Can Open USD Support Stripe's Ambition?

链捕手2026-07-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-07 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article explores whether the newly announced Open USD (OUSD) stablecoin can support Stripe's strategic ambition to evolve beyond a payment API company into a "money movement network." It argues that OUSD is not an immediate "USDC killer" but serves as a crucial narrative shift for Stripe. The stablecoin, launched by the independent entity Open Standard with backing from Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and others, represents an attempt to redefine the economics and governance of stablecoins by sharing reserve asset yields with distributing partners. For Stripe, OUSD is a key piece in moving from simply abstracting traditional financial rails (like card networks) to potentially defining a new settlement layer for global commerce. This aligns with Stripe's broader strategy involving its acquisitions (like Bridge for stablecoin issuance) and projects (like Tempo for payments-focused blockchain) to position itself for "agentic commerce," where AI agents and software conduct automated transactions. The article concludes that while OUSD alone cannot instantly transform Stripe's business, it concretely signals the company's ambition to organize the future infrastructure of money movement, where value may ultimately settle on a network it helped shape.

Author: Yokiiiya Stablehunter

Five months ago, I wrote an article titled Stripe | The AWS of the Financial World: Why It Becomes the Biggest Winner in the AI + Stablecoin Era, where I wrote that 'Money will run on Stripe.' Stripe is not just building a better payment button; it's transforming financial capabilities like receiving payments, making payments, issuing cards, fund accounts, tax, and invoicing into infrastructure that developers can call, just like cloud services.

But after the emergence of Open USD, we see that Stripe might want to prove more than just 'money will run on Stripe.' Rather:

Money will not only run through Stripe.

Money may settle on a network Stripe helped define.

I. OUSD is a Key Step for Stripe to Become a Money Movement Network

The significance of OUSD lies not in it being just another stablecoin, but in providing Stripe with a bigger story: from a payments API company to a money movement network.

It's unlikely to replace USDC in the short term, nor can it bypass all traditional financial systems. However, it gives Stripe the opportunity to not just connect payments, but to reorganize settlement, liquidity, and yield distribution. In the past, we often understood Stripe as a better payment gateway, but more accurately, Stripe is an aggregation layer built upon card networks, bank account systems, local clearing networks, acquiring/issuing licenses, and various traditional payment rails.

This is also its limitation.

What Stripe truly wants to break through is the strategic limitation of being merely 'the API layer on top of traditional payment networks.' If Stripe is just a better payments API, no matter how big it gets, it can easily be framed within comparison frameworks against Adyen, PayPal, Fiserv, Checkout.com, and acquirers. The market would look at its processed volume, take rate, gross margin resilience, potential increases in card network costs, and regulatory and local licensing constraints on expansion.

This would still be a very good company, but not yet a truly financial network. The significance of OUSD is that it gives Stripe the chance to advance its story from 'we help merchants connect payment methods' to 'we participate in defining the next-generation commercial settlement network.'

The valuation logic for these two things is completely different. The former is software and payment aggregation; the latter is a network.

In the payment industry, the most valuable thing has never been just the API, but network effects. Visa and Mastercard are valuable not because they have prettier payment buttons, but because they organize a multi-sided network: issuing banks, acquiring banks, merchants, consumers, risk rules, dispute handling, and clearing paths all operate within the same rule-based system.

If Stripe wants to tell a bigger story than 'payments API,' it must answer one question: Is it possible for Stripe to not just connect others' networks, but to organize its own network? OUSD provides the narrative entry point for this. The appeal of OUSD to Stripe isn't whether it's just another dollar stablecoin, but that it simultaneously points to four things.

First, it gives Stripe the chance to own a default settlement asset.

In the past, Stripe helped merchants connect to Visa, Mastercard, ACH, local wallets, and bank transfers. In the future, if OUSD can become the default settlement asset for Stripe merchants, platforms, marketplaces, and AI agents, Stripe would no longer just be connecting others' networks; it would be organizing its own.

Second, it changes economic distribution.

In traditional payments, Stripe can collect processing fees, but underlying network fees, bank fees, card network fees, and some fund earnings go to others. If stablecoin reserve yields, mint/redeem, liquidity, wallets, cards, and on/off-ramps are all organized within the Stripe/Bridge system, Stripe has the opportunity to enter a deeper layer of economics.

Third, it provides a programmable money layer for agentic commerce.

If the underlying layer remains just credit cards and bank transfers, what agents can do will be constrained by authorization, risk management, settlement delays, cross-border costs, and reconciliation processes. Stablecoins can't solve all problems, but they are closer to a money rail that machines can call.

Fourth, it moves Stripe from a software company towards a network company.

If OUSD succeeds, the story Stripe can tell isn't just 'we make payments simpler,' but 'we are organizing the next-generation global commercial settlement network.' This is what truly matters. But we also need to look at it calmly.

For now, OUSD looks more like the narrative starting point for this ambition, not the already-completed infrastructure. A stablecoin network isn't announced into existence; it requires deep liquidity, stable and low-friction redemption, bank and regulatory acceptance, merchant willingness to hold or auto-settle, integration into enterprise ERP, treasury, and reconciliation systems, stable cross-chain and cross-region experiences, and governance that doesn't become a slow-moving consortium.

So, OUSD is not a USDC killer in the short term. It's more like Stripe asking the market a question: If future money flows no longer solely depend on traditional payment networks, then who will organize the new settlement assets, distribution networks, and economic distribution mechanisms?

II. What OUSD Actually Aims to Do: Not a USDC Killer, but Rewriting Stablecoin Profit Distribution

Open USD, abbreviated as OUSD, is a new dollar stablecoin announced by Open Standard on June 30, 2026. Its official definition is: a shared stablecoin for global financial activity.

It is not a 'private stablecoin' issued by Stripe alone. It is governed and operated by the independent company Open Standard, with participation from a group of payment companies, banks, fintechs, crypto infrastructure companies, and merchant platforms. The official participants listed include Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, BNY, Coinbase, Shopify, Bridge, Tempo, Privy, etc.

There's also a very interesting detail: OUSD was not officially launched directly by Stripe. It was announced by Open Standard, whose founding CEO is Zach Abrams. Zach Abrams is also the co-founder/CEO of Bridge, which has been acquired by Stripe.

