Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit2026-06-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

By: Zen, PANews

An a16z partner fell asleep on the spot for over 30 minutes, and you have to grit your teeth and finish presenting your Series A materials, worth $15 million, to a person who is "unconscious"... This sounds like dark humor, but it's a real VC pitch story experienced by Greg Isenberg, founder of Late Checkout and LCA.

Last week, after Greg Isenberg shared this experience on X, it quickly resonated within the Silicon Valley startup community.

"This is venture capital," Isenberg said, noting that founders sometimes fly across the entire country just to "perform" for a group of people who aren't necessarily alert. Fundraising is like a dance; sometimes the founder leads, sometimes follows, and sometimes the dance partner is already asleep.

He believes almost every founder has a similar story, but people rarely talk about them publicly because they might need to raise funds again in the future and can't afford to offend VCs. In fact, Isenberg did not name the specific firm, only saying it was a top-three venture capital firm. In the end, it was the sleeping partner himself—Marc Andreessen of a16z—who proactively admitted to the embarrassing incident, jokingly blaming it on founders in San Francisco who kept telling him he should try "psychedelics."

After Isenberg fired the "first shot," many other founders and investors have come forward to share their own personal experiences during the fundraising process.

Absurd Moments in the Pitch Room

The reason Isenberg's rant spread quickly and prompted more entrepreneurs to share is that he revealed a side of the fundraising process that is rarely described publicly. In the common imagination, a project pitch should be a rational, efficient, and respectable business negotiation among elites, but in reality, it's not always the case.

The story of Airwallex Co-founder and CEO Jack Zhang is one of the most vivid scenes.

During the most feverish period of the SoftBank Vision Fund, Jack once flew over 30 hours from Melbourne to London to pitch while running a 39°C fever. However, the investor arrived late, walking into the conference room completely barefoot after being 90 minutes behind schedule.

As Jack began his formal presentation, the other party opened a bag of peanuts, chewing while listening. About 30 seconds later, the investor interrupted him to ask how much he wanted to raise. Jack answered $100 to $150 million. The investor directly said, "I'll give you $300 million. We can make you the industry leader." The entire meeting ended just 20 minutes later. Jack later joked that the time it took him to get from Heathrow Airport to the office was longer than this pitch that determined his company's future.

This story of the "Barefoot Sage" immediately made Y Combinator partner Tom Blomfield feel addressed. He said he might have met the same person, as the individual had picked his feet, eaten with his hands, smoked during a meeting, and finally stubbed out the cigarette in his lunch, then poured coffee on it to put it out.

However, Blomfield himself has also left a deep impression on pitching entrepreneurs with some "quirky" behavior. Starcloud Co-founder and CEO Philip Johnston claimed that during a Zoom pitch, one partner spent the entire time tossing peanuts into the air, catching them in his mouth, and then crunching on them. Blomfield frankly admitted that partner was himself and humorously replied, "I thought we agreed we wouldn't talk about your YC interview."

Besides these more recent next-gen pitches, Uber Co-founder and former CEO Travis Kalanick also came out to reminisce about his own anecdote from as early as 2001. Before a scheduled meeting was about to start, Kalanick intercepted a partner who was trying to escape outside the VC's office, and ultimately completed the pitch in the passenger seat of the partner's parked Lexus. Midway, the partner's large belly pressed against the steering wheel, and he grabbed Kalanick's laptop to quickly flip through the PPT himself. Kalanick left only one sigh: "Fundraising in 2001, it really had a special feel."

Other stories are more like black comedies born from misaligned language and situations. Sphere Labs Co-founder Dirichlet was once asked by an existing investor to pitch to an ultra-high-net-worth individual with a fortune exceeding $10 billion, who also managed a large fund, during a dinner.

The introducer reminded him: "His English isn't great, but you still need to give him a good pitch." So Dirichlet spent 30 to 45 minutes introducing the company slowly and in simplified terms. The other party kept nodding, occasionally saying "Yes," and even ordered a dessert in fairly decent English. It wasn't until after the dinner ended, with handshakes and hugs, that he learned the other person didn't actually understand a single English word except for "Yes" and the Greek yogurt on the menu.

More Glaring than the Absurdity is the Power Dynamic

If bare feet, eating peanuts, and car pitches still carry a certain comic flair, other stories fully expose the inequality in the fundraising relationship.

Cloudflare Co-founder and CEO Matthew Prince mentioned that Cloudflare was once rejected early on by a Sequoia partner because the other party didn't believe women could lead a security infrastructure company.

