Prediksi Pasar Dewa Judi Palsu vs Asli: Membongkar Keajaiban 8300 Kali Lipat; Manipulasi Harga Meraup 230 Ribu Dolar

Odaily星球日报2026-01-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Artikel ini membahas dua insiden kontroversial di pasar prediksi Polymarket. Pertama, seorang trader bernama ascetic mengklaim menghasilkan keuntungan 8.300x dari $12 menjadi $100.000, namun kemudian dituduh melakukan "Sybil farming" dengan menggunakan banyak akun untuk memanipulasi persepsi dan menciptakan perdagangan palsu. Insiden kedua melibatkan seorang trader yang memanipulasi harga XRP di Binance dengan modal $1 juta untuk memastikan taruhannya di Polymarket menang, menghasilkan $233.000 dengan biaya rendah dan mengakibatkan kerugian besar bagi bot perdagangan. Kedua kasus menyoroti risiko manipulasi dan pentingnya kehati-hatian bagi pengguna platform prediksi.

Orisinil|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Penulis|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

Sebagai jalur panas yang terus naik sejak awal tahun, pasar prediksi tidak kekurangan keajaiban penciptaan kekayaan.

Namun di balik keajaiban, apakah itu keajaiban nyata yang dicapai dengan membaca situasi dan bergerak lincah, ataukah manipulasi palsu dan sensasi yang menyesatkan, membutuhkan mata yang tajam untuk membedakan yang asli dan palsu. Baru-baru ini, seorang trader Polymarket di X mengklaim telah mencapai "keajaiban 8300 kali lipat", dari modal 12 dolar hingga taruhan yang menghasilkan lebih dari 100 ribu dolar, tetapi segera dibongkar karena menggunakan banyak akun palsu dan sensasi lalu lintas; sementara trader lain memanipulasi harga XRP, meraih 230 ribu dolar di bagian "prediksi naik-turun 15 menit", melakukan panen satu arah terhadap bot taruhan di Polymarket.

Di panggung taruhan pro dan kontra, ada yang ingin menari dengan kebohongan, ada juga yang memanfaatkan celah aturan untuk meraih keuntungan, dalam taruhan benar dan salah, tidak ada strategi yang tak terkalahkan, hanya taktik yang fleksibel.

Dari 12 Dolar ke 100 Ribu Dolar: Keajaiban 8300 Kali Lipat: Ikon Hidup Polymarket VS Skema Palsu Trader

Awal cerita dimulai dari sebuah postingan "kisah pribadi dari modal 12 dolar yang berjuang hingga untung 100 ribu dolar, mencapai return 8300 kali lipat".

Pada 16 Januari, trader ascetic memposting bahwa melalui "taruhan semua atau tidak sama sekali dalam fluktuasi jangka pendek Bitcoin", dia berhasil melipatgandakan modalnya secara berturut-turut 16 kali, akhirnya, mencapai pencapaian milestone dari 12 dolar menjadi untung 100 ribu dolar. Pada saat yang sama, dia menekankan, dalam proses taruhan "juga membagikan strategi taruhan dan alasan di baliknya secara detail".

Kemudian, di kolom komentar, dia memberikan tautan akun Polymarket-nya, dan langsung mengatakan bahwa keajaiban penciptaan kekayaan seperti ini hanya bisa terjadi di Polymarket (Catatan Odaily Planet Daily: Terasa familiar? Platform serupa yang digunakan trader sebelumnya termasuk tetapi tidak terbatas pada OpenSea, Blur, Pump.fun, Hyperliquid, Aster, dll).

Kolom komentar kemudian menjadi "euforia komunitas anggota Polymarket", banyak yang memberikan selamat, bahkan Kepala Pertumbuhan Global Polymarket LeGate berkomentar: "Selamat, bro! Aku pikir kamu layak! Selamat mendapatkan lencana @PolymarketTrade!" (Catatan Odaily Planet Daily: Akun ini adalah akun komunitas trader aktif Polymarket.)

Jika Anda mengira ini adalah "postingan pamer kekayaan mendalam yang biasa", maka Anda mungkin meremehkan tingkat dramanya.

Dengan cepat, arah peristiwa "keajaiban return 8300 kali lipat di Polymarket" ini berubah drastis.

