Kalshi与Polymarket平台交易额创下历史新高

cryptonews.ru2026-08-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-03 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

7月份,Kalshi保持为最大的预测市场平台,其月交易额达377亿美元,环比增长14%。与此同时,国际平台Polymarket的交易额下降26%至79亿美元,而其美国分部Polymarket US则增长54%至50亿美元,两家平台的总交易额从6月的140亿美元降至129亿美元。 分析指出,Kalshi的增长主要得益于向所有美国用户开放访问。此外,6月11日至7月19日举行的世界杯足球赛显著推高了投注量,Kalshi上西班牙对阿根廷决赛的市场吸引了约19亿美元,Polymarket上关于赛事冠军的投注额约达40亿美元。赛事结束后,平台活跃度明显下降,三大平台的未平仓合约总额从7月初约20亿美元降至月底约12亿美元。 据此前评估,世界杯相关合约在两个平台的总交易额约200亿美元,占赛事期间平台总活跃度的约63%。

截至七月,最大的预测平台仍是Kalshi。该平台当月交易额达到377亿美元,较上月增长14%。

与此同时,国际平台Polymarket的交易额下降了26%,至79亿美元——而美国平台Polymarket US的交易额则增长了54%,达到50亿美元。因此,两个平台的总交易额从六月的140亿美元下降至七月的129亿美元。

The Block的分析师将交易活跃度的增长与Kalshi决定向所有美国用户开放访问联系起来。今年五月,这家受商品期货交易委员会监管的公司取消了注册限制,使得美国交易者能够合法参与交易,无需再规避各州的地区性封锁。

The Block指出,七月投注额增长的主要因素是于6月11日至7月19日举行的世界杯足球赛。Kalshi上关于西班牙与阿根廷决赛的预测市场吸引了约19亿美元,而Polymarket上关于锦标赛冠军的投注额则达到约40亿美元。

世界杯的结束导致活跃度显著下降。The Block写道,Polymarket、Polymarket US和Kalshi的总未平仓合约量从七月初的约20亿美元减少至月底的约12亿美元。

此前,Chainalysis的专家估计,Polymarket和Kalshi上与世界杯相关的合约总交易额达到200亿美元。根据他们的数据,在资格赛和锦标赛期间,赛事投注约占这些预测平台全部活跃度的63%。

end-content

İlgili Sorular

Q根据文章,2024年7月哪家预测市场的交易额最大?

A根据文章,2024年7月交易额最大的预测市场平台是Kalshi,其月交易额达到了377亿美元。

QPolymarket在7月份的总交易额是多少?

A2024年7月,Polymarket的全球平台(Polymarket)和美国平台(Polymarket US)的总交易额为129亿美元。

Q文章中提到的推动7月交易额增长的两个主要因素是什么?

A推动7月交易额增长的两个主要因素是:1. Kalshi向所有美国用户开放了访问权限;2. 6月11日至7月19日举行的世界杯足球赛,吸引了大量相关预测和投注。

Q在Kalshi平台上,关于世界杯决赛的预测市场交易额大约是多少?

A根据文章,Kalshi平台上关于世界杯决赛(西班牙对阵阿根廷)的预测市场吸引了约19亿美元的交易额。

Q到7月底,Polymarket、Polymarket US和Kalshi的未平仓合约总价值是多少?

A到2024年7月底,Polymarket、Polymarket US和Kalshi这三个平台的未平仓合约总价值约为12亿美元。

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit2 dk önce

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit2 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit7 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit7 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit7 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit7 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片