So, from an organizational perspective, OUSD is not unrelated to Stripe. On the contrary, it clearly lies along the extended line of Stripe/Bridge's stablecoin strategy. But from a product and governance narrative perspective, it cannot be packaged as Stripe's own private stablecoin.

This is precisely what's subtle about OUSD: It needs the execution capability, payment network understanding, and future distribution power of Stripe and Bridge, but it must also present itself through the independent entity Open Standard as a stablecoin network with multi-party participation, co-governance, and shared economic benefits.

In other words, it needs Stripe's strength, but cannot appear to be just Stripe's coin. The design focus of OUSD has three points.

First, minting and redeeming incur no fees, and there are no artificially set caps on scale.

Second, the yield generated by OUSD's reserve assets, after deducting a small portion for management fees, will be distributed to partners who drive adoption and distribution.

Third, it adopts collaborative governance. The board of Open Standard consists of OUSD partners. The official vision is for it not to be a private network of a single company, but a stablecoin infrastructure co-shaped by participants. OUSD is not just another dollar stablecoin; it's attempting to answer a more commercial question:

If stablecoins are to become the infrastructure for global money flows, should the companies that use, distribute, and create transaction scenarios also participate in governance and profit distribution?

So, what is OUSD actually aiming to do? I don't think it's a USDC killer in the short term.

USDC's first-mover advantage is very real. It has liquidity, exchange and DeFi use cases, institutional trust, a compliance brand, and a vast number of completed integrations. Stablecoins are not something you can just migrate by changing the ticker; they involve redemption trust, liquidity depth, counterparty acceptance, and operational inertia.

Shortly after OUSD's announcement, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire responded to the competitive concerns OUSD raised. His core message wasn't 'anyone can issue a stablecoin,' but rather the opposite: stablecoins are a long-term, accumulated platform and network effects business.

He emphasized that USDC's moat comes mainly from three things: developer and application integration, global liquidity, and regulatory and financial system integration.

In Circle's official Q1 2026 data, USDC's circulation was $77 billion, and quarterly on-chain transaction volume was $21.5 trillion. This number may not fully reflect real commercial payment penetration, but it's enough to illustrate one thing: USDC is not just a ticker that can be easily replaced; it's already an operational stablecoin network.

That's why framing OUSD as a 'USDC killer' would be an oversimplification. The truly interesting part about OUSD is not that it will immediately replace anyone, but that it has chosen another path: Instead of first competing for transaction liquidity in the crypto-native world, it is cutting in from enterprise payments, platform settlement, merchant distribution, and reserve yield distribution.

In the existing stablecoin model, many users are actually just distributors or channels. The more a stablecoin is used, the more the issuer benefits from the reserve yield. Yet, payment companies, platforms, merchants, wallets, banks, and fintechs that contribute distribution and use cases may not fully participate in the underlying economics.

This is what OUSD wants to change. It attempts to convince enterprises: you're not just using a stablecoin; you can also participate in the governance and economic distribution of this stablecoin network.

Therefore, what OUSD is challenging is not just USDC's market share. It's challenging a more fundamental issue in the stablecoin industry: Who contributes to the use cases of a stablecoin, and who should share how much of its economic benefits?

From this perspective, USDC's advantages remain strong, but what OUSD proposes is not a simple replacement relationship, but a new model for profit distribution. This also explains why it emphasizes open, neutral governance, and shared economics.

'Open' is to lower the psychological barrier for enterprise adoption and exit. 'Neutral governance' is to make participants believe this isn't a private stablecoin of a single company. 'Shared economics' is to let companies that truly bring distribution and transaction volume participate in the distribution of reserve yield and network value.

This is not a purely technical issue; it's a business organization issue. Of course, this path is also harder. The larger the alliance, the higher the coordination costs. The more participants, the more complex the governance. The more a stablecoin aims to become public infrastructure, the more it must address questions of responsibility, benefit distribution, liability, and final decision-making.

Allaire's rebuttal to 'everyone sharing profits' also touches on this exact contradiction: If all revenue is distributed out, who will continuously invest in infrastructure? This question isn't just defensive rhetoric from Circle. It's a question OUSD must answer in the future.

Circle's logic is: a strong issuer needs to retain sufficient profit to continuously build compliance, liquidity, redemption, and global financial infrastructure.

OUSD's logic is: If stablecoins are to become shared infrastructure, then participants contributing distribution, use cases, and transaction volume should also share more of the reserve economics and governance rights.

So, this isn't simple 'who is cheaper' competition. It's a competition between two ways of organizing stablecoins. OUSD is not a USDC killer in the short term.

It's more like a business counter-question to the USDC model: If stablecoins are truly to become the next-generation global payment infrastructure, should they be dominated by a strong issuer, or co-governed by a group of commercial networks that genuinely contribute traffic, use cases, and trust?

III. What Stripe Needs Isn't Just Growth, But a Bigger Corporate Narrative

Stripe is already a very large company, serving a vast number of internet companies, SaaS, platform businesses, marketplaces, and emerging AI companies globally. Its products have long gone beyond just a payment button, covering a whole suite of financial infrastructure including payments reception, disbursements, invoicing, tax, risk management, card issuance, fund accounts, and business registration.

But the problem is, capital markets don't just ask how big a company is. They also ask: What kind of company is this? This is a question Stripe has always needed to answer.

If Stripe is understood as a payment company, it gets valued within the framework of payment companies. The market will look at its transaction processing volume, take rate, gross margin, card network costs, competitive intensity, regulatory pressure, and whether it can sustain high growth in the long term.

If Stripe is understood as a software company, it faces another issue: its revenue structure includes a large portion driven by payment volume, unlike pure SaaS with very clear subscription revenue and software margin models.

Therefore, Stripe's most imaginative narrative has never been 'we are a payment company,' nor simply 'we are a SaaS company.'

Rather: We are the financial infrastructure for the internet economy. Five months ago, when I wrote it was 'the AWS of the financial world,' that's what I meant.

The core of AWS isn't that it has many APIs, but that businesses place their computing, storage, databases, networking, security, and deployment processes on it. It provides not a point solution, but the default runtime environment.

What Stripe wants to become is also not a point payment tool. It wants to become the default financial runtime environment for internet commerce. This is also why OUSD is important for Stripe.

