AI Competition's New Battlefield: Long-term Memory Becomes the Pain Point, How Users Can Secure Their Own Context Ownership

marsbit2026-06-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A new front is emerging in the AI competition: user ownership of long-term memory and context. As AI models like ChatGPT evolve from chat tools into persistent digital assistants that learn user preferences and workflows, a critical question arises: who owns this accumulated "memory"? Currently, this personalized data is siloed within each platform (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), creating a fragmented experience when users switch models. The article highlights ZetaChain's strategic pivot from blockchain interoperability to addressing this AI "memory" challenge. Its new focus is on building a "Private Memory Layer" and an "AI Consumer Layer." Through its consumer product Anuma, ZetaChain aims to give users encrypted, portable memory that can be used across different AI models. This system also envisions programmable, auditable permissions for AI agents and a framework where user knowledge can be monetized as shareable assets. Ultimately, ZetaChain's transformation reflects a broader infrastructure shift. The future bottleneck is less about raw model capability and more about continuous context, user-controlled identity, and permission management across multiple collaborating AI agents. The company's ZETA token is being repositioned as an "AI infrastructure token" to facilitate access, payments, and permissions within this proposed ecosystem. The core narrative advocates for returning control of personal context and AI relationships to users, rather than leaving them locke...

Author: Zen, PANews

You spent half a year training ChatGPT to understand your work habits, writing style, and long-term projects. It learned how you like to revise articles, which companies you often follow, and gradually came to understand your preferences for content structure, tone, and information density.

But one day, a newer, more powerful model appears. You open Claude, Gemini, or DeepSeek, and find yourself having to start all over again. The new model doesn't know you, isn't aware of the work context you've accumulated over the past months, and doesn't understand how you think, write, or make decisions.

Over the past two years, the most important competition in the AI industry revolved around "model capabilities." Whose reasoning was stronger, whose context window was longer, whose coding ability was better—these factors almost decided everything. But now, a new issue is emerging: AI is getting to know you better, but who exactly does this "understanding" belong to?

Role Shift: AI Transforms from Chat Tool to Personal Digital Assistant

In November 2022, the AI chatbot ChatGPT debuted, sparking a global chat craze. It reached 100 million monthly active users in just two months, becoming the fastest-growing consumer application in history. At that time, large language models were more like an "advanced search." Users asked AI questions, it generated instant answers, and when the conversation ended, the relationship also ended.

But in recent years, the role of AI has been undergoing a significant shift. As reasoning capabilities, coding abilities, and tool-calling functionalities have continuously improved, AI has begun to deeply integrate into real workflows. More and more people are using it to write code, organize information, analyze data, plan trips, manage schedules, and even for long-term participation in content creation and business decisions.

In many cases, users are no longer just "asking AI questions" but are engaging in long-term collaboration with AI. It starts to understand your working style, expression habits, and long-term goals, begins to consistently participate in the same project, the same workflow, and even gradually takes on some execution tasks. To some extent, AI is evolving from a one-time Q&A tool into a persistently available personal digital assistant.

And as model capabilities have significantly increased, the capabilities of top products have increasingly converged, and with AI being used long-term and extensively, new issues have begun to surface.

Once AI begins long-term collaboration, "memory"—the system storing and recalling past experiences to improve decision-making and overall performance—ceases to be just an inconsequential database. In many application scenarios, the bottleneck is no longer the model's reasoning level, but the capabilities related to long-term memory and context management. Cloudflare has also directly labeled agentic memory as one of the biggest challenges and fastest-developing areas in current AI infrastructure.

Leading AI companies have also realized that long-term memory is becoming part of the product experience. OpenAI has split ChatGPT's memory into saved memories and reference chat history. The former saves information users wish to retain long-term, while the latter allows ChatGPT to extract useful content from past conversations for subsequent personalized responses. Gemini has also begun learning user preferences based on prior conversations. Claude has introduced Memory and supports memory import and export.

Platform Silos Turn AI 'Memory' into a New Industry Battlefield

But the problem is that these memory capabilities are largely still confined to their respective platforms, belonging only to the platform's independent account systems and product environments—they remain isolated islands. Although Anthropic supports memory import/export, it currently functions more like a migration tool for Claude rather than a universal memory standard jointly adopted by various companies.

And this is precisely the gap ZetaChain aims to fill. After fully pivoting to AI, ZetaChain began extending the concept of "ownership," originally from the crypto world, further into AI memory and user context. What it hopes to build is not just a chat product, but a privacy memory layer (Private Memory Layer) independent of model platforms, allowing users to truly own their long-term memories, behavioral preferences, and AI context.

