供应量冲击:TRUMP、MELANIA代币三个月内流通量翻倍,价格暴跌86–99%

ambcrypto2025-12-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

根据Tokenomist数据,2024年第一季度推出的代币如TRUMP、MELANIA等尽管早期受到市场热炒,但目前正面临严重的价格下跌,跌幅介于86%至99%之间。主要原因是流通供应量在三个月内大幅增加,多数代币的流通量翻倍,持续对二级市场造成抛压,形成“排放冲击”。 具体案例显示,Layer流通比例从21%升至31%,价格下跌99.7%;Melania从25%扩至55%,跌98%;GoPlus Security从15%增至29%,跌92%。尽管各项目背景不同,但市场反应一致:高额代币释放叠加流动性不足导致价格大幅下跌。 近期资金集中流向比特币、以太坊及现实资产代币(RWA),使得新代币面临流动性短缺。即使是有实际用途的项目(如网络安全基础设施代币GoPlus)也未能避免暴跌,表明在代币经济设计不利的情况下,实际效用未必能支撑币值。 市场观察者认为,代币设计、解锁计划和流通量激增是导致下跌的主因。总结而言,可持续的代币释放机制和严格的供应控制仍是新项目成功的关键,否则仍将容易受到排放冲击和长期价格抑制的影响。

Tokenomist最新数据显示,尽管早期备受炒作,但TRUMP和MELANIA等第一季度推出的代币正面临巨大的下行压力。该数据对比了发行价与当前流通供应量及市场表现。

在所有监测案例中,自发行以来流通量急剧扩张,价格暴跌幅度介于86%至99%之间。

大规模增发,价格崩盘

报告强调了一批新发行资产流通量的急剧增加,包括Official Trump、Melania、Layer、Plume、GoPlus Security和Bubblemaps。

在大多数情况下,流通量在三个月内翻倍,给二级市场带来持续的抛售压力,导致供应量冲击。

例如:

  • Layer的流通量从21%增至31%,价格下跌99.7%
  • Melania的流通量从25%扩大至55%,价格下跌98%
  • GoPlus Security的流通量从15%增至29%,价格下跌92%
  • Plume的流通量从20%增至33%,价格下跌86%

尽管各项目情况不同,但市场反应遵循相似模式:大量代币增发结合流动性不足,导致价格被迫在更低水平进行发现。

流动性集中流向主流资产

近几个月资金广泛轮动至比特币、以太坊和现实世界资产(RWA)代币,使得规模较小的新发行项目面临流动性短缺。

随着资金向主流资产和RWA倾斜,新代币缺乏结构性需求来吸收新增供应。

这种模式在流动性趋于保守、零售参与度下降的阶段十分典型。

在此环境下,代币释放机制比项目基本面更重要,即便是真实用例也可能无法保护代币免受供应量冲击。

表面需求不足为凭

GoPlus Security作为与有实际价值的网络安全基础设施相关的代币尤为突出,但其价格仍较发行价下跌超92%。

数据印证了过往周期中一贯的主题:当代币经济学对持有者不利时,实际效用并不总能转化为代币价值。

市场观察者将代币设计、解锁时间表和发行后流通量的急剧增加视为这些下跌的主要驱动因素,而非单纯的项目质量。


最终结论

  • 代币设计仍是决定后期价格行为的最关键因素之一。
  • 除非新项目优先考虑可持续的代币释放和更严格的供应控制,否则新发行资产很可能持续容易受到供应量冲击和长期价格抑制的影响。

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

Q根据文章,哪些代币在流通供应量大幅增加的同时价格暴跌了86%至99%?

A文章提到的代币包括TRUMP、MELANIA、Layer、Plume、GoPlus Security和Bubblemaps。其中,Layer价格下跌99.7%,Melania下跌98%,GoPlus Security下跌92%,Plume下跌86%。

Q什么是导致这些新代币价格暴跌的主要原因?

A价格暴跌的主要原因是代币设计、归属时间表以及发行后流通供应量的急剧增加,导致排放冲击。大量代币释放结合薄弱的流动性,迫使价格在更低水平进行发现。

Q文章中提到即使有实际用例的代币如GoPlus Security也无法避免价格下跌?

A是的,GoPlus Security虽然与有意义的网络安全基础设施相关,但其价格仍从发行价下跌了92%以上。这表明在代币经济学不利于持有者的情况下,实际效用并不总能转化为代币价值。

Q当前市场流动性如何影响新代币的表现?

A近几个月资金广泛转向比特币、以太坊和现实世界资产代币,导致较小新发行代币面临流动性短缺。由于资本向主要资产和RWA集中,新代币缺乏结构性需求来吸收新供应。

Q文章最后提出了哪些关于代币设计和未来发行的建议?

A文章建议新项目应优先考虑可持续的排放和更严格的供应控制,以避免排放冲击和长期价格压制。代币设计仍然是决定发行后价格行为的最强因素之一。

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit6 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit6 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit9 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit9 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit29 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit29 dk önce

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News37 dk önce

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News37 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

MELANIA Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! MELANIA (MELANIA) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında MELANIA (MELANIA) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: MELANIA (MELANIA) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınMELANIA (MELANIA) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: MELANIA (MELANIA) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında MELANIA (MELANIA) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

132 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.01.20Güncellenme 2026.06.02

MELANIA Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların MELANIA (MELANIA) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片