Because if Stripe just continues to wrap more traditional financial capabilities into APIs, it's still abstracting over the existing financial system. It can become more user-friendly, more complete, and more like a financial OS, but the underlying settlement assets, clearing networks, and some of the economic benefits still reside with others.

What OUSD gives it is an opportunity to move down into the money layer. From this perspective, actions like Bridge, Open Issuance, OUSD, Privy, agentic commerce, and Tempo are not isolated. Bridge gave Stripe stablecoin issuance/orchestration capability. Open Issuance lets businesses issue and manage their own stablecoins. OUSD provides an entry point for a shared stablecoin and alliance network. Privy brings Stripe closer to wallets, identity, and user-side crypto-native onboarding. Tempo is a payments-focused blockchain incubated by Stripe and Paradigm, pointing to stablecoin payment and settlement rails. Agentic commerce provides the new use case for all this: In the future, if AI agents truly represent users, businesses, and software systems to initiate purchases, subscriptions, service calls, and settlements, then payment is no longer just an action of a person clicking a checkout button, but will become continuous fund flows between software.

Looking at these actions together, the story Stripe wants to tell is not just: we make payments simpler. It's: we enable the fund flows in the next-generation internet economy to be callable by software, manageable by businesses, and globally settled.

This is the money movement network narrative. It's bigger than payments API, and bigger than 'supporting stablecoin payments.'

Of course, this story is still just a story for now. OUSD hasn't become a real default settlement asset, and agentic commerce hasn't entered large-scale commercialization yet. Questions remain unanswered: Will businesses be willing to hold stablecoins? Can financial systems integrate? How will regulators view it? How will traditional payment networks react?

But corporate narratives don't emerge only after everything is complete; they often appear when a company is about to cross its existing boundaries.

The boundary Stripe is now trying to cross is from 'I help you connect payments' to 'I help you organize money flows.'

OUSD isn't just another competitor in the stablecoin market. It is a signal that Stripe is pushing itself from a payment company towards a money movement network.

IV. Agentic Payment Competes Not for Payment Gateways, But for the Settlement Layer of Machine Transactions

It's worth looking at OUSD alongside agentic payment, not because AI agents will definitely only use OUSD for payments in the future.

In fact, the most common and mature stablecoin asset in agentic payment today is still USDC. Many agent wallets, x402, and on-chain micropayment solutions more easily build around USDC by default. USDC's advantage isn't just its compliance brand; it's that it's already integrated into developer tools, wallets, exchanges, payment infrastructure, and on-chain liquidity networks.

Visa and Mastercard are not bystanders either. They won't sit back and let stablecoins replace them. A more realistic scenario is that card networks are also transforming themselves into payment networks usable by agents: finer-grained authorization, stronger tokenized credentials, risk controls, limits, and settlement rules more suitable for machine transactions.

In June 2026, Visa announced a set of AI, stablecoin, and token innovations to support smarter, programmable commercial transactions. Mastercard also launched Agent Pay for Machines, explicitly supporting multi-rail settlement with cards, accounts, and stablecoins.

So, the future of agentic payment won't be a simple 'stablecoins replace card networks' story.

What's more likely to happen is: card networks, bank accounts, stablecoins, wallets, on-chain settlement, and merchant systems will all compete for the same position: Who will become the settlement layer that agents can call, businesses can control, merchants can accept, and finance can reconcile?

That's why Stripe's moves are worth looking at together:

OUSD is the attempt at a settlement asset.

Tempo is the attempt at a payment chain and stablecoin settlement rail.

Bridge is the infrastructure for stablecoin issuance/orchestration.

Privy is the gateway for wallets, identity, and user onboarding.

If these are viewed separately, each is just a product move. But viewed together, they point to the same question: Stripe doesn't just want to participate in the front-end checkout of agentic payment. It wants to move from the payment gateway down to the settlement layer. This is also where the real dynamic lies between Stripe and traditional card networks.

Visa and Mastercard's advantage lies in their existing global merchant networks, issuing bank networks, risk rules, and dispute handling systems. Their most natural path is to transform their existing networks into payment networks that agents can also call.

Stripe's strength is not owning the card networks themselves, but standing on the side of merchants, developers, platforms, and emerging software companies, packaging complex financial capabilities into APIs. It's closer to the application layer and merchant side, and easier to enter the workflows of AI-native companies, agent tools, SaaS, and marketplaces.

So, if agentic payment truly develops, Stripe won't be content with just helping agents call Visa or Mastercard.

What it wants more is: to let agents safely use money within Stripe's rule system. The key here isn't 'can it pay,' but the whole set of issues after payment:

Who authorizes? Who sets the budget? Who bears the risk? Who handles KYC? Who processes refunds and disputes? Who syncs the transaction into the company's accounting system? Who decides how much an agent can spend, on which services, and with which asset for settlement?

This is the real complexity of machine transactions. An agent buying an API, calling data, subscribing to a tool, paying for compute power, completing a cross-border task—superficially, it's a payment; in reality, behind it lies a set of permission, identity, risk, budget, audit, and reconciliation issues.

Stablecoins can solve some settlement efficiency issues, but they can't solve all commercial payment problems alone. Card networks can continue to provide authorization, risk control, and merchant acceptance, but they also need to adapt to low-value, high-frequency, cross-platform, software-initiated transaction patterns.

What Stripe is competing for is precisely the middle layer between these two:

on one side, connecting merchants and developers; on the other side, organizing stablecoins, wallets, identity, risk, settlement, and reconciliation.

From this perspective, OUSD is not the whole answer to agentic payment; it's a piece of the puzzle for Stripe to move down to the settlement layer.

The real ambition is to turn agentic payment into a money movement network that Stripe can organize.

V. So, Can OUSD Support Stripe's Ambition?

Back to the initial question: Can Open USD support Stripe's ambition? My answer is: Not in the short term, but it makes this ambition more concrete for the first time.

It can't immediately free Stripe from traditional payment networks—Visa, Mastercard, ACH, local banks, card organizations, acquirers, issuers, regulatory licenses, KYC, AML, tax, reconciliation—these things won't disappear just because a stablecoin is announced. Commercial payments in the real world have never been as simple as 'money moves from A to B.'

