous venture. Fermi is presented as a symptom of a broader AI infrastructure bubble. A significant gap exists between announced data center projects and those under construction, hampered by severe supply chain delays for critical components like transformers. While tech giants plan massive investments, many projects face cancellation or indefinite delays. The article warns that Fermi's story may be repeated, as many ventures are built on speculative narratives rather than deliverable infrastructure.

marsbit43 dk önce

Fermi Crisis: A Case Study of an AI Power Stock's Sudden Decline

marsbit43 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures