Dos fundadores de la cadena pública china NEO se enfrentan, la opacidad financiera es la causa principal

marsbit2026-01-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

**Resumen: Disputa entre los cofundadores de la antigua cadena pública china NEO por falta de transparencia financiera** Los cofundadores de NEO, Erik Zhang (Zhang Zhengwen) y Da Hongfei, han protagonizado una disputa pública que revela graves problemas de transparencia financiera en la fundación de este proyecto blockchain establecido en 2014. Zhang, quien regresó oficialmente en septiembre después de haber abandonado el proyecto previamente, denunció en noviembre la opacidad en la gestión de los activos de la fundación, controlados unilateralmente por Da Hongfei. Zhang afirmó que buscó acceso a informes financieros detallados pero encontró resistencia, describiendo la situación como una "caja negra". La controversia se intensificó en diciembre cuando Zhang acusó a Da de utilizar recursos de NEO para desarrollar un proyecto independiente llamado EON, lo que motivó su regreso para supervisar la gobernanza. Zhang también criticó que NEO dependía de hackathons para crear una "falsa prosperidad" sin usuarios reales. En respuesta, Da Hongfei contraatacó alegando que Zhang controla la mayoría de los fondos de NEO (incluyendo los tokens NEO y GAS) y domina los derechos de voto de los nodos de consenso. Da prometió publicar informes financieros en el primer trimestre de 2026. Zhang anunció unilateralmente que, a partir del 1 de enero de 2026, Da Hongfei se enfocaría en el desarrollo de NeoX y SpoonOS, alejándose de las operaciones principales de NEO, aunque Da no confirmó este...

Quién iba a pensar que una cadena pública china tan antigua llegaría a este día. Lo que es aún más lamentable es que los principales proyectos de IA chinos, como Manus, Kimi y Minimax, han tenido noticias importantes durante dos días consecutivos, ya sea siendo adquiridos por miles de millones de dólares o recibiendo financiación de cientos de millones, mientras que la antigua cadena pública ha comenzado a enfrentarse.

Por lo visto, los dos cofundadores de la cadena pública NEO, fundada en 2014, Zhang Zhengwen (Erik Zhang) y Da Hongfei, básicamente se han separado por completo y continúan discutiendo en X. Basándonos en sus declaraciones y la información pública disponible en línea, intentaremos entender qué sucedió exactamente entre los dos fundadores de esta antigua cadena pública.

Opacidad financiera

En realidad, Zhang Zhengwen dejó NEO hace algunos años, lo cual confirmó en su propio Twitter, y regresó oficialmente en septiembre de este año. El detonante de esta disputa fue en noviembre. Según mensajes de la comunidad y información pública, Zhang Zhengwen, como núcleo técnico, encontró obstáculos al buscar obtener el informe financiero detallado y el flujo de fondos de la Fundación Neo.

Posteriormente, Zhang Zhengwen acusó a la Fundación Neo de operar de manera opaca durante mucho tiempo, con un estado de activos similar a una "caja negra". Señaló que Da Hongfei ha controlado de manera unilateral los activos de la fundación, excluyendo los tokens NEO/GAS, y carece de un mecanismo completo y auditable de divulgación.

En la discusión mutua de hoy, también descubrimos la razón por la cual Zhang Zhengwen se fue anteriormente. Dijo que Da Hongfei se acercó por separado y le dijo que la eficiencia era baja si ambos estaban a cargo de NEO, por lo que optó por retirarse temporalmente de la gestión para "mejorar la eficiencia". Sin embargo, descubrió que Da Hongfei estaba utilizando los recursos de NEO para desarrollar el proyecto independiente de cadena pública EON. Esto también lo impulsó a regresar e intervenir en la gobernanza de la fundación.

En una comunicación con la comunidad en noviembre, Zhang Zhengwen mencionó que NEO anteriormente dependía de hackathons para crear una "falsa prosperidad", sin usuarios reales, y muchos proyectos de hackathon desaparecían después de recibir premios.