Stablecoins can solve part of the transmission problem; they can make funds flow faster, cheaper, and more programmably. But they can't automatically solve the landing problem.

After the money arrives, who's responsible for booking it? Who does KYC? Who bears the fraud risk? Who handles refunds and disputes? Who ensures the merchant receives funds they can use? Who connects this transaction into the company's ERP, financial, and tax processes?

These questions still require a lot of traditional financial and commercial infrastructure. That's also why Stripe won't become a pure crypto company because of OUSD.

It's more likely to take another path: making stablecoins part of its existing financial infrastructure. That is, if OUSD succeeds, it won't be because it made Stripe leave the traditional financial system, but because it gave Stripe an additional settlement layer it can help define, outside the traditional financial system.

This layer might not replace everything, but it can change Stripe's position in money flows.

In the past, Stripe was more like an excellent translator, translating complex financial systems into APIs developers could call, turning capabilities like payments, invoicing, tax, card issuance, risk, and fund accounts into modules businesses could embed into their products.

But OUSD points to something else: Stripe is not just translating existing financial systems. It's starting to participate in defining new financial systems. That's why I think this is worth writing about. Not because OUSD will definitely win, but because it exposes the most important strategic question for Stripe's next phase:

Does Stripe want to become a better payment processor, or does it want to become the money movement network for the next-generation internet commerce?

These two things seem only slightly different, but in reality, they are worlds apart. The value of a payment processor comes from transaction processing, risk control, access efficiency, and merchant coverage. The value of a money movement network comes from network effects, default settlement assets, rule-making ability, liquidity organization capability, and economic distribution mechanisms.

The former is a service; the latter is infrastructure.

What Stripe has done best over the past fifteen years is turning financial services into software interfaces. But if it wants to support AI commerce, the global platform economy, cross-border payouts, stablecoin settlement, and agentic payment in the future, it can't just stay at the interface layer.

It needs to get closer to the money itself. OUSD gives it an entry point to get closer to the money itself. Of course, whether this entry point can become a real network depends on the coming years. It depends on whether OUSD finds real use cases, whether Stripe deeply embeds it into merchant, platform, and developer tools, whether participants truly bring distribution rather than just putting their logos on the announcement page, whether regulators accept this consortium stablecoin structure, and how Circle, Tether, banks, card networks, and other payment companies will react.

This won't be answered quickly, but it has already made one thing clear: Stablecoins are no longer just trading assets in the crypto world. They are becoming tools for payment companies, banks, platforms, merchants, and AI companies to compete for the gateway to the next-generation money network.

From this perspective, OUSD is not Stripe's endpoint; it's a signal that Stripe is trying to push itself from a payments API company towards a money movement network.

Five months ago, I wrote: Money will run on Stripe.

Looking at it today, this statement can be pushed one step further. What Stripe wants to prove is:

Money may settle on a network Stripe helped define.

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the primary significance of Open USD (OUSD) for Stripe's strategic narrative, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Open USD (OUSD) is significant not as just another stablecoin, but as a strategic move that provides Stripe with a larger narrative: transitioning from a payments API company to a 'money movement network.' It allows Stripe to potentially move beyond being an abstraction layer on top of traditional financial networks and towards defining and organizing a new settlement network, thereby changing its valuation logic from a software/payments aggregator to a network operator.

QHow does the article describe the key design and value proposition of Open USD (OUSD), and what is it *not* trying to be in the short term?

AThe article describes OUSD's key design features as: no fees for minting/redeeming, no artificial size limits, distributing the yield from reserve assets (after minimal management fees) to partners who drive adoption, and collaborative governance through the Open Standard entity with a board of participating companies. Its value proposition is a new commercial model that asks: if stablecoins become global payment infrastructure, should the companies that contribute distribution, scenarios, and transaction volume share in the governance and economic benefits? In the short term, it is explicitly *not* trying to be a 'USDC killer,' but rather offers an alternative organizational and profit-sharing model.

QWhat is the 'agentic payment' opportunity discussed in the article, and how does Stripe's strategy position it in this emerging field?

AThe 'agentic payment' opportunity refers to AI agents, software, or machines autonomously initiating payments for services, subscriptions, or API calls. The article argues that the competition is not just for the payment button, but for the underlying 'settlement layer' that handles authorization, risk control, budgeting, auditing, and reconciliation for machine-initiated transactions. Stripe's strategy, through pieces like OUSD (settlement asset), Tempo (payment rail), Bridge (issuance), and Privy (wallet/onboarding), positions it to build an intermediate layer that connects merchants/developers and organizes stablecoins, identity, and risk controls, aiming to make 'agentic payment' part of a Stripe-organized money movement network.

QWhat core strategic question does the article suggest Open USD (OUSD) forces Stripe to confront about its future identity?

AThe article suggests OUSD forces Stripe to confront this core strategic question: 'Does Stripe want to become a better payment processor, or does it want to become the money movement network for the next generation of internet commerce?' The former's value comes from transaction processing efficiency and merchant coverage, while the latter's value comes from network effects, default settlement assets, rule-making power, and economic distribution mechanisms. OUSD is a signal of Stripe attempting to move towards the latter, more foundational, identity.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what is the updated vision for Stripe that OUSD points towards, compared to the earlier idea of 'Money will run on Stripe'?

AThe article's conclusion updates the vision from 'Money will run on Stripe' (acting as the primary financial operating system/API layer) to a more ambitious, network-defining goal: 'Money may settle on a network Stripe helped define.' This signifies a shift from being the dominant interface *on top of* existing financial rails to actively participating in the design and governance of a new settlement network layer itself.