Dari Keajaiban Taruhan ke Penipuan Palsu: Data Return 8300 Kali Lipat Dipertanyakan

Pada tanggal 16 Januari, trader Moses yang mengklaim diri sebagai "Peringkat Trader Polymarket 2025 ke-515" mempertanyakan data akun trader ascetic: "Pernahkah Anda berpikir mengapa saldo akunnya di postingan pertama adalah 3000 dolar? Jawabannya sederhana: dia menjalankan 'ladang sisir' yang besar. Dia tidak mulai dari 12 dolar, tetapi dari ratusan akun, masing-masing diisi 10 hingga 20 dolar. Begitu salah satu akun mencapai 2900 dolar, dia mulai memposting. Sejak itu, dia melakukan tujuh transaksi, semuanya menang.

Tapi perhatikan, dia setiap kali bertaruh dengan semua uangnya. Trader sungguhan tidak melakukan ini. Dia hanya mengejar ketenaran, menghalalkan segala cara untuk mencapai tujuannya.

Karena tidak mendapatkan volume yang cukup, dia bahkan tampaknya menggunakan akun lain untuk melakukan transaksi palsu, untuk mencapai harga yang dia inginkan.

Sebelum mempercayai 'selebritas internet' secara membabi buta, pastikan untuk menyelidiki sendiri. Lampiran menunjukkan beberapa akun sisirnya yang gagal, yang paling banyak hanya menghasilkan 1000 dolar."

Kemudian, Moses menambahkan di kolom komentar bahwa semua akun dibuat 7 bulan lalu, dan terus berpartisipasi di pasar acak, semua akun mulai mengikuti tantangan yang sama pada hari yang sama 2 bulan lalu. Seluruh klaim "10 dolar ke 100 ribu dolar" adalah palsu!

Tidak hanya itu, dia juga menyertakan tangkapan layar halaman utama dan tautan akun sisir terkait:

  • Akun satu: https://polymarket.com/@brockmatthew;
  • Akun dua: https://polymarket.com/@wellscandice;
  • Akun tiga: https://polymarket.com/@jbryan.

Meskipun ascetic kemudian menanggapi di kolom komentar bahwa dompet dan akun yang disebutkan Moses tidak terkait dengannya, dan beberapa anggota ZSC DAO (komunitas trader Polymarket tertentu) juga membelanya, menyebut tindakan Moses sebagai serangan dunia maya, tetapi konten balasan bot di postingan sebelumnya ascetic dan hubungan antara akun Polymarket-nya dengan banyak akun dengan pola perilaku serupa membuat kredibilitas "keajaiban return 8300 kali lipat" ini sangat diragukan.

Ada juga yang berkomentar, sulit memahami alasannya melakukan ini, karena "7 taruhan beruntun yang sukses" sendiri sudah merupakan hal yang hebat; tetapi kemudian ada yang menunjuk, ini masih merupakan "permainan bot dengan jaring luas".

Tentu, agak ironis, bio Moses juga menulis label "perjalanan dari 1 dolar ke 1 juta dolar", apakah itu catatan nyata atau target pribadi, kita tidak tahu.

Dibandingkan dengan ascetic yang sulit dinilai keasliannya, kasus berikutnya tentang manipulasi harga di pasar taruhan "naik-turun XRP 15 menit" yang menghasilkan keuntungan 230 ribu dolar mungkin lebih layak dipelajari oleh pemain paus.

Trader Manfaatkan Spot Binance untuk Panen Balik Pasar Prediksi: Modal 1 Juta Dolar Raup Untung 230 Ribu Dolar

Pada 18 Januari, trader Polymarket PredictTrader membocorkan operasi trader yang dramatis seperti "The Wolf of Wall Street" - dengan memanen likuiditas bot trading, dia menghasilkan 233 ribu dolar dalam hitungan jam, dan belum menarik perhatian besar pasar.

Waktu yang dipilih trader bernama a4385 ini sangat strategis - saat itu Sabtu malam, likuiditas pasar tidak mencukupi, dan buku order spot Binance juga relatif tipis.

Dalam perdagangan "XRP Naik-Turun - 17 Januari, Waktu Timur AS 12:45-1:00 sore", dia membeli banyak token "Naik".