Another time, he was introduced to a16z Co-founder Marc Andreessen, thinking it was just a casual meeting, but Andreessen thought it was a formal pitch and brought the entire a16z partnership team. When someone pointed out he "didn't seem prepared," Prince admitted it was true because he genuinely hadn't prepared, and he ultimately framed that rejection letter.

Prince also added a story about Khosla Ventures founder Vinod Khosla. When Cloudflare was preparing its Series C round, Khosla had given a term sheet and invited Prince, along with the other two co-founders, Michelle Zatlyn and Lee Holloway, to dinner.

Near the end of the dinner, as Michelle and Lee left for the restroom, Khosla leaned over and told Prince that he was impressed with Prince but wasn't as optimistic about the other two co-founders. If Prince was willing to fire them, he could give their equity to Prince. Prince believed the kindest interpretation was that it might have been a character test, but he was still deeply offended and subsequently blocked Khosla.

The story of Flexport Founder and CEO Ryan Petersen involves some inexplicable market misjudgment. During one pitch, a well-known VC told them the global logistics market was only $6 billion (in reality, it's trillions). This absurd number prompted his CFO to retort on the spot: "So you're saying this market is smaller than the USB cable market?"

Figma AI lead Ted Benson also recounted his awkward experience. During his first startup, he flew to Redmond. Mid-meeting, a VP suddenly interrupted him, asking, "Why am I talking to you? Who do you know that got this meeting on my calendar?" Then added: This isn't going anywhere, but you have 15 minutes left, want to just chat?

On more specific funding structures, Mercor CEO Brendan Foody pointed the finger at the so-called "Sequoia scam." He claimed that in the past 6 months, he had seen several cases where Sequoia entered the same funding round with two tranches of capital at two different valuations, but the market narrative only emphasized the higher valuation, which founders then passed on to employees and angel investors.

Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire later responded, saying similar situations had happened about 5 times in the 7 years since he joined Sequoia, but he believed calling it a scam was unfair. His explanation was that for hot companies, especially AI companies, other investors were willing to pay prices far above Sequoia's judgment. Therefore, Sequoia tried to separate "company-building partnership" from "capital price," ultimately resulting in two investments with different valuations close in time. He emphasized that VC is a long-term game, and intentionally misleading doesn't align with long-term interests.

This power dynamic doesn't only exist between VCs and entrepreneurs but also between LPs and VCs. Equal Ventures Founder and Managing Partner Rick Zullo recalled that when raising his first fund, an LP demanded a meeting at 7 a.m. on a Monday, just two days after his daughter was born. The LP was 45 minutes late, listened to the meeting while eating a breakfast burrito, and finally said he wasn't planning to make any new investments.

Someone commented that this is the downward transmission of abuse: LPs belittle GPs, GPs belittle founders, and founders then belittle non-founders. Zullo responded that there's no reason for this cycle to exist. Just because someone was once an asshole to you doesn't mean you have the right to be an asshole to others.

When Investors Truly Side with the Founder

However, this chain reaction sparked by Isenberg wasn't just a collective indictment of VCs. Many founders also mentioned that in the world of fundraising, there are also investors who are genuinely willing to help the company, respect the founders, and even change the company's fate at critical moments.

For example, the Vinod Khosla who tried to "drive a wedge" in the story above presents a completely different image in other entrepreneurs' accounts.

Startup Grind and Bevy Co-founder Derek Andersen recalled that in May 2017, he was just 6 weeks away from running out of cash. One early morning, he told his wife on the couch that he was almost out of money and might lose everything. His wife simply said, "You'll figure it out." So he spent the whole night sending emails, praying, and at 1:39 a.m., sent an email to Khosla, whom he had only interviewed a few times at Startup Grind and wasn't close with.

At 7:34 a.m., Khosla replied to the email, asked for a phone number, and called him later while on his way to a meeting. Andersen said the advice and encouragement from that call helped him raise $1 million within those 6 weeks, ultimately saving the company.

Linear Co-founder and CEO Karri Saarinen provided another, more complete positive example. He said he hadn't encountered too many bad things about VCs; the worst usually was just the other party being very polite but clearly uninterested.

After founding Linear, he deliberately kept the company in a state of "not needing to raise funds," not casually accepting pitches, and only proceeding when both sides had genuine interest. When Sequoia first asked to meet him, he clearly stated he wasn't fundraising but still brought materials to meet more partners. After the pitch, they asked how much he planned to raise, and he again stated he wasn't fundraising. A few weeks later, when Linear truly decided to raise, Sequoia competed with other interested VCs and ultimately led the seed round.