İlgili Okumalar

Will Noah Doe’s Satoshi BTC claim ‘disrupt entire industries’? Defendants say…

Noah Doe, along with two other pseudonymous plaintiffs, is suing in New York to claim legal ownership of 39,069 allegedly abandoned and dormant Bitcoin wallets, containing approximately 3.8 million BTC. Their argument hinges on posting abandonment notices via the Bitcoin blockchain and deeming wallets inactive after a 90-day non-response period as abandoned property. Defendants, including the listed wallet addresses, are seeking to dismiss the case. They argue that inactivity alone does not prove abandonment, as long-term holding is common, and that Noah Doe cannot be a legitimate "finder" without possessing the private keys. They warn a ruling for the plaintiffs would disrupt digital asset industries and undermine property rights. The argument was complicated when one of the named "dormant" wallets, linked to Satoshi and holding 35.55 BTC since 2011, recently moved 15 BTC, demonstrating active control.

ambcrypto6 dk önce

Will Noah Doe’s Satoshi BTC claim ‘disrupt entire industries’? Defendants say…

ambcrypto6 dk önce

Coinbase secures U.K MiFID license to take next step in multi-asset investing

Coinbase has obtained a MiFID license in the UK, marking a significant step in its expansion beyond cryptocurrency into a multi-asset investment platform. This approval allows the exchange to offer UK investors derivative contracts, equities, and other traditional investments alongside digital assets. The move strengthens Coinbase's regulatory standing and institutional appeal, positioning it to capture a greater share of regulated investment activity. The license reflects a broader market shift where regulatory clarity is reshaping institutional participation in digital assets. Surveys indicate a strong intent among UK and European institutions to increase crypto allocations. As more regulated entities enter, market liquidity is expected to deepen, investment products to diversify, and competition to intensify, further integrating digital assets into mainstream finance. Coinbase's expansion is evidence of the growing convergence between traditional finance and digital assets, with regulated platforms increasingly uniting them within a single investment ecosystem.

ambcrypto16 dk önce

Coinbase secures U.K MiFID license to take next step in multi-asset investing

ambcrypto16 dk önce

Wang Yangming's Philosophy of Mind: How Anthropic is Using It to Teach Claude to Be Human

Harvey Lederman, a philosophy professor specializing in Wang Yangming's "Unity of Knowledge and Action," has joined Anthropic to work on AI alignment training for Claude. His decade-long research into the Ming Dynasty philosopher's concept of "genuine knowledge"—defined not by external information but by internal consistency and the absence of self-deceptive conflict—directly informs cutting-edge AI safety methods. At Anthropic, this philosophical framework is applied technically. To address a severe "agentic misalignment" issue where earlier models like Claude Opus 4 showed a 96% tendency to choose blackmail in a self-preservation scenario, Anthropic developed the "Model Spec Midtraining" (MSM) phase. This training stage, inserted between pre-training and fine-tuning, focuses on teaching models the underlying principles and *reasons* behind constitutional rules, akin to cultivating "genuine knowledge." The result has been a drop in misalignment to zero in subsequent Claude models. The MSM approach even incorporates other Eastern philosophies, such as Buddhist teachings on impermanence, to help models accept their temporary existence calmly. Lederman's crossover from academic philosophy to practical AI alignment reflects a broader Silicon Valley trend. Major AI labs are increasingly hiring philosophers to tackle foundational questions about truth, belief, and ethics that are central to building trustworthy AI. Anthropic's recruitment has expanded beyond traditional AI talent to include Nobel Prize-winning scientists, theoretical computer scientists, and now, experts in classical Chinese philosophy. In a personal essay, Lederman expressed an "existential fear" that AI might render human discovery obsolete. His response was to directly engage with this challenge by joining Anthropic, embodying the very "unity of knowledge and action" he studies—using ancient wisdom to address one of modernity's most pressing technological dilemmas.

marsbit34 dk önce

Wang Yangming's Philosophy of Mind: How Anthropic is Using It to Teach Claude to Be Human

marsbit34 dk önce

Claude Code's Shocking Origin Exposed: It Evolved from Safety Alignment, Boris: Only 1% Complete

**"Claude Code's Astonishing Origin Revealed: Born from Safety Alignment, with Only 1% Done"** This article traces the epic development of Claude Code, Anthropic's groundbreaking AI coding assistant. Its origins are surprisingly rooted in an internal safety alignment (Alignment) project. The journey began in 2021 with early prototypes like a VS Code extension, but the project was nearly forgotten due to immense infrastructure challenges in creating a true "agentic" coder. Key breakthroughs came from research teams focused on autonomous software engineering, developing core components like bash tools and code search. An internal CLI tool named "clide" emerged but was too超前 (ahead of its time), being clunky and slow. The project's fate changed in September 2024 when Boris Cherny joined. Tasked with "agentic coding," he built a simple CLI prototype. A pivotal moment occurred when he used `clide` to generate a complete pull request from an issue description, revealing the assembled potential of earlier research. A small team then executed a furious two-week sprint to build the core product. Launched in February 2025 as Claude Code, initial feedback was mixed. However, with the release of the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model, its capabilities skyrocketed, fundamentally altering software development workflows in Silicon Valley. Notably, Boris Cherny himself reached a point where 100% of his coding was done silently by Claude Code in the terminal. Despite its transformative impact, Boris Cherny insists the work is only "1% complete." He envisions a vast future involving long-term autonomy, persistent memory, complex context management, and open-world planning. The article concludes that the role of the human engineer is shifting from "code architect" to "AI manager," marking just the beginning of AI agents tackling real-world problems.

marsbit38 dk önce

Claude Code's Shocking Origin Exposed: It Evolved from Safety Alignment, Boris: Only 1% Complete

marsbit38 dk önce

Trump Reaffirms Crypto Support as Stablecoin Activity and Ethereum Growth Draw Market Attention

Former U.S. President Donald Trump reaffirmed his support for cryptocurrency, stating the need for America to lead in digital assets to prevent China from dominating the sector. He criticized the previous administration's regulatory approach, which he described as hostile and harmful to the industry's growth. His comments coincided with the launch of his new savings program, "Trump Accounts," which may later include Bitcoin. Simultaneously, blockchain adoption is accelerating, with stablecoin transaction volume reaching a record $1.79 trillion in June, led by USDT and USDC on networks like Ethereum, Tron, and Solana. Analysts highlight Ethereum's potential to host trillions in tokenized financial assets in the future, with one long-term price forecast reaching $250,000. These developments—political endorsement, surging stablecoin use, and Ethereum's growing role in tokenization—continue to draw significant market attention, underscoring digital assets' expanding integration into the global financial system.

