Топ-5 холодных кошельков для криптовалюты

VC.ru2022-09-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-09-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Самый безопасный вариант хранения криптовалюты – холодный. Такой подход подразумевает удержание монет вне сети.

Самый безопасный вариант хранения криптовалюты – холодный. Такой подход подразумевает удержание монет вне сети. Многие участники криптосообщества используют для холодного хранения криптовалюты специальные аппаратные кошельки. Такие устройства, как правило, похожи на флешку. Их можно хранить в сейфе или другом безопасном месте.

⠀

3 производителя и 5 холодных кошельков

⠀

На рынке холодных кошельков образовалось три производителя, которых можно назвать лидерами индустрии. Рассмотрим их предложения.

⠀

Ledger

⠀

Компанию основали во Франции в 2014 году. По состоянию на август 2022 года, в линейке Ledger представлено две топовые модели криптокошельков, которые сделали организацию лидером рынка:

⠀

NANO X. Цена: $149. Модель поддерживает 5500 токенов. NANO X совместима с невзаимозаменяемыми токенами (NFT). Криптокошелек может соединяться с мобильным телефоном по Bluetooth. Также разработчики обращают внимание на удобный большой экран устройства.

⠀

NANO S PLUS. Цена: $79. Модель поддерживает 5500 токенов и NFT. В отличие от NANO X, у NANO S PLUS меньше экран. Также модель не умеет коннектиться с мобильным по Bluetooth. Отсутствие некоторых технических возможностей покрывает небольшая цена устройства.

⠀

Источник: официальный сайт Ledger

⠀

Интересно! В 2020 году в сеть утекла база данных Ledger. Из-за прорыва систем безопасности компании пострадало около 270 тыс. пользователей. Многие подверглись фишинговым атакам.

⠀

Trezor

⠀

Компанию основали в 2012 году. Trezor – главный конкурент Ledger на рынке холодных криптокошельков. По состоянию на момент написания обзора, компания предлагает две модели холодных хранилищ:

⠀

Trezor One. Цена: €69. Модель поддерживает свыше 1 тыс. токенов. На корпусе криптокошелька установлен монохромный дисплей и две клавиши для управления операциями.

⠀

Trezor Model T. Цена: €249. Кошелек поддерживает свыше 1800 токенов. На его корпусе установлен цветной тачскрин. В отличие от One-версии, Model T поддерживает карты microSD, FIDO2-аутентификацию и ряд других функций.

⠀

Источник: официальный сайт Trezor

⠀

SafePal

⠀

Компанию основали в 2018 году. По состоянию на момент написания обзора, у SafePal одна модель холодного кошелька – S1. Ее можно приобрести за $49.99.

⠀

Источник: официальный сайт SafePal

⠀

Модель поддерживает 33 блокчейна и свыше 30 тыс. токенов. Устройство выполнено в форме кредитной карты.

⠀

Покупать такие устройства с рук или через непроверенных посредников не рекомендуется. Дело в том, что криптокошельки могут быть прошиты. В этом случае инвестор рискует потерять всю криптовалюту.

⠀

Иван Булочкин для vc.ru

İlgili Okumalar

From Wuhan to Silicon Valley, Manus Took Nine Months

From Wuhan to Silicon Valley: Manus Acquired by Meta in Nine Months Manus, an AI startup, was acquired by Meta for billions of dollars, marking Meta’s third-largest acquisition after WhatsApp and Scale AI. The deal was finalized just nine months after Manus launched its product in March. Founded by Xiao Hong, a graduate of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Manus began in Wuhan. Xiao had previously sold two tools: a WeChat public account editor and a CRM tool for enterprise WeChat. Manus, initially criticized as a "shell" product for building on existing models rather than developing its own AI, used models like Claude and Qwen. In July, Manus relocated from China to Singapore, reducing its team from 120 to 40 core members. This move was crucial to facilitate the acquisition by a U.S. company amid regulatory challenges. The negotiation with Meta took only ten days, driven by Meta’s urgent need for a proven AI application—Manus had achieved $125 million in annualized revenue through a global subscription model within eight months. Investors including Sequoia China, Tencent, and ZhenFund saw returns of dozens of times on their investments. Following the acquisition, Xiao Hong became a VP at Meta. While ZhenFund’s partner Liu Yuan declared it the era for young Chinese entrepreneurs, the path to success involved moving the company out of China.