Intensificación de las contradicciones

En diciembre, Zhang Zhengwen emitió una declaración pública exigiendo que Da Hongfei cumpla con las obligaciones de divulgación financiera prometidas desde el 9 de diciembre. Más explosivo aún, Zhang Zhengwen anunció unilateralmente que, según un acuerdo telefónico previo entre ambos, a partir del 1 de enero de 2026, Da Hongfei ya no participará en los asuntos de la red principal de NEO, y en su lugar se centrará en el desarrollo y operación de la cadena lateral NeoX y el nuevo proyecto SpoonOS.

Da Hongfei respondió de inmediato, diciendo que Zhang Zhengwen en realidad controla la gran mayoría de los fondos del ecosistema NEO (incluidos los activos principales tokens NEO y GAS), y domina el derecho a voto de los nodos de consenso. También acusó a Zhang Zhengwen de retrasar durante años por varias razones (como esperar a que se complete la migración a N3) la transferencia de fondos a la dirección multisig (Multisig) de la fundación.

Da Hongfei prometió publicar el informe financiero de finales de 2025 en el primer trimestre de 2026, y compartirá datos preliminares con antelación.

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

İlgili Sorular

Q¿Cuál es la razón principal del conflicto entre los dos cofundadores de NEO, según el artículo?

ALa razón principal del conflicto es la falta de transparencia financiera en la Fundación NEO, con Erik Zhang acusando a Da Hongfei de controlar unilateralmente los activos de la fundación como una 'caja negra'.

Q¿Qué descubrió Zhang Zhengwen (Erik Zhang) que lo impulsó a regresar a la gestión de la fundación?

ADescubrió que Da Hongfei estaba utilizando recursos de NEO para desarrollar un proyecto de cadena de bloques independiente llamado EON, lo que lo motivó a regresar e intervenir en la gobernanza de la fundación.

Q¿Qué medida anunció unilateralmente Erik Zhang en diciembre respecto al papel de Da Hongfei en NEO?

AAnunció unilateralmente que, a partir del 1 de enero de 2026, Da Hongfei ya no participaría en los asuntos de la red principal de NEO y se centraría en el desarrollo de la cadena lateral NeoX y el nuevo proyecto SpoonOS.

Q¿Cómo respondió Da Hongfei a las acusaciones de Erik Zhang sobre el control de activos?

ADa Hongfei respondió que Erik Zhang en realidad controla la mayor parte de los fondos del ecosistema NEO, incluidos los activos principales NEO y GAS, y domina el poder de voto de los nodos de consenso.

Q¿Qué compromiso de transparencia financiera hizo Da Hongfei durante el conflicto?

ADa Hongfei se comprometió a publicar el informe financiero de finales de 2025 en el primer trimestre de 2026 y a compartir datos preliminares con anticipación.

İlgili Okumalar

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit46 dk önce

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit46 dk önce

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit51 dk önce

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit51 dk önce

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

The Federal Reserve Chairman is considering reducing the number of regular Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings held each year, a potential major shift from the current practice of eight meetings annually that has been in place since 1981. According to a report, the proposal was discussed internally, with possible details finalized ahead of the September meeting. This change would mean fewer formal opportunities to vote on interest rates and could diminish the Fed's ability to respond to economic data while reducing market access to policy signals, marking a reversal of the central bank's long-term trend towards greater transparency. While the 1935 Banking Act sets a legal minimum of four meetings per year, historical meeting frequency has varied. The move aligns with the Chairman's broader agenda of institutional reform since taking office, which includes revising communication practices and data usage. An internal memo from 1988 had previously concluded that the eight-meeting schedule remained appropriate. If implemented, this reduction in meetings would significantly reshape the Fed's operational rhythm and its interaction with financial markets.

marsbit1 saat önce

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit1 saat önce

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit2 saat önce

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

CORE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! CORE (CORE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında CORE (CORE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: CORE (CORE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınCORE (CORE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: CORE (CORE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında CORE (CORE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

390 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.13Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların CORE (CORE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.