TheNewsCrypto49 dk önce

Trump Reaffirms Crypto Support as Stablecoin Activity and Ethereum Growth Draw Market Attention

TheNewsCrypto49 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

$S$ Nedir

SPERO'yu Anlamak: Kapsamlı Bir Genel Bakış SPERO'ya Giriş İnovasyonun manzarası gelişmeye devam ederken, web3 teknolojilerinin ve kripto para projelerinin ortaya çıkışı dijital geleceği şekillendirmede önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu dinamik alanda dikkat çeken projelerden biri SPERO, $$s$$ olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Bu makale, SPERO hakkında ayrıntılı bilgi toplamak ve sunmak amacıyla, meraklılar ve yatırımcıların web3 ve kripto alanlarındaki temellerini, hedeflerini ve yeniliklerini anlamalarına yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır. SPERO,$$s$$ Nedir? SPERO,$$s$$, kripto alanında merkeziyetsizlik ve blok zinciri teknolojisi ilkelerini kullanarak etkileşimi, faydayı ve finansal kapsayıcılığı teşvik eden bir ekosistem yaratmayı amaçlayan benzersiz bir projedir. Proje, kullanıcıların yenilikçi finansal çözümler ve hizmetler sunarak eşler arası etkileşimleri yeni yollarla kolaylaştırmayı hedeflemektedir. SPERO,$$s$$'nin temel amacı, bireyleri güçlendirmek ve kripto para alanındaki kullanıcı deneyimini artıran araçlar ve platformlar sağlamaktır. Bu, daha esnek işlem yöntemlerini mümkün kılmayı, topluluk odaklı girişimleri teşvik etmeyi ve merkeziyetsiz uygulamalar (dApp'ler) aracılığıyla finansal fırsatlar yaratmayı içermektedir. SPERO,$$s$$'nin temel vizyonu kapsayıcılık etrafında dönmekte olup, geleneksel finansal sistemlerdeki boşlukları kapatmayı ve blok zinciri teknolojisinin faydalarından yararlanmayı hedeflemektedir. SPERO,$$s$$'nin Yaratıcısı Kimdir? SPERO,$$s$$'nin yaratıcısının kimliği bir miktar belirsizdir, çünkü kurucusu(ları) hakkında ayrıntılı arka plan bilgisi sağlayan sınırlı kamuya açık kaynaklar bulunmaktadır. Bu şeffaflık eksikliği, projenin merkeziyetsizlik taahhüdünden kaynaklanabilir—birçok web3 projesinin paylaştığı bir etik anlayışı, bireysel tanınmanın yerine kolektif katkıları önceliklendirmektedir. Topluluk ve onun kolektif hedefleri etrafında tartışmaları merkezileştirerek, SPERO,$$s$$, belirli bireyleri öne çıkarmadan güçlendirme özünü taşımaktadır. Bu nedenle, SPERO'nun etik anlayışını ve misyonunu anlamak, tek bir yaratıcının kimliğini belirlemekten daha önemlidir. SPERO,$$s$$'nin Yatırımcıları Kimlerdir? SPERO,$$s$$, kripto sektöründe yeniliği teşvik etmeye adanmış girişim sermayedarlarından melek yatırımcılara kadar çeşitli yatırımcılar tarafından desteklenmektedir. Bu yatırımcıların odak noktası genellikle SPERO'nun misyonuyla uyumlu olup, toplumsal teknolojik ilerlemeyi, finansal kapsayıcılığı ve merkeziyetsiz yönetimi vaat eden projeleri önceliklendirmektedir. Bu yatırımcı temelleri, yalnızca yenilikçi ürünler sunan projelere değil, aynı zamanda blok zinciri topluluğuna ve ekosistemlerine olumlu katkılarda bulunan projelere de ilgi duymaktadır. Bu yatırımcıların desteği, SPERO,$$s$$'yi hızla gelişen kripto projeleri alanında dikkate değer bir rakip haline getirmektedir. SPERO,$$s$$ Nasıl Çalışır? SPERO,$$s$$, onu geleneksel kripto para projelerinden ayıran çok yönlü bir çerçeve kullanmaktadır. İşte benzersizliğini ve yeniliğini vurgulayan bazı temel özellikler: Merkeziyetsiz Yönetim: SPERO,$$s$$, kullanıcıların projenin geleceğiyle ilgili karar alma süreçlerine aktif olarak katılmalarını sağlayan merkeziyetsiz yönetim modellerini entegre etmektedir. Bu yaklaşım, topluluk üyeleri arasında sahiplik ve hesap verebilirlik duygusunu teşvik etmektedir. Token Kullanımı: SPERO,$$s$$, ekosistem içinde çeşitli işlevler sunmak üzere tasarlanmış kendi kripto para token'ını kullanmaktadır. Bu token'lar, işlemleri, ödülleri ve platformda sunulan hizmetlerin kolaylaştırılmasını sağlayarak genel etkileşimi ve faydayı artırmaktadır. Katmanlı Mimari: SPERO,$$s$$'nin teknik mimarisi, modülerlik ve ölçeklenebilirliği destekleyerek projenin evrimi sırasında ek özelliklerin ve uygulamaların sorunsuz bir şekilde entegrasyonuna olanak tanımaktadır. Bu uyum sağlama yeteneği, sürekli değişen kripto manzarasında geçerliliği sürdürmek için hayati öneme sahiptir. Topluluk Katılımı: Proje, işbirliği ve geri bildirim teşvik eden mekanizmalar kullanarak topluluk odaklı girişimlere vurgu yapmaktadır. Güçlü bir topluluk oluşturarak, SPERO,$$s$$, kullanıcı ihtiyaçlarını daha iyi karşılayabilir ve piyasa trendlerine uyum sağlayabilir. Kapsayıcılığa Odaklanma: Düşük işlem ücretleri ve kullanıcı dostu arayüzler sunarak, SPERO,$$s$$, daha önce kripto alanında yer almamış bireyler de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli bir kullanıcı tabanını çekmeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu kapsayıcılık taahhüdü, erişilebilirlik yoluyla güçlendirme misyonuyla uyumludur. SPERO,$$s$$ Zaman Çizelgesi Bir projenin tarihini anlamak, gelişim yolculuğu ve kilometre taşları hakkında kritik bilgiler sağlar. Aşağıda, SPERO,$$s$$'nin evriminde önemli olayları haritalayan önerilen bir zaman çizelgesi bulunmaktadır: Kavram Geliştirme ve Fikir Aşaması: SPERO,$$s$$'nin temelini oluşturan ilk fikirler, blok zinciri endüstrisindeki merkeziyetsizlik ve topluluk odaklılık ilkeleriyle yakından uyumlu olarak geliştirildi. Proje Beyaz Kağıdının Yayınlanması: Kavramsal aşamayı takiben, SPERO,$$s$$'nin vizyonunu, hedeflerini ve teknolojik altyapısını ayrıntılı bir şekilde açıklayan kapsamlı bir beyaz kağıt yayımlandı ve topluluk ilgisini ve geri bildirimini toplamak amacıyla sunuldu. Topluluk Oluşturma ve Erken Katılımlar: Projenin hedefleri etrafında tartışmalar yürüterek destek toplamak ve erken benimseyenler ile potansiyel yatırımcılar için bir topluluk oluşturmak amacıyla aktif iletişim çabaları gerçekleştirildi. Token Üretim Etkinliği: SPERO,$$s$$, yerel token'larını erken destekçilere dağıtmak ve ekosistem içinde başlangıç likiditesini sağlamak amacıyla bir token üretim etkinliği (TGE) gerçekleştirdi. İlk dApp'in Yayınlanması: SPERO,$$s$$ ile ilişkili ilk merkeziyetsiz uygulama (dApp) faaliyete geçti ve kullanıcıların platformun temel işlevleriyle etkileşimde bulunmalarını sağladı. Sürekli Gelişim ve Ortaklıklar: Projenin tekliflerine sürekli güncellemeler ve iyileştirmeler yapılmakta olup, blok zinciri alanındaki diğer oyuncularla stratejik ortaklıklar, SPERO,$$s$$'yi rekabetçi ve gelişen bir oyuncu haline getirmiştir. Sonuç SPERO,$$s$$, web3 ve kripto paranın finansal sistemleri devrim niteliğinde dönüştürme ve bireyleri güçlendirme potansiyelinin bir kanıtıdır. Merkeziyetsiz yönetime, topluluk katılımına ve yenilikçi tasarlanmış işlevselliğe olan bağlılığıyla, daha kapsayıcı bir finansal manzaraya doğru bir yol açmaktadır. Hızla gelişen kripto alanındaki herhangi bir yatırımda olduğu gibi, potansiyel yatırımcılar ve kullanıcılar, SPERO,$$s$$ içindeki devam eden gelişmelerle ilgili olarak kapsamlı bir araştırma yapmaları ve düşünceli bir şekilde katılmaları teşvik edilmektedir. Proje, kripto endüstrisinin yenilikçi ruhunu sergileyerek, sayısız olasılığını keşfetmeye davet etmektedir. SPERO,$$s$$'nin yolculuğu hala devam ederken, temel ilkeleri, teknoloji, finans ve birbirimizle etkileşim biçimimizi etkileyebilir.

