Guncangan Emisi: TRUMP, MELANIA Anjlok 86–99% karena Pasokan Beredar Meningkat Dua Kali Lipat dalam Tiga Bulan

ambcrypto2025-12-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Menurut data dari Tokenomist, token yang diluncurkan pada kuartal pertama seperti TRUMP dan MELANIA mengalami tekanan penurunan ekstrem hingga 86–99% meskipun sebelumnya mendapat sorotan positif. Penyebab utamanya adalah peningkatan suplai token yang beredar hingga dua kali lipat dalam tiga bulan, menciptakan tekanan jual yang signifikan. Contohnya, Layer turun 99,7% dengan peningkatan suplai dari 21% menjadi 31%, sementara Melania turun 98% dengan suplai naik dari 25% menjadi 55%. Pola serupa terlihat pada aset baru lainnya seperti Plume dan GoPlus Security, yang juga mengalami penurunan harga drastis. Likuiditas pasar yang terbatas dan pergeseran modal ke aset utama seperti Bitcoin dan Ethereum memperburuk situasi. Bahkan token dengan utilitas nyata seperti GoPlus Security tidak kebal dari penurunan ini. Laporan menyimpulkan bahwa desain token dan jadwal emisi yang tidak berkelanjutan menjadi faktor penentu utama, bukan hanya kualitas proyek.

Token yang diluncurkan pada kuartal pertama, seperti TRUMP dan MELANIA, menghadapi tekanan penurunan yang ekstrem meskipun sebelumnya digembar-gemborkan, menurut data Tokenomist terbaru. Data tersebut membandingkan harga peluncuran dengan pasokan beredar saat ini dan kinerja pasar.

Dalam setiap kasus yang dipantau, float yang beredar berkembang secara agresif sementara harga anjlok antara 86% dan 99% sejak peluncuran.

Emisi Besar-besaran, Harga Runtuh

Laporan tersebut menyoroti peningkatan tajam dalam pasokan beredar di sejumlah aset yang baru diluncurkan, termasuk Official Trump, Melania, Layer, Plume, GoPlus Security, dan Bubblemaps.

Dalam kebanyakan kasus, float yang beredar berlipat ganda dalam tiga bulan, menempatkan tekanan jual terus-menerus di pasar sekunder, menyebabkan guncangan emisi.

Sebagai contoh:

  • Layer bergerak dari float 21% ke 31% dan turun 99,7%
  • Melania berkembang dari 25% ke 55% dan turun 98%
  • GoPlus Security bergerak dari 15% ke 29% dan turun 92%
  • Plume bergerak dari 20% ke 33% dan turun 86%

Meskipun narasi individu berbeda, reaksi pasar mengikuti pola yang sama: emisi token yang berat dikombinasikan dengan likuiditas yang tipis menghasilkan penemuan harga paksa pada level yang jauh lebih rendah.

Konsentrasi Likuiditas Menguntungkan Aset Utama

Rotasi luas ke Bitcoin, Ethereum, dan token aset dunia nyata dalam beberapa bulan terakhir telah membuat peluncuran baru yang lebih kecil terpapar pada kekurangan likuiditas.

Dengan modal yang tertarik ke aset utama dan RWA, token baru memiliki sedikit permintaan struktural untuk menyerap pasokan baru.

Pola ini khas dalam fase di mana likuiditas menjadi konservatif dan partisipasi ritel memudar.

Dalam lingkungan seperti itu, jadwal emisi lebih penting daripada fundamental produk, dan bahkan kasus penggunaan yang asli mungkin tidak cukup untuk melindungi token dari guncangan emisi.

Permintaan Superfisial Tidak Cukup

GoPlus Security menonjol sebagai token yang terkait dengan infrastruktur keamanan siber yang berarti, namun harganya masih turun lebih dari 92% dari peluncuran.

Data ini memperkuat tema yang konsisten di seluruh siklus sebelumnya: utilitas praktis tidak selalu diterjemahkan ke nilai token ketika tokenomik bekerja melawan pemegang.

Pengamat pasar mengaitkan desain token, jadwal vesting, dan peningkatan float pasca-peluncuran yang agresif sebagai penggerak utama penurunan ini, daripada kualitas proyek saja.


Pemikiran Akhir

  • Desain token tetap menjadi salah satu penentu terkuat dari perilaku harga pasca-peluncuran.
  • Sampai proyek baru memprioritaskan emisi berkelanjutan dan kontrol pasokan yang lebih ketat, aset yang baru diterbitkan kemungkinan akan tetap rentan terhadap guncangan emisi dan penekanan harga jangka panjang.

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

QApa yang dimaksud dengan 'emission shock' dalam konteks artikel ini?

AEmission shock merujuk pada tekanan jual yang ekstrem dan penurunan harga drastis yang dialami token kripto baru akibat peningkatan pasokan yang beredar (circulating supply) secara agresif dalam waktu singkat, seringkali menggandakan pasokan dalam tiga bulan, tanpa diimbangi dengan permintaan yang memadai.

QToken apa saja yang disebutkan mengalami penurunan harga terbesar menurut data Tokenomist?

ALayer turun 99,7%, Melania turun 98%, GoPlus Security turun 92%, dan Plume turun 86% dari harga peluncurannya.

QApa penyebab utama penurunan harga token-token baru tersebut menurut artikel?

APenyebab utamanya adalah desain tokenomika yang buruk, termasuk jadwal vesting dan emisi token pasca-peluncuran yang terlalu agresif, yang menyebabkan pasokan yang beredar melonjak dan menciptakan tekanan jual terus-menerus di pasar sekunder.

QMengapa token dengan utilitas nyata seperti GoPlus Security juga mengalami penurunan harga yang signifikan?

AKarena dalam fase di mana likuiditas pasar terkonsentrasi pada aset utama seperti Bitcoin dan Ethereum, utilitas praktis saja tidak cukup untuk melindungi token dari tekanan jual jika desain tokenomikanya tidak mendukung, seperti emisi pasokan yang terlalu tinggi.

QApa pelajaran utama yang dapat diambil dari laporan ini untuk proyek token baru?

APelajaran utamanya adalah desain token dan pengendalian pasokan yang berkelanjutan sangat penting untuk mencegah emission shock. Proyek baru harus memprioritaskan pengelolaan emisi token dan jadwal vesting yang ketat untuk melindungi nilai token dalam jangka panjang.

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit6 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit6 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit9 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit9 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit29 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit29 dk önce

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News37 dk önce

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News37 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

MELANIA Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! MELANIA (MELANIA) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında MELANIA (MELANIA) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: MELANIA (MELANIA) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınMELANIA (MELANIA) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: MELANIA (MELANIA) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında MELANIA (MELANIA) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

132 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.01.20Güncellenme 2026.06.02

MELANIA Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların MELANIA (MELANIA) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片