深潮35 dk önce

From Wuhan to Silicon Valley, Manus Took Nine Months

深潮35 dk önce

86% Return? How to Use a Bot to 'Earn Passively' on Polymarket

This article details the development and backtesting of an automated trading bot for the "BTC 15-minute UP/DOWN" market on Polymarket. The author identified market inefficiencies and automated a manual strategy to exploit them. The bot operates in two modes. In manual mode, users can directly place orders. In auto mode, it runs a two-leg cycle: First, it observes the market for a set time after a round begins. If either the "UP" or "DOWN" side drops by a specified percentage (e.g., 15%) within seconds, it triggers "Leg 1" and buys the crashed side. It then waits for "Leg 2," a hedging trade on the opposite side, which is only executed if the sum of the Leg 1 entry price and the opposite ask price meets a target threshold (e.g., ≤ 0.95). Due to a lack of historical market data from Polymarket's API, the author created a custom backtesting system by recording 6 GB of live price snapshots over four days. A conservative backtest with parameters of a 15% crash threshold and a 0.95 sum target showed an 86% ROI, turning $1,000 into $1,869. An aggressive parameter set resulted in a -50% loss, highlighting the critical role of parameter selection. The author acknowledges significant limitations of the backtesting, including its short data period, failure to model order book depth, partial fills, variable network latency, and the market impact of the bot's own orders. Future improvements include rewriting the bot in Rust for performance, running a dedicated node, and deploying on a low-latency VPS.

marsbit35 dk önce

86% Return? How to Use a Bot to 'Earn Passively' on Polymarket

marsbit35 dk önce

Why XRP’s rich list matters more than price right now

XRP's price has dropped nearly 50%, but the key story lies in its supply and ownership structure. Over 6 million wallets hold only small amounts (≤500 XRP), while a significant portion of the supply is locked in escrow or held by a few large wallets. This means the truly liquid, tradable supply is shrinking, as evidenced by declining exchange balances despite heavy selling pressure. The cost to accumulate XRP has also risen sharply, pricing out many retail buyers. Consequently, even a modest return of demand could lead to disproportionately sharp price increases due to the constrained available supply.

ambcrypto39 dk önce

Why XRP’s rich list matters more than price right now

ambcrypto39 dk önce

Times Square Goes Crypto: XRP “589” Catches Ex-CFTC Chair’s Eye

Times Square's New Year's Eve display for 2026, consisting of the numerals "2026," was constructed using 589 LED bulbs. This specific number sparked significant reactions within the XRP community, as "589" is a recurring motif in its online circles. The coincidence led to widespread sharing of content and speculation on social media platforms. Former CFTC Acting Chair Caroline Pham, now at MoonPay, added to the buzz by reacting to the footage with rocket emojis. However, no official endorsement or connection between the event organizers and XRP exists. Mainstream news outlets reported on the display's logistics without mentioning crypto, and analysts caution against interpreting the coincidence as meaningful financial guidance. The event is largely seen as an example of how online communities rapidly identify and spread patterns.

bitcoinist41 dk önce

Times Square Goes Crypto: XRP “589” Catches Ex-CFTC Chair’s Eye

bitcoinist41 dk önce

Paradigm's Stalling Moment: When a 'Research-Driven Crypto VC' Faces Reality Test

Paradigm, once a leading research-driven crypto VC, is facing significant challenges marked by an unprecedented wave of high-level departures since April, including multiple partners. Its investment strategy, which previously yielded iconic deals like Uniswap and Flashbots, has struggled to adapt to shifting industry trends toward application-layer innovation and financial products. The firm has made several high-valuation, late-stage investments—such as Farcaster, Babylon, and Monad—that have underperformed post-token, while missing early opportunities in high-return areas like derivatives and RWA. Its incubation initiatives, including the EIR program, have also seen setbacks, with projects like Shadow and Yield Protocol halting operations. Recently, Paradigm has increased investment frequency and shifted toward earlier-stage deals. It is now focusing heavily on Tempo, a payment-focused Layer-1 blockchain developed with Stripe, aiming to regain its influence in a more results-driven market. Despite these challenges, Paradigm remains one of the best-capitalized VCs in crypto.

marsbit1 saat önce

Paradigm's Stalling Moment: When a 'Research-Driven Crypto VC' Faces Reality Test

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片