Lawan tradingnya adalah "market maker individu" yang umum di Polymarket - berbagai bot trading. (Catatan Odaily Planet Daily: Market making di Polymarket relatif sederhana,门槛 rendah bagi pengembang individu, bot trading sekarang sangat populer). Pada menit ke-10 setelah perdagangan dimulai, XRP turun sekitar 0,3% dari harga pembukaan, tetapi dia telah mendorong bagian "Naik" hingga 70%. Bot trading melihat peluang keuntungan, tetapi tidak menyadari justru jatuh ke dalam "jebakan harga" yang dipasang trader ini sebelumnya, malah menjual lebih banyak token "Naik" kepadanya.

Pada akhirnya, trader ini membeli token "Naik" senilai 77 ribu dolar dengan harga rata-rata 48%.

Dan hanya 2 menit sebelum penyelesaian acara taruhan ini, sebuah dompet di Binance membeli XRP spot senilai sekitar 1 juta dolar, mendorong harganya naik sekitar 0,5%; beberapa detik setelah penyelesaian acara taruhan, 1 juta dolar spot ini cepat dijual kembali.

Dengan kata lain, biaya manipulasi harga ini adalah - sekitar 0,25% slippage transaksi satu arah + biaya transaksi.

Menggunakan akun VIP Level 4 Binance (0,06%) (mudah didapat) dan slippage dua arah 0,25%, total biaya sekitar 6,200 dolar, biaya operasi aktual mungkin lebih rendah. Dengan mengulangi operasi yang sama berulang kali, ditambah celah likuiditas akhir pekan, trader ini借此 mengosongkan dana beberapa dompet bot.

Beberapa bot ditutup tepat waktu, sementara yang lain tidak cukup cepat bereaksi, kehilangan semua dana - termasuk @aleksandmoney, akun yang kehilangan semua keuntungannya selama setahun (sekitar 160 ribu dolar).

Tautan akun Polymarket a4385: https://polymarket.com/profile/0x506bce138df20695c03cd5a59a937499fb00b0fe

Di akhir artikel, semoga trader yang bertaruh pro dan kontra di pasar prediksi, berjuang dengan penuh semangat, dapat membedakan fakta dan penampakan. Terkadang, kebenaran tidak selalu objektif, sedangkan standar dan aturan yang ditetapkan platform ditentukan oleh manusia.

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

QApa yang diklaim oleh trader ascetic dalam postingannya di X pada 16 Januari?

ATrader ascetic mengklaim bahwa dia berhasil menghasilkan keuntungan 10.000 dolar AS dari modal awal 12 dolar AS melalui serangkaian taruhan di Polymarket, mencapai pengembalian 8.300 kali lipat.

QApa tuduhan yang dilontarkan oleh trader Moses terhadap ascetic terkait pencapaiannya?

AMoses menuduh ascetic menjalankan 'farm sybil' dengan menggunakan banyak akun, masing-masing diisi 10 hingga 20 dolar AS, dan hanya memulai postingan setelah satu akun mencapai 2.900 dolar AS, sehingga klaim 'dari 12 dolar AS' adalah palsu.

QBagaimana cara trader a4385 memanipulasi pasar untuk mendapatkan keuntungan 23.300 dolar AS di Polymarket?

Aa4385 memanipulasi pasar dengan membeli sejumlah besar token 'naik' di pasar prediksi XRP, lalu mendorong harga XRP naik sekitar 0,5% dengan membeli 1 juta dolar AS aset XRP di Binance sesaat sebelum penyelesaian, sehingga memastikan taruhannya menang.

QApa peran bot perdagangan dalam insiden manipulasi harga yang dilakukan oleh a4385?

ABot perdagangan bertindak sebagai likuiditas dan lawan perdagangan. Mereka menjual token 'naik' kepada a4385 karena melihat peluang arbitrase, tetapi justru terjebak dalam manipulasi harga dan mengalami kerugian besar.

QApa tanggapan ascetic terhadap tuduhan yang dilayangkan oleh Moses?

AAscetic membantah tuduhan Moses dengan menyatakan bahwa dompet dan akun yang disebutkan Moses tidak ada hubungannya dengannya, dan dia mendapat dukungan dari beberapa anggota komunitas ZSC DAO.

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit21 dk önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit21 dk önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit38 dk önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit38 dk önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2 saat önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

GODS Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Gods Unchained (GODS) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Gods Unchained (GODS) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Gods Unchained (GODS) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınGods Unchained (GODS) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Gods Unchained (GODS) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Gods Unchained (GODS) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

158 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.13Güncellenme 2026.06.02

GODS Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların GODS (GODS) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片