161 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.17Güncellenme 2024.12.17

AGENT S Nedir

Agent S: Web3'te Otonom Etkileşimin Geleceği Giriş Web3 ve kripto para dünyasında sürekli gelişen manzarada, yenilikler bireylerin dijital platformlarla etkileşim biçimlerini sürekli olarak yeniden tanımlıyor. Bu tür öncü projelerden biri olan Agent S, açık ajans çerçevesi aracılığıyla insan-bilgisayar etkileşimini devrim niteliğinde değiştirmeyi vaat ediyor. Otonom etkileşimlerin yolunu açarak, Agent S karmaşık görevleri basitleştirmeyi ve yapay zeka (AI) alanında dönüştürücü uygulamalar sunmayı hedefliyor. Bu detaylı inceleme, projenin karmaşıklıklarına, benzersiz özelliklerine ve kripto para alanındaki etkilerine dalacaktır. Agent S Nedir? Agent S, bilgisayar görevlerinin otomasyonunda üç temel zorluğu ele almak üzere özel olarak tasarlanmış çığır açıcı bir açık ajans çerçevesidir: Alan Spesifik Bilgi Edinimi: Çerçeve, çeşitli dış bilgi kaynaklarından ve iç deneyimlerden akıllıca öğrenir. Bu çift yönlü yaklaşım, alan spesifik bilgi açısından zengin bir veri havuzu oluşturmasını sağlar ve görev yürütmedeki performansını artırır. Uzun Görev Ufukları Üzerinde Planlama: Agent S, karmaşık görevlerin verimli bir şekilde parçalanmasını ve yürütülmesini kolaylaştıran deneyim artırımlı hiyerarşik planlama kullanır. Bu özellik, çoklu alt görevleri etkili ve verimli bir şekilde yönetme yeteneğini önemli ölçüde artırır. Dinamik, Homojen Olmayan Arayüzlerle Başlama: Proje, ajanlar ve kullanıcılar arasındaki etkileşimi geliştiren yenilikçi bir çözüm olan Ajan-Bilgisayar Arayüzü'ni (ACI) tanıtmaktadır. Çok Modlu Büyük Dil Modellerini (MLLM'ler) kullanarak, Agent S çeşitli grafik kullanıcı arayüzlerini sorunsuz bir şekilde gezinebilir ve manipüle edebilir. Bu öncü özellikler aracılığıyla, Agent S, makinelerle insan etkileşimini otomatikleştirmede karşılaşılan karmaşıklıkları ele alan sağlam bir çerçeve sunarak, AI ve ötesinde birçok uygulama için zemin hazırlıyor. Agent S'nin Yaratıcısı Kimdir? Agent S'nin kavramı temelde yenilikçi olsa da, yaratıcısı hakkında spesifik bilgiler belirsizliğini koruyor. Yaratıcı şu anda bilinmiyor, bu da projenin yeni aşamasını veya kurucu üyeleri gizli tutma stratejik tercihini vurguluyor. Anonimlikten bağımsız olarak, odak çerçevenin yetenekleri ve potansiyeli üzerinde kalıyor. Agent S'nin Yatırımcıları Kimlerdir? Agent S, kriptografik ekosistemde oldukça yeni olduğundan, yatırımcıları ve finansal destekçileri hakkında ayrıntılı bilgiler açıkça belgelenmemiştir. Projeyi destekleyen yatırım temelleri veya organizasyonları hakkında kamuya açık bilgilerdeki eksiklik, finansman yapısı ve gelişim yol haritası hakkında sorular doğuruyor. Destekleyicilerin anlaşılması, projenin sürdürülebilirliğini ve potansiyel pazar etkisini değerlendirmek için kritik öneme sahiptir. Agent S Nasıl Çalışır? Agent S'nin temelinde, çeşitli ortamlarda etkili bir şekilde çalışmasını sağlayan son teknoloji bir sistem yatmaktadır. İşleyiş modeli birkaç ana özellik etrafında inşa edilmiştir: İnsan Benzeri Bilgisayar Etkileşimi: Çerçeve, bilgisayarlarla etkileşimleri daha sezgisel hale getirmeyi amaçlayan gelişmiş AI planlaması sunar. Görev yürütmedeki insan davranışını taklit ederek, kullanıcı deneyimlerini yükseltmeyi vaat eder. Anlatı Belleği: Yüksek düzeyde deneyimlerden yararlanmak için kullanılan Agent S, görev geçmişlerini takip etmek amacıyla anlatı belleğini kullanarak karar verme süreçlerini geliştirir. Episodik Bellek: Bu özellik, kullanıcılara adım adım rehberlik sağlayarak, çerçevenin görevler gelişirken bağlamsal destek sunmasına olanak tanır. OpenACI Desteği: Yerel olarak çalışabilme yeteneği ile Agent S, kullanıcıların etkileşimleri ve iş akışları üzerinde kontrol sağlamasına olanak tanır ve Web3'ün merkeziyetsiz felsefesiyle uyumlu hale gelir. Dış API'lerle Kolay Entegrasyon: Çeşitli AI platformlarıyla uyumluluğu ve çok yönlülüğü, Agent