Similar positive memories also appear in the stories of founders from Figma, Nansen, and Profound.

Figma Co-founder and CEO Dylan Field recalled that when Figma raised its seed round in 2013, most people didn't understand the product, but most of the people he met were very friendly. Reddit Co-founder Alexis Ohanian also came forward to admit that missing Figma was his own misjudgment. Because several similar products had failed before, he mistakenly thought no one could succeed in this direction.

Nansen Co-founder and CEO Alex Svanevik also said that over the years, he had met over 100 VCs, and positive experiences far outweighed negative ones.

Profound Co-founder and CEO James Cadwallader remembered that last year before his Series B pitch at Sequoia's Menlo Park office, partner Alfred Lin asked him if he needed anything. He said he wanted coffee, and a few minutes later, Alfred Lin personally brought back the coffee, without calling an assistant or handing it to someone else. It was just a very small gesture, but before a tense meeting that determined whether funding would proceed, it was enough for a founder to remember for a long time.

In the end, this Silicon Valley-style chain of fundraising stories doesn't present a simple conclusion of whether VCs are good or bad. It's more like a collective pressure release for the startup fundraising ecosystem. Founders recount those absurd, rude, and even humiliating moments, revealing that fundraising is never just about matching capital with projects; it's also a complex interaction revolving around information, status, trust, and control.

But these stories also show that the relationship between founders and investors doesn't have to be this way. Good investors may not always back every company or offer the highest valuation, but they at least treat the entrepreneur sitting across from them seriously, understanding the long-term effort and preparation behind a pitch.

Respect and trust that go beyond capital and valuation are the most enduring undertones in Silicon Valley's startup stories.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are some absurd moments during fundraising pitches shared by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs?

AEntrepreneurs shared several absurd moments: a16z's Marc Andreessen fell asleep for over 30 minutes during a pitch; a SoftBank Vision Fund investor arrived 90 minutes late, barefoot, and offered $300 million after just 30 seconds; an investor ate peanuts and crushed a cigarette into his lunch; another tossed peanuts in the air and caught them in his mouth during a Zoom call; and a founder pitched in a VC's parked car after the partner tried to escape the meeting.

QWhat examples illustrate the power imbalance in founder-VC relationships?

AExamples include: a Sequoia partner rejecting Cloudflare partly because they didn't believe a woman could lead a security infrastructure company; Vinod Khosla suggesting Cloudflare's CEO fire his co-founders to get their equity; a VC claiming the global logistics market was only $6 billion (versus trillions); a Microsoft VP asking a founder 'Why am I even talking to you?'; and an LP making a VC pitch at 7 AM shortly after his child was born, then showing up late and declining to invest.

QWhat positive experiences did founders share about their interactions with venture capitalists?

APositive experiences include: Vinod Khosla giving crucial advice that helped save Startup Grind/Bevy with a $1M raise; Sequoia's Alfred Lin personally fetching coffee for a founder before a pitch; Sequoia proceeding respectfully when Linear initially wasn't fundraising and later leading their seed round; and founders from Figma and Nansen noting that most VCs they met were kind and professional, even when passing on investment.

QWhat was the 'Sequoia scam' accusation mentioned, and how did a Sequoia partner respond?

AMercor's CEO accused Sequoia of a 'scam' where it invested in two tranches at different valuations in the same round, but public narratives only highlighted the higher valuation. Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire responded that this rare practice (about 5 times in 7 years) occurs when other investors are willing to pay much higher prices. Sequoia aims to separate being a 'company-building partner' from 'capital price,' leading to two closely timed investments at different valuations. He argued intentionally misleading founders doesn't serve long-term VC interests.

QAccording to the article, what is the underlying theme of these fundraising stories?

AThe stories reveal that fundraising is not just a rational capital-allocation process but a complex dance of information, status, trust, and power. While many absurd and disrespectful moments highlight inherent imbalances, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release. The concluding theme is that the relationship doesn't have to be adversarial. The most enduring foundation in Silicon Valley is respect and trust that go beyond capital and valuation, demonstrated by investors who treat founders seriously and understand the effort behind each pitch.

İlgili Okumalar

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit25 dk önce

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit25 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit25 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit25 dk önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

ZEN Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Horizen (ZEN) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Horizen (ZEN) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Horizen (ZEN) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHorizen (ZEN) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Horizen (ZEN) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Horizen (ZEN) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

147 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2026.06.02

ZEN Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların ZEN (ZEN) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片