ZetaChain's consumer AI product, Anuma, advocates for users to own a set of encrypted private memory, supporting seamless use across mainstream AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc. Users don't have to rebuild context, preferences, and work habits every time they switch models. Instead, users control access permissions and bring their historical memory to different models and agents.

As AI gradually accumulates users' usage preferences, writing habits, workflows, and historical conversations, the so-called "memory" will increasingly resemble a layer of "personality mirror." It not only determines whether a model's responses align with user preferences but may also determine whether the model, when making decisions on your behalf in the future, acts according to your habits and values.

Beyond giving users ownership of memory and allowing them to choose models with different strengths for different tasks, Anuma is also building a programmable, auditable, and revocable permission system. It allows AI agents to read records once, with permissions revocable at any time, and all permission changes can be recorded and tracked on-chain.

Moreover, users' memory and knowledge graphs can become assets that can be shared, authorized, and monetized without exposing raw data. This enables professional users such as investors, doctors, lawyers, and developers to encapsulate their expertise into agents, publish them to an Agent Marketplace, and earn revenue when others call upon them.

From Cross-Chain to Cross-AI Platform: Why Did ZetaChain Pivot?

What enables Anuma to achieve these functions is the underlying infrastructure, Private Memory Layer, developed by ZetaChain. As an infrastructure for AI-focused private memory, identity, permissions, payments, and agents, it aims to allow applications and agents to collaborate across models while users retain control.

ZetaChain had long focused on cross-chain interoperability infrastructure, with the core goal of solving asset and message transfer issues between different blockchains. Regarding the "unified multi-chain entry point," it built a considerable network and narrative. According to official data, there are 11.9 million unique addresses and 241 million transactions on its blockchain.

But after Anuma publicly launched on April 27th this year and surpassed 50,000 users in its first month, ZetaChain began deciding to fully pivot to AI, gradually phasing out its cross-chain interoperability business. Behind this pivot lies a relatively clear internal logic.

In the past, ZetaChain mainly dealt with the issue of incompatibility between different chains. In today's AI world, similar fragmentation exists. To some extent, digital assets are to blockchain what memory and context are to AI. Different models have their own closed memory systems; once users switch platforms, the long-accumulated context and behavioral preferences are often interrupted.

With developments in recent years, ZetaChain believes the biggest challenge it faces now is no longer cross-chain transfers between blockchains, but continuity between different models and agents, and the issue of user ownership over their own context.

a16z crypto previously mentioned in an analysis article that agents have begun to become economic participants, but they still lack portable identities, programmable payments, verifiable authorization, and the public coordination layer needed for cross-environment collaboration. Therefore, compared to many AI + Crypto projects awkwardly searching for application scenarios, ZetaChain's pivot logic is much smoother.

In business history, successful pivots by infrastructure companies are not uncommon. Such companies often don't simply switch tracks but chase new bottlenecks based on product logic. NVIDIA's most important initial narrative was graphics computing and gaming GPUs. But with the rise of AI, its GPU architecture ultimately became the core infrastructure for the entire AI industry. Infrastructure never revolves around the same constraint point forever, and true winners are often those who earliest identify that the "next constraint point" is emerging.

From Privacy Memory Layer to AI Consumer Layer

With the explosive development of AI, the future form of AI will clearly not be confined to chat windows but will gradually evolve into numerous long-term, collaborative AI assistants. Based on this judgment, after proposing the "Privacy Memory Layer" and attempting to solve how AI can understand users long-term, ZetaChain further proposed the concept of the "AI Consumer Layer," hoping to redefine the relationship between users and AI after AI works on behalf of users long-term.

In ZetaChain's vision, future AI won't just answer questions but will deeply participate in users' workflows and daily decisions. Different AI assistants will be responsible for different tasks—some handling code, others organizing finances, some planning schedules, and others participating long-term in content creation and research analysis. For these AIs to truly collaborate, they need to share the same set of long-term context, identity, and permission systems.

Therefore, the so-called "AI Consumer Layer" essentially attempts to integrate originally scattered capabilities into a unified framework. Among them, Memory handles long-term context, Permissions handles access control, Identity handles the identity system, Payments handles invocation and payments between AIs, and Agents are the AI networks that ultimately execute tasks on behalf of users.

This is why "ownership" has become the core concept ZetaChain repeatedly emphasizes.

Because in this system, whether users still own their context, permissions, and identities becomes paramount. For example, in the future, an AI responsible for code review could be temporarily authorized to read a GitHub repository; an AI handling tax organization could read tax filing materials once; an AI arranging travel could only access travel history and calendar permissions. Permissions would no longer be uniformly controlled by the platform but dynamically allocated by users and revocable at any time.

And this is precisely why blockchain is starting to reconnect with AI.