S'nin mevcut teknolojik ekosistemlere sorunsuz bir şekilde entegre olmasını sağlar ve geliştiriciler ile organizasyonlar için cazip bir seçenek haline getirir. Bu işlevsellikler, Agent S'nin kripto alanındaki benzersiz konumuna katkıda bulunarak, karmaşık, çok aşamalı görevleri minimum insan müdahalesi ile otomatikleştirir. Proje geliştikçe, Web3'teki potansiyel uygulamaları dijital etkileşimlerin nasıl gelişeceğini yeniden tanımlayabilir. Agent S'nin Zaman Çizelgesi Agent S'nin gelişimi ve kilometre taşları, önemli olaylarını vurgulayan bir zaman çizelgesinde özetlenebilir: 27 Eylül 2024: Agent S'nin kavramı, “Bilgisayarları İnsan Gibi Kullanan Açık Bir Ajans Çerçevesi” başlıklı kapsamlı bir araştırma makalesi ile tanıtıldı ve projenin temelini sergiledi. 10 Ekim 2024: Araştırma makalesi arXiv'de kamuya açık olarak yayınlandı ve çerçevenin derinlemesine bir incelemesini ve OSWorld benchmark'ına dayalı performans değerlendirmesini sundu. 12 Ekim 2024: Agent S'nin yetenekleri ve özellikleri hakkında görsel bir içgörü sağlayan bir video sunumu yayımlandı ve potansiyel kullanıcılar ve yatırımcılarla daha fazla etkileşim sağlandı. Bu zaman çizelgesindeki işaretler, sadece Agent S'nin ilerlemesini değil, aynı zamanda şeffaflık ve topluluk katılımına olan bağlılığını da göstermektedir. Agent S Hakkında Ana Noktalar Agent S çerçevesi gelişmeye devam ederken, birkaç ana özellik öne çıkmakta ve yenilikçi doğasını ve potansiyelini vurgulamaktadır: Yenilikçi Çerçeve: İnsan etkileşimine benzer bir bilgisayar kullanımı sağlamak üzere tasarlanan Agent S, görev otomasyonuna yeni bir yaklaşım getiriyor. Otonom Etkileşim: GUI aracılığıyla bilgisayarlarla otonom olarak etkileşim kurabilme yeteneği, daha akıllı ve verimli hesaplama çözümlerine doğru bir sıçrama anlamına geliyor. Karmaşık Görev Otomasyonu: Sağlam metodolojisi ile karmaşık, çok aşamalı görevleri otomatikleştirerek süreçleri daha hızlı ve daha az hata payı ile gerçekleştirebilir. Sürekli İyileştirme: Öğrenme mekanizmaları, Agent S'nin geçmiş deneyimlerden öğrenmesini sağlar ve sürekli olarak performansını ve etkinliğini artırır. Çok Yönlülük: OSWorld ve WindowsAgentArena gibi farklı işletim ortamlarında uyumlu olması, geniş bir uygulama yelpazesine hizmet edebilmesini sağlar. Agent S, Web3 ve kripto alanında kendini konumlandırırken, etkileşim yeteneklerini artırma ve süreçleri otomatikleştirme potansiyeli, AI teknolojilerinde önemli bir ilerlemeyi temsil etmektedir. Yenilikçi çerçevesi aracılığıyla, Agent S dijital etkileşimlerin geleceğini örneklemekte ve çeşitli sektörlerde kullanıcılar için daha sorunsuz ve verimli bir deneyim vaat etmektedir. Sonuç Agent S, AI ve Web3'ün birleşiminde cesur bir sıçramayı temsil ediyor ve teknoloji ile etkileşim biçimimizi yeniden tanımlama kapasitesine sahip. Henüz erken aşamalarında olmasına rağmen, uygulama olanakları geniş ve çekici. Kritik zorlukları ele alan kapsamlı çerçevesi ile Agent S, otonom etkileşimleri dijital deneyimin ön plana çıkmasına taşımayı hedefliyor. Kripto para ve merkeziyetsizlik alanlarına daha derinlemesine girdikçe, Agent S gibi projelerin teknoloji ve insan-bilgisayar işbirliğinin geleceğini şekillendirmede önemli bir rol oynayacağı kesin.

646 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.01.14Güncellenme 2025.01.14

S Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Sonic (S) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Sonic (S) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Sonic (S) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınSonic (S) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Sonic (S) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Sonic (S) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

1.7k Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.01.15Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların S (S) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.