As more and more AIs simultaneously work on behalf of users, "who can access what," "whether permissions are revocable," and "whether invocations are traceable" will gradually become new infrastructure issues. And on-chain permission systems are naturally suited to handle this kind of multi-party collaboration.

'AI Infrastructure Token' ZETA Brings Utility Growth Alongside Pivot

Alongside ZetaChain's strategy adjustment, the functionality and utility of the ZETA token have also been adjusted. In the past, ZETA was more like a traditional public chain token, primarily serving Gas, validation, and cross-chain network security functions, with not much innovation in its mechanism design. But under the new narrative, ZETA will become an "AI Infrastructure Token," with its utility significantly enhanced.

According to ZetaChain's current description, ZETA will serve several purposes in the future:

Firstly, access permissions for AI models and Agents. Access to certain advanced models, specialized AI tools, or Agent services may require unlocking or payment of invocation fees using ZETA.

Secondly, payment settlement between Agents. ZetaChain mentions that future interactions between different AIs and applications will be completed via on-chain payments through the x402 protocol. Its goal is clear: if AIs in the future will automatically invoke other AIs, then machines also need a native payment system.

Thirdly, on-chain operations for permissions and memory updates. User modifications to permissions, access controls, and memory states may all become on-chain records in the future.

Fourthly, the creator economy. ZetaChain hopes that in the future, professionals like developers, researchers, lawyers, and doctors can encapsulate their knowledge into AI tools or Agents, earn revenue through invocations, with ZETA facilitating the flow of value.

However, it's important to note that this part currently remains largely at the narrative stage. Because the AI Agent economy itself is still far from mature, and truly large-scale "AI invoking AI" and "Agent autonomous payments" have not yet emerged. Concepts like x402, on-chain permissions, and AI identity currently belong more to pre-built infrastructure than to validated, large-scale demand.

But the reason ZetaChain and its product logic are noteworthy is not just because it's building an infrastructure paired with an AI product. More importantly, it attempts to redefine whether users' future memory, identity, context, and AI permissions belong to the platform or to users themselves. What ZetaChain wants to do, in essence, is to ensure these things are no longer controlled by platforms but returned to the hands of users.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the core issue regarding AI 'memory' that the article identifies as a new competitive battleground?

AThe article identifies that AI 'memory' or long-term context is becoming a new competitive battleground. Currently, AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini store user preferences, work habits, and project contexts, but this 'memory' is siloed within each platform. This creates a problem where users lose their accumulated context and personalized AI understanding when switching between different AI models or services.

QWhat problem does the company ZetaChain aim to solve with its 'Private Memory Layer'?

AZetaChain aims to solve the problem of fragmented and platform-owned AI memory. Its Private Memory Layer is designed to be a user-owned, encrypted layer for storing long-term memory, behavior preferences, and AI context. This allows users to take their personalized 'memory' and seamlessly use it across different AI models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and agents, maintaining continuity without starting over on each platform.

QWhat major strategic shift did ZetaChain make, and what was the logical connection behind this shift?

AZetaChain made a major strategic shift from being a cross-chain interoperability infrastructure for blockchains to focusing entirely on AI. The logical connection is that the core problem of interoperability and fragmentation exists in both domains. Just as it previously solved the issue of assets and data being siloed on different blockchains, it now addresses the similar issue of user context and memory being siloed within different, closed AI platforms.

QAccording to the article, how does the role of AI assistants evolve in the future vision presented by ZetaChain?

AIn ZetaChain's future vision, AI assistants evolve from simple chat tools into a network of long-term, specialized digital assistants that deeply collaborate. Different AI agents will handle specific tasks (e.g., coding, finance, travel planning, content creation). For them to work together effectively, they will need to share a unified framework for long-term context (memory), user identity, permissions, and a native payment system for inter-agent transactions.

QWhat new utility is the ZETA token expected to gain following ZetaChain's转型 (transformation) to AI?

AFollowing its transformation, the ZETA token is expected to evolve into an 'AI infrastructure token' with significantly expanded utility. Its expected new uses include: 1) Access and payment for premium AI models and agent services. 2) Settlement for payments between different AI agents (via protocols like x402). 3) Facilitating on-chain operations for updating user permissions and memory access controls. 4) Powering a creator economy where professionals monetize their expertise by packaging it into AI agents or tools.

İlgili Okumalar

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit33 dk önce

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit33 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit33 dk önce

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit33 dk önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 saat önce

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

ZEN Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Horizen (ZEN) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Horizen (ZEN) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Horizen (ZEN) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHorizen (ZEN) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Horizen (ZEN) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Horizen (ZEN) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

147 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.12Güncellenme 2026.06.02

ZEN Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların ZEN (ZEN) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片